1466 posts • joined 5 Mar 2010
Re: All at once or none at all
"If you were starting from a blank sheet, you'd build your towns/cities/villages/etc so that vehicles and pedestrians were completely separated"
Wasn't Milton Keynes built like this ? The downside being with no mixing of cars and pedestrians, it can be a very dangerous place to walk at night, as you're out of sight ?
Indulgences ?! wft ?
Didn't they disappear with disco ?
Besides, is purgatory mentioned in the Bible (quick wiki) ah, I see ... Maccabees ... a disputed book of the bible.
"Two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong ..."
Why am I reminded ....
of the line from H2GT2G about needing a receipt every time you go to the toilet ?
English acronyms ... only 26 letters
means we're starting to see some duplication ... I thought "POS" meant "Piece Of Shit", and that kinda supplanted "Point Of Sale" ....
Recently had an amusing experience when Mother in Law was signing off "LOL" thinking it meant "Lots Of Love". No real harm done, except when she said to her nephew on Facebook "Sorry you weren't too well, LOL" ...
Am I the only person who read this that this guy hasn't been *sentenced* to this time in jail, but that he is in jail (i.e. without bail) awaiting trial ?
In which case aren't there 2 amendments in the US constitution that are relevant ? The 8th (Excessive bail) and 6th (Right to fair and speedy trial)
Just saying ......
Important information's gone from being 4 or 5 levels deep to about 20.
I suspect that is probably intentional ....
Tell me about it - only it's not London, but Brum. Have had that sodding copper chopper hovering in a tight circle around my street for 90 minutes at least 3 times this year.
Around 2 am.
No sirens, no sounds from the ground, and nothing on their twitter feed.
Oh, and it has some sort of flashbomb on the front, so as it's bearing down it's blinding you - really wouldn't have been out of place in "Apocalypse Now".
I have little time for a police force that tries hard to intimidate it's citizens.
SoundHound seems to work better
for me, leastways. YMMV
"fin de semaine" != "le weekend/le week-end"
at the risk of being boring, the reason the French (and Italians) had to nick the word "weekend" is because they had no concept of Friday night/Saturday/Sunday being in anyway different to any other combination of an evening followed by two days. "Fin de semaine" translates perfectly as "end of the week". However it means the same in French as English ... "end of the week". Where a "weekend" is a different (cultural) concept.
giving the thousands who pass by on the M1 motorway something to ponder: “What the bloody heck is that for?”
The tower, or the M1 ?
how does it compare to the assembly building for the Saturn V in Florida ? A building so vast it had it's own weather system, apparently : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_Assembly_Building
My point is that there was (and I will stake a tenner I could use the word "is") no effective oversight. Who was managing her ? How was her performance being monitored ?
Having employees with the degree of autonomy required to cause this clusterfuck is acceptable (and probably inevitable) in small man+dog outfits. But in a public service ?
So, my question stands. What *other* unsupervised employees are there in Yorkshire police ?
Re: Blame database snafu on sacked administrator?
And our wonderful press won't ask why the hell an administrator was able to do this. Clearly there *is* (not was) a culture of amateurness in Yorkshire Police (which is the REAL story). So where else is it prevalent ?
“We are in a situation not of our making,” said Chf Supt Odell
I beg to differ ....
Re: Throwing actions
Bad form to reply to ones self, but the same episode also showed that:
1) Men are just as likely to ask directions as women (although the subjects were tested *alone*)
2) Men are no better at parallel parking than women.
Re: Throwing actions
There was a recent Mythbusters which looked at this and found negligible differences between young boys and girls when it came to throwing ... the differences set in after puberty.
If you want to assess two subjects and remove any learned bias, get them to throw with their other arm - as soon as you do that girls and boys throw pretty much equally.
One day ...
I might write a program to hit phishing links with hundreds of thousands of bogus login details, and invite people to forward me any phishing emails they get as targets.
In fact, now I'm thinking about it, a better way would be a distributed app (a la SETI@Home) so the logins appear to come from all over the net.
On a more low-tech note, if everybody who got a phishing email clicked the link and supplied a duff login, the inherent value in phishing would collapse overnight.
I just need that round tuit ....
Vaguely reminds me of a comment
by a security expert years ago, who said that if people wanted to communicate securely, the best bet was to fax each other in handwritten arabic.
@Greg J Preece
The Daily Mail lost because they alleged Psychic Sally used a particular technique of defrauding which they had no proof of. This is a specific claim which is a slur, and hence Sally (rightly) won when she accused them of libel.
If they had simply said "Psychic Sally is a fraud - no one can speak to the dead" then it would have been a different outcome. Mainly because I bet if they did print that, all of a sudden Psychic Sally will be nowhere to be found.
I suspect that it will be impossible to delete this data ...
Even if it was only one column in a database, you would still have to locate, restore delete and re-backup those old databases. And that's before we consider the possibility that the data might be in key-related tables which need to be present for the database to work ....
There needs to be some ISO standard for what to do in these instances ... maybe *replacing* the data with zeros, or spaces, or whatever is needed ...
all webcams I know have a light on them to indicate if they are active..
surely if the webcam can be turned on without your knowing, the light could also be disabled ?
*Properly* implemented encryption ...
8192 bit encryption is worthless if a user chooses "password" as .... well, as their password.
Re: Does this mean ...
only if you like queueing ....
Re: "Assange, who referred to himself in the third person throughout the keynote"
Shit ! I'm fucked :(
"Assange, who referred to himself in the third person throughout the keynote"
Surely that's reason enough to ignore him ?
Yet curiously ...
we are told it's not possible to identify orphan works ...
No security system should have a single point of failure
Which is what has happened here. Someone who had access to the data *also* had access to the means to smuggle it out.
On another thread, I commented that IT admins should not be able to read the data under their control. I've seen it done with Windows ... (I apologise for vagueness, I am not a SysAdmin) it involved creating a folder with an account which was then deleted, having given access to the management, and denied to the administrator. So they could not look inside the folder, (nor take ownership).
Re: "return car manufacturing to Britain"
Indeed. And have just built a brand new powertrain factory in Wolverhampton ....
Oh FFS !
And we pay taxes for this ?
"The Cloud" .. exactly what the man wants
with more and more content going into the cloud, it becomes *much* easier to wipe out content you don't like ....
"Banks are really IT companies that just happen to do banking"
this was stated last year, after the NatWest fiasco. Was anyone listening ?
How about "A Clockwork Orange" ?
I would argue we're looking more like the future imagined in that book ...
Seems an awful lot of money
to enable access to government websites that only work in IE6
Re: Ignore the terrorists ...
in a way, I believe that's what happened. The IRA spent the best part of 20 years bombing the population of the UK, who in that time did absolutely nothing whatsoever to indicate they had any interest in the problem.
I started Uni, sharing with an Irish chap in 1984. The Grand Hotel bombing happened, and he pointed out that a week later - as usual - absolutely no one had asked him anything about "the troubles".
The same will happen with Islamic terrorists. The great British Public will simply astound them with their total and utter lack of desire to learn anything about their "cause".
Willful, pigheaded ignorance - that's how we will beat them.
If IT Admins can access whatever they want, it's a shit organisation.
Six degrees of Kevin Bacon ...
The more data that is hoovered up (strangely appropriate term, given the circumstances) then eventually *everybody* will be connected to *everybody else*.
At which point it becomes pretty useless.
Gerry Dorsey ....
So, presumably, premium-rate phone numbers
will be blocked by default ?
Hypocritical cant then.
and what *can* we do? We live in a society where governments can steamroller us into an illegal war, despite millions of people marching against it (in fact the only notice they took of that was to make it illegal to march in Westminster).
I suppose we could vote Labour - oh, wait a moment - they are pledged to support this too !
For myself, I'd set up a VPN through my router, and let them try and track me. As I suspect those that are talking here will do. I don't mind leaving thick criminals to the mercies of UK plod, as I am very concious that "criminal" is what the government says it is - like reading out a list of names - rather than anything absolute
Re: @User McUser (again)
are you being thick ?
I was just suggesting situations which *will* (not may, will) arise which will scupper the whole "we need to keep records of who's calling who" argument. In a similar vein, my mother-in-law lives locally, and occasionally we run errands for each other. So a call between her landline and mine could have been between me, my wife, or our son, and her and her partner. Now you scale that up to two houses of multiple occupancy phoning each other, and keeping all the records you like won't help you know *who* was talking to *who*. Given that this is exactly what we are being told these new powers are for, I find my suspicions immediately aroused ... what do they really want these powers for ?
What will probably happen ...
a lot of hot air, and then someone will gently point out to the befuddled MPs that when they talk about everyones web/phone usage being logged, they mean *everyone*.
At which point I suspect MPs will suddenly find something much more interesting the other side of the room.
you totally failed to read the question. Unless you actually record the conversation point to point, you don't know WHO was speaking.
My sons phone died a few days ago, so I let him use my work phone to call his mate. Something I will probably have forgotten in 6 months time, should plod come-a-swooping. Things would get even more interesting if the number he called for his mate turned out to be his mates Dads phone. Or (even more worrying if you have a suspicious spouse) his mates *Mums* phone.
Meanwhile, in the real world ...
most routers can happily support a VPN natively. Certainly mine can. So for around $50/year (use of dollar symbol deliberate, to emphasis where the money will go (or €40 if you prefer)) it's trivial to insulate my entire household from UK plc. That's everything then. Web traffic. VOIP traffic. Emails. Social media traffic (although they are welcome to my sons drivel). With the added bonus that you escape your ISPs traffic shaping. Win-Win I believe.
Re: It occurs to me...
you could even crowdsource it ....
Re: They could have done that in England.
Downvoted because (as has been pointed out many times - including El Reg) Swedish law doesn't allow for extra-territorial questioning.
Dunno if anyone remembers, but a few years ago a US guy killed a girl here, and left her body in a car boot before flying off to the US. He was identified, we issued a warrant for his arrest, which translated into a request for extradition which a US court happily compiled with (he's now serving life in the UK).
Would you have been happy if instead of that, the US said "no, we won't extradite him, but feel free to pop over and ask a few questions" ?
Sigh. This whole "the US are out to get him" line ...
is really a bit thin now. The US have made absolutely no legal moves to try and get Assange into the US. (Hot air doesn't count, btw).
*Even* if they should whip up an extradition request (which would require charges be laid, which they haven't), under the EAW, the *UK* would need to OK a further extradition from Sweden to the US.
That decision would be subject to the UK Supreme Court, under the HRA. Currently, the UK supreme court has bigger balls than Teresa May (passim). In fact, I suspect the last thing the UK *government* wants is for the US to request JAs extradition, and have the supreme court veto it.
JA knows all of this, and is supposedly an intelligent man. Therefore his motives for dodging the warrant are questionable, and appear to have a lot more to do with self aggrandisement, and fear of jail, than any possible "threat" from the US.
downvoted because there's a world of difference between physically gaining access to a server room, and gaining access under a false flag.
Re: Fountain of Youth
or his Mum ;)
- BENDY iPhone 6, you say? Pah, warp claims are bent out of shape: Consumer Reports
- NASA rover Curiosity drills HOLE in MARS 'GOLF COURSE'
- WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
- Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9
- Shellshock: 'Larger scale attack' on its way, warn securo-bods