Re: "Cameron's Conservative party have promised...
What's the saying "Fool me once ..."
ISTR a certain Cameron promising a referendum about the EU *after* an election in 2010.
When was it ?
1705 posts • joined 5 Mar 2010
What's the saying "Fool me once ..."
ISTR a certain Cameron promising a referendum about the EU *after* an election in 2010.
When was it ?
reading the original report, and the comments here reminded me that the world ended in 2000.
I rarely go into town, as it is. Main haunts being Town/Symphony hall, Rep, Alex and (very rarely NIA).
The point being these are *all* 15 minutes from where I live.
Being smaller than London, there's a best of both worlds situation. I live in SW Brum, and can be on Broad Street in about 15 minutes from where I live. Yet 10 minutes the other way there's the beautiful Lickey Hills and Worcestershire countryside.
And the convergence of the M6/M5/M54 doesn't hinder things.
Speaking as an ex-pat Londoner, the only things I really miss are: tube trains, foreign films, and a decent Italian delicatessen.
I heard the video was like one of her concerts in that nobody came.
I bet you talk about "loopholes" too.
Currently, in our criminal justice system, it is up to the state to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that a person is guilty of a crime. If they can't do that the person goes free. Why do you blame their lawyer for doing their job. Why not blame the CPS lawyers for NOT doing theirs.
Blaming defence lawyers for successfully defending their clients is akin to blaming a winning team for the fact the other side lost. "Why, it's Manchester Uniteds fault for scoring more goals that Fulchester City lost."
I wonder if more, or less people have watched these videos than would have before this news ?
Oh we are so close to an Oscar quote:
"To lose one parent is unfortunate. To lose two starts to look like carelessness"
-The Importance of Being Earnest.
When "The Wire" came on, I had to double check that the flats where D'Angelo held court (with that sofa incongruously sitting outside) weren't the flats I first lived in when I moved to Birmingham.
And the streets of Baltimore are a dead ringer for a part of Manchester (Santiago Street IIRC) where my brother stayed for a year, when he was at Uni ....
Over much arguing, the only phone I will provide for my 17 year old is an old Nokia 5800. My reasoning being he is a fucking kid, and (a) never looks after anything (even stuff he's paid for) and (b) never ever listens to adult advice (such as not to wave your phone out every 5 minutes).
A couple of months ago he was walking through a local park when a couple of hooded youths stopped him, asked the time (I mean really !?) and then demanded his phone. As soon as they saw what is was they went "no man, dat's a sick phone, we don't want none of your Nokia shit man!" and fucked off. To (according to the policeman who took his statement) mug someone else for their Blackberry a few minutes later.
Much to lads chagrin, policeman praised my attitude in ensuring lad didn't have a mug-magnet phone.
This is what lad claimed they said. I guess people really do talk like that. Innit ?
The pie is shrinking, so there needs to be rationing. I can't see any government risking domestic power cuts except as a measure of absolute last resort. Also I see a media battle between the government (who will try and persuade people that it's all the fault of the power companies) and the power companies (who will blame the government, the EU and "the market").
Bad move for the government, unless they decide to wade in with chequebook and legislation - the power companies will have dictated the contractual landscape, and made sure it's industry that goes offline first. Factories, big office complexes (and hopefully a few government departments ;) ). At which point (those of us who remember the 3 day week) you will start seeing the lay offs.
And that's the price you pay for not educating the population properly AT SCHOOL so they had enough grasp of science to debate nuclear power rationally. Still, maybe if we burn a few media studies graduates, we can keep some lights on.
I grew up in the 70s, and recall getting home from school, and lighting the candles for when my Mum got home from collecting brother from playschool. Giving thanks for a gas cooker (a preference I have never lost) and for my Dads inna te distrust of electricity (he was born in Southern Italy, where power cuts are a way of life) which meant he insisted on gas central heating. Being a real engineer, he rigged it up to run off a car battery, so it could run without mains.
No power cuts in the 80s, no power cuts in the 90s, but in the past 4 years we have had at least 3 outages of over an hour. My suspicion is lack of capacity makes it harder to route around stolen cables.
The less you have of something, the more it costs. It really is that simple.
"Spitting Image" did a good explanation of the whackiness of the European arrangement back in the 80s ..
companies are holding back investing until they know the score on independence ?
"terrorist" like "criminal", is whatever people want it to mean.
And there's the rub.
And we have a long and glorious list of examples of powers being given to the state "for extreme instances" only to discover them being abused*. Take the councils who used RIPA to investigate that heinous crime of putting bins out on the wrong day.
*Why does a dog lick it's bollocks ? Because it can. Same logic with abusing powers.
Apples and oranges.
The automotive market is completely mature. Any technological developments are going to be evolutionary, and as such the consumer base is well known.
Telecoms - particularly *mobile* telecoms is still an emerging industry, and as such likely to see revolutions in technology. This makes it a far more volatile market.
One possibility - and certainly a threat for Apple - is that a new revolutionary development is made, which can only work between two newer handsets. All of a sudden the lack of buying power for the new iPhone becomes an issue, as it prevents you from plugging your new technology.
I doubt it will bankrupt the supermarkets. They calculate very carefully how much "shrinkage" they can bear.
After all you could achieve 0% shrinkage if you put all the goods behind a counter and customers had to ask for them. You know, like in the 50s ? But that costs waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much in staff. And also doesn't give you an arena to tempt customers to buy something on impulse.
Supermarkets have long ago figured the price of profit is a little shrinkage.
Slightly related, but we bought the FiL a bottle of premium whisky for Xmas a couple of years ago. One that comes in an aluminium lined presentation cylinder. Wrapped it up without checking it inside.
Come Xmas day, opens pressie, takes out bottle, it still had the anti theft tag on. It dawned on me that some genius in the BWS section hadn't worked out that putting the radio-transmitters in a Faraday cage *might* just stop it working.
I wonder how many shoplifters hit that store ?
I did email head office like a good citizen.
+1 for online shopping. But then MrsPage uses a wheelchair, so shopping is already a chore.
Tesco ran (are running) an offer where you pay £10/month (IIRC) and you get as many deliveries over £40 as you want Tue-Thu. Which kinda cancels out delivery charges if you play it right.
Also there is an option to say "don't substitute" you can set if you like. Although IME it's no problem to reject a substitution on the doorstep if you like.
For me, the next step forwards should be supermarkets targeting households that are geographically clustered, and try and see if they can arrange a "neighbourhood drop" system. Free delivery for 10 households in the same road. I say this, as every day in my little cul de sac *someone* has a delivery from Tesco. Given the cost of fuel, if they could combine those into a single journey ...
Also the supermarkets could hook up with Amazon* and eBay* and offer to deliver stuff with the online groceries.
*Other online retailers are available
You can have the lights on, or the polar bears.
Bit "nobody needs more than 640K" of you there ?
"Namely that existing material strengths are simply inadequate to deploy lightweight large structures, and that's what you need for serious lifting capabilities."
Who knows what lies ahead ?
is changing. We no longer have "shows". We have "products" of which only a small proportion is the actual airtime of the TV element. We then have "exclusive online content". Plus media tie-ins with "Hello", "OK !", "Take a Break", and even the "Radio Times" printing "stories" from the show. Then you have the official FB pages, and Twitter feeds - cunningly balanced with the official "unofficial" FB pages and Twitter feeds. All of this hot air generates enough media energy it becomes a self-sustaining reaction with other non-affiliated media sources having to report on the "news" that is the product.
Britains Got Talent
Call the Midwife
Dancing on Ice
Strictly Come Dancing
plus the regular soaps. "Corrie", Eastenders, Emmerdale ...
also has a "like" AND "dislike" functionality. The idea being you can "train" it, so it can record "suggestions". Programmes it thinks you might like.
So Virgin Media already had a scoop on what *it's* punters do and don't like. And given the "dislike" feature, it's probably more valuable to TV execs than FBs rather late entry to the party.
Free WiFi in all trains, and 240V power points for charging phones.
It was only meeting a colleague recently who has to travel Swindon->London that I realised this is uncommon ....
e2a:Just read another posters comment. Yes WiFi can be temperamental, but it's still better than nothing.
Should be obvious really ... do you seriously see a politician saying to the spooks "Rummage around all you want in our dirty laundry" ?
Remember there were very serious allegations that the spooks spied on Wilsons government in the 60s. Who knows what juicy "leverage" they gained over MPs ...
Sorry, I have to call you out on "No one complains" ... a lot of people have complained. Even here, on El Reg. So please don't make sweeping statements like that.
but my Cameron filter won't let me ...
Because the media space has already been filled with an atmosphere of "if you object you must have some sinister agenda" usually in the same breath as "paedophile", or "terrorist" depending on the sound of your name, and colour of your skin.
The only place you'll get a libertarian view is more off-grid ... blogs, twitter, Facebook ... that is all the places the government want's to bring under it's control.
MP = Member of Parliament - elected representatives to our lower house, equivalent to your congress.
Actually, I suspect this is what 95% of our MPs genuinely think is possible.
You know the old joke about a jury being made of 12 people too stupid to avoid jury duty ? Well the matching political axiom is that parliament is made up of people too stupid to do real work.
I suspect a 3 question grilling would reveal that the majority of MPs struggle with the distinction between Google search results and the fact that they aren't hosted by google ... do you remember when you were learning about computers, and had to distinguish between A and (A) ??????
and Google are not the only search engine. Although I'd be quite happy if our elected representatives believed they were.
What about Yahoo! ? Bing ? Not sure if Magellan or Altavista still exist, but this could be a great incentive for their revival.
Or - heaven forfend - what if a bunch of people donated some CPU time to a crowdsourced search engine with a distributed database. Try and shut *that* down ....
that kids today (anyone under the age of 30) just won't fully appreciate the tension of the 70s and 80s. I was 14 in 1980, and recall me and my friends (all fairly geeky) were convinced it was a question of "if" not "when" the 4-minute warning would come.
"Protect and Survive" was considered essential reading.
work out when the owners mobile is approaching home, and have heating fired up when they're 20 minutes away ?
Could also turn on driveway lights ? And the oven ?
Just a thought.
FM does me just fine. Anyway the only radio worth listening to is Radio 4. Sometimes.
I can see a rainmaker case over the definition of "registered user" ... there are a few sites where you can upload content without "registering".
Facebook has now built up a very detailed picture of people who *aren't* on Facebook, simply by dint of cross-referencing the address books of everyone who *is* on Facebook.
Since there's fuck all I can do about it, it's just ticking over at 1/10 on the worry-o-meter, but it's interesting to speculate what they can do with this information. The most straightforward being to serve up a list of social-networking refuseniks to any future administration who decide that people who aren't on Facebook have something to hide. But it could go way deeper than that.
When I first signed up for my hotmail account (back in 1995), it was made crystal clear to me in the T&Cs (as I recall them) that under no circumstances was I to share my password with anyone.
So what has changed that people are now allowed to give their precious login details to these sites ?
Does anyone recall that story from a few years back where a guy was jailed because he signed up to Facebook, gave FB his hotmail login, and FB proceeded to spam his address book including his ex-wife who had an injunction against him. Judge was unimpressed with his claims of innocence and basically said "you're a dick for giving your hotmail password to Facebook" ?
IIRC the reason HAL erroneously predicted a failure of the AE35 unit was because it was a reflection of his subconscious realisation that the source of his conflict was coming from Earth. It was a manifestation of his desire to break with Earth and remove that conflict.
How on earth did the KVM traffic get through the properly configured firewall the bank must have ?
or Mars ?
those images stored in proprietary systems, as I discovered when I asked for a copy.
It's the power that will be the killer. AFAIAA "Scotland" is wedded to the idea of subsidised (by the English) renewables. Presumably they're hoping that 2/2 will become a new paradigm in international business ?
vaguely musing with MrsJP a few days ago that there's a certain symmetry in people today choosing to go to a coffee shop because they can also access the lastest news via wifi.
Seems remarkably similar to 200 years ago where you went to the coffee shop to access the latest news (via newspaper).
One thing I know for sure about MS is they are very hot on localisation ... I know this after having to install a South Korean version of windows (from the MSDN) to flush out a bug we could not get to happen here. IIRC it was to do with Unicode and 4-byte character codes.
Can anyone see Birmingham City Council dishing out Linux Distros to it's XP citizenry ?
Just weird ....
the problem is it's a fine line between forewarning the innocent, and aiding the guilty.
Many years ago when I worked at a large supermarket, we were warned in quite some detail of a shoplifting scam. A few weeks later a relative of one of the managers was caught in a rival supermarket trying the exact same scam ...
"A day late, and a dollar short".
You might have pulled a stunt off like this 10 years ago. But nowadays, with a proliferation of millions of people sending each other links every second of the day, I suspect most "on" filters will get turned "off" within 24 hours, as people start wanting to access the links their friends can see.
Out of curiosity, how many links on (say) they Daily Mail website will require opting out ?
Or in my lads case, to use the canteen. Personally I had no problem with it ... it was hardly space-age kit, and it saved the kids having to carry money and incidentally, meant kids who didn't pay for school dinners weren't singled out in anyway.
a few hilarious ****-ups with the "infallible" system, and they'll be quietly pensioned off.
As a matter of interest, does anyone know of anywhere that uses SOLELY fingerprint ID for NON-TRIVIAL applications ?