1084 posts • joined Friday 5th March 2010 16:20 GMT
Playing devils advocate ...
How can you change the system ?
If we're not careful, we're going to end up with a system where companies will be expected to pay the tax HMRC *thinks* they should pay, rather than the tax they should pay, based on a set of codified rules.
A lot of these tax wheezes were set up by governments in which successive ministers left to take up highly paid directorships with firms who are taking advantage of said wheezes.
*unintended* consequences ?
Re: Bad decision by naive court
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Re: Do they ?
Bad form to follow one's own post, but this is really starting to get on my tits ...
VM make a big marketing point about getting iPlayer, 4OD etc etc. Then the second any of their customers complain (read their forums !) you get this mealy mouthed "iPlayer problems are down to the BBC, 4OD content is controlled by Channel 4" and so on).
So what *exactly* is the point of paying Virgin ?
Reminds me of the Fawlty Towers scene where the guests go to complain, only to have Basil complain more ("You think I don't know ? You're just staying here, we have to live with him.")
Do they ?
"But the four broadcasters also punt these catch-up services to rivals Sky and Virgin Media, who bundle the services into their broadband packages. "
Because of a snafu'd TiVo series link (it failed to realise that "Part 2" of Derren Brown followed "Part 1") I was forced to try and watch if THE DAY AFTER on catch-up. Nowhere to be seen. So obviously I downloaded it. A call to VMs customer service revealed that it's the broadcaster, not VM who decide what appears on the VM catch up.
Would *you* go ?
The US has a long and very public history of ignoring international law - what makes anyone they will honour their word ?
Wasn't there a case
a while back where a juror researching a case uncovered a patent untruth from the police which made it impossible for the defendant to have committed the crime ?
Maybe people would research less if they felt they could trust the system ?
Re: Very interesting case ....
So *any* assemblage of random bytes can be assumed to be encrypted ?
God help anyone researching radio white noise.
Mail order tax ?
If you can't catch them when they sell it, maybe you can catch it when they deliver ?
Very interesting case ....
I'm curious as to what would happen if a computer were seized with - say - a file of data from SETI, and the police asked you to "decrypt" it.
*Any* venture calling itself "Egnyte"
deserves to fail.
("Ignite" - geddit ?)
Re: Work cut out
Believe it of not, OFCOM has dummy phone numbers you can use for testing. Well, to be more precise they publish a list of numbers that will never be assigned. Not sure about Royal Mail.
what will happen
is the legal system will be used to make what you or I say irrelevant, whilst what the ruling classes want to say valuable.
There *is* a precedent for this. The introduction of printing in the C14th. Which transformed how - and moe importantly what people communicated about. It's no mystery the inquisition and Jesuits go back to these times. And if you look at the creep of laws we've got in the past 15 years, you'll have an idea of where we are going.
How about quoting ?
A lot of forums and newsreaders helpfully include the original post when replying. So where does a person who might *rebut* a libellous post, but ends up repeating it stand ?
Also, how about a poster who doesn't repeat a libel, but then posts in a manner which makes it clear they believe it ? Previously with no forum, they were irrelevant. However, with the TwitBook effect, they are recorded for posterity.
Re: I don't get this.....
Because it's *identifying* not naming the individual, which exposes them to defamation. Going back, you could have been done for libel if you had suggested a "well known former Radio DJ renowned for running marathons for charity", even though you hadn't actually said "Jimmy Savile". Of course the ultimate judgement would be in court.
Why I love El Reg
Where else would you read the word "loquacious" in a headline ?
Just to complicate things .... radioactive decay ?
Isn't there an experiment somewhere, where a mass becomes lighter over time, as it decays ?
I read a lovely quote recently
Someone said they'd know when they lived in a better world, when schools and hospitals have all they need, and the army has to do a sponsored walk if they want a tank.
"I really thing the chugging model is wrong, and would love to see it stop (I'm not sure how, or rather "why" we could ban it though)."
is to tax charities.
Criminal libel in the UK
is a very nasty charge to face (luckily only rich people can do it). Basically it's an accusation that the originator of the libel is so deliberately defaming, they need jailing. It also makes any part of the distribution chain responsible. For those interested, read up on the "Goldenballs" incident from the 1970s, where Private Eye was sued by Sir James Goldsmith. He launched a criminal libel writ, and had W H Smiths prosecuted (which is why they stopped selling Private Eye for years in the 70s and 80s).
There aren't many charities I give to nowadays
I refuse to give any money to a charity who either uses chuggers, or makes marketing calls to me. I feel desperately sorry for the good folk who actually collect money by freezing their 'nads off shaking a bucket, when you realise that the "charity" is then going to spend that money with a commercial outfit, and on directors salaries.
A few months ago, working from home, I noticed a car pull up outside (we live in a cul de sac). Out got 4 guys, clipboards and lanyards at the ready, and they proceeded to flashmob the street, for .... Macmillan Cancer. Won't take a penny, but are *very* pushy to get a monthly DD signed up. I haven't checked, but I suspect that if the DD is cancelled before the collectors made any commission off it (why do you think they do it) then they will be able to clawback a fee from the charity.
For my final year project, in '87, before I could work on the software, I had to write the assembler. On a VAX.
Found myself in Comet yesterday
they were next door to the shoe shop the Mrs wanted to go to (!). Busy, but hardly queuing out the door. Had a walk round. Most stuff was still at 10% of the MRP, so still more expensive than a 5 minute google.
Given they're already over-burdened with older models, I can see a lot of stock being left in the stores when the shutters go down. And despite the Dixons/Maplin thing, I suspect very few will ever re-open in any guise. Every retail park near me has at least one empty cathedral-sized unit. And the nearest shopping centre has empty units where JJB, TJ Hughes, Peacocks, Alders, Woolworths, Clinton, Millets, Past Times were, to say nothing of the smaller units. I wonder how it works with business rates ... because looks to me like you're going to have to squeeze more from less.
On radio  last week
Tuesdays PM, some expert made a very shrewd point about Starbucks. He said that they claimed to HMRC they hadn't made a profit, whilst at the same time publishing shareholder accounts (in the US) showing how much profit they were taking (since shareholders like profit).
He also made the point that HMRC *already* had the powers to use such documentation in calculating tax liability.
But when Vodafone can write of billions of tax over a cosy afternoon tea with the head of the HMRC (remember the guy who tried to tell the select committee he didn't have to answer them) what's the point ?
There is absolutely zero incentive for HMRC themselves to simplify the tax system - the more complex it is the more of them you need.
Just blue-sky thinking, but why not abolish all taxes, and simply take a %age of every single transaction made with currency . Imagine the Pound as the IP of the UK government, and every time it's used they get a licensing fee.
no one has mentioned Mike Hunt yet
No, it WAS permitted early on in the bible, and was then forbidden.
people can be sued for libel ....
However, bear in mind, UK public policy
is rather than fix the potholes, pay for the punctures.
you'll find there *is* a criminal libel. And you really, really, really, really, really, really would not want to be charged with it, let alone found guilty. Ask Private Eye about "Goldenballs".
Criminal libel makes every person in the chain guilty. That's why WH Smiths stopped selling Private Eye for ages in the 70s and 80s. They were found guilty of criminal libel, and had to pay quite a bit.
If you're relying on HIGNFY as legal gospel ...
I'll come visit you at Her Maj's pleasure.
UK libel laws are incredibly subtle, and easy to fall foul of. Just saying "allegedly" before a scurrilous statement would be no defence whatsoever, if a court felt you clearly intended to defame someone. Also, bear in mind that in the UK, veracity is not an automatic defence to libel. Which maybe why Jimmy Savile went unreported for so long. You could have found yourself facing a libel suit if you said "Jimmy Savile does a lot of work for childrens charities, and is famous for being surrounded by young girls on TOTP" in a context implying something less wholesome. Both statements true. But you could go down.
where managers earn their money
circuits and lines are assessed as part of a businesses BCP plans. If you have predicated your business on a single telecoms provider and circuit then it needs to be flagged as an issue and either rectified (get a second supplier and circuitry) or devise a compensating control (which may be to power your entire internet pipe through a 3G dongle). Our BCP has an off site war room setup with a 3rd party (Sungard) where essential staff would be transferred in the event of a building becoming compromised (i.e. no internet access).
BCP/DR is a serious business - getting it wrong can result in going under.
Doesn't surprise me ...
Storage is cheap, processing is expensive (and slow). So if you are into *big* data analysis, you'll build massive cubes to cut down on the processing needed for slice-n-dice multi-dimensional reports.
Company I worked for could easily build a 10Gb series of cubes overnight. Each one is unique, so no differential possible.
Doesn't work that way.
The "healthier" the population, the longer they live. And there's pretty much universal research which shows that the cost of providing healthcare rises exponentially as you start going over 40. Or in other words 80% of your heath spending will be on the 20% of the oldest of your population.
The longer people live, the more chance they have to develop (expensive) cancers that they would have died not knowing anything about, if they died younger.
"Logans Run" ... if you can get over the 70s-ness of it all made a serious point.
Depending how you define healthy.
Re: If you encrypt something more than once...
I have a very vague memory that multiple encryption can weaken the resulting ciphertext. Can't remember why. It will also become increasingly (and exponentially) harder - and therefore slower.
having had WP7 foisted on my, by an evangelical IT department (who have now canned it, for the reasons I shall list), I have actually grown used to it. And to be fair, it pretty much does the job with a couple of glaring exceptions:
1) can't record calls (although I have since learned that iOS can't either, and it's a limitation of the OS architecture no being able to run a background app while the phone is active)
2) no bluetooth file transfer
The fact that WP7 won't be upgraded to WP8 is a massive slap in the face. It's clear that MS regard WP7 as a stopgap, like WP6.5 was to WinCE, so there is a sense of being lumbered with WP7.
However, the biggest killer, is the total lack of apps. I refer people to a lack of BBC apps for WP7 for a start. There have been a few occasions when I've notice useful business apps that aren't available for WP7. It's this app-free feature which (IMHO) is going to do for WP8.
On a rare visit to the cinema
last weekend (Skyfall with the sprog) this advert was like an oasis in a sea of mobile phone and watch adverts.
Why not ban the Guiness ads - surely all that surfing is dangerous ?
Please fix the forums first
before adding icons (unless you add a "please fix it" icon).
You *used* to be able to "view post in context" when reviewing your own posts. Click that link and it took you - amazingly - to see your post in the thread.
You took it away over a year ago - and looking in the user forums, I'm not the only one who misses it.
Re: What about
very likely yes.
Whilst I might agree with you about volunteer soldiers, it's worth remembering that a great majority of soldiers in WW1 and WW2 were conscripts, who had very little choice.
Ah, if only life were that easy ...
The problem is "friends" who can create a chain whereby the originator has no idea AND CAN HAVE NO IDEA who will actually see what they post - even if they are technically savvy, let alone the average FB user.
Clearly the Malicious Communications act (or whatever) has some sort of wording that ignores intent which means it's very possible you could be arrested even though it's patently obvious you did intend offence.
Bearing in mind, in the UK, arrest is a punishment in itself, involving the forcible taking of DNA and fingerprints, and possible problems when applying for US visas.
Re: Not that readily
nowadays you'd be arrested.
Re: Not really too bothered by ads ...
Well a lot of US shows are 42 minutes long ... Although I agree with other posters about the irritating development of in-programme trailers and messages. But these are probably an inducement to buy the DVD.
I wonder if one day we'll fall through the looking glass, and every TV programme is just an advert for another TV programme ....
Another reason (if one were needed)
to avoid proprietary formats. Or insist that the system can export to a standard. Especially given the amount of research that is going into software to scan medical images.
Not really too bothered by ads ...
Since I never watch anything in realtime anymore. Say there's a 1 hour programme on at 9pm ... set TiVo to record it, and start watching at 9:15, fast forwarding the ads.
Yes, 15 minutes of ads to an hours programme. Says it all really.
It seems advertisers have cottoned on to this, which is why you get long shots of big logos - you can still see them at 10x speed.
Didn't TiVo get into problems for this
back in the 90s ? ISTR they offered a subscription service which connected to a database which held details of where the ads were (presumably entered by a human). The TiVo would load the timings and use them to skip ads on recorded content.
Given the current climate, this is easily stopped with two words:
should torpaedo it
Re: Abuse of process
We live in hope ... occasionally judges can really stick it to the man ....
Mr Rahmatullah, a Pakistani citizen, was transferred to US forces after
being detained by British forces in February 2004 in an area of Iraq under
US control. Shortly after that, the UK authorities became aware that US
forces intended to transfer him out of Iraq. That transfer took place
without the UK having been informed of it. By June 2004 UK officials knew
that Mr Rahmatullah was no longer in Iraq. He had been taken to
Afghanistan and was being held in a detention facility in Bagram Air Field
and there he has remained. On 15 June 2010 the recommendation of a
detainee review board of the US army that Mr Rahmatullah be released was
approved by a senior officer but this has not taken place.
Although the legality of Mr Rahmatullah’s detention did not need to be
determined for the purposes of this appeal, there was clear prima facie
evidence that he is detained unlawfully under the Geneva Convention. The
UK was under a duty to ensure that Mr Rahmatullah was not being held in
breach of the GC or to request his return.
- On the matter of shooting down Amazon delivery drones with shotguns
- Review Bring Your Own Disks: The Synology DS214 network storage box
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene
- IT MELTDOWN ruins Cyber Monday for RBS, Natwest customers
- Google's new cloud CRUSHES Amazon in RAM battle