4528 posts • joined Friday 28th May 2010 13:33 GMT
Yeah, I mean your Android phone is just a constant barrage of targeted advertising, all over the homescreen, during phone and video calls, etc.
Glass is just another Android device.
Re: Back from the brink?
WP is objectively a great OS, certainly not pants. People who don't know what an OS is probably shouldn't use the term.
"very much loved"
Re: Internet connection required
There were rumours the PS4 would be like that too. They are merely rumours.
If you hard-boil them then it's a whole other sandwich - equally toast and fried/poached/scrambled egg or even toast & soldiers.
However I hope your loaf doesn't go mouldy...
No Gorilla glass
Surely everyone puts a screen protector on their pricey smartphone anyway so the smeariness issue is moot?
I'm very tempted to upgrade from my 610 but I guess I'll wait a bit. At this end of the market, it does sound a very good deal - for a basic smartphone apps are less of an issue I would imagine too since that's not what we want a budget phone for.
Re: Dear God
You need to learn about the reduced section and when the fill it up. I know a married couple who lived off £10 for their groceries as their regular life, and it wasn't even like they were just surviving, they could rustle up quite nice meals.
"By living off just £1 per day for food for 5 days, you will be bringing to life the direct experiences of the 1.4 billion people currently living in extreme poverty and helping to make real change."
In many of the poorest countries, £1 would buy you 3 meals... hell in some countries you could buy 3 beers with £1!
Re: Why does it have to be in a phone?
Maybe that's how you treat your pets, but not the rest of us.
Re: Revolutionary small payment method
Don't be silly. He has such an important life, those 20s could be used posting a sarcastic comment on the internet. People need to live more relaxed lives...
Taking a card out of my wallet is ... quicker than loading a phone app
Isn't the point that you don't have to load an app?
I never really understood why Amazon have their own branded credit card. It doesn't seem to fit in with their other products and they seem relatively focused on their target markets (unlike Tesco for example). Other than a bit of extra cash, is there some good business logic for doing this?
Re: Wandering lonely
You mean shifting from crummy local Windows infrastructure to scalable, efficient open-source stack?
Re: Will they also force...
When Ford buy all the showrooms and prevent any builders buying new ones, wait and see.
Re: Oh no!
Might is right eh?
Re: The kids won't use it??? WTF
How often do you see people paying with their phones? I never saw anyone... barely see anyone using NFC on their CC either although it's handy in MCDonald since small payments need no pin.
Re: The frame comes off
String/rope/wire routinely hold hundreds of Kg and things costing far more - the mast on a yacht for instance.
Re: I would sell my mum for votes
Eunuchs have historically been employed in brothels and harems, since they can be trusted not to touch the merchandise.
Re: The Microsoft Tax
I think they're both equally asinine.
Easy to say, harder to do when you're talking about big amounts of data. Even if you have a copy, getting it into another setup is a big job because data volume has increased far faster than upload speeds.
They could but they make tons of money from AWS as well. It would not do MS any good if their AWS customers got huge price hikes because migrating to Azure might be no easier than porting to Linux and staying on AWS without needing to migrate data.
$5000 for Piers Morgan?
It's a bit low but I could do with the cash if he promises not to talk too much.
Great objective reporting...
Re: Always cheaper?
It's anti-competitive to lower their prices?
Re: Its not a mistake
Maybe he doesn't think it's right he should kow-tow to other's customs, that is hardly an unusual view amongst nerds - as is general contempt for social convention.
Re: There some cool possibilities
I never said it was perfect, only that there are possibilities here. In theory clever software could detect things with some degree of usefulness, it doesn't have to be perfect.
Re: Nice, if you can watch it
£5.99 is the monthly subscription, HoC just became available like every other show.
Re: @Steve Knox
They make it easy to cancel though. You don't have to phone some pushy salesman to get them to allow you to cancel, which is my pet peeve for free trials. Not as good as those trials who let you pre-select not to pay when you sign up, but not bad.
There some cool possibilities
(in a techy marketing way at least)
Like seeing what you're watching based on your hashtags and tailoring ads for stuff in the show or deemed likely to be of interest. Advertising tailored to you based on what you're doing RIGHT NOW is pretty powerful potentially.
Before people feel the need to tell us how streaming doesn't suit their needs, can I just jump in and say we already know that, and you can save your time.
Re: Too expensive
Yes I wasn't being sarcastic... if you are happy with cheap bulky laptops then good for you but there's no need to tell the world you don't like slimline versions. I would rather spend £500 than £1500 myself but so what, both are available.
Re: How many of Facebook's "one billion" are …
FB is compatible with playing outside and using emails but it would be a pretty crap parent who deliberately tried to stop their kid being up to speed with this decade's technology. Just because you don't get it... your parents probably thought having a personal stereo was equally terrible.
Re: What is, and what should be
Is this just the same old "only stupid people use FB" dross that you felt compelled to spew, or a specific critique on Home?
Re: Facebook Home?
If I was a big FB user - it was the main thing I did on my phone - I'd probably welcome better integration.
As for iOS, you are right BUT sometimes big players get special rules/exceptions, for instance WP has built-in Twitter/FB/etc functionality (which you can ignore). It is unlikely IMO though.
Re: Who to blame?
Sorry Dave but it's a good job you are a wage slave rather than an entrepreneur. You just have no clue
a)You get to earn about £10k tax-free. That could cover your expenses to work like travel and clothes, meaning you are then taxed on 'profit'.
b)Equating a job and a company is asinine in the first place.
c)"A billion dollar company IS making massive profits, or it is on the way out anyway." Balls it is. A $1bn company making profits of $100m is not any more profitable than a £1m company making profits of £100k.
d)Some companies run on a margin of say 10% - they manufacture and sell on so they have vast costs and thus very high turnover without that big profits. Others have margins of 70% or more if they are a service company. If you tax on turnover, you kill any company which actually makes anything.
I am taxed (pretty much) on my gross; why should a company be any different?
Because a company IS completely different. A company might bring in $1bn but spend $900m. Your 'margin' is ridiculously high in comparison.
In fact the personal tax-free allowance of £10k you get covers things like transport and other expenses so you effectively ARE being taxed on your 'profit'.
Re: The tax laws are open to all...
Only when "people" in question are over-privileged nerds who think shady tax strategy equates with being evil.
If you want to be a contractor, running a Ltd company is the only really sensible option because many companies will NOT hire sole traders. Contractors go Ltd for other reasons than tax efficiency, that is simply a bonus once they are set up.
Also, if you don't avoid NI, you end up paying both employee AND employer NI as you are the employer - how is THAT fair?
Re: Missing matter
I didn't say they were. It was a hypothetical comment.
Re: unfair burdens?
$10m in REVENUE is pretty small fry really, that is not a big company by any stretch of the imagination.
Why do you possibly think he would be upset by that?
Re: Who to blame?
A a tax on turnover is a stupid idea designed to appease stupid people who think that because a company is "a billion dollar company" they must be making vast profits.
By not using Google you impact on their business and thus their profits.
And of course you shoot yourself in the foot, but then socialists are happy to ruin it for tehmselves as long as they can bask in the warmth of spoiling it for others.
Do you really think Starbucks are simply going to pay full tax on all UK earnings? Of course not, they will simply divert a few £m to the UK as a peace-offering... there is no legal obligation so it's basically a donation to appease the masses.
Re: The tax laws are open to all...
Is "don't be evil" the new "Hitler" of online discussion?
Re: Hmm... @ AC no 1
"it is not moral and it is not right." Based on what exactly?
You're also ignorant because this is not true: "she 'earns' a minimal wage to avoid paying tax and has a personal income of around 4x the average. She doesn't pay tax on her income"
Any money she takes from the company has been taxed corporation tax (what Google are avoiding paying). You don't pay personal (income) tax on this income up to the upper threshold because it's already been taxed. If you take income above the upper threshold (about £40k) then you pay some additional income tax on it (about 12% I think) so the income is double-taxed.
Re: You don't
"a UK business tax based purely on transactions in the UK"
What a stupid idea. Any company which imports goods from outside the UK is now not able to offset valid expenses against sales. Kill what remains of manufacturing in one swoop.
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?
- Two million TERRIBLE PASSWORDS stolen by malware attackers