Is the Internet not allowed in your city?
607 posts • joined 10 Mar 2010
Is the Internet not allowed in your city?
It's a form of copy protection.
One would hope that the police would require more evidence than the victims accusation to go to court, at the very least records showing the IP used to upload the images and records associating that IP to the suspect. Or perhaps text messages/emails to the victim saying they were going to do it.
I think in many caaes though the ass hats uploading the pictures admit to it when challenged by police.
Not really, since the industry will simply make up statistics to prove that it's still a problem and the draconian laws they want are needed. You can use statistics to prove anything, 40 percent of people know that.
In my opinion it's all been downhill since Visual Studio 2008.
I'm not really a developer but I tinker occasionally, perhaps it's down to me because I use it so rarely but I find that Visual Studio 2010 and 2013 seem like they had more time spent on making them look shiney than on making them useful or straight forward to use.
I agree, perhaps the point I didn't get across was that I think El Reg (and probably other media) are misreporting this as being about pay when it isn't.
None of the quotes in the article imply the drivers are unhappy about being paid less then the tech workers, so is that really what they're unhappy about.
I suspect the working conditions may be what they're actually complaining about, and while there may be some problems the fact that you live too far away from your job to go home at night is hardly the fault of your employer. If you want to live closer to your work either change home or change job.
If they really are complaining about getting paid less than tech workers at Facebook, then they need someone to tell them to stop being bloody silly. You can't legitimately complain your pay is different to someone doing a totally different job. It's the same stupidity you see in a lot of the arguments about pay disparity between men and women, in many of the cases I've see reported of women complaining they get paid less than men in their company they are not comparing their pay to men doing the same job. (Not to say their isn't any gender discrimination in any workplaces, just that people are not always making realistic assessment of the situation).
@localzuk presumably to prevent the clients from executing this vulnerability against a DC.
Buying smart devices for employees instead of doing BYOD, particularly if you already provide them with feature phones, is largely common sense but something lots of organisations don't do partly due to costs but mostly due to politics. These days entry level smartphones cost the same or less than a basic feature phone from many corporate mobile network providers so cost is much less of an issue, it's really mostly down to the politics of the managers at what ever level used to be allowed smart phones when they were expensive not wanting all the drones to seem like they have fancy shiny gadgets now to.
Using these lovely (but utterly pointless) buzzword acronyms of COYD and COPE, perhaps those managers can be beaten round to allowing, since we all know how managers like buzzwords.
Could this be a rather shrewd long term plan?
Get rid of Elop and any other staff they didn't really want, and get paid a huge sum for it.
Then a few years later start making nice Android devices with typical Nokia design and styling.
If they still have the talent pool available that created things like the N900 and never released N950, then they could produce some very interesting Android phones.
That does make me wonder how it might of been with James May presenting though.
"They now include quite a few simulations"
As do Cisco qualifications, the problem with these however is the virtual lab tests only support 1 accepted method of achieving the result even if there are other routes or commands that are just as valid to use, in IT there are always multiple ways to do the same job.
"Can anyone tell me the orbital velocity of the spacecraft around the comet"
What do you mean, an African or European spacecraft?
"What's happening is the same as with cars - not many people even know what's is under the bonnet these days. There's no need -- many never even check the basics as the annual service will sort it."
I like the analogy but the flaw in it is that most people pay someone with training to service their car annually how many do this for their PC?
Most people will, if their car starts behaving weirdly or doing something it didn't do before, will seek professional advice, how many do this for their PC (before it's too late)?
Most people will, if they get someone knocking at their front door claiming to be from the garage and have come to service their car because it has a fault, when they hadn't called a garage about it, won't just hand over their keys. How many people fall victim to pop up ads, emails or even this spate of phone calls claiming their PC has a virus and needs looking at, just click here or type in this address to let us in to fix it?
The problem is, people don't view the things they access with their PC as "real" be it their email or their bank account, it's just on the computer so it's OK.
The answer to 2,2b and 4 is use something like MailScanner on your edge mail transport, drop all exes and zips, the AV scan it does on the rest should take care of the rest including PDFs but you could drop them to if you want since MailScanner will notify the users when it's blocked their attachments, so they can ask you to release it if it's a false positive.
The answer to 1 and 3 are the same. Who cares? Put the most acceptable AV of your choice on end user machines for some protection but have them keep all their work on a file server. If their PC gets infected nuke it, re-image and away you go.
In a well managed and backed up environment viruses and malware are rarely more than a bit of a nuisance. The bigger security problem is educating and preventing your users for falling for phishing mails and the like.
Are you really accusing the above post of being racist?
Dewey is generally correctly pronounced "Dew ee" or even "Du ee" rather than "Jewy" (there is an audible difference if you enunciate properly, you don't get Jew on your grass on a cold morning). It is a real surname and is Welsh in origin.
Also I'm not sure that playing on the semi-accurate stereotype of Jews working in the legal and financial sectors can be considered anti-Semitic. Unless you consider working in the legal and financial sectors to be a bad thing.
Besides which the entire post is clearly a joke on the theme of phishing email. Reading racism into it says more about you than it does about the poster.
IANAL but I suspect the legality of this, from a data protection point of view, may be taken care of Twitter's own terms and conditions that you agree to by signing up and using the service, I would imagine there is a clause in their about consenting to third party apps reading and processing your posts.
As far the Samaritans being classified as a data processor, the only information they handle is a Twitter ID which is not necessarily identifiable to a real person and the content of their tweets which again don't necessarily contain personally identifiable data.
Whether they can be considered a data processor for processing publicly published data on the basis that some fool might tweet under their real name and tweet their home address I'm not sure.
Not sure it counts as being outed if it wasn't actually a secret.
Tim seems to be more of a "oh yeah btw I'm gay" sort than a "I'M QUEER AND I'M HERE!" sort.
Is there really much of a market for porn on blu-ray? I'd be very surprised if so, the uptake of Blu-ray very Did in mainstream media is still slow.
"If it's not on a search engine, it does not exist."
Hardly a 100% accurate statement. It may be true of information on small sites and blogs etc, but if I want to find a story on the BBC news site or on El Reg I don't Google it I go to that website and use their own search feature.
"I built something that fits on your wrist, and you don't need a phone to make it work,"
So you built a smart device that runs apps, connects to a mobile network and makes phone calls that goes on your wrist. What you've got there Mr AM is a phone, with a strap (sorry, cuff) on it.
So what you're telling us is, you've made a phone "and you don't need a [another] phone to make it work,"
Congratulations on this groundbreaking work, no longer will we all need to a second phone to make our first phone work.
"What you do instead is bend the fibre to tap it."
" you'd likely have to shave off the cladding.
This is not impossible"
Am I the only one who read the article and/or has seen the inside of deep ocean cable before?
Aside from the fact that those heavily armoured, extremely thick, multi-layered cables of fibre, poly and steel will have a limited amount of bend in them (which may not be sufficient bend for this type of tap) you're still having to cut through the high voltage electrical feed to get to fibre pairs where you've bent it.
Assuming that there's redundancy in those electrical cables and cutting them at one side for your splice doesn't take out one or more repeaters you've still got the danger and inherent problems in cutting through a live high voltage cable, whether that be a diver under the water or inside a hypothetical winch equipped submarine.
Don't worry, little Bobby Tables will patch it for you.
While I agree with the sentiment of your post, it would be worth pointing out that the article author didn't say to ignore the rules or the insurance, only not to bother getting a licence.
Assuming that you had insurance, and were flying responsibly beyond all the required distances from people, buildings and "congested areas" I think it's highly unlikely you'll be prosecuted.
Unless of course something goes wrong and you crash and injure someone, but I doubt having the necessary CAA licence would make the slightest difference in that event, you would likely be prosecuted with similar results regardless.
As an aside, it would be eminently sensible for the rules (or lack there of) regarding the sale of drones to be changed, depending on what the CAA do with their new regulations on the matter.
It wouldn't seem unreasonable to me that you should have to prove, or at least complete a form stating, you hold the necessary licence before being allowed to buy one.
While ignorance of the law is never an excuse as such, the fact that you can walk into high street stores (Maplin did sell the DJI Phantoms) and buy one would not make the average buy think a licence or insurance are required, anymore so than they would be when buying a toy remote control car.
I recently bought a new car (of the normal road-going variety) and was unsurprisingly asked for my driving licence before being allowed to drive off in it, I'm not sure there's any law requiring that but if not there should be.
Indeed, there are a great many users of analog FM receivers however the vast majority are those listening in cars.
An uptake in mobile manufacturers including DAB in their devices may well reduce that number however as cars with built in Bluetooth music streaming and/or 3.5mm Aux in connectors is on the rise, not to mention replacement head units for older cars with Bluetooth/Aux in being substantially cheaper than those with DAB.
Another good plan for the BBC to increase uptake of DAB would be to produce (ok contract out and re-badge) cheaper DAB units for cars.
DAB has one inherent flaw that digital terrestrial TV didn't, the cost to consumers to upgrade.
There is a difference between the rights of an individual and the rights of a corporate entity. Sometimes this is a good thing, in this case perhaps not so good.
I demand that I may OR may not, have received NSLs.
Defender is effectively a light and less managed version of System Center Endpoint Protection, a lot of the core file are in fact the same between the two as I recall.
De-authing networks does have it's legitimate uses though. For instance in a business environment where people shouldn't be using their own Wi-Fi or plugging in unauthorised equipment in your buildings but do so anyway.
Have just installed, with network cable unplugged and no Microsoft account required (obviously need to add one if you want to use the Store)
Not tried it yet but if it's anything like 8.1 you can circumvent the online account requirement by simply disconnecting frim the network during setup.
Quite. It's annoying when they say this so early on, they can't possibly know the impact or scale of the breach so soon.
I'm not a customer of any of their sites but if I were in the event of breach I would be happier to be told "At this time we are confident that no customer data was accessed, but are performing a thorough investigation to verify this. We will inform you if any of your data is affected." than to be told my data isn't affected initially and then told it is later.
"they should not claim it is Open Source"
They don't, and never have.
The Android OS is open source, and is available as such through the AOSP (Android Open Source Project).
Google's app store and other proprietary software is added on top and is quite decidedly closed source.In much the same way as HTC Sense, Samsung TouchWiz or all of Amazon's Kindle stuff on the Fire.
' "Security through Obscurity" is no security at all. '
It annoys me when people say this because is demonstrably untrue. It would be more accurate to say "Security through obscurity is generally poor and easily circumvented, but can hamper efforts to break the underlying security".
It also depends on the obscurity, hiding your spare key under the doormat is security through really poor obscurity. Hiding your door key up the arse of model pelican you keep by the front door is also security through obscurity but far more likely to be effective.
"Also of the binary blob that Google wants people to implement? Why not have that in open source format?"
Security for one, exposing the authentication systems contained within might put customers at risk perhaps. Also (and this is more likely) the DRM systems for apps and music/video content, compromising that would negatively affect their relationship with rights holders thus making it harder to licence content for streaming/download.
I don't really see a problem here, Google are entitled to stipulate requirements of including their app store and other services on devices. Just as manufacturers are entitled to choose to go with AOSP and use their own app store instead.
Really this is only happening because of the market share Android has. You don't see them investigating Microsoft because their phone OS forces you to use their app store and services, or specifying the hardware required to be allowed to licence it.
MS do this for much the same reason as Google's requirement to include a full array of software, that is to ensure as consistent a user experience as possible across devices and there by protect their software brand image.
Microsoft will off this free to poorer hospitals in Spain to try it out.
Being Windows 10 it will suffer from the Blue Screen Of Diez.
N.B. This only really works if you pronounce it the Spanish way rather than the Mexican/colonial way.
In fact the kernel may be quite different but the version number was kept at 6.x for compatibility. Some developers make their software perform prerequisite checks based on the NT kernel number. It was left at 6 after vists to help compatibility with such software.
This is an old issue. Some 32 bit apps wouldn't install in XP 64 bit because they checked for kernel version 5.1 and 64 bit used 5.2.
Back to dated names perhaps, Windows 2015 ?
Indeed, Windows 2000 was essentially 50% of the development from NT4 to XP, all the nice stable backend improvements and stuff with a rather spartan GUI on top.
Windows ME was the other 50%, i.e. all the bells and whistles and fanciness without the backend and reliability to support it.
"what feels like a coating of caster sugar dissolved in PVA glue and jizz."
Speaking from experience of that texture Mr Dabbs?
If so I daren't ask the circumstance.
If it's not a word it certainly should be. It has far more right to be in the OED than some of the other Internet slang that has been added of late.
I think the BOFH would approve of the term out-bastarded.
AbelSoul I think you need to reread the post you're replying to. It asks why the English don't get on vote on Scotland staying, not on English independence.
Heh, amusingly Windows 8 and Scottish independence may well work out the same way.
Do it (in the event of a Yes tomorrow) or try to do it (in the event of a No), then realise that no-one is entirely happy with the result and try and fix it later like Windows 8.1
Where this comparison falls down of course is that with Windows 8 people had the choice to go back to using Windows 7.
"The No campaign seems to be entirely FUD, without any actual positives"
Partly, but this is natural because independence is change and fear and uncertainty in regard to change (particularly major change) is a natural human reaction.
There are some actual positives, the number of actual positives depends on how much you believe various politicians.
The 'Yes' campaign may not be FUD, but it's certainly got the UD. Uncertainity because some things have not been properly planned and disinformation because of things that Alex Salmond and the SNP claim they will absolutely be able to do that everyone else says the can't (including the people who would actually be responsible for allowing it).
Because he's seen as some kind of Scottish hero by many of the 'Yes' zealots, despite not really having achieved very much and being just as much of slimey lying weasel as every other politician.
Like you I don't object to Scottish independence, just the SNP and it's leader.
The best effect a 'No' result could have tomorrow is causing Alex Salmond to be forced to resign.
Presumably Bing's predictions have some margin of error in their values?
If so those results are somewhat close together to be of much use surely.
Bing's prediction essentially tells us what those of who are don't fall within the Venn diagram of 'Raving luncatics' and 'Politicians' already knew, that the vote is looking like it may be too close to call.
Whichever way it goes, it's probably going to result in demands of recounts, legal challenges and accusations of misconduct from one side or the other.
I'm far more interested in if this will have any impact on the services Zapp are supposed to be bringing to market.
For those unaware they are working with most major banks to bring contactless payment support into the banks own mobile apps, thereby allowing you to make contactless payments direct from your current account rather than having to top up a third party wallet.
For me this will be the most useful implementation of mobile NFC payment.
I beleive GEM on the Atari520/1040 had this as well, though my memory is a little hazy.
You mean if BT abandon it? Or are you implying they could force BT to hand over ownership of the cables and ducts?