If the touchscreen packs up in the wet,
does it have physical buttons, for page turning purposes?
1293 posts • joined 27 Apr 2010
does it have physical buttons, for page turning purposes?
About time Flava Flav got into the wearable tech market. I can see it now...
The flavWatch redifines the concept of the watch, as it is suspended from the users neck. It also emphaises its form, by being much larger than competitors' devices. Rather than incorporating WiFi, 4G, or fitness monitoring, it is a single function device - it tells you the time, upside-down.
I ordered my Nexus 6 from John Lewis. Good thing they have such a good returns policy, as I was shocked to find that it wasn't a Replicant.
What if I need to authenticate in the dark?
IP is not the solution to replace FM. Anyone can have FM for a one off, minimum cost, and it'll work pretty much anywhere. Not so IP.
DAB isn't the solution, either, mind.
Granted, no one is saying that I did, but they might, so please send me as much Pound Sterling as you can afford, so that I can keep a legal team on retainer.
Although Doom/Aliens becomes a lot less scary when you can pop in a cheat code and shotgun/chainsaw/punch everything to a messy death!
This week's Who was the best of the current series, to date. Plenty of "hiding behind the sofa", from my brood, and, whilst the story didn't make a huge heap of sense, it was quite fun (the 66 second countdowns were a good source of tension).
The whole "I teleported everyone to the Tardis, then took them home while you were sleeping" device was a bit cheap, but I can forgive that, as Doctor Who is supposed to be cheap! What really let the whole thing down was Clara not leaving. She has a ready made happy ending (Rose and Amy both got tragic send-offs, we don't have to have another one), and everyone is sick of her - she was Matt Smith's Doctor's companion, and that story is done, so just let her go and have the new Doctor pick an appropriate companion. Even Mel wasn't this grating.
Unless employers aren't sure what they're hiring people for, recognition and performance measuring shouldn't be all that difficult - appraisals can be a pain in the arse, but they're not really as arduous as we all think. I don't think experience isn't relevant to remuneration, rather it's taken into account during the recuitment phase.
Maybe I'm just lucky to be working in the public sector, where we have clearly defined (and published) pay scales, and tend to progress up them in an orderly fashion?
No, if the effort, challenges and responsibilities are going to be very different, I'd set this out in the job descriptions, and set the two positions at different points on the pay scale. They may start at the same company, at the same time, working the same number of hours, and both do a "good job," but they would not be working the same job. It might be as simple as paying a higher hourly rate for the unsociable hours of the evening shift.
I'm going to regret this when someone pulls out the relevant piece of legislation that shows my solution to be somehow illegal, but it's surely a fine principle?
It's a lot easier than your making it sound. Established pay-scales, and regular reviews to ensure that employees have the opportunity to progress up their pay-scales. 2 people, doing the same job, will be on the same pay-scale, at points determined by their respective experience/performance.
(Icon is sarcastic - this really isn't rocket science)
Using Openmediavault on a collection of reclaimed hardware (old tower PC, various hard-drives approaching end of life), here. Genuinely curious if there's much advantage to splashing out on a dedicated box, or saving the money to spend on better drives?
We'd run around outside.
And thanks to malfeasance, too, for the detail on the software..
the keyboard as a large case that the Pi was then fixed into, giving something resembling a BBC Micro, with the ports accessible round the back (remember when computers looked like computers?).
I'd promised my eldest one of these but the self-assembly element is gone, and he's already started learning Scratch at school, so I can't see the point, now. Shame. £100 seems a bit steep for a Pi+keyboard, too. Will they be offering the software seperately and, more importantly, is it any good?
currently sells for the better part of £400 - did you mean to reference the Xperia E3 as Sony's budget model, or am I just poor?
Children can't give consent to having explicit photos taken (because they're children, and are protected against this sort of thing by existing laws); adults can give that consent (because they're adults), but that does not equate to consenting to have those same photos splurged over the internet.
Nothing sexist in that.
Focus is being placed on women, I expect, because they're more likely to be victims of this sort of thing, but it wouldn't necessarily follow that this would be women-only legislation.
I didn't think much of Green Wing, but The Book Group was great. Revealing her to be The Rani would be rather wonderful (if a tad predictable, I suppose).
If we're lucky, they'll have something special in store; if not, well, at least I'll be able to impress the kids by knowing more about the character than they do!
but they've probably always been that way. I've only noticed it post-relaunch, as I've been watching them as a grown-up, not a (easily pleased) child.
That said, they really ought to decide who the market is, as they seem to be slightly too difficult to follow for children (and now in too late a timeslot, for some reason), and slightly too crap for adults. Shame, really, as Capaldi and co. are doing their best with what they've been given.
It's always important to comment on articles like this, so that you can register your disinterest.
Excessive permissions seem to be the standard, but there's usually a good reason for having call access (making calls from the app, as has been mentioned above). I got more cross with the default behaviour of facebook messenger, where it splurts "chat heads" all over the screen, obscuring anything and everything. Shitty, shitty app that did not need to be a standalone entity.
Gasp! What a faux-pas!
Nigella would probably shove it up her nose.
Are these prices that the social networks/ad agencies have put on personal data, or values that consumers have put on their own data?
The first set would have some meaning, the second set would be hot air.
It's very important that we all give up any thoughts of privacy, so that she can protect us from the paedos and jihadis.
The politics of fear is alive and well.
they'd roll this out as a free upgrade to anyone who got Windows 8 bundled with their PC, and have a handy checkbox to switch off all the Metro crap.
And who is it that's going through this forum and downvoting every single post?
I was shocked to read past the sub-head, and discover that this wasn't about Jude Law.
I'd hate for the ends to be used to justify the means, but if he's the sort of dingbat who thinks tweeting pictures of his wang to party groupies is a good idea, it's probably best for us all that he be removed from government office.
in the UK, at least.
Windows is a bit misleading - maybe they should drop the brand all together, and launch Windows 9 as Microsoft Tiles?
And then relaunch Windows 7 as Tiles For Desktops, just to maintain the air of confusion.
In the case of my town, that'd be dummy shop fronts, in an effort to make the town look less deserted than it actually is.
"sex file" just doesn't sound right. Unless it involved David Duchovny, I suppose.
If no one ever clicked on those ads, they wouldn't be there (and Google wouldn't be making all that money). But, they are there (and Google are raking it in), therefore: someone must be clicking.
Who are these people?
Surely an understanding of the way someone sees themself is invaluable if you are trying to sell them a modile handset, which would more than likely be something the customer would use to reinforce their self image?
I can't believe I just came out in favour of marketing.
I think someone has invented an app that will lead horny men to other horny men, on the off chance that one of them might be a woman.
No, REALLY, writing your posts in OCCASSIONAL caps makes you look like a MENTAL.
the nice thing about Android is that I can "fiddlarse about" if I so choose, but it's not a requirement (unless you have a shitty handset - but even then, it's just a case of finding out how to remove all the shit that Samsung have preloaded it with).
but if the creator is off with his big pile of cash, I doubt it'll stay good for much longer.
Telcos and manufacturers should be required to cooperate, to ensure that users always have access to the most up-to-date OS (that their hardware can support). Still pie in the sky, but at least all the bases are covered!
Much like CarphoneWarehouse, they were OK if you knew what you wanted
Me: "Can I have [handset] on [contract]?"
Them: "No, but you could look on our website."
Never got any pressure off of the salespeople in either CarphoneWarehouse or Phones4U. Stark contrast to the greasy little shits in the network shops (with the exception of the nice boy in one of the O2 stores), who all seemed to want to a) get me to upgrade to 4G, or b) convince me that a crappy handset was a good reason to stay with their network.
and that other manufacturers will take note, and reduce the amount of crap that they shovel onto our handsets.
but I'm less a fan of reduced consumer choice.
It was always clear that the networks resented their existence - the man in the Three shop advised me not to go to Phones4U, as they "wouldn't have tested all of their handsets on our network". Granted, the chap at Phones4U couldn't get me a deal that suited, but he was a lot less pushy than any sales drone from the network-owned shops, and didn't try to blind me with bullshit.
Maybe a stiff breeze will sort this problem out?
Last time I checked, you needed to pay an annual subscription.
See also: people who still double-click on hyperlinks, because that's how they were taught to use their computer. Change can be hard, for some.
I have to ask: aren't cycle helmets dorky enough, already?
Are you mixing up the X and G? The X is expensive, but I thought it was their flagship model, with the G as the £150 budget model.
Isn't that the opposite of what this ruling says?
Really? Not taking pictures of my junk makes me abnormal?