there were those of us commentards who were saying he wouldn't last the year
When you've been saying that for the last 5 years it doesn't sound quite as prophetic ;)
6106 posts • joined 28 May 2010
When you've been saying that for the last 5 years it doesn't sound quite as prophetic ;)
With something like FB, you can actually tell exactly who was affected because FB owns all the data... they can very easily see every user used in a sponsored ad.
Why on earth should they give away everything this brought in? If they only earned $5m from stories, they shouldn't still be fined $20m?
Clearly he rose from one of the original members of the company when tiny to running it when gigantic by being stupid.
I very much doubt he is stupid. Out of touch, yes. Eccentric and with poor social skills, yes. Stupid... no.
Will Steve get to pick or will the board do it? Will it be someone internal or an outside appointment - I can't really name any other MS folk now Sinofsky has left?
I wonder why he implemented such a massive reorganisation right before leaving. Shouldn't the person initiating such a huge restructure be the one to see it through?
What point exactly are you making? Because other people and countries do bad things, that makes it right to do so yourself?
Were you never taught that two wrongs don't make a right? Committing a crime in response to another crime is still a crime, e.g. vigilante mobs. Robin Hood may be a popular hero figure but he was still a criminal.
If you are prepared to release classified documents as a matter of principle/ideals, to try and genuinely change the world, you need to be aware that you will likely suffer for it even if you are later revered. that's part of the deal, and something you consider an acceptable risk - so many others have been imprisoned or died over history, from Mandela to St. Paul!
I guess they figure the search term is more memorable than a URL. In many cases they're probably right.
You don't have to install WP any more than you have to install this thing... many companies offer hosted WP and will do everything for you.
What makes you think this setup is any less open to hacking?
If they could have a URL which simply redirects to their FB page, this would probably be slightly better IMO. I don't want to have to "find you on FB".
I don't object to template based sites, they are in fact far preferable to the kind of crud many small businesses use.
But what's wrong with just using WordPress? It lets you use templates and will also work from iOS since you can do everything from the browser.
Lots of people like riding horses but they were replaced by cars. They are now exclusively used for recreation (OK 99% to account for people on farms, etc but you get the point).
The same could happen to self-drive cars but more likely is that you'll always be allowed to take control, except perhaps on motorways where it makes sense to force everyone to be automated.
Driving in the Scottish countryside is not going to disappear.
If planes carrying hundreds of passengers can take off and land on autopilot and fly from place to place, and fighter planes can engage other planes at Mach 3 before landing on an aircraft carrier, I reckon driving you to Asda is not exactly outside the realms of possibility.
There is absolutely no reason on the technical side that cars can't drive at least as well as humans, even amongst other human driven cars. It may well require a lot more work to figure out, but there's nothing magical about your brain that can't be reproduced.
Once upon a time the idea that a phone could beat a grandmaster at chess would have been laughable.
Um, when a train will take you between literally any two addresses in the country, yes. So, no. Think a bit more before posting a glib one-liner.
Seems eminently plausible.
The biggest issue is trying to fit self-driving cars into roads alongside old fashioned manual-driven cars, rather than having a proper self-driving infrastructure which would require individual cars be far less smart.
>>I think as soon as insurance companies get a whiff of this fashion
Um, I think something which is an internet phenomenon is probably going to have attracted their attention already, and that the revolutionary idea of a camera on your dashboard probably wasn't hard to come with in the first place.
It doesn't really gain the insurers much anyway. On average each insurer will still have to pay out as often so while this might make the system more accurate, most of the errors in the current setup probably balance out :)
Well done for proving how little you actually know about what these websites DO.
Liking is as important a part of FB as the post voting is on these forums.... not very.
Who exactly is this "we"? What exactly are you doing about it?
The same way everyone got bored with mobile phones and email and went back to landlines and fountain pens?
FB may go but social networking is clearly here to stay until something else replaces it - it is a natural idea that once the infrastructure supports it, the way people communicate will change.
I don't agree. Google, yes... but I get the impression Zuck genuinely believes in this guff. He sounds like a typical nerd talking about how great the internet is, etc etc. If a nerd makes something cool and suddenly people are throwing $billions at them, what exactly do you think is going to happen?
Wouldn't they be better putting WP8 on it? Or does MS stipulate they cannot?
Or a beautiful example how you can twist a theory to fit any observed data?
Less cynically, 7mm over the oceans' surface comes to 2.386×10^12 m^3 (cubic meters)... is that a reasonable amount of water to be flooding Oz?
Can we come up with something better than "idiot tax"? It's even less funny than the round corners meme.
If you use gmail then you're automatically logged into google. So the answer to "What's Google got that anyone needs to log in for?" could simply be "gmail"
And Drive (Docs) of course, which is a decent tool. And Picassa (if it's still around).
I find that the more someone whinges about privacy, the less there is about them anyone would want to know about.
Other than the fact I'm doing it through the Google home-page, what's the story here? I'm not giving Google more info than they already have, and this isn't letting other people search my stuff. It's just a convenient way to let me search across data with multiple Google products, which Google already knows about me.
A bit like how you're an idiot if you have to check your own diary, because you put the things there in the first place?
Some people really should think a bit more before trying to make others look stupid.
...to get in trouble breaking South American employment laws.
It works pretty OK without touch really. For me anyway... I very rarely click the Start button on W7. All the Metro stuff is wasted on me, but it doesn't really get in my way either. I wouldn't buy a new PC to get W8 but I wouldn't not buy a new PC because it had W8.
Since W8 is massively different to its predecessor, your statement doesn't even make sense let alone seem funny.
Luckily I noted this was filed under Bootnotes before commenting
Given that the vast majority of web users will never explicitly log out I think you get an idea.
Also: "daily mobile active users in the UK stood at 20 million" seems to pretty clearly state 20 million users. If I login to my bank 3 times a day I'm still one user.
Telling you how many logins is not useful at all, I haven't logged in for weeks but I load the page most days.
Maybe El Reg should commission a report into the phone choices of Fortune 500 CEOs, or entrepreneurs who have started up successful profitable companies, etc.
An average Joe spending £500 on a mobile phone is idiotic, regardless of brand.
It's easy to just make these statements. The sad fact that is if you say it in an authoritative manner, some people will take what you say as established fact.
That goes for pro/anti arguments against green energy I should add, just as for pro/anti arguments about any emotive argument ("the bible actually says ..." being another prime example where people just say things demonstrably not true.
The people arguing a Range Rover is less harmful to the environment never seem to be people who actually care about the environment, and it's surely a bit of an anomaly how many of them own Range Rovers and could perhaps be motivated by self interest.
I saw them and thought "great another dumb feature" and immediately disabled it. Are they actually worthwhile?
If a 6" phone won't fit in your jacket pocket, your jacket is crap. Suit jackets are often traditionally used for carrying your diary, wallet, etc. Hell, may suit jackets I can (just) get my Kindle into.
Anyone who cares already has the preview though.
If they hadn't done a Pro version, maybe this would have had a chance. Hell, releasing Windows PHONE 8 for tablets might have had a better chance and would be a bit less confusing.
And then when you eventually get to that point, you can actually do some work on your PC.
And yet camouflage is still used even on armoured vehicles.
Many businesses use such locks, this isn't just about homes.
As for why... the humble key was not originally chosen because it's the best possible way of securing a lock. It was chosen because at the time, it was the best solution afforded by modern technology. Assuming an old solution must be better than a new one is as bad as assuming a modern solution is better than a old one.
>>It really should be L.A.S.E.R. though
As long as you're going to do it that way when you speak as well (El. Eh. Ess. Ee. Ar)...
Typical Linuxtard. UI is not considered functionality.
A Raspberry Pi is about 10X more powerful than the PCs Win3.11 used to run on. Perhaps troll-hunters might take on some trivial computer knowledge.
It would just be hilarious watching people getting freaked out when a bin shouts "Hi Dave, bored of your iPhone?"
She sold 5% of her holding. How is that news?