@AC
Can you provide any evidence for everything on Android being routed through google, and any evidence for google spyware?
Do you know how much effort Amazon puts in to knowing all it can about you?
1498 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Mar 2010
Google's content does not stop at Youtube. The Android Market has apps, games, books, movies and music. There are also Google apps for catalogues and periodicals. If that's not enough there is Listen for podcasts and News and Reader to help you organise the content of the whole web. Then there's Google Plus to see what your friends (who work in IT) have been up to.
How hard would your mum find it to get apps on Android Market? Type PODCAST into the search field and see how many fart apps you have to dredge through.
But it doesn't matter. A quad-core ipad will be known as the first quad-core tablet and all others will be regarded as cheap Chinese copies. If they do an 8.2" ipad, it will be a magical new format - far superior to the 7" devices Jobs derided - and Xoom 2 Media Edition will be a cheap Chinese copy. "Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before..." with a massively biased media and blogosphere telling the world what Apple wants the world to be told. Meanwhile, they rest on their laurels and patents.
There were enough comments before you typed yours that you should have known there was actually a storm of educated rage. Who do you think was envious of the ability to patent an idea which someone else has already demonstrated? We all have that ability, but most people can see that it stifles innovation and favors the big US magaevilcorps like crApple.
Don't need to control how apps work, but can if you want.
Allowed to add flexibility, but not forced to.
Permitted to have access to such low-level functionality and not required to know how to use it, yet still have a phone which is better than the competition.
Some of this functionality comes preinstalled.
There, educated you. No charge. Now you're a bit better informed you can stop trolling.
Android does everything you think it should, and more.
Android doesn't need a heap of tools to manage it. It just works, and it allows itself to be managed so that it works exactly as you want. I wish all OSs did that!
Your view of "consumer-oriented" is skewed. What you define is "developer-oriented" in that the developers have all the control and the consumer has none (other than to buy a better phone). With android the consumer is allowed to control the app; elsewhere the app controls the consumer.
Android allows you to install apps which are not a part of the Android OS. Not all of these apps are written by the Android team and not all of them handle memory, storage and networking in a way which suits every phone owner. This is the same for lesser phone OSs too, so I'd expect them to have the ability to install similar support apps. If they don't allow this then they cannot be called modern consumer-oriented OSs.
Can anyone answer the question I originally posted?
Please learn the difference between anonymous and pseudonymous. There is one, which is why you recognise me. It's also why Barry Shitpeas gets trolled by editorial staff while the anonymous itards do not. But why is anonymity so common among itards and not among other groups?
Prince, Madonna and Elvis all used their given names.
Here's how it works...
The market page says "this app can send premium rate SMS messages, do you want to install?"
The users installed.
The TOS said "this app is going to send premium rate SMS messages, do you want to continue?"
The users continued.
The apps described here are not viruses, so anti-virus would not help, so it's not required, which is what the devs said. And since the apps are only doing what it says on the tin, I'd be wary of the lawyers if I were to call them malicious.
It means expert. The sheep are called sheep, not the experts. "Fandroids" (those are the people who sell google's products for them, 'eh?) needs no apostrophe, but "em" does. I'm ere to help.
Old and tech is not dead, and it won't be killed by having the lists of specs removed. What you're describing there is the death of the old advertising. It's true that advertising sells products better than technological virtuosity, a claim which you chose not to disprove, only deny.
It's not the configuration of the Kindle Fire, it's that people know what it's for. If you go to Android Market you'll see sections for Games, Apps, Books and Movies. In the US there's a section for Music too. And they've recently released Catalogs (shopping) and Currents (for periodicals). The Google ecosystem doesn't come up short, it's just not pushed hard enough.
Is it a better experience than Android? I tried the first palm Pre and really liked the OS, but stuck with my trusty Treo at the time. When I had a go with WebOS on a tablet I was totally disappointed with the experience. It's even less welcoming than a blank Android homescreen and, with no concept of widgets or shortcuts, it won't get any better with use. It was neither fun nor immersive. Even the ipad feels dynamic in comparison.
Cards was good concept, but ICS's multitasking is at least as good, and everyone's copied the other WebOS selling point of combining contacts from different sources. Unless there's an app which is only on WebOS, what's the point?
If you visit sites a lot then "pin" them from the tab bar context menu. The tab will move to the left hand side and only the icon will show. Pinned tabs open automatically when you open Chrome.
Here are some keyboard shortcuts:
Bookmarks: f6, then type a few letters of the site name
Close tab: ctrl+w
Close Chrome: ctrl+shift+w
Back: backspace or alt+<left arrow>
Search: ctrl+e then type
New tab: ctrl+t
New window: ctrl+n
Downloads: ctrl+j
New bookmark: ctrl+d
...and many more
Just like a no-button smartphone has an essential feature in being able to unlock the screen with no buttons, a no-anything device has an essential feature in being able to find it when it's been turned off and put down somewhere. Get a broad patent for that and you will own the market.
Kudos to Apple for making me think different. A few years ago I'd be trying think of amazing devices, these days I think of patent trickery and how to stifle innovation.
8%? You think the headline is valid when only 8% of users (or is that 8% of the 40% who even noticed the battery) have a problem.
It's interesting that so few care about screen resolution though. That's just about the last thing the fanboys have left to boast about, so it's a Very Big Deal if the Anonymous Cowards who spew out hatred at anyone with a better phone are to go by (and 4g support is just a gimmick to them).
And by "so few", I mean nearly 3 times as many as hate the battery life. Maybe "iphone owners love their screen resolutions" would be a more appropriate headline.