Weird Trackpad Placement
Seriously - what's this trend of migrating the trackpad to the left side of the device? It belongs in the middle otherwise it's awkward (for use with either hand).
398 posts • joined 2 Feb 2010
Seriously - what's this trend of migrating the trackpad to the left side of the device? It belongs in the middle otherwise it's awkward (for use with either hand).
She must have called Saul.
Exactly this. I'm fairly sure that most of the contents aren't encrypted anyway, especially the stuff on the SD card. So what difference does it make?
If that is truly your situation then you should really invest some time in talking to a financial adviser. Pensions are very important unless you plan on taking a trip to dignitas when you reach 60 and you have a right to know exactly what you are paying into, how much is in it and if it sucks, to transfer somewhere better. Leaving it until you are too old to fix any problems is insane.
In their current form they are bad enough because they are not allowed to deal with consumers directly.
Instead, if you want to complain because (in the hypothetical situation of course) they are so incompetent that they would keep sending engineers to the wrong (new build) estate for a whole year, leaving the occupants without even a phone line; the only course of action is to contact those at director level of BT, who of course are on first name terms with those of OpenReach.
If they are fully split, surely this would just be even worse? Or would they be forced to be accountable to the general public?
You kids and your love for traversing menus, Is it really that hard to open cmd and type "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 12.0\Common7\IDE\devenv.exe"?
Now the whole casual Friday thing is a whole new level of BS - especially if they are tying charity to it.
1 - Giving to charity is fine (though of course some charities are more worthy than others) so if that's a thing then do either a silly fancy dress day or just a bog standard collection. Don't try to make people pay to wear their own clothes - it's insulting.
2 - If the dress code is there for any supposed improvement to client image or productivity then how are things different on Friday? Is no work done on Friday? Do clients never visit? It makes no sense.
Sounds like you need to find somewhere less stupid :) Good luck.
As a software developer I would never again take a job with a dress code. I feel that it's a very good barometer of management style. Recently (past year or 2) I have told several recruiters where to shove it on that basis alone. We are a scarce resource so companies need to buck up their ideas to remain competitive if they want to attract the best people.
The worst are those places who enforce strict dress code for some (male, non friend of the boss) employees and let the others wear whatever they want. I've worked somewhere like that previously and it's not a good environment.
Also I would really like to meet one of these "customers" who are so terribly fragile that they'd throw a contract in the bin over employees of a prospective service provider being dressed one way or another. They would be very fun to troll but I have a feeling that they do not in fact exist.
Try Aldi instead - no shrinkage at all when you cook their meat, no white slime and it's really tasty. Actually often a bit too tasty for me having been raised on processed crap.
I ran with OpenElec on a pi for 6 months or so but eventually became frustrated with the lack of power and sporadic plugin support. It handled the basics fine but struggled with some codecs and high resolutions.
Now I have Kodi running on an Intel NUC, which also has Steam and a few other useful bits. It came with Windows 8, which is meh but it's been no trouble getting any peripheral (rf remote, various keyboards and mice and game controllers) hooked up, which was a pain on the pi. It works so well that it's now become our primary gaming platform as well as media consumption device.
My advice - if you want to fuck about or have low requirements and not much cash then go for OpenElec. If you want a bit more umph, with the added bonus of making a (kind of) Steam box, go for a NUC or similar.
Microsoft had a monopoly. Almost all PCs ran Windows and they were judged to have abused that fact to ruin other companies chances by bundling their own browser.
At the moment Apple don't have a monopoly on the smartwatch business. That may change if they do really well. (I personally hope they don't because in my opinion the concept of apps, especially ones on watches is stupid and is damaging to the progress of the whole tech industry)
The thing is I do think that Apple should have been given quite a bollocking on for their anti-competitive behaviour when the iPhone was being planned. Mainly for the way they were pretty much the only company in the MP3 selling market, used that position to lock users into iTunes, which then locked them into using iPods, which in turn they went to great lengths to ensure only worked with iTunes. Then they nicely evolved iPods into iPhones. Now if that's not a clear example of using dominance in 1 market to disrupt others I don't know what is.
I've seen these driving around. They look weird and I don't like them.
That's my review :P
Self employed with a kid and an old car, living in the poverty trap that is London... I really feel for you.
Things are better outside the capital so if you can get the cash to move and can find work then do it.
Good luck and a pint cause you probably need it.
Surfaces are doing well? Sorry but I just don't believe it.
I've never seen anyone using one in public and I don't know anyone who knows anyone who has one. And I work in a .net dev company with a bunch of very pro-MS devs.
Maybe MS are just paying their own employees to buy them multiple times :P
I would POSSIBLY consider this on the condition that the channels that I watch get a much larger cut of the money than Google do. However, given that only pewdiepie makes anything worthwhile even from ads these days, I can't imagine a sub would be different for anyone else than being (blocked) ad supported. Other than Google themselves of course.
Also, has anyone else noticed that it's really hard to find new channels to watch these days since the multiple awful layout changes?
Is it me or when it gets kicked does it's body language say "Just you wait till I get my automatic defense system..."
Sorry small business owners but the old saying goes - if you can't beat them, join them.
Make an eBay and an Amazon shop and do most of your business through there. You'll find that if you are actually UK based and offer good customer service people will buy from you even if you charge a little bit more (not taking the piss though). Mainly cause they will get their stuff that week, not some random period of time later when the cargo ship arrives.
Or were you selling Chinese bits and bobs yourselves but adding a massive markup on top by any chance and are now just sad because the game is up? I'm looking at you Maplin.
If you think that's bad you should look into the way groups work.
If you add people to a group in WhatsApp and then as group admin you leave, the group is persisted and a RANDOM participant is allocated as the new admin. So if a user does this by accident, bad things can happen. Also any users who've been in the group can see each others profile pictures and phone numbers and the messages that were sent to the group even if the admin kicks them out.
Even the fact that it's phone number rather than user name based really doesn't sit right with me.
These things look pretty cool and all but I just can't see it taking off for mass market consumption.
Most people I know don't even use the 3D function of their 3D tellies because you have to wear "stupid glasses", hell I've never even bothered trying the option on my projector. Mainly I can't see many folks wanting to strap a massive thing to their head and lug around a pound of battery.
As a niche product for porn, theme parks, science or the DIY helper thing it could work nicely but as for mass market I just can't see anyone wanting it.
So then I wonder what the rules would be if someone used uber but only charged enough to cover half their fuel costs. So basically used it as a communal car sharing app.
The point about if you were traveling to point B anyway is interesting as well because it's common to give non-driving friends or relatives lifts to places then ask for them to pay the fuel in it's entirety.
An example might be if a friend wants to go to an airport, with their partner (who just for the sake of it let's say the driver doesn't know). The couple will each pay half of the driver's petrol so they are getting a cheap ride and the driver isn't out of pocket. The driver though has used his car to take a stranger (the partner) somewhere in exchange for money. So would that be covered by insurance or not?
One question about all this.
Is car sharing illegal in Australia if the passenger pays some of the petrol money plus a bit more for the effort?
If you see a cyclist about to run a red light that you are about to cross and you are big enough - cross anyway. Chances are they'll come off much worse if they fall off. Unfortunately dickheads like that are usually just as bad in their Audi as on their bike though so it might just mean another bad driver on the road while they recover or get their bike fixed instead...
Speaking of which - the most common red light running I see from drivers is at junctions where U-turns are forbidden. There's one in particular where I've nearly been ran over twice. All lights like that should have cameras fitted and automatic fines given out accordingly.
How is this a big deal? On most systems I've worked on, there is an "other" option which would allow people to specify (if they want to). That goes for any dropdown box based field unless it specifically needs to be one of the provided options for business reasons.
Choosing whether or not to provide this functionality should be a no brainer. It's easy to do and if it makes someone who normally has a difficult time happy then why not?
I always thought having to press the word "Free" was weird anyway. It took me a few seconds to actually figure out that was a button at all and not just a label when I first looked at the store.
But I guess it's offensive to have buttons that look like buttons...
I use it all the time. Though many of the people I want to chat to seem to be moving onto Skype. And anyone under 25 seems to be on KiK. What's with the weird proprietary ones being popular?
You can use Pidgin to talk to Facebook friends though (well, until quite recently anyway, not sure about now). The added bonus being not having to look at stupid Facebook.
The Japanese have a different outlook:
"The nail that sticks out gets hammered down"
Glass of Dutch wine at the Nail Gun Arms anyone?
Don't worry - they'll just mess with their content lock some more so you won't be able to get on YouTube or other notorious sites such as gov.uk from one hour to the next. That should give you at least a couple more hours of of extra "usage".
Oh great, another hosted authentication system from Microsoft. So far I believe this is their 4th but maybe I've missed one...
To my knowledge they have:
Live Connect, which seems fairly widely used but is secreted away somewhat and not really linked up to their Azure stuff.
Azure ACS, which is now deprecated after being "best practice" for a little while.
Azure Mobile Applications, which always seemed weird as an auth point for me but they bundled scheduled tasks in with those too so who knows?
Of course there's also the good old forms auth stuff and Azure ACS was kind of linked with active directory on Azure too.
Either way - this "ecosystem" is a massive mess for anyone just getting started. Honestly if it were up to me I'd not touch Microsoft auth with a barge pole. They just don't seem to know what they want to do.
No, it's much worse than that.
You just get a project per platform and the UI for that platform goes in there.
You can handle the sizing stuff in code but its a pain and very much a manual process.
Honestly, if you want something actually cross platform - just build a website.
Is this about apps (as in phone apps), web applications or just applications in general?
The term "app" is so horribly varied that it's impossible to use it properly these days.
As for the fact that most devs have poor security in web applications - yes that's probably the case for the reasons mentioned about (we've all been on the receiving end of Boss: "do it later"). But for (phone) apps it's even worse, mainly because there are hoops to jump through to allow SSL and on-device encryption, which many new, indie devs simply aren't going bother with.
"In one sense, it belongs to Microsoft now. In a much bigger sense, it’s belonged to all of you for a long time"
... but in a real sense, it belongs to Microsoft now, who will fuck it up.
It looks like they've sorted out some of the issues of Windows 8 but frankly it's going to take more than the implementation of obvious features that should have been in the predecessor (at least) to bring me back to Windows.
I already switched to Mint on my low powered laptop (though the poor thing needs putting out to pasture tbh) and my Desktop install is starting to get a bit more unstable so it's gonna get the Linux treatment too when I can be bothered.
I'm just sick of the MS bullshit. It's going to take something special to bring me back, especially when the alternative doesn't cost anything.
We're very heavily invested in all things Azure so this outage caused us big headaches yesterday.
It wouldn't be so bad for TFS online to be down if Visual Studio didn't have to timeout (~3 minutes) on EVERY SINGLE FUCKING CHECKOUT...
But no, the amazing resilient cloud can't be down so no need to do some defensive coding around that.
It's exactly this kind of crap that is turning me off MS dev (and MS in general tbh) more and more. Which is a shame because I normally sing the praises of both Visual studio and TFS, especially when used together.
"Been hit by both of these."
"I assume you mean you have been hit by service outages"
No, service outages happen, that's annoying but it happens.
The 2 services I listed were extolled as being best practice for a while before the announcement that they are being deprecated. ACS will stay around but will not be developed so it's going to just get more and more out of date and Federations are being actively canned next year (not sure of the details so existing ones might still work but I doubt if you'll be able to make new shards).
Well sticking stuff on a VM would certainly work but that kind of defeats the purpose of Azure's offering IMO. We may as well (and should) have gone with AWS if we were going to do that. Besides, they've only been offering actual VMs for a couple of years and our stuff was already on Azure by then.
As for the bacpac option, they don't include the transaction log so aren't fit for purpose for most companies who would need a real backup strategy for a legal requirement to minimize risk.
And of course RDP being disabled by default is a good thing but you shouldn't have to take down your live service to enable it. And you shouldn't need to enable it because Azure should provide access to real diagnostic tools from the admin console.
They do but they don't push out major version upgrades. They do deprecate them though.
"What history of nixing customers"
Azure Federations, Azure ACS. Been hit by both of these.
"Azure is easier to use"
I use Azure every day and can confirm that it most certainly is NOT easier to use than AWS. At least from a development and deployment point of view.
I'll list a few off the top of my head examples of where Azure makes things more awkward than AWS (or an on-premises setup, which is basically the same as AWS) I'm talking from a .net perspective, which in theory should make things easier so I dread to think what it's like for non .net folks.
- Wrappers. To deploy to Azure you need to wrap your projects in a special .cloud project. These frequently become corrupt (especially when upgrading) and have lots of config XML duplication. Very awkward to merge. (You don't have to use these if all you are making is 1 website but for anything remotely interesting you have to use this mechanism)
- Deployment. Is SLOW. You can deploy from Visual Studio, which packages up your application then sends it up to Azure, which will then makes a whole new VM, installs what it needs then allows you access. This can take anything from between 5 and 45 minutes depending on the size of your application and which way the wind's blowing. Note that getting the deployment set up in the first place is a pain because you need to mess around with storage locations and other auth stuff. Oh and if you just want to make a minor CSS tweak (for example) to a wrapped website you need to do a whole new redeployment because any changes you make via RDP aren't guaranteed to remain.
- Config. With Azure, they've thrown the .settings stuff in the bin and implemented a fudge so you can store your settings in the .cloud project and access them through a proprietary MS class. This does fall back to web.config or app.config if the setting isn't found but it throws and catches an exception to do it. Also it duplicates config, meaning it's easy for stuff to get missed out. Oh and it still takes ~5 minutes to make any config change via the Azure front end (it must do a soft reboot or something).
- Waste. For every project in a .cloud wrapper Azure will create a VM, eating into your cores limit.
- Backup. Backups (of Azure SQL) are still practically impossible to get set up in a reliable, automated, on and off-site way.
- Azure SQL. Is just generally awful. Missing features (freetext search, custom CLR functions, scheduling), difficult to diagnose when things are going wrong.
- Scheduling. Is only available via creation of a mobile app and even then it's only able to call a web service so you still need a whole instance per (different) scheduled action.
- Remote access (RDP). Needs to be enabled specifically from the first deployment or you need to redeploy with the various settings enabled. Makes debugging a failing service very difficult. Oh and you can't do an in-place swap of VMs while turning on RDP because it creates another endpoint and you can't swap in that situation. That means downtime, of however long it takes it to deploy.
- Diagnostics. Aren't provided by MS at all. The best software seems to be "Azure Management Studio", which is OK if a bit flaky (I put this down to the services they are calling rather than their software). But to get anything useful you have to mess around with more settings, pepper your code with more Azure only MS classes (Azure Diagnostics), turn around 3 times and stand on your head.
...That's all that immediately spring to mind.
Oops, I misread "charge" as "change" ... and even quoted it. What a numpty! You get the message though.
Well, they have certainly pushed me to change more - to Linux.
I've just moved house and we don't have a phone line yet so we're using a prepay 3g dongle. So naturally we're being conservative with bandwidth.
So last night I boot my Windows 8.1 PC for the first time since moving, turn off Windows Updates, various sync things via the "modern" UI, App Updates via the store and all the rest of the bandwidth eating stuff I could find ... and it still keeps gobbling up data. It's the final straw for me. I've had enough.
If this is the "cloud" future that everyone wants then count me out too. Once I've got time, Windows 8.1 is going and being replaced with Linux. I can always run a VM if I need Windows for gaming or Visual Studio and even then, next time I move jobs I'm intending to go somewhere less MS focused. And universal apps can fuck off too (you got WCF support yet MS? Thought not). Besides which, app dev on the Windows platform in general is dire compared to Android and Azure is a massive, slow, gold turd compared to AWS.
That's me though. Having read your articles and comments I feel your pain that you and your clients will be stuck with Windows for the foreseeable future. All I can say is good luck :/
For me it's a single portal, offering brand new content, as well as an archive of previous stuff (music, film and TV shows), including old and obscure, possibly never released on DVD stuff (cartoons etc), with the ability to take an offline copy.
At the moment, torrents offer basically this for free so I guess I'd pay maybe £5 - £10 a month for it. Maybe they could have an ad supported version too. As you say though - it's about availability, not price.
Well no, obviously the spaceship didn't CRASH there - it was underground and took off.
If it means a reduction in the dumbing down of franchises on consoles then I'm all for it.
Mobile for easy, throwaway yet expensive crap. Console and (hopefully) PC for real games, which are actually challenging to play and have plenty content. Oh and some good UIs would be nice.
Old horse o.o
I'm all for not discriminating against people who like to say they are whatever gender they want but this seems like a little strange way to go about it. I'd have just replaced the dropdown with a tag based textbox so it covers all bases while still remaining elegant.
Thinking back to my own childhood, I can say that in fact technology and computer games had the exact effect that Ellison describes - and it was the best thing that could have happened for me.
I grew up in a relatively poor area. Thankfully not the hell that inner city kids have to deal with but the kind of place where 8 out of 10 families (mine included) were dependent on benefits of one form or another.
As a young child I'd go outside a lot and do all the usual stuff such as making tarzan swings, camps in bushes and things like that (didn't have a bike until I was 12 as we couldn't afford one). The people I'd do these things with were not nice (I knew right from wrong) and along with the good, wholesome activities there were the games which involved setting stuff on fire and other antisocial stuff.
That all changed when I got my Sega Master System (saved up all year). Now I finally had something to do, which didn't involve hanging around with mini-chavs. Then when we could afford the Internet, that really allowed me to become the person I am today. I could talk with those with views like my own and it allowed me to see that there was a whole world out there to experience.
Fast forward a few years and now I'm doing well. I'm a software developer with a good degree from a decent uni, a good few years of experience and will soon be buying my own house. The majority of the kids I hung around with are either dead, in prison or on benefits with a horde of little bastards of their own.
It's true, computer games and other tech can prevent kids from going outside and in my opinion, that's a good thing.
Wow, old news today Reg - the DM covered this one weeks ago.
Hilariously inappropriate device though non the less.
Right click the start button (bottom left hotcorner if 8.0)
You will be happy.
Very under-reported (and non-obvious) but useful feature, which should have been in Windows since XP.
Unfortunate and very mean, but quite funny.
This really is what 4chan [used to be] all about. Not getting people to kill themselves or the lame moral crusades.