You can put it in there via the configuration menu, +Customize and pull Hello to your menu. That's it.
59 posts • joined 23 Apr 2010
You can put it in there via the configuration menu, +Customize and pull Hello to your menu. That's it.
Or does it run on OS-X? When I encounter developpers I only see MacBooks running either OS-X or Linux I guess market share is about > 80%. So if Microsoft keeps ignoring this they will lose even more markershare. Especially with the younger ones. I can not recall running into a young dev (in the twenties) running the microsoft toolchain. Not ONE.
It's Wayland now isn't it? Or MIR?
Or just select (copy), middle-mouse (paste)?? In some places life is just good(tm).
According to Cringerly (http://www.cringely.com/2013/11/25/intel-wants-everyones-chip-maker/) maybe Intel will be making Google's chips.... at 14nm.... And not because Intel likes Google but because they have so much 14nm capacity and (maybe) not enough buyers. What will they do? Next years will be very interesting.
Oh and Googel wants this because they rather buy a design than they must buy the whole package from one. Macchiavelli's "divide and conquer"... In all respects.
> "companies are already swarming round it like flies to shit..."
> Because it's already dead?
No because it stinks...
And it convenient for the government too, to know everything of your members of parliament. Saves time. Why have a debate any more, you know all opinions in advance.
What a crap. Market share CAN be about units, it MUST not. For example in the server market, market share is normally measured in income not units. Otherwise is was impossible for MS to have a (out of my head) share of about 30 ~50% while (nearly) all big clouds are running Linux only. Linux server market share is exclusively about ENTERPRISE Linux distros. For the proprietary unices the (unit) market share is almost not measurable, but in income they still count (just like mainframe).
If market share was about income instead of units Apple is probably on top, followed by Samsung. Android is invissible and Google's mobile revenue is (black?) magic.
> You just hit the core issue Don Jefe... WindowsRT is NOT Windows.. in the same way iOS is not OSX.
> Microsoft never quite got that message.
That and they should have based it on Windows Phone code instead of Windows nx/xp/7/8 code. And built win8 as a proper desktop OS without all that touch nonsense. Just like Apple (iOS/OSX) en Google (Android/Chromebook) are doing. One size doesn't fit all devices.
Sharing a kernel can be wise, sharing a UI code base for desktop and touch is foolish.
It shouldn't be that hard. The operators could filter out the text messages before they send it to the devices. A kind of virus checking for SMS...
> If Android is Linux then I can surely
>Use an open source JDK / JRE to run my Tomcat or Jetty on it
You can. Not directly out of the box, but I've seen OpenSuSe running on a Galaxy S2 right onto the stock kernel. You only need root access. And yes you could run Tomcat on top of it. Usefull? I doubt! Fun? Yes! (and that what Linux is, fun to use!! :-) )
The main reason for succes of iOS and Android is the ease of use or better the ease of system management of your own device. You don't have to be like a system administrator. Quite different from Windows (Pro/i386/x86_64) devices with its endless ways of installing and updating software from all sources. My experience is that ordinary people are not capable of properly take care of their device. With the controlled environments of Apple and Google this is a no-brainer. Maybe WinRT can compete but this platform lacks all other advantages of 'normal' windows. A very difficult game Microsoft has to play.
'Seriously? This came from Microsoft (by proxy)? They have the biggest ones I've ever seen'
No if it's your strategy to have a software monopoly and crunch all your competitors then it's all right. ;-)
'It is not possible to remove Google apps (e.g. Chrome, Maps etc).'
Bullish, look at cyanogen mod or Amazon's kindle. Booth without chocolate apps.
Microsoft tries to get a piece of the action (remember their cloud presence is almost like their phone's) with higher prices than their biggest competitor? Good luck! Because I can see no compelling reason that one has to buy Microsoft in the cloud. Cloud == web and web based stacks on Linux are hot while Microsoft's stack is not. The only reason is some old-fashioned enterprise app that requires windows. There are a lot off them, but I hardly see any new load coming to Windows.
So they are putting a HA cluster in a SPOF??? What are they smoking??? Making a very complicated setup (means much more change to f*k-up) in a SPOF rig? What's the point? So you can check "we have an HA cluster"? Or is w2k12 so unreliable you always need two? or....
If you really want to master Linus system administration:
0. Take a LSB course
1. Linux from scratch
2. Choose family
3. Master the package manager (pkg/apt or rpm/yum,zypper,..)
4. Learn basic vi
5. Learn basic regex
6. Learn to script, start with basic bash later you can matter python
7. Learn autoyast (side family)/kickstart (red hat family)/preseed (Debian family) for fully automated OK installation
8. Learn puppet/chef
By then you've got a few years of experience.
Office365 is a Windows only sollution so one can argue if it is web based software or a last century fat client solution in disguise?
Or will it be like this: you pair your smartphone our tablet with a dumb terminal with real keyboard, mouse and use your window () as screen at the office only if you have to do some 'real' work. When you are done you just take your device with you stop you can access your work everywhere from out of the cloud. Or am I smoking something now?
You are absolutely right! IMAP support in Outlook is really bad, but then it was was never built for it.
eeh, you meant it doesn't run their usaul iPad apps... ;-)
Big companies tend to put their own image of OS on a machine instead of the preinstalled OEM version. Wonder how this new scheme is goiing to affect the bih companies.
So what you're describing is a 100% Microsoft lockin: sharepoint and O365 do not work on all devices (far from it) and it does not look like it's going to get better. Only if you buy in this Microsoft thingy for the full 100% it will work. And they trying to sell this in 2012??? They're still living a decade ago...(LOL)
Or at least make sure that the price is "right". Google might be interested because of all the IP Nokia possesses. I'm not sure if Motorola give them enough firepower....
"Metro is perfectly suited to those who want an entertainment/information displaying/social networking device... ie:a consumer. Productivity and use of a PC as a working tool is something else entirely, so whilst MS may win over the consumer with Metro they are going to have a hard time pushing it to those who use a PC as a productivity tool."
If this is their target who on earth will they win from iPad and Android? Don't see it happening. They will be third and that's not how the Microsoft eco system can survive... Start selling your shares...
I think MS won't be able to retain it's hold on the IT market as it is today. They're just too late on the smartphone/tablet market to get a > 90% market share. It a pity it took 20 years....
Do you have the answer for the (right) question?
I dare you to compare with iOS.... that's what it's aiming at and there it will fail. Windows will never have it's monopoly again: thank god
There's only one problem with this "WIN": it won' t run on anything but microsoft.... So you buy a "cloud solution" that requires one make of client.... I'v never understood this...
any decent information system lasts for centuries, nothing new here. Ask your bank when they started their banking system, I bet it during the 60's, maybe 70's, so that's pretty old too. Nothing wrong with old systems as long one keeps it current.
Yep Nikon is a big name, but the biggest is ASML, a Dutch company.
ASML expect to ship production EUV in 2013: http://www.asml.com/asml/show.do?ctx=41905&rid=41906
Apple attracts people with nice products. They have to because they are not mainstream. What is MS doing: bullying people to walk their way. Someday this is going to fail. Will 8 be this failure? Place your bets, please.
What if the tablet market keeps growing like it does now, how long will it take before more tablets than pc's are sold? I don't believe MS will have the same market share in tablets as they have in PC. MS has to reinvents itself to not become the next mainframe builder (you can still make shigloss of money with it, but you won't lead anymore)
But why pay for a proprietary solution when you can get it all for free. MS is no playeron the internet cloud providers and I don't see it changing. Is there one compelling reason?
And when will that be you reckon? The same day mainframe will get their supremacy back or when there will be dinosaurs again?
Which new users? The ones coming from iPad or even Android? Really? You are serious? Won't ever happen.
Our use wifi? Like most people do with a smartphone whenever they can.
You mean that companies can pay local contractors in stead of handing over tax money to the USA... Our investing the money in their own company in stead of handing it over in a licensing scam....
Why paying for crap services anymore?
Mono's .NET because it's evil in itself
I'm a powershell noob, but " shutdown -s -t:1" reminds me of old times, now I just enter "poweroff" ;-)
Maybe that manufacturer can license the Nokia technology en get it to the market quick and with a real Phone OS.
Is anyone here really looking out for WOA/Win8 and will line up for the stores? Does anyone really care?
In the netherlands there is a large department that uses a secure memory stick as booting device to connect to the department's network. Personal equipment is used. This MS policy will harm all users big time when it starts to prevent officers to use their fresh bought laptop/pc to use this stick. If Dutch gov is wise they have to protect there investment now by stopping MS with this policy.
Is demand for Windows in the cloud this low that they are forced to lower prices to attrack one or two customers...
yep, you're absolute right. Macs are a niche. You can hardly state Macs dominate the desktop market, do you?
Whether WP is a good product or not is not the discussion, WP is a niche and the masses just don't care. Time is changing.
"Unless they are some weird hippy corporation that hasn't yet learned better (not because firefox has a problem per se, just because a lot of business software still doesn't work 100% properly in it)."
Do you consider Defense (like government) hippy? So speak for yuorself and not what other oraganisations are running!
Google uses no SAN or NAS but use their 2 build in normal desktop (maybe laptop nowadays) sata disk to form their ever expanding uber GFS storage thing. Network interaces tops probable at 2 certainly no more (give me one good reason). The only thing they spend some money on is on ECC memory, all the rest they buy the best bung for the buck. So have a look in the price list of the most common HW vedors and you can make a good guess what a Google server could look like.