Re: Or an anti-matter beam!
Positron beam is probably cheaper and much easier to generate.
864 posts • joined 24 May 2010
Positron beam is probably cheaper and much easier to generate.
"Hey look were doing something"
Result: Lots of talk and headlines, no reaction.
"The key to business is not to provide the best service, but the only service!"
Reacher Gilt, Going Postal, Terry Pratchett.
Virgin boxes remain property of Virgin, and you have to return them if you cancel, so they are in effect rented.
This assumes the same type and version of PLC, many mission critical systems will run multiple redundant HW/SW from different manufacturers.
If it was capable of infecting a multitude of systems, then there would be significant risk.
But, there are also other mitigation strategies.
Depends on the atmosphere if they have one.
A relatively dense atmosphere could transfer energy from the star facing side of the planet to the side facing away.
Change the mars approach angle so it hits the planet, there it's landed, nothing about landing intact.
Add "System failure, reinitialising queue, you are now x in the queue"
Waste in political terms is "money is being siphoned off to my predecessors backers"
Improvement is "money is being siphoned off to my backers!"
"This is only for the government to make money selling our data and will make no difference to our care."
The Gov has no real need to make money, however current party funders are generally in the business of making money somewhere.
...will use pairing and mobbing as required.
A good team will adapt to changing scenarios and use the method they deem appropriate for the solution, so rather than a one approach fits all solution, it's a more flexible approach.
Legally it's 2 years for electronic goods in the EU.
"and they were quite happy with once a year even at 40,000 miles per year"
Can you charge one from a normal socket fast enough to do 40K a year?
Most of them are in Ireland, for tax reasons.
They're launched out of the tube and subsequently the water by compressed air, once clear of the water the rocket motor ignites
This has been used in some next generation ransomware.
They want to stick their own headers and crap in it before sending it to their customer, their concept is that it stops other recruitment companies stealing their clients.
Waves then crumples up some old CS coursework.
I think this is for interbox comms, so metres rather than mm.
I don't think this is intended for optical computing.
The problem with big projects is they have feck all to do with efficiency or saving money or improving things.
They are about those in charge making appearances as though their tenure actually achieved something and feeding money to those party sponsors who assisted them in getting elected.
There are functions that will need this kind of bandwidth, but not that many.
It will become more prevalent with autonomous vehicles, with potentially high bandwidth sensors.
Question is does it offer more than say CAN-FD or Flexray if there is this need?
One of the main advantages of CAN is that a large portion of the bus management is done in HW. When operating on lowest cost Microcontrollers this can make a big difference!
Especially when they can be running between 80-90% CPU load when operating, adding extra communications processing is going to be greater cost add.
@JS19, think you have your numbers backwards.
There's a distinction between firmware and tune. Most systems will have one firmware and multiple tunes, basically they will use the same system on different models of vehicle and so the tune is selected for the vehicle. They generally modify the tune, rather than the firmware.
Both have signatures, but the signatures need to be capable of being updated, as the systems sometimes need updates, the firmware generally checks the signatures at runtime to check for memory corruption among other things.
How they get around this I do not know.
They do and have done for many years, the problem is there is no way to have independent verification of the signatures, except during programming at the dealership.
Another active theory is it was a comet reflecting Earth borne signals.
Men in Black covered this best "A person is smart, people are dumb panicky animals and you know it"
So they want to flog it to BT when they privatise it then...
The operator is not removing the Ad's, but just replacing them with it's own.
The real problem is marketing get involved.
Most dashboards are a computer + infotainment + other vehicle ECU's.
Effectively ignition on, but not driving.
@PNGuinn, it's so they can pronounce it correctly when they're drunk.
The "lack of progress" is political as you effectively state, the direct to moon was risk management.
Unfortunately there is a technology gap, until we can develop reliable, fully reusable launch architecture, orbital cost will not reduce significantly.
Until we have something that doesn't need 300-400 tons of fuel to get into orbit it won't become accessible to the masses. Which would be a massive technological leap.
There are proposals, Skylon is pushing the envelope of what we have, but it will require a radical technology to really change things.
More privatisation by the back door.
"I imagine yes it'll save some people some money"
Just line the pockets of some party political contributor.
The last barge landing was attempted with an F9 V1.1, this will be a V1.2 which made the successful Landing and has much stronger legs than the V1.1
And commercial paying passengers have gone up for 10x the cost of an SS2 ride, for those that want to and can afford the high cost, it was the same with early air travel.
But 99.9% of people in the world cannot afford this.
This brings it down to about 99%, small gap some would say, but that .9% covers a much larger volume of potential paying customers.
With the commercial opportunity comes profit and potentially investment.
It took ~60years to go from the first aircraft flight to scenarios where 50-60% of the world populous could afford to fly.
The technical challenges of reducing the cost of space access are that much greater due to pushing the boundaries of our technology. Getting into space is an expensive and risky business.
As happened with air travel a technological revolution will be required (jet engine), until that happens, not much will change.
Actually Electrolysis is very efficient (~90%), the problem with Hydrogen is converting it to a form where it can be used as fuel, compressing it and cooling (due to compression) is where most of the energy is wasted.
The wire needs to be at least 36,000km long and ideally 72,000km depending on what counterbalance can be applied.
Can't play different rules, can't change things up, can't steal etc.
One of my favourites is to put all fines in the middle and if you land on free parking you collect the money.
The other being land on GO and collect double.
I'm not saying its realistic, its just a game after all.
Peter R. 1, the major flaw in your argument is who and what determines "danger to society".
Law's are easily changed, whereas polarising punishments are not so easily introduced or re-introduced.
There's a very fine line between protecting "society" and protecting the authority of those in power.
Removing the death penalty is a very effective means for a democratic society to have measures and checks on those in authority.
I'm not saying there aren't political prisoners in any system, but removing the death penalty prevents them from being removed completely.
No just a vague attempt at forcing wages down.
@ AC they are already at war, just under a Cease fire.
So lets say you have a DB of patient records and you wanted to search say family history for a specific condition, say heart attacks.
Would you supply the encrypted dataset and then encrypted form search criteria?
The 'engine' would search for that encrypted form search criteria in the encrypted dataset and somehow return the results?
"The NHS might still be public..."
Not for long.
Most of the new builds I've looked at you couldn't fit a classic mini in there and get out, let alone anything modern.
Jobs for their idiot mates, keeping them away from where they can do real damage.
@Zsn, nope, NBI is used to heat the plasma inside the reactor.
The neutrons from the reaction exit the system through the reactor walls and are intended to be used to heat water, probably heavy water, to produce steam and conventional generation takes place.
Direct generation cannot be done with a Tokamak or a Stellarator, it requires an Aneutronic reaction to do direct generation. Neither of these are capable of reaching the required temperatures and pressures for Aneutronic Fusion.