Re: I'm puzzled
Who said it was a new audio format?
5855 posts • joined 28 May 2010
Who said it was a new audio format?
Music isn't just about the audio though, is it? Otherwise people wouldn't pay loads of money go to listen to songs in a big room with poor acoustics next to lots of sweaty strangers, that they already paid for and can listen to in an armchair through some nice headphones.
I think that's what this is about... something beyond just the sound. If you record a concert, even in blu-ray, it is not the same as being there. The musical experience IS fundamentally un-pirateable.
How on earth you get that kind of stuff into iTunes I have no idea of course :)
>>The man is an eejit, he reckons he can make music un-pirateble
You do realise you've fundamentally missed the point? He isn't claiming to have invented unbreakable DRM. It's about a wider "something" beyond simply listening to the track. Akin to pretty artwork in CD cases, etc, which are not the same if you try and photocopy them.
But if someone offered you the money you'd probably do it, which is the case here.
It's not a phone. It's a computer more powerful than the desktops we grew up using, selling for a fraction of the real-terms prices of those computers, which is smaller and lighter than a Sony Walkman, and contains a phone.
Modern phones ARE flat-out amazing, regardless of brand.
El Reg just seems desperate to start a feud. Maybe Fry refused to sign an autograph, or maybe it's just a cheap publicity grab. But it seems rather crass to stoop to tabloid levels to choose a target of ridicule.
El Reg's harrying of Fry is staler than Apple's R&D department.
9-5 is already rather a big part of your life, considering you wouldn't put that much time into nearly any hobby even if you had the time!
So Cheesy, you expect me to do that in my free time after I slog my guts out working all day? Or should I decide to do it when I could be getting work done - that doesn't sound like a decision I can make lest I get a kicking in my annual review for loss in productivity.
I may be motivated to keep current but as an employee that motivation manifests as pushing for training. Not spending my personal time and money.
Surely if employees haven't kept up to date it's because their employer has not provided adequate training in the first place?
Is an SD card as quick as built-in memory? I assume it is, if you get a decent card?
Glad I didn't decide to sell AAPL and buy Oracle shares!
Maybe he's just bored and wants to spend his loot.
Since their entire business model is about to be wiped out by browsers blocking plugins, they have little choice - like Adobe trying to migrate their tools to HTML5 from Flash.
I wouldn't say "better" - in fact as a developer I would say the opposite. But as a consumer it means it is supported natively in the browser without the need for plugins. Unity doesn't work on iOS or any other browser which doesn't support plugins, unless you package it into a standalone app. If what you are making is a website with 3D content, that's not great.
IE introduced it in either IE10 or IE11.
The only 4k TV I've seen IRL was simply stunning and made every other TV - even expensive ones - in the shop look awful. However whether that's down to resolution or just a superior screen I have no idea. I find it hard to see why the pixel size should have such an impact when standing 20-30 feet away, as I was when casting my eyes across the array of TVs, but the 4K one was just in a different league.
"I vaguely remember when a dominant company "integrated" systems into its os to block out competitors"
The key word is in your own post. Dominant. iOS/Apple is not in a dominant position in the mobile OS market, and it is nowhere near being a monopoly. The dominant player is Android/Google.
Paint is part of Windows, surely?
I've used it and didn't find it a must-have.
And for typical PC users, they would just end up lost "where's my internet gone". Alt-Tab is a power-feature to the majority of Windows users. Expecting them to find applications they can't even see on their screen anymore... you're kidding. As IT people, it's easy to forget just how low the common denominator is. It's not a criticism on users, just an observation.
No they haven't. About 5% of people have. Because that's (being generous) how many people aren't running Windows.
I bet Windows has loads of features Linux doesn't and vice versa. For instance, Windows has a really sucky command line... but for 99% of users it's not a problem, whereas a much higher proportion of Linux users use the command lineor even rely on it.
If you try and add every feature everyone has, you get a big mess, not a perfect OS.
>>It's useful for many people, especially power users working with many different applications at once.
Maybe a large number of people, but relatively a very small segment of Windows users. It's niche enough that people who need it could buy an add-on.
However I would've thought these days, more and more people would be using VMs to meet the same goal rather than running hundreds of applications on one PC?
Indeed, I've seen it in Windows at least 10 years ago. Not sure if it was an add-on, or part of the graphics drivers support.
It's not really that useful a feature for most people.
There's a difference between what's stored on your device, and what's in your account. If you own a phone, PC and tablet, you may have different content downloaded on each.
And you can't (that I know of) delete content from being IN your library. It's not in your library to begin with really, Apple just record in a central server which albums you bought and are allowed to download. "deleting" it doesn't make much sense if you paid for it, unless you want to hide your music taste from someone :)
Thanks AC, that does make a bit more sense, probably it shouldn't have been allowed to get onto your device without explicit permission.
They never made you download it, they only made it available to download IF you wanted it. They did not upload the album into 500 million peoples' accounts, they merely set the permissions so that everyone could access it.
People concerned about security and privacy really should bother to do the slightest amount of research if it's something they are worried about, rather than remain totally ignorant while simultaneously complaining they don't feel safe.
It's jerks like you who MAKE people want to escape the real world!
People walk about reading books all the time without attracting such ire.
If the person is able to hang around - no pressing return flight - would they be offered a seat in the next attempt?
Shoreditch is 10min away from good places though.
At the very least they'll be paying an absolute bomb for the offices.
Except there was no bait.
They never told their fans and investors they were planning to do it in the first place. People assumed it based on rumours, now are blaming Apple that those rumours weren't true.
Nothing to see here.
You said he couldn't eat soup, not that he couldn't drink from a cup either. I was not being glib, because if you'd said his tremor was that bad I would have suggested this spoon is probably unable to combat such extreme issues. He doesn't have a tremble, he has a full-on shake - surely when it's that bad just getting the spoon in the bowl is pushing it?
They do make anti-spill mugs though I think often for use at sea, if he can physically hold the thing one of those might be of use for regular drinks... tea through a sippy cup can't taste the same.
I'd probably have bought him a mug. But I agree, it's a very neat idea. And deceptively simple, a real "how did nobody think of that" project.
I'm not sure there is. You need massive budgets for legal and certification/regulation. Things don't only cost a lot due to greed and profiteering, they also reflect the extortionate barrier to entry costs.
I find that rather unlikely.
If they have WiFi then this isn't changing anything. If they don't, then a Wifi-capable fridge which isn't broadcasting (since it's not joined a network) isn't going to do much either.
Is it? Says who?
Don't you have to tell the device to join your WiFi, rather than have the WiFi ask the device to join? Isn't that the whole principle of WiFi... so the fact it is WiFi enabled means as long as you never let it join your network, it's OK?
Or can one coerce a device to connect by pushing a request from the router?
I've turned down a metronome app recently on WP8 because it wants access to all these things. Do the vast majority actually USE any of this data, or has the developer left everything checked? You'd think the OS would know, based on what classes you use, exactly which permissions are required since it's sandboxed?
How exactly do you envisage MS changing the behaviour on your server if you don't install the update?
Then why is his opinion of any interest when discussing a modern smartphone accessory? It's about as relevant as asking an Amish what they think of the self-parking features on a modern car.
"They don't know what power I use and at what time, all the now is substation X is drawing Y power at Z time. They also don't know what is using the electricity in my house.
So in answer to your point, they are intruding a lot."
Firstly, how does a smart meter "know what is using the electricity in my house"?
Secondly, how is knowing when you're using the energy an intrusion? That's like saying your ISP and mobile phone provider are intruding because they know exactly how many Kb you are downloading/uploading each second, or that BT are intruding because they itemise exactly when you make each phone call, and how long it lasts.
It's almost like all the privacy-freaks haven't really thought this through before getting all hot and bothered. Seeing a 2min spike in your energy use at 5:17pm is surely far less intrusive than knowing you phoned your mum at 7:13pm for 5 minutes and 4 seconds?
The only thing that's "serious scary" is how uninformed supposedly well-educated, tech-savvy people are, and how little they think before jumping on a bandwagon.
The fact you think everyone is that smart suggests you yourself are far less smart than you like to think.
And everyone else is just like you, right?
Your utility company already knows how much power you use. What aspect of your private life are they violating by knowing you use more at 5pm than 4am?
Couldn't the same be said for the iPad? Many of us thought so.