Re: More bloatware...
(Almost) everyone is a Chrome user! You could make the same association with lavatory users.
1351 posts • joined 23 Mar 2010
(Almost) everyone is a Chrome user! You could make the same association with lavatory users.
"...lack of IE support in Windows 10..."
IE 11 will ship with Windows 10, it just won't be the default browser. It is supported until 2023-01-10 (the same date as Win 8) but will get no new features and there will not be an IE12. Hooray!
I happen to love Jabber. I only got it working one time, but that was when I had to demonstrate my ability to "video call" from home in order to be excused from travelling for a pointless 3-day project meeting in a soulless business park near Oxford. Come the day, Jabber failed so I missed the entire meeting but had the most productive week of my tenure with zero interruptions!
Is there no Web RTC product yet to replace all these silly messengers?
Another key bit: "security with a secure boot-loader used to validate the kernel and operating system and prevent hackers booting code not signed by NCR"
That's what Chrome OS already does (when run in Kiosk mode, which is ideal for ATMs as well as hotel front desks, restaurant tills etc). And for banks there's Chromium OS so they don't need to depend on Google for updates (or have them pushed by Google).
As much as I like Android, if "Kalpana apps are Webbified – built using HTML rather than using Microsoft-friendly tools and language" then the best OS would be something like Chromuim OS, Firefox OS or WebOS.
Activist blogging is the future of journalism.
Android's roadmap is to have better integration with your car, watch and entire digital life. Can you imagine how cool it would be if you just had to wave your wrist in front of the ATM and it showered you with cash? I can't see Red Hat doing anything like that.
A Chrome extension with "No special permissions" can read the URL of the tab you're on and use AJAX to send it to a remote server. It can also inject code into the page, which makes it possible to grab a username. It can be run every time you load a page.
"Went back to using a laptop."
A Chromebook I hope!
FTP Server Pro is an Android app - frippery.
Minesweeper is a Windows application - useful functionality.
Just go with "App" means "Application" and you'll be right 100% of the time!
"in a Chrome browser" is misleading. Chrome allows you to set a web app as an application, run it in its own window (not in the tabbed interface) and pin a shortcut to your OS applications menu. That app is running "in the browser" but the user doesn't see a browser. ARC is similar AFAICT.
I can think of one, but only because the dev is too lazy to build a web app for it, and I'm sometimes too lazy to reach form my phone. Other times I'd rather use the website than the app when I'm on a desktop. But "crap app ecosystems" is going way too far! Just because an app's not particularly relevant on the desktop doesn't mean it's not relevant on a phone.
Or if you want to force a muslim publisher to print pictures of Mohammed...
(that would be interesting because unlike christians they're a "protected group" so might already have religious freedom)
We can't all have rights when government is expected to decide them. The fight is to decide who should be allowed them, and christians are losing. It's one set of bigots against another.
<waiting for downvotes from both sets of bigots>
Do you need me to write it slower?
@gnasher it turns out they all offer the same protections. The controversy is not what they want you to think it is.
"four federal courts of appeals and the Obama Justice Department have all taken the position that RFRA can be used as a defense in private suits involving the enforcement of laws that substantially burden free exercise of religion"
Ellen would still be on TV if religious people were not compelled to work for her or to watch her.
"America’s business community recognized a long time ago that discrimination, in all its forms, is bad for business,"
That's why Apple doesn't discriminate against Saudi Arabia, which religiously uses its freedom to act like ****s towards anyone they want.
Just adblock them.
One does not simply return information from the database.
The concierge talks about you with other hotel staff. He tells the cleaners that you're a bad tipper, they tell him you leave hair on the soap. You walk through the lobby and can't look people in the eye because you know they know you know they know your secrets. But when a computer knows where you live all it does is realise you're in a hotel and might be interested in some local attractions. When the Value Judgement engine goes live, THAT'S when you need to feel creeped out.
Sent from my Chromebook
...is instant fail.
"So why not someone promoting rights?"
The law does promote rights. It's just that it's rights some people don't want us to have.
The state hasn't banned gay people, they've allowed private business to decide who they do business with. This is more freedom, not less, and less government, not more. This leaves business to operate as they see fit, and to succeed or fail depending on the will of the people who transact with them. That's more democratic than having a government tell us what we can and can't do, and far more democratic than having a CEO tell a government what they can and can't tell people to do. Are you sure it's a good thing when CEOs use their influence over government, rather than over the public?
@AC the Hobby Lobby case you allude to was not about contraception. They never excluded (female) contraception and never asked to be able to exclude (female) contraception. It was "abortifacients" they objected to, which is post-conception birth control. There was a lot of hot air generated by the fact what they objected to were not technically abortifacients, and they were alternatively labelled "contraceptives" by the left-wing media despite not being contraceptives.
They're not banning gays, they're banning the ban on freedom. Freedom does go away if you ban it.
There are usually loud voices arguing against corporate influence of government. They must have taken the week off.
@Mage the guest house couple were only refused after they had turned up in the evening expecting to be able to sleep in a bed. There are gay-only hotels and a gay resort, I've been refused entry to a club for being straight, refused a taxi ride and been excluded from parts of gyms for being male, so I support the general principal (it would be homophobic and misogynistic not to support discrimination!) but nobody should support them refusing service at such a late stage.
Apple say they can't support a law which leaves people free to run their business as they like and face public censure rather than state sanctions if they offend common decency, but Apple is free to run their business in such a way that an entire state faces censure for offending common decency. They have proved the new law (which is really the overturning of laws restricting freedom) makes sense. If Indiana had banned boycotts then that would definitely be worth complaining about.
If you're gay and want to buy a wedding cake with a plastic man and woman on the top I'm sure a christian bakery would sell to you. They're not anti-gay. If you're straight and wanted a wedding cake with pentagrams and a goat's skull depicted on it, they'd probably refuse. But not because they're heterophobic.
The solution to the gay marriage "problem": get government out of marriage. Get it out of as much as possible, including telling us who we can trade with. Am I correct in my understanding that the US marriage license was introduced to prevent interracial marriages and was not intended to serve any useful purpose?
Incidentally, it's legal for a gay baker to refuse to sell to christians.
He doesn't care about STEM, he cares about "diversity". But he doesn't care about diversity in street sweeping because you don't win votes by encouraging women to do dirty work in unsafe or uncomfortable environments. And he doesn't care about diversity in rap or social work, because there are no votes in making black culture "inclusive" or in challenging women's dominance in any area. What he really cares about is being sexist and racist towards men and white people, because that's what the influencers call for and anyone else is a "troll".
Degree courses where women are >70%: Health, Public administration, Education, Psychology.
Degree courses where men are > 70%: Computer science, Engineering.
Degree courses which are being made "diverse": Computer science, Engineering.
Which countries have "diversity" in STEM? Those where women have fewer options. If you let women choose not to be scientists, they do so. Be fine with that, like we're fine with men choosing not to be psychologists.
Glad she got that one. I'd hate to go to TaylorSwift.porn and see anything but the real thing.
I'm pretty sure KelisTaughtTaylorSwiftToGiveHead.com. But she had to charge.
Did you read every word, or just every other word? The guy was raped (by feminist standards) but he'll see no justice because our gynocentric laws allow women to rape with impunity. In reality (not the feminist fantasy world the law reflects), there is no justice to be served here because there was consent, but in the Ched Evans case consent didn't matter...because he's a man.
Ched Evans had his life ruined because he had sex with someone who was drunk and therefore unable to consent. This woman was unable to consent to being filmed and the man she was raping* could not give consent to being "pleasured". Don't put her on TV, put her in jail! And tell us her name.
Technically it's not rape, but it would be if our laws were not sexist. She enveloped him, he penetrated her. Only penetration is rape. Because she was unable to consent to penetration it's actually him that's the criminal, and being drunk is no excuse (for a man).
"lock if it suddenly moves more than a metre or so"
That makes a lot of sense.
Coincidentally I had the "unlock if walking" idea myself a few days ago but quickly realised all it would take to unlock a stolen phone would be...to walk. For the article to make sense the phone would have to be unlocked when you put it in your pocket, but that would mean the screen would have to be on. If it could detect walking shortly after being turned off, that might be useful, though insecure, but it would lock when you stop to cross a road so is not a lot of use.
As for setting an alarm off when you grab your bag, I assume the phone would be locked in the bag and therefore not considered stolen when it moves.
Markets are not entirely free but the major characteristics exist in many markets. Namely, price determined by supply and demand, and no external barriers to entry. Moore's law exists in free markets and a state contract does not absolve a producer of the need to compete for other contracts. If they stagnated they would not have any private customers after their contract ended, and would not get another state contract either. There is always an imperative to improve.
"Moore's law is a product of technological advancement."
...which is a product of free market capitalism. If you don't have to compete you don't have to get better. If you're not allowed to compete, you can't make something better.
Explain the adoption of the steam engine without reference to the profit motive!
"...owes as much to Moore's law as it does to free market capitalism."
Moore's law is a product of free market capitalism.
Read (or listen to) people like Nicole Foss who make a good point about how credit and resources (energy in particular) are the drivers of economic growth. With credit we have effectively built capital and bought products with money we've not yet earned, and we rely on growth to enable us to earn that money in the future. But declining returns on energy make that growth more difficult to achieve. For example, a Texas "nodding donkey" well can extract about 100 barrels of oil using only the energy from a single barrel to power the well. In a growing world economy we need to turn to Alberta tar sands for our energy needs, but for the same barrel of oil input the energy you can extract from that environment is far lower. The growth of energy has to slow, and efficiency gains might not be enough to counter it, meaning economic growth has to slow, meaning we can't pay off the credit.
Credit has enabled us to bring forward consumption from a future that might not exist! The $30 phone may be a mirage rather than a miracle.
On the other hand, it's just Malthus' theory with some finance mixed in.
How does "not covered in shit" fit into that explanation?
"I wonder which side the feminist lands on- womans freedom vs objectification."
Demonisation of male sexuality, every time.
Here's the same model, in the same pose, in 2012. When, presumably, she looked "under 13".
"We considered that readers were likely to interpret the model's expression and pose as being sexual in nature."
I consider it necessary to show people what the clothes look like.
"unless you like these things in real life you are not going to like them in porn"
6 people disagree!
Download updates from other users, download checksum from Microsoft secure site. Simples!
Chrome OS already does this.
@cambsukguy I always have my laptop nearby. I have a desktop in the study because it's cheaper than a laptop and a Chromebook for "around the house" because it's better than Windows. All in, I spent less than the cost of a Windows laptop with Chromebook-like performance.
My phone and tablet are always nearby but they're not as good as a laptop for many tasks.
@Yugguy 30 seconds is a long time when you want to do a search relevant to what someone has just said, or look up info on the TV show you're watching or some music you're listening to. It's long enough that you might just continue the conversation instead, or keep watching the TV show... So it might not be a problem, but it's great to have instant access to the web all the same.
"the tenements of optimisation"
Sounds like a Dickens satire on economics and inequality.
Like Chrome OS?
The "bring Windows devices back to a pristine state" equivalent on a Chromebook is the Powerwash function, which removes all users and software and brings the computer back to a clean install of the latest OS version in about a minute. Try that on Windows and it takes you far longer than that just to get to the point where you need to start applying years' worth of updates.
So selling or buying a second hand Chromebook is as easy and secure as can be, and when you log on to a new one all your settings and software are downloaded for you.
"I can't say I'm bothered about using sleep mode at this point in my life."
As a Chromebook user I ONLY bother with sleep mode. It's so reliable I never reboot unless the OS gets updated.
"My wife's Linux box comes in and out of sleep mode in seconds"
I know that feeling! After using my Chromebook, with its instant resume from sleep, it feels like an eternity waiting for Linux to come back to life.
"My Win 10 PC boots from cold to login in something near 30 seconds - and thats without SSD. I can't say I'm bothered about using sleep mode at this point in my life."
When you have a laptop which can resume instantly it's a great addition to your living room, kitchen or anywhere! If you want to find out about a movie, do a quick bit of shopping, write an email or start a flame war in the comments section, you'll appreciate having a keyboard and multiple windows instead of using your tablet. If you had to wait 30 seconds to boot, or you couldn't rely on the PC waking up properly then you'd reach for the tablet instead, which is a poorer experience for certain use cases.
"influence/bribe our government twats to make the balance even worse"
If you want to have a government that has the power to make your life worse, and you know it will be beholden to corporations (as proven by all of history) then I can't help you. Has any corporation ever made anyone's life worse without the help of a government? On balance, have corporations made people's lives worse?
The economic policies of the rich and those in power did not decide that it should be cheaper to make stuff in China. They are as beholden to global shifts as anyone else. If you try to ignore economics you'll make everyone poor, not rich - see Venezuela.