Re: Not the right design
Presumably it can/will be disabled when the phone is locked.
6093 posts • joined 28 May 2010
Presumably it can/will be disabled when the phone is locked.
The opposite of regular 3D printing then, subtractive rather than additive? Like how Apple make their unibody cases?
I actually don't object to being given a free service in return for using my information, as long as you tell me how it will be used and let me quit if I disagree. Someone has to pay for it...
However, I would be interested in FB offering a paid membership to opt out of all that crud - give people who object a way to keep using your product and paying the revenue you would have got through ads.
For now, if I just don't 'like' products and brands the problem seems to go away. The only time I would 'like' is to support a local business or enroll in a contest which I'll then 'unlike' later.
No, not even slightly. Perhaps use a dictionary... evil doesn't mean running questionable practices, just as a moron is not someone who is technically incompetent.
Dubious, questionable, controversial, worrying, unethical are all terms you could use quite legitimately. Evil is several orders of magnitude above any of those, unless you view that taking liberties with digital privacy is on a par with throwing Jews into gas chambers. If you do, then I'll make an exception against using the term moron.
... with 5 years Google F1 experience
or 'tosser' and 'lodger' for someone who plays loud music and leaves muddy shoes in the hallway
And each generation ends up sounding like sad old crusties when they come out with stuff like:
" I'd suggest that the disease of social networking is to blame for the rapid rise in the nonsense language as kids try to be individual and identify themselves."
(not picking on you just making a point)
If there is less redundancy doesn't that mean less ways to say the same thing which implies the language is easier to learn?
Opium is a plant. Any number of incredibly toxic poisons are plants.
Saying "it's just a plant" is as empty of fact as "it's just a natural chemical". It's as bad as people claiming pornography and pedophilia are the same.
Shush, druggies aren't great at logical arguments.
Smoking a joint != growing your own plants.
>>Do you really think they don't look at what El Reg commentards are speculating on?
Yeah, it's cool to do even if there's no immediate use. Remember, video conferencing used to be something people willingly paid big bucks for, before the tech (mainly infrastructure) became ubiquitous.
R&D for its own sake isn't pointless.
The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke (sort of) covers the idea of ubiquitous, total communication in a fairly plausible way. One direction such things could take - which would appear utopian to some here and unacceptable to others.
Thanks for pointing it out - all this toss about privacy being eroded is daft. In the past, every telegram you wrote HAD to read by someone else. Every phone call you made was listened in on.
How short sighted (ha!) to assign today's limitations as fundamental road-blocks. You'd hope people on a tech forum would be a little more open-minded.
Pessimism generally is a self fulfilling prophecy, people need to be excited about new tech. If it doesn't work, move on, but don't be apathetic and kill it before it can have a chance.
"Yeah, but why would you WANT to fly to America in 3 hours?"
"You want to send someone to the moon just so they can come back?"
Yeah, because one thing failed all things will fail. It may be a pivotal moment, it may be nothing much - these things are only easy to see in retrospect. Similar with self-driving cars.
Glass 1.0 isn't such a big deal, but the concept has maybe a 50:50 chance to truly change the world IMO.
>>Been hearing this...... for almost 15 years. Wake me when it really happens.
True, but "it hasn't happened yet" is not a good argument for "it will never happen". The boy who cried wolf did get eaten by a wolf.
Maybe you smart guys, who have never seen this running, should write to the inventors and explain to them why the thing they already developed and used won't work.
Failing that, read the linked article which talks about robustness.
Most homes still need the ability to write and print a letter, print a coupon out, etc. Now, sure, you can print from your phone or tablet but getting your home network up and running without a PC is a faff.
Touch-screen smartphones and proper tablets (not just a computer stuck in a touchscreen unit)? Siri? iTunes?
First to mainstream market on those, no? Someone selling a few mp3s online doesn't really count, and I think modern tablets are different enough from their predecessors to count. And a fully touch-screen phone is /was a pretty bold move.
The cheaper iPhone is an older model, like Sony releasing the PS2 slimline.
I was referring to the iMac, duh.
iGlass might be a bit close in name... I like the pun of calling it iWear.
I'm not convinced we'll see fingerprint scanning on the 5S, or at all until they can actually make it do more than replace a lock code... integrate it as your iTunes purchase authentication and by implication use it in a wallet to order pizza without ever using a password.
That seems to need more infrastructure to me.
Crap attempt. They already invented that.
Those crappy YouTube and nice 1080p videos are going to look so much nicer now. And I will finally be able to read text on the screen easily.
I guess I'll now be able to read 2pt type now, but that's not really high on my want list.
Tasing yourself would be preferable.
The whole point of FB is the content is based on you and your friends. If you find FB content hugely boring that says more about you than it does about FB.
Actually, those of above average intelligence actually realise that just because someone doesn't like the same things as you doesn't make them less intelligent.
Possibly because we're talking about FaceBook, not FakeBook. Possibly, you're just a retard with no understanding of logic who gets enjoyment out of generalising other people and then insulting them, in the same way black people were once treated.
Computers can these days run more than one program. The fact your browser is on FaceBook doesn't mean you are using FaceBook.
Computer nerd in "people who don't like what I like are idiots" shocker. Of course someone who spends their time blithering on about how other people are idiots, or compiling their OS, is a fully integrated normal member of society.
I hear the PS4 won't play PC games either. It's almost like they're completely different devices which happen to include "xbox" in the name.
Why do you need a hologram for it to work... why not a pair of augmented-reality glasses which simply makes it look like there is a hologram?
>>Wooohoo. My diesel car retains 100% of its tank capacity after five years
Think before speaking. The tank doesn't lose capacity but the engine WILL lose power and the mpg WILL deteriorate... net effect, a full tank will not get you as far as it did when new.
>>They already did that. It's called Petrol. Or Diesel.
I never drove a car that could do 5000 miles on a tank of gas. Or that cost $5000 new.
When you've been saying that for the last 5 years it doesn't sound quite as prophetic ;)
With something like FB, you can actually tell exactly who was affected because FB owns all the data... they can very easily see every user used in a sponsored ad.
Why on earth should they give away everything this brought in? If they only earned $5m from stories, they shouldn't still be fined $20m?
Clearly he rose from one of the original members of the company when tiny to running it when gigantic by being stupid.
I very much doubt he is stupid. Out of touch, yes. Eccentric and with poor social skills, yes. Stupid... no.
Will Steve get to pick or will the board do it? Will it be someone internal or an outside appointment - I can't really name any other MS folk now Sinofsky has left?
I wonder why he implemented such a massive reorganisation right before leaving. Shouldn't the person initiating such a huge restructure be the one to see it through?
What point exactly are you making? Because other people and countries do bad things, that makes it right to do so yourself?
I guess they figure the search term is more memorable than a URL. In many cases they're probably right.
You don't have to install WP any more than you have to install this thing... many companies offer hosted WP and will do everything for you.
What makes you think this setup is any less open to hacking?
If they could have a URL which simply redirects to their FB page, this would probably be slightly better IMO. I don't want to have to "find you on FB".
I don't object to template based sites, they are in fact far preferable to the kind of crud many small businesses use.
But what's wrong with just using WordPress? It lets you use templates and will also work from iOS since you can do everything from the browser.
Lots of people like riding horses but they were replaced by cars. They are now exclusively used for recreation (OK 99% to account for people on farms, etc but you get the point).
The same could happen to self-drive cars but more likely is that you'll always be allowed to take control, except perhaps on motorways where it makes sense to force everyone to be automated.
Driving in the Scottish countryside is not going to disappear.