"adds an interface that will allow admins to configure UEFI settings remotely"
I can see no possible way in which this will end badly. At all.
187 posts • joined 12 Feb 2010
"adds an interface that will allow admins to configure UEFI settings remotely"
I can see no possible way in which this will end badly. At all.
Anyone want to get the watchdog a pair of dentures?
Bought a double charging plate from a French company - name escapes me - for about £50 and a charging coil for my Samsung Note II. Now I place my Note and Nexus 7 on the charger next to my bed at night and, assuming a cat hasn't moved either one, all happy in the morning.
Once they get the standards set for higher current charging then laptops will also get more interesting.
Good news, crap English. "Half the price" surely?
Just got a text from them "apologising" - I guess this and other bad press has worked.
Not that it helps as they really should not be affected by a single fiber cut, even if it cracks a whole load of them. Poor network planning, poor management and incompetent staff. Nothing to see here.
"I am shocked... shocked to find gambling going on in this café!"
We had the same concerns and problems back at "16K day" - most off the shelf equipment couldn't cope, but Demon's routers did and then "64K day" a number of years ago (I'd moved onto other things by then, so I was only a consumer again) and then AS numbers grew too big and so on and so on.
For those pushing their beloved IPv6 - it's like on of those lovely gated communities where the grass will be cut to exactly the height of the handbook and old cars will not be tolerated in driveways, but then when the houses don't sell the less desirables start moving in and the old guard start to whine. IPv6 never needed multihoming (I was one of those arguing at RIPE meetings about how this would never really work once real world applications and resilience was required) and NAT was seen as a hack and not something ever wanted in IPv6 (la la land called, they have your unicorn). IPv6 is still a solution looking for a problem and no matter how much the proponents keep pointing and laughing at IPv4 they are still selling something that smells suspiciously like snake oil.
The problem is that the law has been misinterpreted to suggest that the authorities terrorising citizens is the right way around, while the reverse is a criminal offence.
I find email@example.com with the password of "donald" or sometimes "youpeoplearemorons" is also useful...
Ah, fond memories, wasted youth.
So, the judge is concerned that the majority of the $300m+ will go to the class action lawyers and not the members of the class action? That's a first - that anyone cared.
You missed the raft of morons who want to talk to you about a new role but are too stupid and/or mean to pay for the "InMail" feature so can't email you directly. The few that do it right I send back a polite but firm e-mail to encouraging them to read all the way to the end of my profile where it reads "go away".
The irony here also being that the most successful consumer drone maker is French. I am no longer sure of the figures but the AR.Drone and AR.Drone 2.0 have sold in their hundreds of thousands globally...
Parrot pretty much abandoned s/w development for the AR.Drone 2.0 a couple of releases in. They have passively dropped Android by simply not doing anything beyond an advertised edition to support the GPS module - and that arrived 4 months or more late.
The AR.Drone 2.0 is a generally fun bit of kit let down by an attention-deficit led company.
This is very similar to my (very amateur) reading of UK law as implemented by the CAA. I read up on most of these in a cursory way when I got my Parrot AR.Drone 2 last year. Flights "for gain" are not allowed unless you have a license - which may be the difference between the UK and Spain of course.
"There is no reported problem with the Orange Mail app, customers are only charged for data usage."
This is the standard unthinking robot response of most customer "service" nowadays. You report anything to a service provider or even a supermarket and they prattle on that "no one has reported a problem". Well stupid, what do you think I'm doing? My dear old mum occassionally asks in her local Tescos why they stopped stocking A or B and the YTS reject deputy manager typically responds "There's no demand for it" - it's insulting and demeaning.
If they were honest - and that's not going to ever happen in a global brand - they would say "you are the first / one of very few people to have reported this so far" but instead they seek to belittle you by trying to make you as an individual feel odd and unusual compared to their "normal" customers.
If you replace the word "innovation" with "profit" then it's would be right. It would be nice if the EU went further and required operators - wired ISPs too - to deliver something defined as "Internet" and perhaps also defining "unlimited" more clearly would be a great job for a regulator. Too many mobile operators block unapproved (read: non-partnered) IM and VOIP services simply 'cause they want the money themselves.
If they want to limit their service they should not be allowed to sell "unlimited" and "Internet".
Looking at the simplistic benchmark screenshots there is no difference between USB3.0 and Thunderbolt, so in effect the money is wasted. Right?
My Asus P1801 is a nice precursor to this, Android on the 18.4" tablet (with 5 hour battery life, and it is about that) and Win 8.1 on the base station. Does nicely for the living room PC.
However Asus are now reported as dropping dual OS support - and this kind of move my the Microsoft cartel may help to explain it. If they want the business building the reference platform.
I wonder how much of the budget goes on paying for corrupt career little-hitlers like the CEO? Surely a proper investigation by another committee is what we need?
Slim were doing this with their network player (the synced multiroom audio not the 25uS claims) years ago. Shame Logitech bought, gutted and shut them down. Luckily, I have enough to keep me going :)
Six months? Make that about 20 years and I second your comment ;)
Applied Cryptography is still pretty much the definitive work, and from 1996 in it's current form. And that was before Blowfish etc.
Me too. I actually bought on when on a trip to SF and I was given the other one by an old colleague in a clearout. They haven't been turned on in over a decade :)
Only Apple product I have ever *or will, knowingly) buy. Was fun. It's in a box along with one I got from a old colleague after he got bored. I think they're the 120's but not sure.
They really don't*. BTs concern is month-on-month numbers and churn. They will only ever change anything if a minor percentage KPI moves the wrong way. Individual customers that aren't FTSE (or equiv) listed? You can ride the train to hell for all they care.
* Yes, the engineers who do the work on the ground (and under and over it) are usually great. The problem is that they aren't the ones you get to interact with.
This article makes no sense. Perhaps it needs an editor to review it?
This will completely fail in the EU.
Someone st Serco forgot to sign the donation slip to the Conservatives again? I wonder if they'll get the message the second time. Look, it took G4S a few attempts but I am sure the donations are now done on a standing order.
Here, use our "free wifi" - just install some cookies, provide us your personal info, your phone number so we can send you an SMS to verify you're a chump for marketing and even a random app on your device for us to, ahem, ensure your secure browsing. Thanks, but no thanks.
In a number of other countries I have visited "free" means just that - many branded locations have a click-though page to accept T&Cs and will leave a cookie, it's true, but no hard sell and give-us-your-firstborn - and smaller non-chain cafes and shops don't even want that. The most complexity was in HK where many restaurants use their phone number as the access key, which seemed like a nice idea.
One of the biggest problems here is that the self-serving politicians have used the old screaming-from-the-rooftops excuse of "think of the children!" to conflate two technically completely unrelated issues - one of preventing under-age viewing of any material that is deemed unsuitable (porn being just the headline) and the availability of illegal content (again, child porn in this case just being the headline).
Any technical approach to either of these is, or at least should be, completely different - even if there is any real workable technical solution to either.
This doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the real reason for this push, which as we should all be aware as somewhat more technically aware and possibly cynical than the general populace, is that installation of both process and capability to filter anything that the authorities of the time choose to filter.
For some more personal and direct feedback on how "wonderful" the RSPCA are try this thread (in which I have taken part). It's very very long
Samsung make something similar available in their own app store but oddly while I can install it on my Note II it doesn't show up for my Note 10.1
The world is full of people who hide behind exactly the sort of whining that Tovalds is talking about. I am no great fan of his but the world moves on and I have had to wander away from the wonderful world of OpenBSD's deraadt and his similar approach - which again, gets results.
"Professional politeness" is very much a vehicle for faked mutual respect and exactly the passive aggressive "we have a problem which we need to talk about" crap that stop things getting done.
Megacops liks Samsung, LG, Sony etc. sort of miss the point (well, they don't really, they just buy the fledgling competition) but if they put any real resource into open-ended research & development on the software side then they would have products just as innovative and original as the companies they lust after. They seem to have great R&D in the hardware part but their software and the walled-garden eco-systems they insist on framing them in suck goats, most of the time.
I was in the process of leaving but Plusnet f****** up so badly I cancelled the cancellation. I didn't realise Plusnet were owned by BT else I would never have even started the process. Looks like I will be returning to Zen after many years, even for the premium, once I get back home for long enough to manage the process.
I have no objection to a standalone ID card that would carry a number of security features that DO NOT depend on a back-end database or the biometrics of the holder - only the card itself. In my mind the danger to liberty is in both the database holding copies of everything - because it suddenly becomes the data and the person is now just an instance of that data - and the ability of of others to legally demand presentation of such a card to receive services that otherwise the holder is entitled to. We have already given up on travel without ID so there's not much point fighting for that one.
I am continually astonished by the lengths that there, on the surface, rather simple enquiries take. 3-6 months for an initial report? Erm - how much is BT retail charging? How much does BT Wholesale (OR) charge? Subtract the two, divide into a percentage and see if it's fair. Even with a power point that will not take more than an hour as it's all pretty much public data.
I didn't see anyone mention forced advertising and Kinect integration ala http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/15/interactive-nuads-xbox-360-kinect/
That's why "always on" is going to be mandatory. DRM is already good enough against the majority of gamers.
Should be interesting to see how this goes down in the EU and other areas with some semblance of privacy protection.
No, it's hiding a vendetta in a crowd. Slightly different thing. And it's been going on probably as long as societies have existed and will continue to do so.
There are a whole slew of challenges here. Amazon is only the largest player in a very rapidly growing market and will not necessarily still be number one in a few years.
I guess the most important choice is content. To me Amazon is the only commercial mainstream UK supplier of eBooks I found that is relatively device agnostic - or rather they supply software which works on all the current devices I want. Even as a seemingly Andoird fanboi I will not use Google Play as that's a real lock in and egenarlly more expensive. Must be the VAT dodge not working. Similarly for the other device tied UK sellers. When I fancy something independent I browse www.smashwords.com and I've actually spent money there on a regular basis for DRM-free titles.
What does get my goat, and Amazon whine it's the publishers but I don't believe them, is the complete lack of loan and resale facilities. If this DRM shit meant anything then it would mean that your books could be transferred securely from one account to another without the old copy being accessible. It's crazy when you can buy a new hardback from an independent reseller on Amazon for less than a fraction of the price of the ebook. It also makes sure the the consumer knows their place - they are renting the book, never ever owning it.
It doesn't do wind or rain and costs HOW MUCH?
I have a cheap FOSHK (CHinese company that makes all the Maplin and other cheap, "real" weather stations) from Signatrol and it does all this and UV/Lux levels and with pywws on a Linux box connected to the indoor unit uploads it all to Weather Underground so they can do the heavy lifting of display and recording. All that for £99 (plus the Linux server that's just a box, hanging around). Oh, WH-3080 for reference - it's cheap, probably only nominally accurate, but it's consistent.
If you're educating to create a workforce, regardless of industry, then there is one way to do it. If you're educating for the sake of knowledge and learning then there's another.
If you watch almost any of the lectures given with the late, great genius Richard Feynman you will get a sense of how to do the latter. He knew that making people understand was the key - if you get your point across as a set of first principles and teach people how to apply those and you manage to get your students to "get it" then you've won. Of course this only applies to those subjects that have a genuine basis from which those first principles come, so bollocks to the soft subjects.
Still haven't stopped laughing. A watchdog with no teeth barking at a lorry driving past the gate.
At least I'm more cheerful than before reading the article. The only downer is we pay for these morons to waste time making up pointless reports that will never be relevant.
In HK last year their train system had Wifi (and some 2G/3G) everywhere. Most shops and restaurants had genuinely free WiFi (most places used their phone number as the password or a number of the receipt - no capture of user details). One nice system from a local telco who's name now escapes me is free WiFi for all HK residents (using ID card numbers or whatever) and for us foreigners you sent a text from your foreign numbers mobe and got an access code back that lasted a week across all the APs.
In London all they need is leaky cables and tiny access points linked with nice thin fiber and voila! But no, not in this country/city.
Could be because every time I see "eBay" in an add or on Google Shopper I simply think either "scam" or "fraud". Perhaps they have an image problem?
From reading the Note 2 forums on XDA there have been a variety of hacks to make the wireless charging work - just a real shame Samsung is so totally crap with it's own accessories...
Well, the BBC claimed it was patent free and open. Then, even with the advances in hardware mostly negating the performance overhead of encoding, they completely failed to use it in-house or promote it. Our tax money (yes, the TV license is a tax in all but name) not at work.
Back in the day (the late 80s AFAICR - the days are hazy now) the incentives were tax breaks for first-round VC funding and loan guarantees to banks for "risky" start-ups. It worked, mostly.
Now, it's about giving hipsters free money to chatter about marketing and "creative" shit - not technology.
I love perl. That is all.
Note that it's VAT that's low in Luxembourg and Corporation Tax that's low in Ireland. A clever company will use everything in it's power to lower it's tax liabilities - this way it can make it's prices lower and/or profit larger, helping it to out-compete the smaller companies that don't have the luxury of multiple national offices.
I don't agree with this un-level playing field but I do accept that it's 100% legal. All this slating of the companies rather than the tax laws stinks of diversions and conspiracy to me.
What is you wanted to loosen your ties with the EU and you didn't want to appear to be the party doing it, how would you whip up public opinion enough to seemingly force you to derogate your involvement in the free market or even more radically initiate leaving the EU in some way?