* Posts by chris lively

458 publicly visible posts • joined 19 May 2010

Page:

Microsoft: IE9 not yet 'broadly' available

chris lively

MS has nothing to worry about...

FF4 is a real piece of crap. It crashes (early and often), is a monster memory hog, and in quite a few ways is SLOWER than other top level browsers. About the only good thing I can say is that it can display a web page...

So what if Mozilla released first. Personally I think FF4 is Mozilla's "Vista". Sure it has a different look, but it's a beast that should have been shot before going wild.

MS: Take your time and do it right. Initial release numbers really don't matter.

As for me, I'm one of the 7+ million that promptly uninstalled it and downgraded back to 3.6.

Meltdown ahoy!: Net king returns to save the interwebs

chris lively
FAIL

Not even close and certainly No cigar..

"That download could be on a local router or the smartphone of the guy sitting next to you on a plane"

Okay, so in essence hackers,foreign governments, etc, could reshape traffic themselves by requesting the initial page/video/whatever from the original server and then telling that server "Oh don't worry, we'll send that out for you!"

Great. Man in the middle anyone?

Somehow I fail to see how this provides more security. Sure it provides (or rather forces down the throat of everyone) the idea of data sharing.. But I don't think most people ever confused Peer to Peer with increased security.

He had a great idea that worked out pretty well and for that I'm very thankful. But I think he may be a one hit wonder.

UK.gov sticks to IE 6 cos it's more 'cost effective', innit

chris lively

IE6 wasn't the problem. It was the specs and programmers

Let me start off by saying we have had zero issues with building modern applications that handle older browsers. We have a couple released in the past year that work in everything released since IE5.5... and they take advantage of later standards when the browser supports them.

However, what I've seen happen with other development companies is that they'll bid on a project. The sponsor will say, it MUST work in IE6. The dev company then says Not a problem. Then promptly takes advantage of all the broken crap in IE6 that isn't supported by anything else. Project is delivered and sponsor pays for it.

So, who's to blame here? I say it's the development company. They could have made it work in not just IE6, but others as well. Without a single issue. However, most web developers quite frankly don't know what they are doing. They use point and click tools and little code snippets they find out on the web.

How does this get fixed? First off, it has nothing to do with the price of the project and EVERYTHING to do with the quality of the people building the software. I'd like to say only use developers or companies in a particular country or price range... But even that isn't accurate.

The only real answer is that the people in charge of buying the software need to be smarter. They need to know how to really evaluate bids and the quality of the bidders. Good luck with that.

Adobe lines up emergency Flash fix

chris lively
Flame

Flash, PDF == ActiveX

It seems that Flash and PDF files have become Adobe's version of Microsoft's failed ActiveX tech. Both were full of security flaws.

I wonder at what point common marginally tech people start talking about PDF in the same way. My guess is soon. Very soon.

@Adobe: Here's a hint. Fix the problems, fast. Don't do "quarterly" updates. Do weekly if you have to. Then when it's finally getting stable, give the products a new name and say they are brand new replacements.

AT&T to ax unlimited data plans on iPhone Monday

chris lively
WTF?

my usage radically increased this month

After reading this article I decided to actually check my usage, something I've never bothered with before.

Excluding last month, the prior 6 months were all less than 100MB. Last month, for some reason, my usage apparently jumped to just shy of 300MB. I haven't done anything different and I don't watch videos. Honestly, I just use it to read sites like this one when I have a few minutes.

My wife's phone shows the same type of jump. My guess is that right along with getting rid of unlimited data they are also changing the way they are counting the bits. Lovely.

Google hails Pac-Man with retro gaming homepage

chris lively
FAIL

switch to bing today

I switched my home page to bing today because of this; or rather, because of the sound that starts playing 10 seconds after you get to the home page.

The first time it came on, it scared the crap out of one of my kids. The sound volume was turned all the way up..

However at Google thought that the noise was a "good thing" should be fired.

Microsoft launches patent suit at Salesforce cloud

chris lively
FAIL

More than that

7251653 - means that you can't have name value pairs associated with your main entities. Which is how pretty much EVERY dynamic system works.

6263352 - means that EVERY SINGLE content management system is infringing.

6664979 - means that every application which has user settings / preferences in infringing. Which would be just about every application ever built

6542164 - means that every application with a tooltip (css :hover anyone?) is infringing

6281879 - covers all of these sites that have some sort of chat feature. Think customer support, sales chat, facebook, etc.

and that's just after reading those things for 5 minutes.

chris lively
WTF?

What a bunch of garbage

After reading the suit and researching the patents, I have prior art on nearly all of them. This is ludicrous.

I hope Salesforce gets all of these invalidated so I don't have to deal with it later. It is utter garbage.

Never mind the fact that Microsoft's own tools AND documentation show how to do this; which in my mind means that they are inducing people to infringe.

Page: