Re: Would you put a beta product in your eye?
FDA would require it to be "out of beta" before doctors could recommend it in the US.
5962 posts • joined 28 May 2010
FDA would require it to be "out of beta" before doctors could recommend it in the US.
If it's a bona fide medical product, the incredibly strict regulations will mean they can't harvest the data. They would (unusually) make money from selling the product, not the data it generates.
So GPS systems, car stereos and passengers should also be banned?
Using Glass while driving would allow GPS and driving information to be put in your vision without you having to look away from the road. If you're using them for email you're an idiot, but people use their phones while driving already anyway.
You might say it makes it easier to do without being caught, but if there's an accident the forensics people could probably tell what you were using it for at the time,
... do you mean the feature which has been around for weeks at least? There were dozens of pages about how to turn it off in 2013...
Your typical user wouldn't understand the question.
And they DID add the option of boot to desktop in 8.1.
Even when I can't figure out how to do something in W8, a simple Google search finds the answer very easily. Techies just like being angry about change, or are too autistic to be able to cope with it (i.e. Sheldon). If they put half as much time into learning how to use the new OS as they do complaining about it on the internet, they'd have mastered the changes and got on with the whole purpose of the computer, which is using it to do stuff.
It's been like 7 years. Get over it already.
You're supposed to use the command-line like a man!
So switch to desktop mode. You don't need to see all 28 applications when you're launching a new application. Even in WinXP the start-menu was by definition a modal experience.
The "we know best and we're going to force it on you" approach is not fundamentally bad, and even if you're wrong, can succeed if you really do force people to get over the changes so they can get on with things. Ribbon is a good example of that; some people hated the thing until they were forced to use it and then decided it was great, others hated it but had no choice but to learn it and then get on with doing some work... mission accomplished for MS (before someone says "OO was an option", it wasn't an option for the masses).
But if you're going to ram something down users' throats which is a big change, you can't at the same time make it confusing what the change IS, and that's the problem with W8. A clear vision, even one which wasn't very good, could have been pushed through and accepted after initial griping - regardless if it should work that way, it can - but a messy vision like W8/RT meant nobody even wanted to try.
If you put it that way, we won't know for absolute certain that other planets exist until we send a man in a rocket to land on them. But then you mightn't believe it wasn't faked so the only way would be to send you to see for yourself.
It's not like Apple and Android updates ever introduce problems.
It just means tiny tubes went in and were used to release radioactive dye (so x-rays could be taken of the blood vessels), and blocking selected vessels to reduce blood flow. The tubes were inserted through the guy's artery, not stuck up his willy.
So sounds pretty OK, considering.
I didn't enter. I think I'd have written about someone who gains powers of a Bose-Einstein condensate.
Indeed. These are the best? You didn't accidentally sort them backwards?
In which case it should be the law you have to be immunised. Saying schools should be allowed to exclude people for entirely legal decisions is idiotic.
Why would you exclude them when everyone else is immunised?
Probably his legal team informed him about it and told him he needed to oppose it, and as he pays them to know best about his legal affairs, he did.
It might be a bit of fun, on the other hand they are using his brand to get recognition. He worked to create that brand as something valuable, why should someone else cash in on it?
The ones who were paid in them previously and made huge profits seem that way.
Hearing it go wrong as you move rooms is far more noticeable than a minute difference in the 120-125Hz range.
Well done you.
I assume you people jumping to criticise Google for taking away other sites' sources of advertising revenue don't run ad-blockers. Otherwise saying it's short-sighted to support this for a better user experience would be pretty hypocritical.
The thing is, if I search for something and Google can show me what I need without me having to manually load another page, that's of benefit to my user experience.
I've only ever heard the opposite, atheists claiming Hitler as a Christian to support their arguments. I didn't even realise religious folk had tarred him as an example of atheism!
It's a funny old world.
I'm not sure the Koran is a rule book, but the Torah and Bible aren't so I'm going to assume you're just a lazy troll.
Yes but AC wanted to make a really original and cutting joke about "fairy stories", which we hadn't all heard before.
Reading the Bible on a train can get you some funny looks, especially if you're young and dressed for a smart city job.
Blocking outgoing data by default could be argued. Blocking all scripts on a website by default couldn't. Modern websites are not static HTML+CSS with a bit of JS thrown in for sparkle. JS is an integral part of a modern website!
If you make your browser safe than JS can't hurt it.
It already was, to those who have used it.
Not bothered about the Nook app/store, we buy all ebooks through Kindle anyway. Might look into it once we've properly got to grips with it.
I bought a regular HD one for £80 or something, several months ago, as an Xmas present for the wife. We're both very impressed with it, after an initial panic before realising we needed an update to add Google Play Store. For 1/3 of the price of an iPad mini, it's pretty sweet.
I wondered about rooting/wiping it with stock Android but not sure what it would gain us on a device used mostly for internet, Netflix and silly games from the Play store?
Crap joke. Even if it was fully replaced with the HTML5 web version, you still need processing grunt to run the code.
You've got to be a proper, proper nerd to not just feel disdain for those who can't build their own PC, but to express disbelief such people exist. You are more out of touch with the common man than most MPs.
It's measured on growth not absolute number.
If only GMail had really good anti-spam measures. You'd have to expect that since you're messaged from within G+, this will make it even easier for them to detect spam.
I often want to contact people I'm friends with on FB (and know in real life), and don't have their email. Which means I just send an FB message to them instead. So it doesn't seem a bad idea, except all my online friends are on FB not G+.
Oh, I hadn't realised that was the case. Getting it on SteamOS would then be a major differentiator.
You totally evaded his question. He wasn't talking about the cost of the OS. The entire point of the article is that Valve are pushing special SteamOS "consoles". Sure you can install the OS on your own PC but that is not what they are promoting.
And the original point stands... why bother with SteamOS on your own PC when Steam already works on regular Linux?
Saying Steam has hundreds of games while XB has only a few is a bit silly, because there are hundreds if not thousands of companies already working on XB games. And Steam games are generally not as big or fancy. Remember that indie games are sold on both XB and PS so there will be a glut of those on top of the big-name games.
Besides if number of games is the important issue, you'd go for a PS3 or 360 which have far more titles than Steam and are still getting new games.
If they are going up against consoles, I can't see this taking off. Console owners like the ease of use from a console.
On the other hand if they are wanting to attract Steam users - the people who will actually have heard of it - these people are generally PC gamers and PC gamers are normally PC gamers because they prefer playing games on a PC.
The niches of nerdy console gamer or PC gamer who wants to play on their TV seem pretty small to me... if they're not going to market this in a big way to compete with MS/Sony it's a bit hard to see it taking off.
Question: since it's basically a Linux PC does this mean it will support Netflix and all those things and/or some sort of app-store, so it can be used as home entertainment hub in the same way as a PS3/4?
It looks like somebody dropped it.
Why not? Are all my MP3s suddenly going to be in a much higher bitrate?
Rhubarb wine is supposed to be nice,
I'm aware how this works, or at least one implementation, but has anyone seen it in real life?
And so cheap they could give them away or release 3D print specs, to drive adoption.
Whether the applications are useful, I have to applaud the simplicity.
Like they used to get scabs into work during all the strikes in the 80s?
Yeah, one often wants to stand in a pitch-black room looking "out of the window" at a day-time scene. That's not at all weird.
Or perhaps you've forgotten that not every single person in the world lives in England, where house sizes are fairly small on average?
>>You are right, projection will never take off.
Your attempt to be a smart alec falls short when you remember that they turn all the lights off in the cinema to get the best results. With a projector the darkest you can ever get is the ambient lighting from the wall. That means in a well-lit room, it might look pretty but it's not going to be realistic.