Re: Oh well
Redditors don't have to be your audience.
1404 posts • joined 23 Mar 2010
Redditors don't have to be your audience.
Being large is important. There is a correlation between large companies and "diversity" because the laws enforcing diversity focus on large companies, and they are better able to absorb the extra costs. It actually helps them when these laws are extended to smaller companies because the bureaucratic cost of compliance and loss of productivity are harder to absorb in smaller companies. All FTSE 100 companies are on board with the "women on boards" programme despite the research showing it harms company valuations (when the requirement to appoint a woman is forced on the company - hiring women is not in itself a value-losing proposition).
@hollerith our local labour party had their preferred election candidate kicked out for being male. The whole point of diversity is to have fewer white men doing things white men have traditionally done. They can't achieve that without discriminating against white men.
Women have been encouraged by a decades long campaign to get them more interested. Now they're at 20% and retention is a problem, because when it comes down to it, they're not that interested. I don't know if you've noticed lately, but women get praise heaped upon them just for turning up, whereas men get told they're awful when women _don't_ turn up. The sexism in IT is towards men.
When teaching decides to call itself sexist and seek more men, I'll reconsider my opinion that the campaign to get more women in STEM is simply anti-male bigotry masquerading as some form of equality.
"Diversity can lead to more diverse ideas."
They're not aiming for a diversity of ideas, they want diversity in skin tone, genitalia and who people sleep with. They're fine with everyone thinking exactly the same way. If you think diversity of skin tone is irrelevant then you're diverse. And they'll sack you for it.
Think of it this way: you pay extra for a laptop with a fancy array of speakers and "Beats" licensed technology built in. Then Microsoft removes the software that controls the speakers and instead of "Beats deep bass 7.1 virtual surround" or whatever they call it, you have "Microsoft stereo audio".
Why not get rid of the software market and make OEMs put their own software on? It works well for Apple. Samnix, anyone?
This wasn't in Chrome, it was in spy-less Chromium.
Apparently it's opt-in and downloaded after the browser is installed. So you have as much right to the software as you would to any other binaries you opt to download after installing your browser.
"There, fixed it for you."
It wasn't broken, just incomplete. You completed it. But who can deny the wage gap myth, and the meddling which politicians can do in response to it, is anything but a leftist agenda.
@corinne I'm just pointing out the bias in the system. Can you imagine a situation where a politician proposes something on the basis that it will be good for men?
Of course women need time off, but the point is that men only have time off because it helps women. And women have time off because it helps women. Sure, women prefer to marry a man who earns more than them, and this means they get to be the one who gives up work. So what's your point? Are you suggesting this represents men having a choice to leave work?
@Doctor Syntax "What part of the words "open" and "rare" did you not understand?"
What part of "choice" do you not understand? If only one person can have something, the person who has first choice has an actual choice. The next person in line does not really have a choice. And it is usually the man who is second in line for the "choice" to leave work.
When a man (braver than me) says to his wife "no, dear! I will not let you stay at home, I choose to do that and you will have to go to work and support me", his wife still has the choice to stay home and have him support her, because the family courts and social conventions are on her side.
"In terms of hourly pay, yes. In terms of effective income for work performed, on the other hand..."
If someone does more unpaid work because their spouse does more paid work then the comparison is meaningless. It would make more sense to take the family as an economic unit with work divided according to the skills and desires of the family members, and measure inequality by measuring how much each member spends on themselves. For example, if women earn 80% of what men earn but spend 150% of what men spend, where should government focus its policies in order to achieve equality?
Yes, women spend more of a family's disposable income than men do. That's why advertising is aimed at women and most of the men in adverts are idiots whereas the women are calm and in control almost every time. It's also why a shop's women's section is near the front door.
"The political activist in question persuaded Lib Dem and former deputy PM Nick Clegg of this and that's why the country now has paternity leave"
We get paternity leave because it will benefit women. Has there ever been a successful campaign which has emphasised a policy's benefit to men?
"House husbands do exist, the choice is open, and it's a rare enough choice."
The choice is not open though. In what family is it not the woman's prerogative to choose to work or to be a mother? The man only has the choice to support his wife from within the family or to be forced out of the family and support her via the CSA.
2 upvotes for misandry...on fathers' day?! The reason fathers work more is that they have more people dependant on them. This is HOW they care both for their children and their wives.
If I have a larger house and garden than my co-worker, and a car instead of a bicycle, and I live a 20 minute drive from the supermarket whereas he lives a 5-minute walk away, should I be paid more? Or should the time I spend cleaning the house, mowing the lawn, washing the car and going shopping UNPAID (how unfair!) not be included in any analysis of whether our employer treats us equally?
The reason unpaid labour is included is to promote the idea that women are discriminated against. Men actually do slightly more work, but women do a greater proportion of the unpaid work, so you can discover sexism by including that. If you look at the spending gap you'll see oppression of men on a huge scale, so nobody ever looks at that. Social scientists have made it their job to find sexism only against women.
Also, note that the unpaid work gap is only present in family environments. Where people live single lives the unpaid work is equal. It is only when they get married that women meet this new wall of misogyny! So this is proof that marriage is oppressive to women. End the family! But it is in family environments where the ugly misandry of the spending gap rears its head. And we don't talk about that (probably because we live in a patriarchy and male power prevents discussion of oppression in any form that is not male, or something).
So we pay more for jobs which involve danger and discomfort. And women are not prevented from doing these jobs, nor are men prevented from entering the more stable, comfortable jobs. Yet men and women make different choices! It's like women are buying a more comfortable job whereas men just go for the money and put up with the discomfort! I'm sure the sexism in that situation is solely against women, of course. It's not that in our gynocentric society men are encouraged to forgo the comforts that women seek, in order to better provide for those women, nothing like that.
By "un-mysterious"...the source code which has been supplied shows that the extension can only send data to/from 5 Google domains, and has access to the audioCapture API. You don't know the data it sends, but it's not entirely a mystery.
I don't have any automatically installed extensions on Chromium for Ubuntu, even though the latest version is 2 weeks old, which means it was built prior to Google's fix for this issue. Could it be that the guy who found the "bug" was signed in and had his extensions sync from a different system, or does Ubuntu do a better job at enforcing rules governing free software? The former sounds unlikely as the issue was only noticed after an upgrade to version 43 and the extensions "minimum chrome version" is set to 31.
"Debian, really, should remove Chrome completely."
"and it downloads mysterious executable binary blobs"
It's not a mystery though. It's the Hotword search so it's pretty clear and un-mysterious what it's doing.
Why did the "Hmm, browsing Wikipedia isn't exactly on the same level as Internet banking..." comment get downvotes? It's obvious that someone going to "https://wikipedia.com/human_rights_in_china" is not at all protected by the HTTPS protocol whereas someone going to "https://mybank.com/viewaccount" is giving away comparatively little information to their ISP and the various public authorities which watch over us.
"There's probably much more blocking going on because "You're talking what I think is bollocks..."
My experience also. For example, when WAM got their hooks into Twitter's account suspension processes a few people I follow got suspended almost immediately. None of them were harassers, they just had different opinions to the radical feminists running WAM. One woman got a permanent ban for quoting Jessica Valenti - the Twitter feminists didn't believe one of their own could say anything so stupid, so they got together and banned the messenger! Claims of "trolling" tend to be about censorship rather than safety, and a claim of harassment often turns out to be nothing more than harassment itself. The abuse problem is way overstated and shared block lists is just going to create a filter bubble within Twitter.
I do develop for local/personal usage (on Windows, Linux and Chrome OS, always on the stable channel), and I also have extensions in the store. I run extensions from .crx and from source files on all platforms, without going through the web store.
"Compare and contrast with the competition"
In Google's case you can develop and release extensions for free outside the Chrome Web Store but there are no automatic updates. How's that a contrast?
The exception is that Chrome on Windows will disable and then prompt you to re-enable any extensions from outside the web store each time you restart the browser. How does Safari for Windows handle it?
...that this is a way to make extension developers charge for their wares and give Apple their 30% cut? Google charges $5 for a lifetime and most of the Chrome apps and extensions are free. If devs had to recoup $100/year they might be inclined either to leave or to take advantage of the payments platform.
Just yesterday they announced a massive racist and sexist funding programme for startups ($125 million IIRC), and they announced a racist and sexist hiring and advancement programme ($300+ million) a few months ago. If they cut out the racist and sexist programmes maybe they wouldn't have to sack so many people. As an anti-racist and anti-sexist I am pleased to see a racist, sexist company failing, and will not buy or promote any more of their products. I am pleased to play a part in their downfall!
BIOS, keyboard, storage, drivers. Chromebooks are exactly the wrong choice for someone who doesn't want Chrome OS!
MTS support was introduced a few OS versions ago, so that would explain the iphone suddenly working when plugged in. It's read-only at the moment, with a new update due soon.
There are some decent radio players on the store for you to paste your stream link into, but I had no problem running that radio station (or any other) from its website.
Please stop telling us how long a Chromebook takes to boot! It's so stable that you only need to reboot when you get a new OS update every 6 weeks or so. The rest of the time you can use sleep and resume like a tablet, which works almost instantly.
That's what apparently happens with paid accounts. For the free space what's meant to happen is that you can't upload any more files, but can access everything you already have. Once you delete a file, you can't re-use the space.
Other (older?) MBA keyboards have symbols for Shift, Tab, delete etc whereas the one you linked to uses words. So whether Chromebooks use words or symbols, they are copying Apple. Similarly, Apple has at times gone with 2 keys to the left of the Z but there is 1 key on the model you linked to. And they have used 2 different orientations for the Enter key. Chromebooks are ripping off their design nomatter what they do!
On the other hand, Toshiba's touchpad has square corners at the bottom and rounded at the top, the MBA has rounded all round. The MBA has 4 keys to the left of the spacebar whereas the Chromebook has 2, Chromebook has no Caps Lock, the brightness controls are in a different place, there are no f1-f10 keys on a Chromebook, it has Backspace instead of delete... But it does have ABC- all the way to Z, which Apple has been using for decades (we can ignore that Apple uses upper-case whereas Toshiba uses lower-case). Definite copy!
Chrome is moving away from this. You can install a packaged extension on Chrome for Windows but it will be disabled automatically when you restart Windows. There's even a warning if you have a non-packaged extension installed (ie. running from source code), suggesting you disable it. And when you install a non-store extension it won't automatically install on all your computers (I'm not sure if it ever did).
"Love the irony..."
I've never forgotten a password, because I have a password manager. I don't see the irony there. The point is that an easy to guess "security" question makes the password weak, nomatter how long it is, so the answer to the question has to be something which can't be guessed, and your father's name should be different on every site just like your password is. That requires a password manager...and that's the irony! Instead of having 1 high-entropy string to remember, you have 2.
That would help some of the 38% of Koreans. And Londoners, Parisians, Romans, Dubliners, Los Angelinos,......
"Why does the answer even have to relate to the question?"
My father's middle name has 200 bits of entropy, constantly changes, and is stored in my password manager.
Why would a company want customers who are likely to forget their password anyway?
Would you like some time away to check your facts?
"Running away when shot"
"*Not actually* grabbing for an officers weapon"
"4 cops on the back of a man"
"kneel on his neck"
"until he not only passes out"
"continue until he is brain dead"
"once cold you call for an ambulance"
"if you remove them via the GUI in Chrome itself they just re-appear next time Chrome is launched"
No they don't. Chrome will uninstall extensons from all synced instances and there is no API for installing an extension. There is a way to create a shortcut-style app from within an extension, but that won't create ad-injectors.
The "problem" is not sexism (against non-males), it is that the male brain is more inclined to be interested in the sort of thing Google needs people to be interested in. By ignoring that, they are actively promoting sexism against the group most likely to want to work for them.
Publishing is 75% female. Any complaints? Teaching is 80% female. Do they need anonymous recruiting policies? Medical students are 70% female. Great News! Undergraduates are 60% female. You Go Girl! Software is 75% male. HOLD EVERYTHING AND HELP THE WOMENS!!1! Men are complaining about sexism? Shut up manbaby!
Diversity is about your experiences and aptitudes, not your skin, your genitals or who you sleep with.
However, if Google wants to down the road to bigot town, they need to INCREASE their number of white people - they are under represented by about 17% - and sack some Asians.
It's hard to find reviews for software not in an app store. Where would your blacklist be, and who would control it?
I'd like to see a Venn diagram of "people who think all 3rd party applications should be able to install drivers and rootkits, read any file and connect to the internet silently" and "people who don't trust their data in the cloud".
"Diehard IE users may lose other functionality that they've grown accustomed to, as well."
IE ships with Windows 10 so IE users will not lose anything.
Why would you expect them to listen to you? You're not a customer. You're not even saying "if you release something with nothing new on it I'll buy it," you're saying" I will not buy anything new because what I've got already works." Of course they won't listen.
"control the store" is spot on! But they had very little chance of doing that when they were up against Google's store offering users the ability to start a game on a phone or tablet and complete it on their console (and only buy the game once). When I first heard of this Android console my first thought was "that's a good idea, I'll wait until there is an Android console which supports Google Play and the games I already own". They thought the "Android" word would attract customers, but customers want "Ecosystem".
If this is the only way to save Windows Phone and this will kill the patient, then Windows Phone is already dead. The faster they recognise that the better. Resurrect the Nokia X and they can at least save Microsoft's services!
The main issue for Microsoft and others implementing Android variants is that Google's is the popular version and developers for that platform use Play Services APIs. But, as Google went to great expense to prove, an API cannot be copyrighted. So, with a bit of lag which we expect of Android OEMs anyway, Microsoft can copy all the functionality Google implements (apparently the cloud infrastructure supporting the APIs is the hard bit, but MS should be well placed to cope with that). In short, if Google moves the goalposts it can cause MS to miss the goal, but only by making Play Services users miss at the same time. And they won't do that.
She can fondle those too!