1879 posts • joined 24 Mar 2010
"it will just take a long time to get there"
How long have you got ?
Even if you can manage 10000 km/sec it will take ~120 years and you'll need >5E18 joules to accelerate to that speed in even a 100 tonne ship
"we(IT bods and bodets) are supposed to be the champions of change."
I think you're supposed to be champions of IMPROVEMENT not change
As far as I know depletion of ozone depends on ..
chlorine derived from CFCs.
The actual reaction is atomic chlorine + O3 -> chlorine monoxide and oxygen.
Unfortunately chlorine monoxide can react with oxygen atoms of which there are some in the upper atmosphere to regenerate chlorine atoms to perpetuate the cycle.
ClO + O -> O2 + Cl
A Non-fluorine containing material such as carbon tetrachloride is also an ozone destroyer.
I've not gone into the details of this ..
.. but I'd *guess* the patent is for the control of an application by gesture on a touchscreen NOT for the software to implement that. After all it could be by an ASIC or some other means.
Still thin-end of the wedge-ish
In the first Foundation novel (~1951)..
Hari Seldon's (?) new recruit, Gaal Dornick, wasn't offered the use of Seldon's 'calcPAD' or something similar to do a quick bit of psychohistory prediction.
It doesn't record if it was a calculator-like device or more like a tablet
To use an old joke
Moses was the first man to ride a motorbike too
"For the roar of Moses' Triumph was heard throughout the land " or similar
Sure, my workflow would be twin Xeon Linux workstation, if need more grunt x86 Linux farm (1024 nodes), finally supercomputer somewhere.
The scientific community
are most likely to use Linux workstations, Linux farms or supers running Linux.
Sounds very high to me too.
It'd be costing ~~£150/year
Coming from the other direction I worked out ~180kg coal (~~equivalent to 630kg CO2) spread over the year would generate ~~30W which still seems high
For the FORTH fanciers
Did you get the feeling that your VLIST flashed before you ?
Plenty of people are thinking about ...
Fuel cells (although AFAIK not chocolate powered ones)
Seriously it's just a device to show how poor the energy density of batteries is compared with (say) the equivalent weight of hydrocarbon. It's only the same as electric car range 50 miles/ diesel car 600 miles
Assuming that chocolate is ~100% fat & completely oxidized
1g = ~37kJ
So the chocolate equivalent of my 300g laptop battery would be ~~11MJ
That should keep it going a while !
Reminds me about the time ..
I wrote a 6802 assembler in 6809 BASIC. Took ~2 hrs to assemble ~ 500 bytes
I've got 6 machines running various version - very different hardware from dual-core atom to dual core AMD to mCeleron. All have installed/run flawlessly.
"Full RHEL6 gcc package takes 3.5 days on SheevaPlug"
You are a star !
"Now i am running OpenSuse"
Always has been for me !
"but space is curved by the various optics"
This is nonsense !
"Because there's just no scope of abuse there is there?"
It's only like ANY other legislation
From LibreOffice help
"If you decide to enter a number directly as a text string, enter an apostrophe (') first. For example, for years in column headings, you can enter '1999, '2000 and '2001. The apostrophe is not visible in the cell, it only indicates that the entry is to be recognised as text and not as a number."
and it works for me !
Re : Why control key
Thanks, I 'd just read it as though it was necessary for SSH.
"wanting to ssh into Linux systems"
Am I missing something ? - I SSH into my Linux systems all the time without a control key.
"between tinkering with the engine and driving to the shops."
Trivial beyond belief !
Having spent YEARS protein modeling, designing PCBs and writing software then all I can say is that internet access is a great addition but NOT the only use for my computers.
Not all will be sacked ....
for how can any business manage without HR ( now to be renamed Robot Resources) ?
By the way..
the greenhouse effect increases HEAT retention but heat != temperature. For example the same amount of energy might raise a cubic meter of air by x degrees or a cubic meter of water by y degrees depending on the Specific Heat of the materials involved. The more telling example is that ice at 0C will not change in temperature until sufficient heat has been added to melt the ice.
It just shows how complicated a picture it all is. It looks like it is difficult to calculate the balance of heat in v. heat out. Approximating the resultant temperature change must be a nightmare.
years ago I had £50000 transfered into my account ( this is when £50000 would have bought a nice 4-bed detached house in good area), unfortunately a few days later it left just as quickly.
Re : Patented salt?
One patents a use : the actual chemical compound is an example that is suitable for the use.
Well-known salts like sodium chloride can be included in a patent if a new use is found.
It keeps plain text passwords in memory - good grief !
There's nothing in Relativity..
that denies FTL velocity. The only restriction is that an object with mass can't accelerate to c without infinite energy. On the other hand anything traveling FTL can't DECELERATE to c without an infinite energy.
So a sort of
Great Program Counter in the Sky ?
Or for the hyperspace believers just use a JMP instruction
"how does gravity operate..."
From General Relativity mass/energy bends spacetime - anything moving in spacetime follows the bend.
It was the first test of General Relativity.
The more mundane one happens everyday as GPS clocks are set to correct for various time mangling effects due to velocity/gravity
"scifi writers came up with the concept.."
I think you'll find relativitists came up with the concept of wormholes
Light moving at c in vacuo doesn't experience the passage of time at all as far as I'm aware all it's motion is in space.
Google 4-velocity or 4-vector for an explanation
"but by the 13th century, ..."
Quite a lot of people would have thought it was flat, or more like not thought about it at all. They were more concerned with witches, demons and such.
Any sailor who had left the sight of land and returned and anyone who had observed them would have a fairly good idea that it wasn't flat, as would many well-read people.
"Any decent scientist will tell you that Einsteins theory of relativity...."
Any decent scientist will tell you that every theory is provisional and any hard negative evidence is likely to be its death-knell.
However Relativity isn't at that point - all tests show agreement. No rival theory matches it for the depth or quality of its experimental verification
Load of tosh
There's always been science and technology - the only difference now is the rate of progress and coordination of information combined with formal education
We'd never have become a more 'advanced' society without it.
Re : A skeptical dreamer
So all those Androids and iPads are waiting for a Windows to run on them to become usable ?
Everyone knows that ..
if you become immortal you have to go round the galaxy insulting everyone in ALPHABETICAL order.
Thanks Douglas for that beautiful twist on the immortality theme
"Carbon dioxide is essential to life on the planet."
Low level are necessary but high levels are lethal - the argument is about the middle ground.and it's possible consequences.
It's rather like saying iron is a good thing full stop but not mentioning that swords, guns and tanks are built from it
Re : Prior Art
It doesn't stop prior art invalidating a patent.
"Invented first" is a pain
It means having to document everything you do AND get someone else outside your immediate project to witness that you've done it AND that they understand what you've done. In drug research it can mean someone signing and understanding EVERY page of a lab notebook.
talent upset you
IGNORANCE is pure bliss (in your case) !
If you are scientifically trained..
you will know that although many areas of science have unknowns and therefore contain possibilities other areas are more constrained by extensive experimental evidence.
So Special Relativity gives the kinetic energy of an object moving at high speed which for the sort of velocity necessary for even a forty year trip to the nearest star is absolutely colossal and that's per tonne. Plasma drive or not that energy is needed and the mass of fuel/engine also needs colossal energy to accelerate it.
Any conjecture about FTL/warp rightly is in the realms of SF as there isn't a jot of evidence and only highly dubious theories.
SF is great, the moon landings were great (I was 18 at the time ) but too many people seem to think ANYTHING is possible. It isn't !
"phase change heatsink"
Er, ice, or bucket of water > steam ??
If you want to grow plants
just release it to the atmosphere.
It's not that CO2 doesn't get converted to carbohydrates in plants it's the RATE of CO2 production that's the problem with the current use of fossil fuels. Not enough growing area to absorb it all. Putting it into a greenhouse only helps a little if at all and you need to make the glass.
This is rubbish..
Don't believe all you see on the Internet and esp. youtube
Trouble is ..
The vulcans already have a patent.
"Old physics will do "
And you are going to stop at the other end how precisely ?
0.99C is ~14000 1000MW power stations for a year for 1TONNE at 100% efficiency.
Everything else is (WILD) speculation
You need to calculate the energy
At 0.99C the relativistic kinetic energy is ~5E20 J PER TONNE - that's a staggering amount of energy. So you need (at least) that to accelerate to 0.99C and then again to decelerate.
All this assumes a propulsion system that is efficient and isn't totally burdened by it's own mass
- Top Gear Tigers and Bingo Boilers: Farewell then, Phones4U
- Analysis iPhone 6: The final straw for Android makers eaten alive by the data parasite?
- Stephen Pie iPhone 6: Most exquisite MOBILE? No. It is the Most Exquisite THING. EVER
- First Crack Bloke buys iPHONE 6 and DROPS IT to SMASH on PURPOSE
- Early result from Scots indyref vote? NAW, Jimmy - it's a SCAM