Re: The amount of Anonymous Trumpists in this forum...
Here's the far-right media talking about several Democrat ads, and how they're helping the Republicans-
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/07/democrats-boosted-extremists-republican-primaries-was-that-wise
Yeah, that's the monolithic left-wing MSM pointing out the moral bankruptcy of the Democratic leadership. Doesn't actually touch on the argument you were making before or answer my request, but well done anyway.
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/democrats-launch-jan-6-newspaper-ad-campaign-iowa-trump-visits-rcna132627
Another perfectly reasonable story, not related in any way to what you were arguing before.
Why? The Dems have already locked up over 1,000 politicial prisoners. Didn't you know this already?
Well, "why?" is because
that's what you said was happening, and I'm asking you to provide some kind of evidence.
And "the Dems", which is an odd way of framing the US Justice Department by the way, have locked people up for committing crimes. Actual, violent crimes. Are you saying they shouldn't do that? Show me the reports of people being locked up for holding any political opinion that doesn't involve violent action. (Hint: the answer to this is a few lines down this very post, but it doesn't support your claim that the Democrats are abusing the power of the federal gov't against Republicans.)
Then people think CBDCs are also a conspiracy theory, when they're just a consipiracy.
Err, no. CBDCs are real enough. You linked to the European Central Bank making plans to introduce one. In doing so - as your link illustrates - it is
very publicly going through the full democratic decision making processes, such as they are, of the EU, answering entirely to the EU's political leadership. Where's the "conspiracy" there?
In the USA, meanwhile, nobody has even talked about introducing one. There's just no drive for it. That's what I mean by "no centralised decision making". Just a lot of people doing their own thing. Is that bad?
You can do it today though.
I'll just leave these here then:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/judge-sentences-florida-man-18-years-prison-attempting-provide-material-support-isis
https://apnews.com/article/islamic-state-terrorism-minnesota-0e4a09840bed202cac17e18e3dfd87d5
The Bbc has actually sorta reported on these, although with their usual spin-
Uh huh. And here's another example of the BBC "pointedly ignoring" these protests: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-67911739
Just because you're not paying attention, that doesn't prove the BBC aren't doing their job.
If AfD win an election, that isn't "toppling the German government", it's just democracy.
That depends what you mean by "win an election". Of course, you could argue that any time an opposition party wins an election the existing government is "toppled". But that's not what anyone means here. Germany has a cultural memory of the Nazis, who proved that you can "win" an election by processes and means that have nothing to do with democracy, and if you think there's
nobody in the AfD and its allies today who sees that as a template worth trying, I have an Internet to sell you. I'm not saying it's likely, I'm not even saying that the leadership is planning any such thing, but I'll bet
someone is thinking on those lines, and it's not unreasonable to keep a close eye on those people.