FANBOY
As per the image on the first page, it's FANBOY. I don't know where the reg's "Fanboi" came from, but I think it must be French.
1498 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Mar 2010
"all this time they've been unable to make calls or something because we didn't sign it"
I know it's politically correct to be dishonest when commenting on google, but you should at least show some intelligence when you do it. The phones do work, and the signing issue involves the carriers. What can google do to make sure that a signed file from a carrier can be used on any ROM compiled by anyone with any signature or with none? Tell us that!
The last change in Gmail (other than improvements to spam detection) was the layout change a little over 2 months ago. 2 months is more than 6 minutes. If you feel unable to cope with the new layout then select the old layout from the Gears menu. THEY CAN'T MAKE IT ANY EASIER FOR YOU AND IT'S FREE!!1!
If you want to search for products then click the shopping link. If you want to look for videos, click the videos link; or just use the regular search for either like everyone else does. If you want to go to a Google product such as docs, Calendar or Youtube then click the other links. Google got all their customers by making everything so f*cking simple that even most reg commentards can use it.
"...increases how valuable you are to an advertiser." True, but this could be read to mean "Google sells your data to advertisers," which is not true. What you get from Google "knowing more about you" (they don't know more about you under the new terms than under the old terms) is a better quality of advert and possibly a better quality of search.
Google is making these changes to compete better with Facebook. Microsoft has invested in Facebook and has partnerships with them. Facebook already knows loads of information about its users, collected from multiple products, and uses them to display adverts. If they decide to use the information to sell adverts outside the facebook.com domain (they don't at the moment AFAIK) then Google would be a loser big time, so they are improving the quality of their ads beforehand.
You can opt out of the social search and you can opt out of Google entirely, with their Google Takeaway service.
I encountered my dining table. That doesn't make it any more difficult not to use it.
You are not forced to use any Google product, even the ones created whilst it expanded its activities after you signed up for a Google account; personally there are a lot which I don't use, but they are there all the same. I just ignore them.
Have you ever tried not using something you don't want to use? From the number of comments like yours on this site I feel I must be special somehow, because I have no problem not using things I don't want. It's not restricted to the online world either - my dining table came with 6 chairs but only 5 have ever been used and I never felt the need to complain that I was given the other.
And they don't sell data either. They analyse the data they collect and provide targeted adverts. They could sell the data to whatever site you were on so they could do their own analysis and select a relevant advert, but that would use more bandwidth and not be such a valuable service. I'd rather pay google a fee for their services and not have my data tracked, but I'm not too bothered about the current state of affairs.
The response to the change to the privacy policy has been totally out of proportion. Facebook's messaging system, calendar, news feed and Pages all know what you've been doing on Facebook's games and the comment sections of various websites, and know a big chunk of your browsing history too. But when Google implement something similar they get compared with Nazis!
Are you sure it's google sending the email? It could be spoofed. Getting email addresses is simple - just take a prefix from a real email address you've scanned and add it to every free email domain you can think of. ralph5@live.com, for example. Another way I think they might do it is by scanning the addresses in those chain mails that go round. People tend to forward those and include the addresses of everyone on the To list when they received it. Those addresses form the body of the mail when it hits its next bunch of recipients and 2 sets of To addresses get forwarded to the next link in the chain. Eventually you can get thousands of addresses being forwarded all over the world, and it will arrive at a spammer in due course.
What details, and what estate?
You can choose not to use gmail, choose not to sync your calendar, contacts and app settings with google servers, choose not to sign in to google when using the Android browser (or use opera). Then they will know practically nothing about you. And if you don't use them for search then they won't use that data anyway.
Android phones are generally sold with no root access because it's safer for the users. Freedom for Android users, as regards this article, is being allowed to use any app store they want without jeapordising their warranty, and having the ability to root the phone.
Here's HTC's help page for unlocking the bootloader. Does Apple have something similar for the Jailbreak community?
http://htcdev.com/bootloader/
How many people on Facebook have shared nothing more than farmville animals in the last week? Google released the stats it did because those are the ones which are important - people using Google products.
I don't bother with G+ much but when I do it's normally the What's Hot section, which is more engaging than anything on Facebook or Twitter.
Lookout has a remote wipe app, and there are others, such as HTC's built-in offering. You can install Lookout's after your phone gets lost or stolen.
Honeycomb has local encryption so presumably the Galaxy Nexus has it too.
OpenVPN is available for Android but you might need root.
"Google integrated youtube and I opted out of using google services."
Anti-trust my ar$e!
What google are doing is competing with facebook. Lots of sites use facebook accounts for things like comment threads or instead of making users go through a registration process with the site. That encourages people to use facebook. If google doesn't do something similar then it will lose out as facebook grows in its place.
In response to facebook's activities I decided to stop using facebook.
Post on a public blog, google will index it. No complaints.
Post on google+, make it public, google will index it. Complaints.
Post on twitter, google will not index it. Complaints from twitter that this will break the internet even though they did not renew the contract they had with google to display twitter data (which they did in realtime Search) and now use nofollow to prevent google indexing their site.
If you don't want google knowing what you do or like then don't use google. It's free, so you're the product. If you use google but don't want your likes and activities to influence the search results then use the regular search instead of the new one.
If you did read it then you'd see that section 5.13 refers to SIM cards being used in modems and sending internet packets from the SIM. It does not rule out using a headphone connection to send audio data from the phone, or using an HDMI connection to send video data from the phone. What if your phone comes with a hands free kit, which is only any use when "connected to the SIM" (via the headphone socket). Should those users have their contracts torn up?
This "unlimited" service is being abused by the people who are limiting it, not by people who plug headphones, amps or TVs into their phones. If they want to limit the service then they should have the balls to sell it as a limited service. End of.
You didn't answer my question "How do you know they're not abiding with the T&Cs?" It's impossible to say that people were booted off for violating terms rather than exceeding the unpublished limited if you don't know that they were actually violating the terms. Using an unlimited amount of data is not a violation of the terms you posted above, yet the people removed from the service were identified as the top 1% of users, not the top 1% of terms violators. If they published a limit then it would be reasonable to end the contracts of people who exceed it.
They're not necessarily applying the rule you posted above. That relates to the SIM being put in or connected to another device, and it's specifically a PC that they mention, not a TV. If someone sends video to a TV from a phone then the TV is no more connected to the SIM than a pair of headphones is if they send audio to a pair of headphones. Did they ask the 1% what they were doing with their SIM card, or did they just cut them off? What if they have projector phones, is that Ok with you?
...where others sell on awesomeness.
Also, what's this "non-retina display" stuff? Retina is a marketing term, not a technical classification. Any screen not used by apple will not be a retina display, even it it's better than apple's screens.
If you look close enough you can see the pixels on apple's screens too, but only a fool would suggest you do that.