MS ARE offering extended support
But for enterprises only, and it's pricey. For banks though, that seems a viable option.
5958 posts • joined 28 May 2010
But for enterprises only, and it's pricey. For banks though, that seems a viable option.
XP 2.0... like W7 then?
Packaging their kit in a slightly bigger handset is not really a technological problem, if the market shows this form factor is desirable they can trot one out easily. Even with literally no new features, the 5S would be a big competitor in that market.
It's sad that to many people. Google is the most 'evil' thing they're aware of in the world. And it's not even like we can assume most of these idiots are Americans.
But hey, people being murdered for their beliefs is far away... having to use your real name is much closer. And I'm probably being silly to suggest having to provide your personal information is perhaps a rung or two down the ladder of evil.
Since we're being cool and trendy I'd better jump on the hashtag bandwagon too (what a moronic habit that is while we're on the subject).
If Google can earn more money by releasing a more useful product, good for them. Even if those two facts are happy accident rather than cause and effect.
So if iPad2 is being sold as the budget model, does that mean iPad3/4 simply aren't on sale any more?
I'd hoped iPad Retina (3/4) would take the £329 slot and iPad2 would sink even cheaper, or simply be discontinued. iPad2 is still a decent tablet since iOS7 supports it, I'm very happy with mine. Like the reviewer, iPad Air/5 is the first one to really make me consider upgrading.
It's quite possible this kind of tactic will get people using Google+, it's an entirely legitimate way to build critical mass on the platform. FaceBook remains king of social by inertia and crowd effects only.
Back in the good old days, telling someone your name was considered rather normal.
Though I was mistaken above, IE10 is different in Metro and Desktop mode already so it's already 2 versions (at least).
Ah, I didn't realise they had decided to build Flash into the browser in that way - thanks for correcting. In that case we're left with the API possibility.
HTML5-DRM isn't a killer feature until everyone stops supporting Flash/Silverlight and relies on HTML5. I can't see that happening very soon so to most users this isn't a reason to dump IE - only when lack of HTML5-DRM is an issue will they do that.
You seem to have forgotten how to read, or at least chose not to before responding to what I wrote.
The only reason I can think of for this (other than bullying) is that all W7 PCs are assumed to have Flash, whereas Flash isn't allowed in IE in metro-mode on W8 (plugins are only allowed in the desktop version of IE in W8).
IV, V and VI were nothing special. Time - same message to those still campaigning for FireFly S2 - to get over it.
Presumably it just means they cease any formal testing on IE9. It might work on IE9 - it probably will - but they don't care if it doesn't.
I mean, gmail works on the experimental browser in my Kindle e-reader and they sure as heck don't test it on that browser!
Microsoft: Just so you know, we'll be ceasing support for this OS in 7 years.
Google: Oh didn't you notice? We stopped supporting your OS last week.
Ah yes, Robin Hood wasn't a criminal because he stole from nasty people.
Are you Japanese? Do you know how marketing and advertising work in Japanese culture?
Yeah, 3D printing has reached the end of the road, it's not going to get faster and cheaper in the next 5-10 years at all.
So Star Trek was pointing to McDonalds then? This would be a great idea... printing burgers from vat-grown meat without a surly teenager spitting in them.
Well since proprietary/closed-source software and walled gardens aren't inherently evil, your question makes no sense.
Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word shill. The whole point of Apple users is they support Apple without Apple NEEDING shills.
Unless you're a web-developer, there's no reason you'd know how this stuff typically works. Most FB users aren't web developers so your statement makes no sense, it's just nerd snobbery.
Is it a good idea to use text-buttons when most FaceBook users don't speak English as their first language? Or does FB offer localised versions of their buttons?
Did you mean "90% of what's on offer in gimmick-filled phones" or "90% of what's needed". Because if it doesn't do 100% of what I need it's of little use!
Don't these giant corporate sales generally take ages to actually go through... e.g. the news reports "MS has bought Skype" but it has to go through regulatory procedures and so on. Has MS already bought Nokia... if not do we know when it will be finalised?
>>Let's hope they are ready for the three-times-the-cost investment they'll have to make so they can edit Powerpoint documents...
Um, the value of work done in 5 hours could easily pay for the difference in cost in a single flight, certainly a return trip. I work freelance and if I can work on a long flight or train ride, that's several hundred pounds earned as well as making the time go by faster.
Well all the developed countries got to that position without the internet, so I'll wager if we cure malaria et al, it is possible to then provide education even without GoogleBalloons.
Fixit were able to take it apart, that means any number of people running little kiosks and shops can do the same. The fixit guys aren't magicians... and they presumably only tried on one unit. Someone running a business of replacing your battery will do this hundreds of times and get VERY good at it.
The question is not "is making it hard to repair a bad thing" but "do the gains of making it this hard to repair outweigh the problems".
It's not my specialist subject, but could they make the thing as light, slim and resilient using more accessible fastenings (i.e. screws and stuff)?
No because the 'nauts have to be smart and capable enough to deal with the mission... the plan is those selected will undergo numerous years of intensive training in everything from medicine to gardening.
I don't know, but we were saying the same of smartphones and then touch-screen phones, and now we all have them.
Style is subjective. Even in the same time and same city, widely disparate things are seen as stylish by different groups.
I don't see them being stupid looking as many want to claim... to me they look exactly like what we've been seeing in SciFi for decades. To many, bringing SciFi into the real world is cool.
In a few years nobody will look twice.
Hipsters care what they look like...
Yeah, and the colour red. Having to read it on a computer screen is rather a strain too, couldn't you make the site black & white and arrange to sent printed copies around, perhaps on a weekly basis?
If there are restrictions so you can't post massive images, I don't see this being a bad new feature. Having to click on links is annoying and shortened URLs are never trustworthy.
It'll make a twitter version of 4chan much more possible too :)
It is a nice idea in theory, I remember reading "A Christmas Carol" and seeing which sections others had highlighted. But I wouldn't normally stop reading to add notes unless I was reading for study rather than pleasure.
I think you miss the point - Kindle provides this functionality with its normal slick style, but nobody seems to use it.
>>That's pretty much a ground up principle for mainframes and I thought most *nixes.
Then please explain why Linux webservers can become inaccessible, even via SSH, if something goes wrong with an application.
I load ripped DVDs onto my iPad to watch at the gym. Now I can obviously batch what's on there every few days, but it's a bit annoying. Equally if you go away with your iPad and want to watch non-streaming content, or can't guarantee good WiFi, you can easily fill it up with a single boxset.
If that isn't something you do, then I agree - 16Gb is/should be enough for most people with only a small amount of extra faffing.
Hard to say without actually trying them I imagine... is a BMW worth more than a Ford?
Where do you buy RAM that is small enough to fit in an iPad for comparison?
It also depends a lot on what the app is doing. A 3D game rendering at full resolution will need 4X the GPU power to get the same FPS (approximately) but pretty much any other app will not be maxing out the GPU. And, 3D apps don't have to render at full-resolution... they can still render at 1024x768 - which is just fine for 3D gaming on a small screen - and use loads more detail. It means you can render scenes at decent FPS you simply couldn't before.
And the CPU improvement is relevant in either case too - your game can have much better AI or whatever.
Meh, I have an iPad2 and the resolution on that is in no way a problem, let alone an embarrassment. It looks sharp and clear. When I use a retina and non-retina side by side, I'm hardly bowled over.
>>Meanwhile, the rest of the industry decides to stick with tradition and continue to incorporate incremental improvements without making up kiddie-talk names for them.
Yeah, tech companies never make up stupid names for their new refinements. Only all the time.
Really, on a tablet you should be praising it for having a full size USB port at all. The fact it's USB3, doubly so.
Companies don't want to cut off their revenue sources. Who'd have thunk it, eh?
While a good point about tracking is made, it seems silly to suggest commerical browser makers "should" provide ad blockers. Adverts are, and always have been, part of the web.
Providing a way for 3rd-parties to create ad blockers is enough IMO.
What an uninspiring list
I see nothing ridiculous about it. Most PC workers are not glued to the keyboard/mouse - certainly not the keyboard.
I have tried the motion of raising my hand to do this and it feels quite natural, as long as the screen isn't too far away. At a trendy standing desk - which I am currently trialling - it actually feels quite natural.
Granted I wouldn't want to KEEP my arm outstretched but some use cases fit it quite well. I don't think it's necessary, but I think it has SOME merit - if someone can work out the kinks. And sorting out the kinks so it can be slick would suit Apple.
I am slightly surprised Apple haven't "invented" touch-screen PCs yet.