27 posts • joined Friday 21st May 2010 05:16 GMT
Re: Major changes
Bwahahaha! If you think RHEL7 will show up any time close to the first of the year, I've got a bridge to sell you. We'll be lucky to get the BETA within a year from its promised date of early 2013. And GA will not be before 6 to 12 months after the beta.
The birthing of 7 is going to make the drawn-out cock-up of 6 look mild in comparison.
Hello? Red Hat is anyone paying attention?
I don't see anything in the documentation that indicates they have fixed the awful bug in KVM where a system with a Haswell CPU will no longer allow 64 bit BSD guests to boot. This is a really blatant and hideous bug.
Re: Again with the CP and terrorism excuses...consider the source.
"Good cannot exist without evil."
Balderdash. Of course it can. This may be presumptuous, but I have a hunch what you really mean is a whole lot closer to "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." It's not at all the same thing.
Funny, mine is a tall stack of failed and failing Seagates. Never lost a single Samsung or WD 3.5".
Re: Paying to keep it running.
"With the main problem being the paying to keep it running. 2.35 megawatts at 10 cents per kwh would come out to a $2,058,600 a year for power."
Bovine excrement of the highest order. That is chump change. There are 69 million income tax payers in the US (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_tax_payers_are_in_America). This amounts to 3 CENTS each. A heavy burden - NOT. It's not even noticeable. It's so far below the noise threshold of national spending that it's not even worth one second of worry.
I also predict that your Moore's Law projection down the road is (1) outside the domain of what Moore's Law is actually concerned with (hint: it's not cost), and (2) it is nearing the point of becoming dramatically outdated as physical limits are approached.
Another thing that fairly leaps out of the numbers. The expense to run this item for its full lifespan (so far) is only 10% of the acquisition cost. It's less than the debt service on the investment.
Keep it running as a national resource. Don't even bother SELLING time on it; AWARD time on it to winning applicants based on interesting and useful projects.
Re: Free delivery better
Nope. Not me. Sorry, everything I order for next day from Amazon without exception gets here the next day on the UPS truck with a bright and friendly driver, packages always in excellent shape. Standard shipping is not much use though. More often than not they use some awful trans-ship-to-post-office service and it I rarely can check the post office more than once or twice a week.
Whatever HDNL is, it must suck to be stuck with it.
Re: Year of Linux on the Desktop
All right, specifics. Just what does Xfce NOT do? Today; not sometime in the past.
I'll tell you one thing Xfce does NOT do. It does not insult and ignore its users.
Re: Fedora 14, then CentOS 6
I also am enjoying CentOS6+Gnome2. But when CentOS7 comes out sometime in 2013 or early 2014 it will be based on Fedora 18 and you-know-what. I sure as hell won't ever be on CentOS7+Gnome3.
It is sad that, while CentOS packages KDE as an alternative to Gnome, it doesn't do the same with Xfce. You have to enable the epel repo to get Xfce. Fingers crossed they will see the light and package Xfce as an alternative to you-know-what with CentOS7.
(Yes, I realize, all these decisions are actually made "upstream" - in RHEL)
Just no. Unity was at NO TIME "making good progress". Its head was up its ass from the day it was conceived.
I would urge you to try an Xfce live CD or USB stick. Then please report anything you really need your DE to do which it DOESN'T do. I couldn't come up with anything when I did that. For now I'm in hog heaven with Gnome2 on CentOS6, but when that stops being updated I sure as hell won't be on Gnome3+CentOS7. Almost Xfce, either on CentOS7 or on something else.
Re: You've been duped again
AC is just being a good nazi as well as a twit. Had he posted from an actual account I would not engage in ad hominem. As it is he deserves it.
Re: Another reason for scrapping the Big E
"the fact is floating museums get gutted prior to commissioning. The innards are replaced with replicas, and they never reveal the entire works of the ship: certainly not the power plants"
Bull. The 16" guns, armor plate, and power plant are still in the U.S.S. Massachusetts and you can walk up and touch them. Not suggesting there is anything of strategic import in that ship, but your statement is incorrect.
Re: UK site with international readership
Oops. That would be EAST of the Mississippi.
@David 45 - the flying heads are enabled by fluid pressure. In a vacuum they would instantly crash. So perfecting a vacuum filled drive would be a lot more work. You'd have to figure out a new way to keep the heads suspended precisely 3 nanometers above the surface but never touching.
Re: open tablets
Or why can't they just screw the stupid Windows 8 logo and put a label "This device can run both Windows 8 and other operating systems". Someone should start a distinctive free logo that says that.
Re: Does ANYONE use GPL 3?
"Today , as announced by Google open-source programs office manager Chris DiBona, the number of open-source projects licensed under GPLv3 is at least 56,000." My beard is not long enough yet to make this a proper hyperlink http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10294452-16.html
Do you have any idea how silly it is to be carrying on a conversation under the name "Anonymous Coward"?
Re: the access time for magnetic media is around a second or so and for holographic storage
Basically, getting to the first byte or the one millionth byte of sequential data is very nearly the same timing within any storage technology, and very different between technologies. Tape may be one second if it is already positioned, and many, many seconds to minutes if it is not.
Bloated commercial money-grubbing software is the crap, not open source. Commercial is dying. Get over it. There is life after the dinosaur.
Just because Gnome shat a brick, does not mean open source is finished. KDE, Xfce, and others pick up where Gnome dropped the ball on their toe. Your view of linux as some kind of controlled monolith like Windows, OSX, and other commercial turds, couldn't be further from the mark.
Re: Stuck with Fedora 14
@The Electron - I was in the same boat as you, but now I've got a better boat. Much better. The answer to our dilemma is Redhat Enterprise Linux 6.x, or any of its clones, Scientific Linux 6.x, PUIAS 6.x, or CentOS 6.x. That gives us a stable, supported, bug-fixed, reliable platform with Gnome2 until 2017. By then, HOPEFULLY, this mess will be sorted out, and RHEL7.x will offer something as good as Gnome2, and other distros will also be back on track with sane DE offerings.
Gnome 3 sucks donkey balls and the Gnome team is a bunch of evil, self-indulgent, egotistical wanker imbeciles for forcing this utter crap down users' throats. It is complete garbage.
I do hope somebody forks Gnome 2 and shows these @$$holes how to do sane maintenance and evolutionary development without gratuitously throwing out all the good, useful features and configurability.
This is particularly galling since KDE recently made exactly the same blunder and took it visibly on the chin with KDE4, yet the Gnome boobs have now gone and done the same thing even after that train wreck.
To the Gnome team: you suck.
Not even close
Actually no. Just no. The US armed forces do not possess a higher count of "guns" than the public. Not even close. But that misses the point. They possess weapons of far higher lethality and effectiveness (heavy machine guns, howitzers, bombs, etc, not to mention nukes), together with staggeringly capable systems to deploy them (aircraft, tanks, etc).
We are talking a population of 303 million compared to an active military + reserve strength of 3 million. There are over 250 million privately held firearms in the US. The armed forces would not have more than a few million personal firearms.
Bravo. Just bravo.
SkippyBing: "Going by the previous example of Concorde heating its fuel to 80C I can't see it being a problem as this is well below the flash point of jet fuel"
Where'd you pull that one from? Jet-A, Jet-A1, and JP-8 have a flash point of 38 C, JP-4 (the old kerosene-gasoline blend) is -18 C, and JP-5 is 60 C. Diesel is about the same as JP-5. Flash point is the point above which a flammable vapor is evolved. Every car on the road is driving around above the flash point (gasoline flash point is -40 C). I.e., the gasoline tank in every car is always filled with flammable vapor. By design, the design is that this vapor is so rich that it is above the upper mixture limit, so a spark won't ignite it within the tank, but if it escapes the tank into the atmosphere in an accident, the mixture is no longer safe and it can be easily ignited.
Autoignition temperature is something else. It is above 200 C for all of the above mentioned substances. That is why it won't just automatically burst into flame at 80 C.
I can't think of any application for Go that would not be better served by either Python, C#, or C++. Requiring braces for block structure, and then TELLING YOU WHERE YOU HAVE TO PUT THEM, strikes me as crazy.
Either require them and let the user put them where he wants, or get rid of them and do it like Python. One or the other.
- It's true, the START MENU is coming BACK to Windows 8, hiss sources
- iSPY: Apple Stores switch on iBeacon phone sniff spy system
- Pic NASA Mars tank Curiosity rolls on old WET PATCH, sighs, sniffs for life signs
- How UK air traffic control system was caught asleep on the job
- Google embiggens its fat vid pipe Chromecast with TEN new supported apps