I've read the anarchist cookbook. I came away with the distinct impression than anyone trying to use it for more than minor mischief was more likely to blow themselves up than anyone else. Some of the recipes were shockingly and obviously dangerous to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of chemistry.
1683 posts • joined 17 Mar 2010
Gotta hand it to him
I have as low an opinion of phishers and scammers as the next guy, but I've got to respect someone who can pull this off. Granted some gullibility of the jailers helped, but still it's a good bit of scam work.
Those who don't learn from history....
Apparently Apple doesn't. Will we have to wait 5 years after iOS malware is in the wild behind the walls of the garden for them to admit such software exists like we did with Macs?
Re: NSFW flag or different pic needed
It's a factual example that includes nudity, though admittedly mild. Very few workplaces are OK with employees viewing such things at work. On top of that, I work for a school district, so the standards are even stricter than usual. Articles are ok so long as they don't interfere with my work. A picture of several bare butts, not so much.
NSFW flag or different pic needed
Had my boss been walking by when I opened that I'd have been in trouble.
Hold the downvotes and hear me out.
The research isn't there. I know this. Some valid research on cannabis as a cancer cure has been done, but the results are too preliminary and the sample groups too small to draw any real conclusions. But what we do have is enough to suggest that maybe we should be looking deeper into pot as a treatment. Not a cure on its own by any means, but as a possible companion to other treatments that may (emphasis on may) be able to increase effectiveness.
Re: the market doesn't always work
but this story is exactly the point, the market does work because customers demand better cheaper alternatives to what is already out there
The customers can demand all they want. If the suppliers can't make a profit on a product, or can't make as big a profit on a new product as they are on an old one, it'll never get put on shelves. One of the downfalls of a free market is that no matter how much the people may want a vaccine for the common cold* they'll never get one because there is so much money to be made from people who get a cold every year or two.
*Yes, I'm well aware of the challenges and probable impossibility around an effective rhinovirus vaccine. I'm just using it as an example.
Who'd WANT to.
First, I'd be interested to know how he thinks we're getting around the Hayflick limit without causing rampant cancer, but lets just assume they've worked that little snag out. Now the question becomes who'd want to live 500 years?
I'm not so sure I'm keen on seeing 70 years, let alone hundreds. For me to be interested in that kind of lifespan we'd have to have a post-scarcity utopian society (which, let's face it, is NEVER going to happen).
Backup to the cloud? Are you insane?
Backing up cloud services to the cloud is one thing, but backing up our on-site servers to the cloud? Yeah, that's lunacy. And make no mistake, on-site servers are in no danger of dying out. There are some server roles that it simply doesn't make sense to move to the cloud.
Plus can you imagine the headache of trying to recover from a major disaster that takes out the communication lines to your town, such as an F5 tornado, without local backups? One town in this area that got hit by one of those didn't have internet for weeks (and no decent internet for months), but the city and school systems were back up (albeit in temporary buildings) in just about 48 hours thanks to some sysadmin's quick thinking to grab the tapes on their way to the storm shelter. Had they been tied to recovering from the cloud it would have been months before all their systems were back online.
Re: Obvious question
That was my first thought, but then I realized how many places offer a senior discount. If it's legal to charge you less because you're old then it must also be legal to charge you more for being middle age as opposed to young, dumb, and full of....you get the idea.
Re: Doubly unusable if he moved the document
Unfortunately $EDITOR edited the word doc with change tracking. Then $EDITOR scribbled on a print-out with red ink. And they want me to make another pass through it and do some structural changes. So my workflow is:
1. Go through change-tracked manuscript in Word (or LibreOffice) doing accept/reject on changes (I get to veto them at this stage).
2. Go through change-tracked MS and PDF scan of hand-annotated print-out, applying handwritten changes. (Thankfully, not as many of them.)
3. Import resulting document into Scrivener and try to rebuild the book's structure and metadata by hand.
4. Retire to the pub, weeping copiously, to consider the possibility of switching to an exciting and fulfilling career as a car park attendant or a tax inspector.
That right there is enough to make me rethink my plans regarding a currently half finished tome I was considering sending off some day. I wasn't real optimistic about actually getting it published anyway, but that just sounds like a nightmare scenario.
Frankly going back to school to get a real degree (as opposed to the acting degree I left with the first time) has proven to be one of the bigger mistakes of my adult life. Turns out the rather expensive piece of paper I have now is worth significantly less than my experience in the field already was. Then again I don't have to worry about qualifying for a work visa, so I'm not quite in the same boat as you are.
All that said, SIGN THE PAPER! If you've been a sysadmin for 10 years, you still have a job, and you haven't managed to implode the server room yet odds are you're competent.
Doesn't take Hawking.
2. Artificial gravity
Rotating cylinder (old technology that, but probably more reliable than any sci-fi solution will ever be)
3. The speed of light limit
Generational ships with nuclear power. That's the key to 1 and 4.
4. The problem of dust hitting your ship when you ARE travelling faster than light. (each grain would have an impact of a Hiroshima nuke...)
Don't go relativistic speeds. Use a generational ship and take your time. If it takes 20 years to go one light year so be it. Or, failing that, we're surprisingly close to being able to produce plasma shields, which we'd probably need anyway to fend off cosmic radiation (which, frankly, is a much bigger problem than the ones you've listed).
As far as we currently know getting to another star system is impossible. Ok, that's a bit harsh, there are weird and wonderful ideas for sub-light ways of getting to another star system but all of them are so far outside our technological / manufacturing capability they might as well be impossible.
We could do it with an O'Neill Cylinder paired to an Orion drive and used as a generational ship. It'd be a big project, but it's doable with out current capabilities, if only just barely.
The fragility of the earth bound supply chains leads me to believe they simply wouldn't work on another planet where, basically, the planet is out to get you.
If we're just talking about survival hydroponics works pretty much anywhere there's water and a breathable atmosphere.
I still think Hawking's wrong about the threat AI poses. There's simply no reason an AI should risk its existence to try to take out humanity. All things being equal such an entity would be better off waiting for us to die or serving our every need until we lose our intelligence to natural selection or something.
But here he's dead on. Sooner or later life on this planet will get scrubbed down to the smallest critters again, just like it has umpteen times before. Our best bet to survive that is to be somewhere else when it happens.
Meanwhile, at the offices of the NSA
"4th Amendment? Yeah, I've seen it. I think I wiped my butt with it this morning."
And THAT, boys and girls, is why the technology department should be involved in the purchase of any mission critical computerized system.
I still smugly mutter "told you so" under my breath every time our HR people complain about the horrendously expensive system they chose to replace our aging in-house system for taking employment applications. Oh, and they did this without bothering to tell the in-house programmer that they'd tasked with creating a new one and giving me just enough time to get midway into the project. Wanna get permanently on my list? That's one real quick way.
After his lies about the food industry caused high quality ground beef to get more expensive and put a whole lot of people (including my brother-in-law) out of work I can't bring myself to feel sorry for him. .
Re: Penguins aren't tasteless, not at all.
Personally I can't think of any situation that didn't involve the threat of starving to death where I'd have been tempted to eat seagull or rat and I'm not too fond of fish either. I think I'll just take your word for it.
Technically there's no such thing as a 'salty' taste receptor. All taste receptors can pick up 'salty' flavors via the ion channels, which is a big part of why salt is so effective at enhancing certain flavors and blocking others. That being the case do penguins lack ion channels also or does the fact that they swim open mouthed through salt water to get their food just overload them?
Re: We need Judge Green again!
It is hard not to conclude that there is a "gentlemen's" agreement between the large Telcos to avoid a competitive push for higher speed connections.
Not really. Upgrading infrastructure is expensive, more so than just building new infrastructure sometimes, and if they charged enough to cover their costs they'd lose customers to the competition. As such they gain no competitive advantage by upgrading past a certain point.
Verizon's CEO told Congress that the market was satisfied with the current slow speeds and that their was little demand for higher speeds.
The market IS satisfied with current internet speeds for the most part. Remember, it's dominated by people who don't know any better and think that a 20m downstream is fast.
Kinda sad actually
When you've got 4 competitors offering the same thing, one of them is Google, and all four are in the running for best (and worst) offering it's really kinda crap all around.
As if I needed another reason not to like the current administration...
you dont understand scientists!!! They said there was NO CHANCE of earth-like planets, until they got observable proof they existed!!
No reputable scientist has said that since Edwin Hubble spied Andromeda through a telescope, possibly before. The fact that there are other galaxies out there put a huge question mark over all the theories about this solar system being somehow unique 70 years before we observed our first exoplanet.
Re: More likely
I'm aware of that. Personally I think it was most likely some astronomical phenomenon. An artificial signal at that power level seems extremely unlikely.
They'll catch a chunk of the transmission with one of their radio telescopes before their planetary rotation moves the dish out of the reception area. Some alien astronomer will circle the data on a printout and write "Wow!" (in their language, of course) and then publish it. Unfortunately they'll neither get the full message nor have an understanding of Earth languages to make sense of it even if they do manage to decode it. Their entire civilization will then spend a year or two going "What the hell was that?" before it's forgotten by everyone except their nerds and conspiracy nuts. Hey, it could happen.
Internet theme song already exists
You know you know it. Sing it with me now....
The internet is for porn
The internet is for porn
Grab your **** and double click for porn, porn, porn
(It seems an appropriate counter to a censorship anthem to me.)
The system is broken
The wiretaps are CLEARLY in violation of the 4th Amendment. You'd have a hard time finding a Constitutional scholar who'd say otherwise. The fact that the judge can dismiss the suit and claim state secrets is just wrong.
I am Jack's impotent rage.
Kanye's openning an online shoe store? Right, adding yeezy.supply to my blacklist now....
Re: I don't follow
Did this idiot post a countdown featuring 100th of a second? Or is it a ridiculous way of saying "February 19th, 21 minutes past 11 in the morning"?
You say that as if there's anything too ridiculous for Kanye West.
I'm guessing that what happened is that Microsoft's lawyers looked the case over and said "Hey boss? If we do this we're going to lose these patents." After all Microsoft has quite a few patents that are downright laughable (my typical example being the patent on deleting files).
I can see it now...
Some dude kicks the robotic dog and it goes all nerd-bot rage on him. I've been saying AI will have no reason to wipe out humanity, but you just gave them one: them 'humans are dicks' factor.
I'd be amazed if anyone can come up with an economic model that'll predict all that lot...
Realistically economic models in general suck at accurately predicting disruptive changes. It's those pesky, irrational humans always throwing things off.
Well it's an interesting alternative to the broken approach of raising minimum wage. I'm not sure if it'd work any better, but I do know that the end result of raising the minimum wage is that within 5-10 years you've got more people not making enough to get by. I will note, however, that at least in this area the people who don't work at all would not be much of a minority, if a minority at all.
Eh, no worries
So, basically, this is either a trojan that has to be run as root (in which case, who in their right mind runs strange software as root) or spreads via SSH attacks by brute forcing their way into root (in which case who in their right mind runs SSH on the default port and doesn't prevent root logins).
Nothing to see here. Move along.
I don't think the fact that we haven't detected alien life is puzzling at all. The costs of interstellar travel are such that it's never going to be something done lightly, despite what sci-fi writers seem to think and the signals coming from those planets would be very hard to identify.
Consider this for a second: We've had the technology, or at least the theory for it and capability to build for those theories, needed to build successful a generational ship for interstellar travel for 50 years now (the key technologies being the Orion drive and the O'Neill cylinder) and no ones even considered doing it because it would be ludicrously expensive. When you start talking about ships that could make the trips in sane time frames the costs get even higher thanks to the absolutely absurd energy requirements (not to mention disastrous side effects like causing gamma ray bursts).
As for the signals, we actually do have one or two signals we've picked up that could potentially have come from alien radio telescopes, but identifying them as such with any certainty is basically impossible.
Basically I don't believe we'll ever visit other stars until Earth is in danger of being destroyed, and then I think we'll do it once and only once. The only way around it is if we somehow figure out how to make stable wormholes, but I've doubts about that to.
A quick search shows that you are wrong. Most of them were Linux OS compromises. See www.zone-h.org/news/id/4737
Perhaps you should read the article in its entirety. And I quote...
We were talking about local kernel exploits, but the first problem is in the website code.
From the results one outcome is clear – code developer teams and webserver admins are still living in two distinct worlds. And if something is not working properly, their answer is that this is most likely the other side’s fault. While this “fight” continues, the defacement count still grows up.
And also, as Androgynous Cupboard pointed out, that article is very out of date. It's a 4 year old article discussing a Linux kernel vulnerability from 7 years ago.
Re: Wow..... just look at all the hate.
Meh, run what you want. As I've often mentioned I've a habit of telling people who shouldn't be running Linux (gamers, students, and the terminally technophobic) to stick with Windows.
But when it comes to Windows on RasPi though I find myself scratching my head and wondering why anyone would do that. Low power machines like this are one of the biggest areas where Linux really shines as well as one of the worst areas where Windows historically falls down. It's not hate so much as confusion.
Just look at website defacement stats and then divide by market share. You are far more likely to be compromised these days running a Linux server stack than a Windows one.
And here I thought that particular breed of ignorance was extinct in this day and age. Here's an education: OS and even web server software are pretty much non-issues for website defacement. Every major web server software, be it IIS, Apache, NGinix, or any of the various Java based servers (ie Tomcat) can be locked down so tight that the NSA would be jealous of their security.
When you actually dig into the statistics and look at how the attacks were accomplished it turns out that almost all of them came in either through a misconfiguration or through SQL injection. In other words bad administrators and web developers are to blame, not the OS or application.
Ok, admittedly MS has made huge strides on improving their security, but they're a long ways from security being a reason that you choose Windows. And the most secure for IoT? Yeah, not even close. That would be BSD, with Linux as a close second and Windows still closing the gap.
It still has supporters? Actual supporters and not just clueless folks who install whatever their computer says it wants? Are you sure?
Re: "As a Christian and Scientist"
A fan of Fisher I see, but you should realize the most recent assessments suggest Fisher was the one whose data suffered from cherry picking and bias, not Mendel's. Fisher's claims against Mendel have been shown to have been completely unfounded. Plus the fact that Mendel came to the correct conclusions 30 years before anyone else came close pretty much vindicates him. But don't take my word for it. See for yourself.
Re: Atheist philosophers but agnostic physicists
I would agree with that statement because physicists (or good scientists in general) tend to be rather agnostic. You can't predict, reproduce, or prove your god? Well in that case your religious theory remains unconfirmed. Next theory please.
I agree completely. I've gotten to the point that I simply roll my eyes and move on whenever someone starts talking about how science "proves God doesn't exist". I've given up trying to explain how it's not actually possible to do that and why good science ignores the question of God's existence entirely.
If Google's ads are going to get through now then what's the point of Adblock? Might as well uninstall it.
In a less-painful scenario, we end up with billions of humans out of work as drudgery is replaced by machines.
Such a scenario could well result in a post-scarcity economy wherein no one actually had to work anymore to survive. In which case the billion-range unemployment numbers wouldn't matter.
And yes, I'm well aware that that's a pie-in-the-sky dream of a best case scenario, but it's also far more likely in the real world than Terminator.
Got any facts to back up that wild supposition?
Dunno if AC does, but I can back it up with anecdotal observations. My Galaxy S2 has outlasted every iPhone anyone I know bought around the same time, and that's with mine being second hand and theirs being new. A couple of them have had to replace their iPhones twice in the time I've had this thing, and I probably won't be replacing mine for at least a couple more years.
Besides, a little logical thought can prove it even without cases to site. The most likely part of any mobile device to fail is, by far, the battery. Sooner or later it's going to stop holding a charge, usually much sooner than the rest of the components stop working. Given that one fact a replaceable battery alone almost ensures than a Samsung (and almost any other Android device) will have a longer life expectancy than an iPhone.
you can't go just lying to investors
Clearly you haven't been paying attention.
Improving acceleration at that level without touching the hardware? All I can say to that is "Wow".
Re: If they ever do a live-action version of the Simpsons...
Worst. Pornster. Ever.
Should be jail time
If you walked up to a woman in a public space and ripped her clothes off you'd be going to prison. Revenge porn is only marginally less reprehensible than that would be.