Nunno, clearly what we need is a government-issued identity card. Isn't that just what the Home Office has been telling us since Michael Howard's day?
1107 posts • joined 25 Mar 2010
Re: @CrazyOldCatMan (Been there, done that...)
Since Scott Adams quite openly begs for his readers to send anecdotes from their office to serve as fodder for his strips - it's not entirely surprising that he seems to have spies everywhere.
That's because he does, in fact, have spies everywhere. In direct proportion to the level of his own readership among the employee base.
Re: Nahh, the old Star Trek was for nerds...
Movie makers have been hijacking pre-existing franchises and dumbing them down for as long as movies have been a thing. Early example.
Moral: don't expect anything else of movies. Certainly not of any movie that has the word "franchise" attached, however tangentially. Artists are creative, they don't want to spend their time splashing about in someone else's imagination. Everyone associated with the Star Trek franchise since Gene Roddenberry died has been a bought-and-paid-for hack, nothing more.
I am so, so glad that someone coherent has finally stood up and said exactly what is wrong with DRM in general, and the DMCA in particular.
I made this point to the NZ parliament, almost ten years ago now, and it got translated into a clause that specifically excludes legal protection for measures that overstep their bounds:
for the avoidance of doubt, does not include a process, treatment, mechanism, device, or system to the extent that, in the normal course of operation, it only controls any access to a work for non-infringing purposes (for example, it does not include a process, treatment, mechanism, device, or system to the extent that it controls geographic market segmentation by preventing the playback in New Zealand of a non-infringing copy of a work)
... which is a legal formulation I'd like to commend to our American cousins.
Shurely shome mishtake
More people shopped on Amazon than played Pokemon Go?
Re: Excellent news
Well, yes... except that it presumably means Microsoft will now abandon all attempt to provide their own documentation, in the same way as they've already handed "support" over to online communities (including Stack Overflow, for developer tools).
It's just a cost-cutting exercise for them.
Re: QR Codes are still around....
And there's the problem, right there. QR codes in the west have only ever really been used for advertising. We've become accustomed to seeing it as an invitation to "scan this if you want to see more ads".
Not very surprisingly, not a lot of people take up that invitation.
We've always seen it as a machine-optically-readable version of a URL. But it really doesn't have to be. It can convey (exchange) all sorts of information that's got nothing to do with web browsing, and it sounds as if the Chinese have realised this. Good on them.
Re: Well, here's your problem
I so want a 'semi-autonomous' car that screams 'DO SOMETHING' at me now.
Preferably in the voice of Plankton's "wife", Karen, from Spongebob.
Re: Bet they assumed Windows Phone contributing a few hundred million
I don't know how many times I'm gonna have to repeat this...
Windows on a phone is a really nice system. I, and many other users (as of last year, it had a double-digit market share in my country) greatly prefer it to either iOS or Android.
What Microsoft did that I don't understand was, stop making Nokias. The Nokia brand was by far its best ticket into the phone market. Whey they stopped shipping those, their sales went from "very low" to "virtually nonexistent". And how that can have come as a surprise to anyone, has me fair betwattled.
Re: Can I just check I have this right..
Well, ideally, you'd be including a UK organisation because that organisation had the best people and experience for the work you want to do.
If it doesn't, then why include it? If the answer is "just to qualify for EU funding", then that would explain a lot about the generally glacial pace of EU R&D over the past 30 years.
On the other hand - if it does have that expertise, then you'd be an idiot to exclude it just because the political status of the UK is likely to change.
This is a positive thing, folks. It's one less factor distorting the award of money based on arbitrary political rules instead of - well, any real reason.
Re: It's the law, isn't it
This is precisely the kind of thing that needs to be negotiated. You know, in the negotiations.
My suggestion would be, Britain continues paying its bit - maybe overpaying, slightly - for programs that include UK researchers and are already underway at the time of Brexit. When those programs eventually wind down, the payments stop and the government of whatever's-left-of Britain at that time can start running its own R&D subsidies.
Re: no chance on win mobile
Pokemon Go requires geolocation enabled. If you've ever used your Nokia for navigation, you'll know what that means for the whole "days instead of hours" battery life thing.
Re: There are dozens of us, DOZENS!!!
I'm just saying No to Android and iOS. There, that's my individuality asserted.
Re: It's not just Twitter
Yep, Google's "helpful" parsing of search results jumped the shark long ago. I think it's actually impossible to perform many searches now, as Google simply won't believe you want them.
Re: Just twitter?
Too right. Is it too late to nominate Teresa for the job?
Re: There is absolutely no way
In other words, Windows 7, but with Windows 10 inner performance improvements, but no spyware, no failed UI experiments....
It's called Windows 8.1.
No, really. Check it out. It's got the stability, performance and security improvements of W10, but you can turn off the spyware and control your own update cycle. And for all the hate directed at Metro, you can live with it for the few occasions when it actually appears. Well, I can.
Australian Information Industries Association*: you're not the future of democracy, so please shut up
Re: Picking and choosing
The price per vote will tumble if, and only if, the system as delivered is perfect and never needs to change.
If, on the other hand, it works like every other major IT project in the history of ever, the price will just go on accumulating for as long as the system is in use.
Re: definition of "better".
It's obvious. "Better" means, "would funnel more money into the pockets of those who pay the report authors' salaries". Viz, the tech industry.
I suppose there's no way to criminalise the release of self-serving bullshit "studies", but can we at least ridicule them a bit more?
You're missing the point
This legislation is being pushed as hard as possible (ooo err) by what is called, without as far as I can tell a trace of irony, the "adult entertainment industry".
Step 1: Outlaw providing porn to minors. A lot of people support this, mostly because they haven't thought through what it means.
Step 2: Implement the Great Firewall of Bri^H^H^HEngland&Wales, although to be honest Scotland and NI are if anything even more prudish in this regard so they'll probably be on board too.
Step 3: Block all pr0n sites that don't require proper age verification, which means a credit card number.
Step 4: Bingo! No more free pr0n in the UK! from now on, You Will Pay for your grumbles. As an added bonus, all the transactions will be identifiable and traceable. Won't that be nice?
This is how Britain preserved the peace of the world, mostly successfully, for a century before the Americans took over. And the Americans did precisely the same.
Look, if you want peace, somebody has to enforce it. If the central government has no teeth - well, if you're very, very lucky and privileged in your geography, history and politics, you get Costa Rica, but more likely you get Somalia or Afghanistan.
One way of "keeping peace" is to put your own soldiers in there. But that's - unfashionable, now. Also, not at all by coincidence, hideously dangerous and ruinously expensive. Or you can try to trick, cajole, shame or bribe another country into doing it for you, but that has most of the same drawbacks plus the fact that you have no direct control over what they do, because their goals are different from yours.
The only other way - note, only other way - is to pick a local team who will do the job for you, and support them. This is far cheaper, more acceptable to voters just about everywhere, and much more sustainable. But of course it means you have to let the local team set their own agenda, like the mujahedin in Afghanistan.
The only time it seriously backfires is when you badly misjudge the local team and find yourself supporting someone really nasty. And we've all done that, the French and Germans as well as the British and Americans.
So who decides if the notice is "in accordance with its own constitutional requirements"?
Basically, the Germans, although everyone else in Europe can put a fair bit of pressure on them (and by the looks of things so far, that pressure will mostly be in favour of Brexit). A British court may provide a figleaf to either side, but it's up to the Europeans whether they want to respect that figleaf. Ripping it off and throwing it in the gutter is a perfectly viable option for them.
Note to author
If you're going to write in the first person, signing your name would be a nice touch. "Amberhawk Training" doesn't sound like anyone I'm likely to meet in a pub.
Also, the painting of "NationBuilder" as a data controller is unconvincing. Seriously, does there exist, anywhere in the world, a company that won't "disclose customer data... if required to do so by law or subpoena”? Without a lot more detail on specifically what "customer data" may be disclosed, this is not nearly enough information to call them a "data controller".
Maybe they'll just disclose the billing contact name and address of the Leave campaign (after all, that's their customer, right?)
Re: and yet still
@Mephistro: nice strategic use of cutoff points there. If you look at the 1-week chart (the link you posted) sure enough, it shows that the euro is very slightly higher against the dollar than it was immediately after the referendum.
If you look at that same timescale, you'd say that the pound has dropped less than 1%:
But if you look at the one-month charts for both, I don't think you'll have any difficulty picking out the referendum results being announced:
Of course, if you take a slightly longer view, you'll see this is far from the worst thing that's happened to sterling, even in the last ten years:
The pound dropped by 25% in 1992, when it exited the ERM. It dropped by more than 30% during the 1970s. It's dropped just 10% since the referendum; even if it's got another 10% to go before it levels out, this is still not a really world-class shock.
Big companies are abusing their position
In other news, water is still wet.
"Name-calling and journalism don't really mix" - maybe not on your planet, but here on Earth they've been inseparable for at least 200 years.
"Why should they [respond]?" Because lots of news outlets, not just El Reg, is running a story about them. Normal PR practice would be to issue a statement.
Sure, very likely the "parody" was a trademark violation. But trademarks aren't covered by the DMCA, and they're not normally subject to any regime of "takedown notice". The proper place to pursue that case is in the courts, not pulling the plug on an entire domain.
Re: re: jurisdiction
There's a difference between the data that a website displays (on your computer, in your country), what it stores (as cookies, also on your computer and in your country), and what it processes and stores itself (on its servers, in some completely different country).
I can imagine the jurisdictional arguments getting quite involved.
It's different, because dismissing the dialogue box does not mean "OK" (something that, according to Microsoft's own UI design rules for Windows, should NEVER EVER have been allowed to happen in the first place). Also because there is - if you actually read the message in full - a transparent way to cancel the whole thing, which there wasn't in the previous generation.
Too little, too late. ("Having to read the message in full" is still a pretty outrageous requirement.) But it is something.
Re: 5 eyes will not be happy
You don't imagine 5 eyes will have less access to European data now, do you? If anything they'll be better off, with GCHQ relieved of the need to think about fig leaves.
And you know New Zealand is another of the 5, right?
Be warned, there's no clotted cream down here.
Yep, and waterfall would be great if only we could have a tightly nailed down and comprehensive spec.
Sadly, not one developer in a hundred - no, make that one in ten thousand - has ever seen one of those, or would recognise it if they did. So the other 9,999 will end up delivering shit.
"Most people would be completely happy with a middle ground."
Newsflash: the middle ground is where you are now. Pretty much by definition.
Are you completely happy? No, because you think it should be somewhere else. Like most of your contemporaries. The only think you can't agree on is where, specifically, it should be. And so you end up with a compromise solution that makes nobody "completely happy".
This is how politics works. And how it's supposed to work, this is by design. I don't think Trump supporters (note, I'm not saying you're a Trump supporter, I neither know nor care whether you are or not) understand this: they think politics is a consumer business, where you decide what you want then find the company to provide it.
Before you give up on conventional politics, reflect: the only known alternative to "compromise" is called "war".
How much did they pay?
Oddly enough, reputable groups aren't exactly queuing up to provide educational materials to Victorian schools. Something to do with the budget being pitiful, and being crowded out by people willing to provide stuff for free provided it's not vetted too closely...
And so you get crap.
Inevitable consequence of public tendering with "price" as the deciding factor.
Re: One tiny step, MS... one tiny step and you blow it.
Yep, this was the big one, the time they failed security forever. And why? What possible gain is there in hiding extensions?
The only - only - half-way plausible answer I can think of is, to make the computer's action less transparent to users. So instead of ".doc files open in Word", now the user is trained to know "files with a Word icon open in Word". How the computer knows to show a Word icon - is deliberately obfuscated.
Either because MS didn't want to burden the poor user's brain with technical details - or because they wanted Windows to look "smarter" than it really is. I know which one I'd bet on as the larger reason.
Re: If it sounds dodgy, it is dodgy
While I agree that open source is important, that's not going to make it anything like "equivalently transparent". How many people are qualified to read and fully understand the source code?
And the compiler?
And the OS it runs on?
And the hardware the OS is installed on?
If you don't understand all of that, how can you be confident you really know what it's doing?
The only really, meaningfully "transparent" system is the one where people sort bits of paper into piles, and count them. In front of as many witnesses as can be bothered to turn up. Anything else is a huge loss in transparency.
This is a trial balloon. Nobody thinks "mandatory backdoors" is going to pass. Brennan and Wyden are both going through the motions because it's their job, but there's no point getting excited about it.
We're being distracted from something, the question is: what? TTIP? Safe harbor?
"... much of the data within the files is several years old"
Sounds pretty authentic to me. Lots of organisations will hoard countless old versions of files on their main server, while (depending on their own competence) using only up-to-date versions for actual operations.
If there are old files - well, it's far from conclusive, but it is consistent with the "hacked DNC server" story.
Note to Jerry Seinfeld
Butlers don't open doors, unless the house is lamentably under-staffed. Porters or footmen do that. A butler's job is to manage all the other household staff.
By "rudimentary understanding of gravity"...
... I gather they mean, "things fall down".
A more reasonable way of putting it would be that cats understand the concept of "containers". But I don't think that's news to anyone who's ever shared a home with a cat.
I think you're reading the wrong subtext, and therefore delivering the wrong rant.
El Reg is generally very pro-IP, and I don't see anything in this article to suggest a variation from that stance. So it's probably not meant to imply "old laws are bad" at all, it's more like "tried and tested".
Re: Mr. Hague - this is why we need a constitution
No, before the internet surveillance included "going through your neighbour's rubbish to check they hadn't been wasting food".
This whole "privacy" thing is basically a myth, it's something that didn't really exist at all until the mid-19th century. Before that, you probably shared your home with two or three other families, or - if you were rich - with servants; either way, there was no notion of "privacy" beyond "closing the door (if your home was one of the minority that actually had internal doors, of course)".
We seem to think of "privacy" as some ancient right, like "freedom of speech". It isn't and never has been.
Re: Fear indeed
Oh please. It's easier to hide information today than it's ever been before.
Previously, if you wanted to cover up your corruption, you had to pay off a bunch of people, pay a bunch of thugs to visit others, and hope like heck that it didn't leak out through some channel you overlooked.
Now, you don't have to bother with any of that. You just call Kanye West (other celebrities available) and ask him to say something stupid, and nobody - for statistical values of 'nobody', at least - will ever notice what you did that day. Problem solved, and it doesn't matter how many people are in on your little 'secret'.
Re: Book ciphers/one off messages
Yes, of course you can do that sort of thing.
But no-one does. Well, I tell a lie. There's a very good chance that people like terrorists, who actually care about secrecy, do something like that. But they're not a significant voting bloc, so who cares about them? No-one who matters, does that.
Because encoding a message like that is a lot of work. For anything much more involved than "Hello, world!", it takes hours of tedious labour. Ain't no-one got time for that nowadays, they want a computer to do it for them.
And if a computer can encode it, another computer can break it.
Re: This is due to unprecedented demand.
Oh yes there has, there was a Brexit referendum in 1975.
Re: I'm in two minds about this...
Clearly, Cameron assumes that unregistered voters who've left it til the last moment are mostly
gullible young people who are more likely to vote 'Remain'.
I wonder if he's right.
It's not quite clear whether people are talking about updates to an existing copy of Windows 10, or the rammed-down-the-throat upgrades being applied to existing Windows 7 and 8.1 systems. From the involvement of Akamai, I can't imagine these are regular updates. Surely not even Microsoft would be insane enough to outsource those.
If Microsoft has engaged Akamai somehow to push their thrice-cursed upgrades, then that might also go some way to explain the tactics that have been deployed. (Particularly if Akamai is paid by the download.)
Yeah... that's not what 'slander' means.
Or 'libel', for that matter.
"The infamous Student worm"?
Wow, those students huh?
Hint: spellcheckers can be misleading.
Re: And what can you do...
The 'blacklisted characters' may be rejected by the web server, before they ever get passed to the database. That would be a practical precaution against SQL injection attacks, and applied probably to all fields in all forms.
Not the best way to do it, by a long shot, but practical.
Re: It's GWX Control Panel or Linux
@Stoneshop: you may mock, but I made those registry edits 9 months ago, and GWX hasn't bugged me since. Not once, through all the horror stories we've heard in that time.