4520 posts • joined Friday 28th May 2010 13:33 GMT
Re: It'll be the..
I was referring to the iMac, duh.
Those crappy YouTube and nice 1080p videos are going to look so much nicer now. And I will finally be able to read text on the screen easily.
I guess I'll now be able to read 2pt type now, but that's not really high on my want list.
Possibly because we're talking about FaceBook, not FakeBook. Possibly, you're just a retard with no understanding of logic who gets enjoyment out of generalising other people and then insulting them, in the same way black people were once treated.
Re: Just let the fucking idiots waste their time on facebook.
Computer nerd in "people who don't like what I like are idiots" shocker. Of course someone who spends their time blithering on about how other people are idiots, or compiling their OS, is a fully integrated normal member of society.
Is Glass too new to copy?
iGlass might be a bit close in name... I like the pun of calling it iWear.
I'm not convinced we'll see fingerprint scanning on the 5S, or at all until they can actually make it do more than replace a lock code... integrate it as your iTunes purchase authentication and by implication use it in a wallet to order pizza without ever using a password.
That seems to need more infrastructure to me.
Re: It'll be the..
Crap attempt. They already invented that.
I hear the PS4 won't play PC games either. It's almost like they're completely different devices which happen to include "xbox" in the name.
Re: "High frame rate hologram generator."
Why do you need a hologram for it to work... why not a pair of augmented-reality glasses which simply makes it look like there is a hologram?
Re: Battery life
>>Wooohoo. My diesel car retains 100% of its tank capacity after five years
Think before speaking. The tank doesn't lose capacity but the engine WILL lose power and the mpg WILL deteriorate... net effect, a full tank will not get you as far as it did when new.
Re: Battery life
>>They already did that. It's called Petrol. Or Diesel.
I never drove a car that could do 5000 miles on a tank of gas. Or that cost $5000 new.
there were those of us commentards who were saying he wouldn't last the year
When you've been saying that for the last 5 years it doesn't sound quite as prophetic ;)
Why only those who complained?
With something like FB, you can actually tell exactly who was affected because FB owns all the data... they can very easily see every user used in a sponsored ad.
Re: The Cost of "Business"?
Why on earth should they give away everything this brought in? If they only earned $5m from stories, they shouldn't still be fined $20m?
Clearly he rose from one of the original members of the company when tiny to running it when gigantic by being stupid.
I very much doubt he is stupid. Out of touch, yes. Eccentric and with poor social skills, yes. Stupid... no.
Who will choose?
Will Steve get to pick or will the board do it? Will it be someone internal or an outside appointment - I can't really name any other MS folk now Sinofsky has left?
I wonder why he implemented such a massive reorganisation right before leaving. Shouldn't the person initiating such a huge restructure be the one to see it through?
Re: While we're grumbling....
I guess they figure the search term is more memorable than a URL. In many cases they're probably right.
Re: Fine but...
You don't have to install WP any more than you have to install this thing... many companies offer hosted WP and will do everything for you.
What makes you think this setup is any less open to hacking?
Re: Dedicated web presence
If they could have a URL which simply redirects to their FB page, this would probably be slightly better IMO. I don't want to have to "find you on FB".
I don't object to template based sites, they are in fact far preferable to the kind of crud many small businesses use.
But what's wrong with just using WordPress? It lets you use templates and will also work from iOS since you can do everything from the browser.
Re: Driving a chore?
Lots of people like riding horses but they were replaced by cars. They are now exclusively used for recreation (OK 99% to account for people on farms, etc but you get the point).
The same could happen to self-drive cars but more likely is that you'll always be allowed to take control, except perhaps on motorways where it makes sense to force everyone to be automated.
Driving in the Scottish countryside is not going to disappear.
Re: One word for this prediction:
If planes carrying hundreds of passengers can take off and land on autopilot and fly from place to place, and fighter planes can engage other planes at Mach 3 before landing on an aircraft carrier, I reckon driving you to Asda is not exactly outside the realms of possibility.
There is absolutely no reason on the technical side that cars can't drive at least as well as humans, even amongst other human driven cars. It may well require a lot more work to figure out, but there's nothing magical about your brain that can't be reproduced.
Once upon a time the idea that a phone could beat a grandmaster at chess would have been laughable.
Re: Isn't that called a "train" ?
Um, when a train will take you between literally any two addresses in the country, yes. So, no. Think a bit more before posting a glib one-liner.
Were you never taught that two wrongs don't make a right? Committing a crime in response to another crime is still a crime, e.g. vigilante mobs. Robin Hood may be a popular hero figure but he was still a criminal.
Wouldn't they be better putting WP8 on it? Or does MS stipulate they cannot?
If you are prepared to release classified documents as a matter of principle/ideals, to try and genuinely change the world, you need to be aware that you will likely suffer for it even if you are later revered. that's part of the deal, and something you consider an acceptable risk - so many others have been imprisoned or died over history, from Mandela to St. Paul!
Re: Why bring poor people online?
The same way everyone got bored with mobile phones and email and went back to landlines and fountain pens?
FB may go but social networking is clearly here to stay until something else replaces it - it is a natural idea that once the infrastructure supports it, the way people communicate will change.
I don't agree. Google, yes... but I get the impression Zuck genuinely believes in this guff. He sounds like a typical nerd talking about how great the internet is, etc etc. If a nerd makes something cool and suddenly people are throwing $billions at them, what exactly do you think is going to happen?
Re: Flying cars?
Seems eminently plausible.
The biggest issue is trying to fit self-driving cars into roads alongside old fashioned manual-driven cars, rather than having a proper self-driving infrastructure which would require individual cars be far less smart.
Re: More surveillance
>>I think as soon as insurance companies get a whiff of this fashion
Um, I think something which is an internet phenomenon is probably going to have attracted their attention already, and that the revolutionary idea of a camera on your dashboard probably wasn't hard to come with in the first place.
It doesn't really gain the insurers much anyway. On average each insurer will still have to pay out as often so while this might make the system more accurate, most of the errors in the current setup probably balance out :)
"It's a beautiful illustration of how complicated our climate system is,"
Or a beautiful example how you can twist a theory to fit any observed data?
Less cynically, 7mm over the oceans' surface comes to 2.386×10^12 m^3 (cubic meters)... is that a reasonable amount of water to be flooding Oz?
Can we come up with something better than "idiot tax"? It's even less funny than the round corners meme.
Re: "one could simply refrain from logging into a Google account
If you use gmail then you're automatically logged into google. So the answer to "What's Google got that anyone needs to log in for?" could simply be "gmail"
And Drive (Docs) of course, which is a decent tool. And Picassa (if it's still around).
Re: Privacy? Oh that was something they had in olden times
I find that the more someone whinges about privacy, the less there is about them anyone would want to know about.
What's the big deal?
Other than the fact I'm doing it through the Google home-page, what's the story here? I'm not giving Google more info than they already have, and this isn't letting other people search my stuff. It's just a convenient way to let me search across data with multiple Google products, which Google already knows about me.
Re: One must be a complete idiot
A bit like how you're an idiot if you have to check your own diary, because you put the things there in the first place?
Some people really should think a bit more before trying to make others look stupid.
You've got to be doing pretty badly...
...to get in trouble breaking South American employment laws.
Re: It's a bit of a shame.
It works pretty OK without touch really. For me anyway... I very rarely click the Start button on W7. All the Metro stuff is wasted on me, but it doesn't really get in my way either. I wouldn't buy a new PC to get W8 but I wouldn't not buy a new PC because it had W8.
Since W8 is massively different to its predecessor, your statement doesn't even make sense let alone seem funny.
Luckily I noted this was filed under Bootnotes before commenting
Re: Ahhh But
Given that the vast majority of web users will never explicitly log out I think you get an idea.
Also: "daily mobile active users in the UK stood at 20 million" seems to pretty clearly state 20 million users. If I login to my bank 3 times a day I'm still one user.
Telling you how many logins is not useful at all, I haven't logged in for weeks but I load the page most days.
Chief People Officer
- On the matter of shooting down Amazon delivery drones with shotguns
- Review Bring Your Own Disks: The Synology DS214 network storage box
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- IT MELTDOWN ruins Cyber Monday for RBS, Natwest customers
- Google's new cloud CRUSHES Amazon in RAM battle