I want to vote down and up. ESR does gpsd and works on the time service, and repository conversion as well.
But well said on Linus.
203 posts • joined 24 Mar 2010
I want to vote down and up. ESR does gpsd and works on the time service, and repository conversion as well.
But well said on Linus.
"People will do this shit without any rational motivation beyond fame so give them a real reason and there are no limits."
This. Times 1000.
No. Parties are governments. Persons of parties are individuals or companies. So this says:
No government shall require .. source code owned by an individual or government, as a condition of import, sale, use or distribution.
It just means they can't refuse to allow it to be sold, they can't refuse to allow it to be imported, distributed or used. It doesn't mean they can't make it a condition of buying it themselves. Nor does it mean that vendors can't make it a condition of selling it.
So governments can mandate open source for their own internal use. Companies and individuals can mandate open source for their own use, and enforce open source licences. But governments cannot mandate open source for companies or individuals in their country, except for critical infrastructure.
It doesn't ban open source. it prevents governments from banning non-open-source.
Also, this requires the attacker to be already running code at the user's current level of privilege - in which case they can install a key-logger and swipe the file.
Nothing to see here.
When every second counts, the police are only minutes away.
Or up to an hour, in rural areas. Or they may misclassify your call and not come at all.
Shotgun ownership is quite high in rural areas, and with good reason. A family man living in a rural area who owns a shotgun is probably just being a responsible parent protecting his children.
Contrary to what many believe, firearms are not banned in England. You don't need to give - or have - a reason of any kind to own a shotgun, you just need to be of good character.
Police rural response times: Norfolk: 20 minutes
Most intestinal tract cancer is caused by HPV or H.Pylori, not bacon.
It's the false certainty which is the problem.
"This is the best available scientific knowledge"... OK but that doesn't mean that it isn't still poor quality knowledge with weak evidence. Best does not mean good, it may just mean least bad.
There is also a well established link between eating lots of dietary fibre and not getting various nasty lower-colon diseases.
Sorry, that's not true any more. It's gone along with the risk from saturated fat, eggs, and salt.
Won't stop the doctor telling you to eat more fibre though. Lots of GPs still think stress causes ulcers. One told me so in about 2010, in spite of it being known to be false since the mid nineties. And I saw a poster telling me to eat less saturated fat in the hospital only yesterday.
It takes ten years for the bullshit to go mainstream, then when it's disproved, twenty for it to disappear again.
Most cancers have unknown cause. All digestive tract cancers, whose cause is known, are caused by bacteria or viruses.
Of course that doesn't give the prohibitionists the ammunition they need to ban anything fun.
Reference for "bowel probably cancer caused by viruses":
Reference for "most digestive tract cancers". 60%-70% of of mouth, throat and anal cancer caused by HPV virus:
That's only accounting for 60%-80% of bowel cancers. What about the rest? Well some warts are caused by non-papilloma virus types... maybe they account for some of the rest. Also some digestive tract cancers are associated with Helicobacter Pylori infection. I would bet anyone £10,000 that in twenty years over 80% of bowel cancers will have been proven to be caused by infectious disease. In all likelihood many will be vaccinated against.
You can't make anybody work, full stop. The court won't order specific performance except under very restricted circumstances, which don't include employment.
However if you have *contracted* to work, you may have to pay actual damages if you then refuse to do so. This will certainly include repaying any additional element of severance pay you received, and may well be more.
Ask yourself: Do you trust European police?
Do you trust Italian, Greek or Spanish police? Or Latvian? Or Bulgarian?
I have a hard enough time trusting our own police, and they are probably the best of the lot. The Dutch probably number two, then the French and Irish and dropping off rapidly thereafter.
Writing secure code is hard.
Someone who thinks only "dumb" developers produce security bugs is overconfident, and is not the right person for the job.
Well I'm really only talking about the EU and the UK in particular, since that's where I live and work. What are you talking about?
For example in the UK it's DPA Schedule 1, s7:
Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.
In other words, confidentiality and integrity must be protected, which requires protections against rogue employees stealing data.
Yes, we allow HTTP/S, but we (I hope) forbid anyone from using a personal email account or file-sharing site without a valid work reason. GMail from HTTPS should be blocked, so there is no reason to allow GMail IMAP.
It's called data protection law - we have to take measures to prevent rogue employees stealing data. That's why your work web proxy has content filtering.
Don't use work computers for personal use, people.
allows -> allowed
means -> meant
can -> could
If the government confiscates wages, and spends to hire staff, this does not bid up the price of labour because the spending is offset by the confiscation (workers have less spending power). If they print money to spend, this bids up the price of labour. You can do a little of this but you cannot do a lot and certainly not nearly enough to cover the amount of spending a modern government likes to do. It will still mostly have to be financed by taxation.
It's a semi-fake app, and a completely fake business, put together for a documentary/publicity stunt/reality tv show.
Before you know it they'll be on documentaries talking about their experiences being "women in tech", then it will be celeb BB followed inevitably by the playboy shoot after all their earnings go up their noses.
This is not what reality looks like. Nobody is that stupid as to think this is a good idea.
Remember how Ashley Madison turned out to be all hookers - basically the replacement after Craigslist stopped allowing hookers to list? No of course men can't have an affair with an attractive married woman by joining a website. You know that really. Of course it was going to be fake.
So is this.
Heck, maybe they'll sell the domain to link-farmers and make a profit in the end, like that glitter-by-mail business, but that's about it.
... Oscar Wilde anyone?
Compression and extension are electromagnetic phenomena at the atomic level. If the material is stretched, the atoms are further apart than the rest position, so the "spring energy" is electromagnetic potential energy. When the atomic bonds are released (because of the chemical reaction), this will be transferred into kinetic energy at the atomic scale (i.e. the atom will depart the surface of the material with significant additional velocity).
But recall: At the atomic scale, kinetic energy and heat are the same thing. Temperature is proportional to the mean square velocity of the atoms in the material.
Bulk material: Spring Energy => Atomic level: Electromagnetic potential energy.
Bulk material: Heat Energy => Atomic level: Kinetic energy.
Bulk material: Chemical reaction => Atomic level: Electrons changing orbit
Bonus: Hooke's law.
Springs are complicated - when a spring is under compression one side of the wire is compressed but the other is extended. Neither of these are linear forces, but all smooth curves are almost straight lines if you zoom in enough. The point of a spring is that very small deflections are added up over the length of a very long wire. This gives an almost linear effect.
Springs closely obey Hooke's law not because it is a physical law, but because they are carefully manufactured to closely obey Hooke's law.
No, sorry. Collins English dictionary, second entry:
"press release" by security researcher mindlessly regurgitated by supposedly reputable sources:
MalwareBytes: Here the very first comment points out who daft it is.
And yet twitter is going wild with people mindlessly retweeting this as if they discovered it.
These are executables. Clue is in the acronym: SFX = Self Extracting Executable
So this amounts to: If you can persuade a user to execute an executable, then that executable can execute code embedded in the executable. Like all executables. So this buys you nothing you don't already have.
Not every bug is a security bug. #notavulnerability
That's the point of the story: The hole got larger and he put in his arm then his whole body. Eventually they sent out a search party, found him, and patched up the dyke.
Moral: the little we are able to do may be enough.
Helium is more viscous than air not less. It's also lighter. These two reasons mean laminar flow is possible at higher velocities, andturbulence is reduced, and the mass of the gas is reduced, all factors reducing head vibration. Turbulence != friction.
(While I am a physicist by training this is not my area of expertise, but the first thing I did was look it up).
That's not correct. http://www.djsphotography.co.uk/original_story.html
The camera was on a tripod, he didn't drop it. He set up the whole situation so that the monkeys would trigger the photograph.
I now wanted to get right in their faces with a wide angle lens, but that was proving too difficult as they were nervous of something - I couldn't tell what. So I put my camera on a tripod with a very wide angle lens, settings configured such as predictive autofocus, motorwind, even a flashgun, to give me a chance of a facial close up if they were to approach again for a play. I duly moved away and bingo, they moved in, fingering the toy, pressing the buttons and fingering the lens.
He intended to get those photos. He set it up to make it happen. His skill and effort went into it. It's his creative effort. It's his copyright.
The problem is that in civil cases in the USA, you pay your own legal fees, win or lose. PETA have an ocean of money and can happily do this for the publicity or just the LOLs. But he can't.
This is less likely to happen in the UK because PETA would end up paying for his lawyer when they inevitably lose the case.
Large organisations fight because they know it's not going to be a one-off so they need to develop a reputation as someone who doesn't cave, or be buried in lawsuits. But for a small business or individual with a one-off claim it's often much more sensible to settle than to fight. (difference between iterated prisoner's dilemma and single game)
"I think the point is not the sentencing regime but that fact that he is clearly delusional, mentally unstable and in need of medical help."
And therefore a dangerous person the public needs protection from.
When "lack of self control", "lack of empathy" and "delusions of grandiosity" are mental illnesses, it's clear that "mentally ill" cannot mean "not to be held responsible for his actions".
The legal standard for insanity is: Are you incapable of understanding that what you did was a crime, or are you incapable of controlling yourself. If yes to either question, it's life in a mental institution, so it's not a defence to be chosen lightly.
Fair enough. HDD prices didn't drop at that rate between 2010 and 2015. Excl. VAT I can find about £20/TB. Perhaps they've reached some sort of limit. That makes tape about six times cheaper per TB.
Disk has much lower fixed costs though.
* Tape storage halves in price per GB every 30 months
* HDD storage halves in price per GB every 18 months.
So at what point will HDD take over from tape?
It already has in most SMEs - convenience is superior. Use a USB3.0 SATA dock (£50), and cheapo HDDs as "cartridges" - £30 per TB.
At these prices snapshotting is a fine solution for SMEs with no de-duping needed, and full random-access capability.
You do know that "the consequences" go further than changes to the transmissivity of the atmosphere?
Of course you know that the change of temperature affects (increases) the quantity of water vapour in the atmosphere, leading to a positive feedback. Modtran can add that in which is great. I think we can say this is well understood, and is not the source of disagreement with well-informed sceptics.
But the change in the quantity of water vapour affects how cloud formation works. Modtran doesn't include that because nobody - nobody - understands sufficiently how cloud formation works to be able to explain current cloud cover, nor how it will change.
Cloud cover affects albedo and can have both positive and negative feedback effects, depending on the type and altitude of the cloud, and the location and time of day it forms and persists. Cloud of course also affects rainfall, rainfall affects transpiration and transpiration affects water vapour in the air.
Nobody - nobody - knows whether cloud feedback is positive or negative overall. So nobody knows what the overall affect on temperature or rainfall will be. Only someone uninformed could think so.
If you had read the article, you would have found out that so-called scientists have written to the POTUS asking for sceptics to be investigated with a view to prosecution.
Then they sue security researchers rather than fixing bugs....
That's just bad maths. A sample of only twelve will often deviate quite widely from a fair sample in any direction.
That's the point of the peremptory challenge, and why it should be restored.
The problem is not that they are breaking the DPA it's that they are a bunch of dishonest cheats who would rig the election bowling club secretary.
Here's the schedule 2 reason which applies. It's number 6 which you accidentally cut off:
6 (1) The processing is necessary for the purposes of legitimate interests pursued by the data controller...
Now if they are cheating that's not a legitimate interest, but you have to prove that before you can prove they've broken the act.
And here's the schedule 3 reason:
5 The information contained in the personal data has been made public as a result of steps deliberately taken by the data subject.
If they are like-minded it can only be because they have already been controlled.
I.e. ignores the leap second, and just treats it as time skew.
Rinse and repeat, Hey presto!!! Infinite storage!!!!
No, because the energy captured by the road results in a higher effective rolling resistance to the car. It's just a disguised petrol generator.
Just... morons. Like the "smart road" which harnessed the motion of vehicles to generate electricity...
Defamation cases can be cheap and easy. Bring them in person, and you can do the whole thing for a few hundred quid. Provided you win - If you lose you will pay the loser's reasonable costs which may be tens of thousands.
In any case Amazon will probably fold at the first pre-action protocol step: A letter to their registered office, noting the damages and threatening to sue if nothing is done.
You owe the bank $100,000, you have a problem.
You owe the bank $100,000,000,000, the bank has a problem.
The US national debt is a problem for China not the USA.
Just assume any crypto tool is an NSA honeypot - the use of which identifies you as a target of interest, even if they can't read it. Like TOR does. (Even though they can likely read that).
(Of course legitimate uses such as by lawyers and banks are anyway very interesting to the NSA and GCHQ. But if you are apparently just a Joe Bloggs using crypto... well, that's really interesting....)
Firstly: A member remains a member until his replacement is elected, (unless he has resigned, in which case he is no longer a member once parliament is dissolved).
Secondly, being a minister does not depend on being an MP. You might be a peer, for example, like Lord Adonis.
Add that to this:
The "safety" story is just the pretext to get the tracking kit (GPS + GSM) installed in all cars.
Every car will be tracked, and will with "appropriate authority" have the microphone activated remotely to listen in to the occupants.
Or since many cars are drive-by-wire now they can be made to steer, brake and accelerate under remote control, this system can be used for assassination as well, unless this unit is segregated from the EMS. Which it won't be.
The only important difference is between zero and one. Until any operating system can actually spend significant periods of time with no unpatched, in-the-wild exploited bugs, they are as bad as each other.
And "shoe in" for "shoo in"..