Re: This isn't just about pedos
Indeed - it's very very dangerous :/
389 posts • joined 2 Feb 2010
Indeed - it's very very dangerous :/
"This decision ... closes one door where people that would abuse children share and indulge in their fantasies online without the use of images, and prior to now have felt beyond the reach of the law in doing so."
Excellent news - now not only are children such as Lisa Simpson protected but now they can also protect those who aren't even depicted! With any luck they'll be able to arrest those who even THINK of children soon (the pedos will have to prove they aren't thinking about kids). </sarcasm>
Do they really think that making it as much of an crime to engage in FANTASY as carrying out the acts for real a good idea? Don't they see that those with such interests will then be more likely to just have kids of their own purely to abuse them?
You really do seem to be the only one here who "gets it"
So by your logic - no company should ever try to enter an established market or if they do they should not use any of the underlying fundamental principals that have been established over the years that the industry has been going.
On the contrary - Steam actually has the technical capability to transfer licences. If you recall when the Orange Box came out, many users ended up with 2 copies of the original HL2 and were advised that they could "gift" their extra licence to a friend.
There is no reason at all that this couldn't also apply to games or DLC that you don't have a duplicate of.
If there was the option of buying DLC second hand (for say - half original price) I would actually buy it. They say that they don't want that because the product doesn't depreciate like a physical second hand one would but it's no different than a car - you pay a premium to have it "new" for the bragging rights. You could even limit the (re)sale of second hand downloaded stuff so that it's only available after the new game hype has died down.
Fail because they are missing out on money from the likes of me.
So it's not really related but I want to know why this is even going through the DoE. WTF has it got to do with them? Surely it should be DoJ or similar?
I think you meant: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/sarcasm?q=sarcasm
Irony is great though and it's ironic how often it's misused.
What about at night then? I wasn't aware that australia covered half the planet.
So how do you know that the very moment she turns 16 she'll be responsible enough?
You should totally patent and sell your technique - it would make you a fortune.
The IT crowd is shit anyway - easily the worst thing that any of those involved have been in.
It just plays on stereotypes of IT people, which bare practically no resemblance to reality.
Cheap datacenter in India it is then.
It's fine because they ticked all the "do you have" boxes and we trust them not to lie.
Indeed it was and it's a pointless limit. Even more so these days.
They'd be much better off learning what numbers actually are and the concept of different bases as well as building the logic to work out complex mental arithmetic rather than being taught to mindlessly recite the result of a specific (simple) calculation.
It's almost as bad as "learning the kings of England" - i.e. learning heir names and the various key dates about them but none of the stuff that actually makes history worth bothering about.
Actually the Japanese quite often use old tech as well as new because they tend not to replace stuff if it's still working. I found it rather amusing to see old terminals and dot matrix printers in the station where you get the Shinkansen from.
You are missing the point that it's a work based site - it's not Facebook. It's for keeping track of work based connections who you might be able to use to benefit your career in the future. Not because you like them.
It's also useful as a barrier between recruiters and your actual email address / phone number because you don't HAVE to share your details with them when they spam you.
Also, if you have a decent profile you can actually get head hunted by good employers from there (not recruiters). It happened to a friend of mine - lucky bugger.
I see someone holding a bit of bendy perspex and an animation of some rollers.
It all seems like lies to me.
Which of course is really the point of all the hype.
Up till now, these things have been unprofessional but this one as you say is enterprise level.
Excellent work. Exactly the sort of research that should be getting lots of charity funding as it could work with many (all?) different kinds of cancer.
In fact - I bet there are lots of other applications for this kind of technique as well.
I hate Skype because it's the only IM client that Miranda can't really connect to properly. The best you can do is have it hidden in the background and use the interop plugin, which is a bit shonky (cause skype is so naff).
I wish MS would somehow merge it with MSN so that the IM part just goes through that with the voice and cam still being Skype's protocols.
I thought that too.
Also am I the only one who finds the new font hard on the eyes?
"However, it's got to be a concern that kids are going to be creating transaction systems using NoSQL. That would be a disaster."
Indeed it would - and it is happening. In no small part because of articles like this for the reasons already stated many times above.
Most people don't care about such detail.
Those that do will just ask their doctor.
I really can't believe that no one pointed this out before they wasted so much money ...
Same here on every Windows machine I've had over the past 10 years or so.
Only numpties get viruses and indeed - AV software is often just as bad as having the virus.
As for your ex - she'd probably been looking at porn and downloaded "codec packs" :P
On a related note - I think that a common attack vector (and cause of badly performing Windows machines) is all the nasty software that comes with off the shelf PCs (stupid mac style application launcher bars, HP drivers and all that rubbish). Its always SO error prone (and users always think that error messages are viruses) so it gives the whole platform a bad name.
It won't work.
I wish they would just get on with actually doing their usual bluff and stop "supporting creative people". I figure there'd be a short period of not much being produced before someone steps into the breach and offers services that people have been asking for for ages, namely - everything available for free via ad supported streaming services alongside premium (but still reasonably priced) physical media with no drm and no unskippable BS, for fans and collectors.
The thing is, we are all techy so the courses they do are crap to us. And yes - I agree in theory that you shouldn't teach office only or MS languages but you have to ask - why are they being taught IT at all? If it's so they can get a job then what's wrong with teaching them stuff that is ACTUALLY in use? I'd say that learning C# would be a bit more useful than something archaic that has 0 real world applications.
I think one of the main problems is that they try to teach IT as a blanket "1 size fits all" course when really it doesn't. If it were up to me I'd have an easier course to teach basics (a bit of hardware, knowing what a virus is, different types of OS including new portable things, a SMALL amount of history etc and maybe at the end making a simple website). Then for the kids who are better, have a higher course where they learn about data structures, algorithms, branching strategies and all kinds of (interesting) things.
Either way - stuff needs to change from how it is at the moment. The course I did was out of date in the 90's and AFAIK they are still teaching roughly the same one (complete with paper keyboards to practice typing).
Well yeah - obviously those countries "lead" the way for BYOD. Mainly because companies in those places don't give a monkeys about data security, viruses being on their network, spam being sent from their servers, or pirated software being used for their work (more than likely theirs is anyway) or any number of other security no-nos. All they see is a saving because they don't have to supply stuff, which means more profit when they sell their shit quality products.
Google index "everything" - i.e. stuff they have not made. Stuff that belongs to other people. Stuff that they do not have the copyright for. Is that not what various news outlets were complaining of? And what of the stock photo companies who now get less revenue because everyone just copies an image from Google image search these days?
Also, TPB is user contributed so anything can be indexed there too.
Yes - because there is REALLY a viable alternative to cars for every situation.
Not every city has London's public transport system.
You are doing it wrong.
You seem to think that it's your job as a parent to look at what your children are doing rather than using the convenient "Yes or No" rating system.
I bet you are one of these terrible people who want to supervise their Internet activity as well rather than trusting the good old government to do it for you.
Some cool ones there but I can't believe you didn't put in paint.net - it's a wonderful little replacement for paint. Great for quick bitmap graphics.
And backup I'd say Cobian is better too as someone mentioned earlier.
As for text editing, I prefer SciTe because of it's configuableness though notepad++ is decent.
I currently use Bing as my primary search engine because over the past few months, the quality of Google search results has plummeted for what I generally search for (geeky stuff mostly). It's ever since they "integrated" their services. I really don't want it to search youtube if I am looking up something in regular expressions ...
Hopefully they won't spoil Bing with too much social rubbish :(
Great - more cool stuff for London, which we won't see anywhere else.
Olympics, Fry, Cisco - Fuck off.
But Azure has always been shit. SQL Server was (maybe still is) nobbled on it where as on AWS it's fully functional (with more besides).
As for web applications - I'd much rather be able to RDP on and have access to all the server stuff (as you'd been able to do with AWS as long as I've been using it) than have to use the horrible, limited silverlight mess that Azure relies on. Not to mention that you have to redeploy the WHOLE thing just to make a single (persistent) change.
Basically - Amazon aren't the underdog here so they don't need to "take on" Microsoft. If anything it's MS who are playing catch up.
Well really it's the patent system that's in the wrong for letting companies patent abstract concepts.
Also (in my opinion) judges should be able to throw out frivolous IP infringement cases and fine the claimants and their lawyers for contempt of court. Same goes for BS litigation seekers (ambulance chasers).
Maybe they should realise that people are just sick of being ripped off.
I was looking at box sets earlier today. The majority of them were £55+ (not special editions) which is simply not worth it for me when I can download it for free. Look at the X-Files for example - you are talking £150.
But take a look at the Alien quadrilogy - that's £25. That's fair and I'll probably buy it.
I also recently bought the 2 in 1 box edition of Life of Brian and Search for the Holy Grail for a fiver.
It would really help if they'd get out of people's faces with unskippable previews and warnings too.
It's really not rocket science - lower the prices or offer economy versions for the non-enthusiasts and stop putting unskippable rubbish before the show and we will buy stuff.
For it to be a complex problem it needs to be a problem in the first place and frankly it isn't. To turn "their" usual argument against them - it didn't do me any harm. In fact I'd go as far as saying that having unfiltered access to porn and access to communicate with others who share common interests actually made me a much more confident and productive individual.
Also - quite hilarious how those that are most adamant about blocking sick Internet filth are usually the same ones who want to have teachers commit acts of sado-masochism (caning) on their kids. Crazy world ain't it.
"We need a THING it can be an app right? They are cool - and it can be on the cloud! It'll wipe it all remotely if we need to and will make everyone more productive."
Duhhhr. Rape lol haha really funny. Me think rape funny.
So imagine you go to a gay club for some reason and in the bathroom a guy rapes you. Still so funny?
Man accused of forcing woman to have sex = rapist, arrested, charged, name and photo made public, life ruined.
Woman definitely forces men to have sex = nymphomaniac, taken into "care", identity protected, victims mocked.
I've been wondering about that since they brought out the iPod and forced everyone to use iTunes.
10 seconds? Haha
Except that in the "good old days" it was hard because absolutely every topic was learn by wrote with no thought going in at all.
Ask anyone over a certain age what 7x12 is and they'll tell you in a second. Ask them 14x6 and they'll have trouble.
Understanding is much more useful than memorizing.
HOWEVER - we do allow people to "pass" when they really shouldn't.
I don't know why they are even wasting their time thinking about such things - everyone knows that these organisations only care about the DPA in terms of "can we tick the box" and never actually adhere to it's principals.
I'm sure that there will be nothing to stop individuals short-cutting any process that is put in place by simply copying data to a (unencrypted) thumb drive then giving it to whoever has asked for it (over the phone with no formal request or paper trail of course).
So at what point do people become "real" journos?
Pull the other one - it's got lithium on.
The only reason that Apple are doing so well is that the entire mainstream media and graphic designers seem to love giving them free advertising.
They always seem to use a Mac whenever they need a stock photo of someone using a computer and usually use an iPhone-like icon to denote a smart phone.
Still - the press are notoriously fickle so when the wind changes (and it will) their bubble will burst.
No - lol
Same here. It's probably more common than you'd think.
"Can you imagine 70 years or so in a prison, knowing you aren't getting out?"
It must be at least something like what those who care about the victim feel, knowing that person is now gone from their lives.
So yeah - sounds like a fitting punishment to me. Much more than the death sentence (life is cheap to those people anyway).
I'd give it a go - sounds like fun. It wouldn't be the same as with a living partner but why not? And the implication seems to be that only singles would use them but they could be good for couples too. Male ones would even be better for guys who are "straight" ;)