It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of assholes. erm, "guys".
506 posts • joined 13 Mar 2010
It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of assholes. erm, "guys".
Yes, they singlehandedly got a grip on their needs.
It's a good faith deletion, and you can rest assured that it will be most thoroughly deleted from the place where you know it to be.
Fix your nomenclature. It isn't an 'untidy desk'; your desk is a 'Horizontal Filing System', and the issues you are dealing with are fragmentation and indexing. Just remember, some FS's are better than others at coping with it. You may or may not need a wetware update, but if retrieval is acceptable, the correct resolution to the issue is to ignore it as in all probability, you have other issues that demand more attention, which may include getting a higher score in nethack.
This from a tech who told a manager "I'll be happy to give your issue all the attention it deserves". I hung up the phone, and we were both happy -- for different reasons, of course.
That's reassuring. I had thought that the builders of trucks and airplanes were more sane than auto manufacturers. My faith in universal corporate stupidity has been restored! Now I can sleep at night. Wait a minute...
Not exactly. In a just and well-run world, they'd shut off services that yield marginal benefits, are excessively expensive, or that haven't been proved to actually work.
I kill me, I really do. If your politics work like they do in the US, shutting off those sorts of things would stop the flow of cash to their pockets or their crony's pockets. They'll just take the page out of the 0bama playbook, threaten to shut down all sorts of essential services, and hire new sentries in order to block the public from using facilities that don't cost anything to erect, and cost nothing to maintain. After all, being a heel pays big dividends and with the press in your back pocket, unlikely to generate a backlash.
Don't believe me? Google 'obama blocks world war 2 memorial'.
now our Marines need to hitch rides on other nation's ships. Embarrassing, really.
You'll have to excuse me while I laugh and mock the statement: "... there is no reason that a political appointee, if supported by competent and experienced civil service executives, cannot be quite successful as director."
In other words, competence and experience isn't a requirement for a job that's essentially a payoff. If the job is truly a sinecure, wholly redundant, then she shouldn't have been given enough power to get into trouble. While the realist in me understands that she was placed there to oversee the ideological purge, in a sane universe, she shouldn't also purge the competent and experienced employees in order to preserve her pathetic and incompetent ass. She's been hoist by her own petard, and man, is that funny.
In other words, a political hack of such imbecility that basic IT behavior like the "extreme measures" mentioned are actually viewed as extreme measures.
Given that most of the Administration didn't have a problem with the Secretary of State using her own personal email server until it was politically advantageous, not a surprise. The only surprise I have is that there isn't more of this. They're too ignorant to know they've been hacked. Surprised they haven't retaliated on the people that found and reported the pwnage.
My guess is that security firm will never work in DC again.
Thanks to our fine government, solving imaginary problems by replacing them with real ones since the start.
I propose the length of time to be in 'KardshianMarriages" -- that's a reasonably long period when talking about seasons.
I'll go away now.
However, part of the workflow for changing them should involve a life-threatening beating for the 5 top officers/wage earners in the company. If the need surpasses their unwillingness to be beat within an inch of their life, then the change is necessary and should go in.
Nice try, but I doubt that they will learn the lesson. Not when they can socialize the costs and privatize the profits.
Using the Gateway 2000 AnyKey keyboard. A thing of programmable beauty, good for many fun pranks when I worked for the CowCompany.
Truly disgusting. Sadly, in the US, we can't claim any moral distinction, given that we have the Kardashians on TV, whose only difference between this utter scum and themselves is that they have enough animal cunning to parley what should be utter humiliation into a fortune. Yeccch.
Better calm down, Walter. You're lathering again.
Gina transcends evil. This is setting up to be an epic mugging of the Company.
Anyone that wishes to stop animal testing should either volunteer to be a test subject, or be called out for the hypocrite they are..
Lends a whole new layer to the term "trigger foods".
Now I know she's the One for me.
Pity that I'm already married and all.
I want more of her, as well. She was brilliant. Evil, too. Bastard needs this to keep him in line.
I want Barbie to do my laptop servicing.
You are not the only one. She slams my doors, too.
Excellent advice. People have to understand that if a record company made an artist a millionaire, it's because they made themselves billionaires.
That's how "crony capitalism" works. Crony capitalism works by taking money and power from the people in order to award it to the politically connected. If you understand that pattern, you may find that your politics may be challenged.
I love your sweeping generalisation that all exe's are bad. I work as a sysadmin, and trolls like you are why I have to first zip exe's using weird compression, rename them to .tiff, open with a hex editor and insert 1029 bytes of tiff file information at the top, just so I can transfer a file, remove the 1029 bytes, rename to whatever zip format and uncompress them and do my job. Pray to whatever gods you believe in that I never discover what kind of car you drive, where you eat, or where you sleep. Revenge is a dish best served totally unbeknownst to the target.
For most of the executroids I know of, the definition of a "zero day exploit" is any and all zero day exploits ranging back to Jan 1, 1970. Power hath its privileges, but is certainly unaffected by the learning curve.
I can't believe you actually put these words in a sentence: "politicians are left with no choice but to do the right thing."
The only way politicians will do that is if you hold a gun to their head.
In other news, similar logic has determined the length of the Chinese emperor's nose. http://imaginatorium.org/stuff/nose.htm
*REAL* scientists measure stuff. This is just another entry for the dictionary in the "bullshitology" section.
You and I look at the same thing and see two different things. Yes, I have no doubt that your contributions are ignored, and even that they claim it is because you're female. There's a lot that goes into that sort of workplace idiocy, and drawing the conclusion that it's really, truly because of your feminine genitalia is self-defeating. It actually hands the tools to defeat your spirit to the people most likely to use them to take advantage of you.
The same jerks that ignore your contributions are ignoring the Pakistani guy because of his skin color, the Indian guy because of his accent, and the self-educated person from a poor family because "he's not one of us", as Eleanor Roosevelt put it so well. I'd say that a business that actually respects its IT talent is a one-in-a-million thing.
What you're really saying when you express frustration with the way things are, is that you want to live in a world without assholes. No kidding. Me, too! Some days, it's schadenfreude that gets me to go to work, other days, it's my morbid curiosity, and frequently, it's a combination of both.
There's no reason to leave IT because you've struck asshole -- if you went elsewhere, I can assure you that you will find assholes there as well. Just study the situation, learn from it, and remember, that until you are in charge, you have to abide by the idiosyncrasies of the people that are. Also remember, that being "in charge" doesn't mean "management" -- team members are often even stupider.
Well, nobody said life was fair. At least the newly un-hobbled man has a chance that didn't exist before.
The problem is how or whether to "fix" unfairness. Using governmental intervention to fix unfairness isn't a slippery slope; it's a precipice. Sure, things like affirmative action opened doors in many places for many people -- but the problem is that once outside forces start to dictate winners and losers, the system gets perverted and abused.
First off; the concept "there aren't enough women in computing, so we must do something about it" has its foundation in the (erroneous) concept that women are somehow inferior in their ability to seek and obtain IT work, and therefore need "help" getting into it. I have tried for years to get my daughters into IT -- despite the attractions of it, they don't want to. Never mind that they are currently working for peanuts -- they just aren't attracted to the field. This in spite of the fact that I have connections that can get them into a well-compensated part of the biz.
It isn't a lack of a desire for joining the anorak set -- the multiple "just so" explanations that a programmer has to be some pimply-faced basement-dweller seem ludicrous in this situation. They just don't want to.
Word to the "feminists" out there -- the moment you state that legislation/external encouragement is needed in order to bring "parity" to the number of women in IT is the moment that you have stated that women as a whole* are not able to fairly compete in an equal marketplace, and are insulting the brilliant women who have proven their skills before you. An equal opportunity hire, IMO, is an Orwellian term for "incompetent, but we hired her because it looks nice", dilutes the amount of salary available for men and women with actual skills, and demeans the women in IT who are actually talented.
* note: I would never make that statement. Some are, some aren't. It all depends upon the individual.
It's even worse than I'd imagined.
Every time I read where someone wants me to "horde" something, I print it, and save it with my stash of such things. I'm preserving a large collection of them. A "hoard", if you will.
Exactly. The entire identity theft industry is predicated on the stunning negligence in using someone else's numbering system as a financial identity. (It began as stunning ignorance, but morphed into stunning negligence as people became aware of all the places it is being misused.) In a sane world, the only thing a social security number thief should be able to do is collect your benefit and pay your taxes.
Not sure how you could avoid using a credit card number for financial purpose, though.
the rest of Bikini Bottom.
Any discussion of guns draws out the nutters on both sides.
Nice article, Lewis, thanks for trying to keep the discussion reasonable.
With a duration measured in 'kardashians', no doubt.
You're spot on. It's poor choices that engender hunger in the US. I've seen the shopping carts of the "hungry" EBT-wielders in the US. If I ate trash like that, I'd weigh 500 lbs, too, and couldn't afford 21 meals a week at that rate, either. The problem is that when you take the social obligation away from charity, then it gets viewed as an entitlement, rather than something to help a person to make it to self-sufficiency. Entitlements get spent in the same way lottery winnings do.
I don't think there is any way to turn social spending of this nature into something that accomplishes its actual stated purpose -- much like prisons that create criminals out of those unfortunate enough to find themselves on the wrong side of the law, it's a "feel-good" non-remedy that gets politicians elected.
Activism is a profession in and of itself. The best activists embrace causes that will not go away, and often contribute to prolonging them, either intentionally, or through the profound ignorance that seems to be job requirement number one for activists. Activism makes an excellent, lucrative profession, with great benefits and public notoriety.
"Poverty" and "Inequality" are the hot ones these days. Poverty has been redefined in the western world to equal the bottom 10% of the local economy, much like inequality has been redefined as being the 99%. Neither will ever go away -- it takes an absolute moron to believe that through some action, they can change 10% into some other number, and an even greater moron to believe that they should make the attempt in spite of the body of evidence proving that with very few, and limited exceptions, *all* past efforts at doing this have failed. By definition, the bottom 10% will always be the bottom 10%. There will always be morons who can't figure that out. The good news for the activists is that by trying to "fix" poverty and inequality, whole new groups of disadvantaged will be created.
Nowhere in the non-first world, are the "poor" graced with computers, cellphones, and cars. They are instead graced with actual hunger. Not the first-world hunger, either, where a morbidly obese person, eating enough overpriced pre-prepared trash at one meal for seven humans, complains that they have to skip one meal a week -- in my unlearned opinion, that just means they need to skip 5 more before they get back to the right weekly caloric intake. Regardless, that seems to be the latest activist rallying cry: "We have to do something about the "hungry" in the US and the UK! It's somehow your fault if you work and pay taxes! Do this right away, before you can think it over!!" It'll be a cold day in hell that I'll feel sorry for a morbidly obese person going hungry. It isn't poor finances that makes them that way, but poor choices, and given that while intelligence is a finite quantity, stupidity has been proven infinite, I don't see a way to eliminate poor choices other than by paying a bounty to idiots to get sterilized.
Our media is clear full of bullshit "documentaries" trying to get you to buy their stupid arguments -- anybody with an IQ over room temperature should be able to figure out that they are the modern day descendant's of Phineas T. Barnum's freak show, out there titillating the masses for pay and notoriety.
If you want to improve society, my best advice is that whenever you see an "activist", punch them in the teeth. (figuratively speaking)
I took a friend who came from actual poverty ($200/month income in 2001) to a US McDonald's, where we watched a woman scarf down three supersized adult meals, fries, ice cream and all. The best part? She had a Diet Coke with it. Apparently, a Diet Coke is a kind of talisman, that you can wave at a 9,000 calorie meal, and have it turn into nothing. Just so you know, like most talismans, it didn't work. I bet she was over 450 lbs. That's not counting her large family (avoirdupoisally, rather than numerically speaking). Needless to say, my companions were amazed by it.
(The only talisman I know of that actually works is my Aluminum Baseball Bat of Pain, which brings on pain.)
While the conclusion that economics is not being treated as a science raises a good point, this loosely edited collection of paranoia and non sequiturs "sense makes none it does, with alacrity and much alarm."
Read that as "Lana Ikea". Was briefly amused at the thought of all humanity wandering about in the bowels of a cosmically huge assemble-it-your-sorry-arsed-self furniture store. Briefly, mind you.
Do you suppose they'd have cat pictures as well? ...and what would Latin LOLCatSpeak be like? Enquiring minds would like to know.
My guess is they used either some solvent or other chemical action to break the gold and silver up, and later precipitate them out...
Just wondering -- when gold is in solution in mercury, and the mercury is boiled off, what size the gold particles are. That technology's been around a long, long, long time.
I don't call a spade a spade. I call it a BLT -- Beancounter Liberation Tool.
Id, of course, doesn't liberate the beancounters -- it liberates me from them.
Why, thank you, Don Jefe. Your post was deliciously insane, and like all true masters of the craft, I cannot tell whether you are serious or not.