410 posts • joined 1 Feb 2010
The file system is locked down intentionally. It means that one app cannot access another app's data unless the developer built in a mechanism to do that (like for example contacts, calendar and photos). If an app does access a shared data source is must declare that requirement in the app's manifest.
If all of that's too long-winded and boring for you, just know that you can't get a usable file manager for the same reason Whatsapp cannot be pwnd on Windows Phone like it can on Android.
You can indeed opt out of cloud storage for your data. Look for "backup" in settings, where you can see what gets backed up to the cloud, and turn individual items on or off. Windows Phone 8 already acts as a "storage mode" device from your PC. Your other points are addressed by 8.1 (e.g. not needing a search button).
As for your comment further above (that 8.1 features should've been in 7) - yeah. Absolutely. Like copy/paste on IOS. Or NFC on Android.
But hey, what I really suspect would make you happy is a Samsung G5 or an HTC One M8. All the freedom you want.
Cautiously curious. If this gets real it could be the first product from Google I'd shell out cash for.
Re: I hate to bang on about this AGAIN
Oh, and if you'd paid attention you'd know that you can choose which parts to share, and which not, and that you can even choose to share no components at all (*gasp*).
Lots more than that -
They also open-sourced Roslyn (the C# compiler written in C#), they've open-sourced WinJS, and introduced .NET Native. And then of course there's Cortana...
Re: Do this if you want to destroy IT
Securing the network is not enough. Ever heard of the concept of defence in depth? You need to secure the network for sure, but also every resource on that network. And that includes devices, not just service endpoints or file shares.
Re: Do this if you want to destroy IT
"...If that's the way Microsoft operate..."
Have you THOUGHT about it beyond gleefully bashing Microsoft?
Imagine you're an IT guy told to allow BYOD but to make it secure. You realise you can't, unless you're allowed to enforce *some* policy on the devices. So you allow BYOD, as long as your employees agree to resetting their iPads and Nexuseses (Nexi?) to factory spec + your policy.
Of course your employees can agree to this state of affairs ...or not. If not, you cannot reap the benefits (reduced cost) of BYOD.
How do YOU think this should operate?
My suggestion? Don't allow unstructured corporate data (documents, spreadsheets, presentations) onto any cloud or BYOD service or device. Structured data (database data) is allowed, but only through a corp-sanctioned (or developed) app. Email is allowed, but PIN + remote wipe policy is enforced. BYOD allows unrestricted Internet access, but taboo on corp-net.
Corp-net services are accessed through DirectAccess (VPN) or LAN using a corp-provisioned device. If you're important enough, you get a laptop. If not, you get a desktop.
If you want to do a better job of security than the NHS, MOD, Sony or Walmart, make judicious use of X509, F5 BigIP, TMG and so on and so forth. Oh, and don't rely on TLS. Supplement TLS with stuff like VPN. If you MUST allow remote access into SharePoint or something, don't expose corp-net credentials. Set up another AD in the DMZ and federate into corp-net. Don't use Google, and don't use Heroku, Azure, AWS or Office365.
Unless you're a hipster startup with 20-something pimply-faced kids, in which case simply swap out all the "don't"s with "do"s.
Re: And what about services?
Go find a Windows Phone. Preferably a Nokia, because Drive and Maps also want to phone home. Reset the thing, and power it up. And after going through that process, come back here and we can have a conversation.
Re: And what about services?
Did you read that article you linked to? Clickbait. Lumias, like all other manufacturers (and Windows, Internet Explorer, SQL Server, Visual Studio...) ask on startup if you'd like to share your location data, browsing history and so on to help improve their services. Some of the more benign (search queries for predictive search) are on by default. Just like Google does. Others are off by default.
But yeah, totes the end of the world, because when do we let facts get in the way of a good vent.
It's tuned for American English, which is why it's so terrible. I tried adding "y'all" after "Go glass" but that didn't seem to help.
Re: Very long term
Consistency. Our nearly obsessive desire to be (and appear to be) consistent with what we have already done. What the downvoters are so ably demonstrating is that once we've made a choice, we encounter personal and interpersonal pressures to behave consistently with that commitment. Given that my post was a factually correct counterpoint is amusing. And a bit sad, given the assumedly enlightened audience here.
Be that as it may, Microsoft do follow their own spec, just haven't implemented all of it. The problem is quantitative rather than qualitative. ODF vendors don't fare much better with their format.
Re: Very long term
Microsoft's format is published and freely available.
I've no preference
But do believe that the overwhelming pro-ODF response is because the tech community is predominantly pro open. This is good, but it doesn't mean it's a fair representation of "citizens" of which I presume most, like me, couldn't particularly give a damn.
Another hairbrained scheme...
...with no idea on how it should be used. If there's a problem it solves, Google would focus on solving the problem rather than asking developers to invent problems that fit the solution. Starting to sound like a cliché I know...
Anyway, I don't give it any more cred than Google Glass, which is their last solution still looking for a problem.
Re: A beelion users can't be wrong (can they?)
Actually it's worse than that. WhatsApp uploads all contacts in your address book. This means Facebook get your number, but also the numbers and email addresses of all your mates.
When Facebook looks at WhatsApp, I think all they see is a data mining wet dream.
@AC - Re: What we want to know is...
All queuing systems are toys - expensive, unnecessary toys: http://www.infoq.com/articles/no-reliable-messaging
Re: GDS (@Julian)
I think you mistake web sites and CMS (of the content variety) with enterprise systems. Where GDS is decidedly underpowered. Mike Bracken is ex-Guardian, and it shows. Some howlers I've heard from GDS architects (also ex-Guardian, unsurprisingly) - "we don't need single sign-on - people remember their Facebook passwords, don't they" and when a gov. dept. insisted on Windows because of device driver constraints "just pay the vendor to write Linux drivers".
GDS are good for sure. But haven't a clue beyond building public web sites (which they do very, very well). They have no enterprise credibility, and their dogmatism is their weakness. F/OSS at any cost, agile or die, and just as importantly, user-needs bias. That last one completely ignores stakeholders you encounter in enterprise scenarios - sys admins, security, business admins.
And whilst I'm having a go -
ALL of UK.gov IT has one core problem - no business objective. Everything they do is in response to a crisis - usually one published in the media. A sentence you hear all too often is "we must replace our old systems". Great. Why? REALLY why?!? Are they too expensive? Don't they handle the current load? Do they need to be updated in response to changes in primary or secondary legislation?
I've worked as a consultant to gov on and off since 2001, and have never, ever been given a SMART objective. Every time I ask I'm given the "business case". Every business case I've seen is so garbled, vague and ambivalent that IT hasn't a clue why they're building something, or procuring it, or (often) what they're supposed to be building or procuring.
The other unfortunate thing about GDS is their arrogance.
I have very mixed feelings about all of this. On the one hand it means there's always going to be work for capable IT people. On the other, it's why we're paying almost £10 for a pack of fags.
Azure is definitely an option...
...just as soon as my backend starts working as a zero-knowledge service that simply routes and stores encrypted blobs, and an encrypted search index. That work is taking time, but it's progressing. And from that point on I couldn't give a damn where my data is stored, so long as it's cheaper than doing it myself.
That ID scheme cracks me up.
It's being built by GDS, will do a fraction of what the Government Gateway does (which is being switched off next year, so no pressure there then); is based on the SAML protocol (so no AD integration, but that's ok because we can haz identities in Mongo*); and best (worst?) of all, doesn't, and will not use privacy enhancing technologies (PET). I mean PET in the sense of U-Prove (or CredLib), and not the Information Commissioner's more general sense.
The upshot is that if GDS get their way, your bank, or Vodafone, Experian or Equifax (i.e. whichever identity provider you end up with) will know that you're being treated for amoebiasis because you're using your digital identity to get your amoebicide prescription. Or (less embarrassing, but equally sensitive), that you're suddenly unemployed and claiming tax credits (oh, wait...).
Quite sad really. Take a great technology (identity federation), and do a half-arsed job because GDS is dogmatic about open source, and wields said dogma through the hands of 20-something script-kiddies that haven't seen an enterprise system, let along built one. The other elephant in the room is the choice of Identity Provider. In the UK there are only two logical options (ideally a combination of the two) - the Home Office, and the DVLA. And even those two come with huge privacy implications...
But hey, it's all good. When labour wins the next election the GDS guys will move on to cushy private sector jobs, and some new version of Martha Lane Fox will scrap GDS and invent a new thing, just as what happened to Directgov.
* Unfair maybe. I've no idea what their identity providers intend using.
Re: Is no one capable
Turned on my pineapple and started up wireshark because I wanted to see what the Xbox One (or rather, Kinect) transmits to Microsoft. I got as far as that green screen, and waited for a couple minutes. Wireshark was showing what must have been an async call to Xbox.com. Lots of encrypted packets. Xbox.com wasn't responding, but came back almost instantaneously on earlier calls, so I assumed it was just running a complex or long-winded process that needs time. I was technically working from home yesterday, so I got myself a coffee and had just started Outlook when I noticed the screen was now black with a message that the first of many monster updates was downloading (Forza 5 downloads 6 f*cking gigs!!).
All said and done I think Microsoft could've done themselves a favour by providing a more informative screen than that green one, but it is just a software issue, and not hardware. I can understand that your average teenager impatience might construe the whole thing as "it's broken".
Re: 'Last EVER REAL Nokia' phone
@JahBless I said innovation. I didn't say from whom. I know I didn't, because I was there when I didn't.
But hey, if you want to talk about innovation from Microsoft and Nokia, try a 41Mbp camera. Or an outlier like the magnetic keyboard catch on the Surface. More mainstream? OneNote + pen.
Compared to a *barometer*? Or a finger print reader. Yeah. That's REAL innovation, innit.
Re: 'Last EVER REAL Nokia' phone
Dude that's starting to get really tired. Disaster how? Whatever your feelings towards Microsoft and their OS, be grateful that there's a third (albeit small) credible player in this market. Keeps them all honest, and drives innovation. Your own choice of device/OS can only but benefit.
No need for an ad blocker. Get a surface. Browse FB using the browser in Metro (touch only), and serious web sites using desktop IE (mouse).
Top them apples!
No mention of asymmetric encryption?
It's how you secure symmetric keys, after all...
Re: Out of pure curiosity...
That quarterly payment is ~equal to the WP license fees Nokia pays Microsoft, so the net effect isn't a wad in Nokia's pocket.
Re: I nearly bought a Surface Pro 2 today.
Interesting device. On paper (er, screen) those specs are compelling, but the build quality turned me off (it's not bad, but it's not as good as the Surface). I looked at it, the Yoga (nice, but too big), Vaio Pro (crappy keyboard), Vaio Duo (fiddley display contortions) and the Surface Pro 2, which I ended up getting. Reasons for the Pro 2 being 8Gb RAM, the display, the kickstand, the back-lit type cover, and the build quality. Another big one is that I expected it to just work (which it does ...so far).
The "just works" thing is big for me. My previous tablet was a Samsung Series 7 Slate. WiFi took a full two minutes before connecting. The Windows Update that followed the 8.1 update left WiFi with "limited" comms.
I. Just. Need. Shit. To. Work.
I agree that the display port is a negative when compared to full-size HDMI, but other than being a minor inconvenience when presenting, I don't need it (I don't use the Surface at home, where I have a beast of a PC with three 22" IPS displays and a Das Keyboard).
Re: It isn't a huge prblem...
Not so sure. Got mine yesterday morning, and it's got everyone that's seen it pretty interested. Granted, one wants to run Linux on it, but it's getting a fair bit of interest, nonetheless.
Re: But I'm far sighted!
Maybe it's different when you go over +2 (I'm +2). That said, I played with Glass a few weeks back, and focus is very, very adjustable, so suspect your friend didn't know, or adjust adequately.
My biggest problem is talking to the damn thing. One, it hardly understands me (the Google bloke says the current version is tuned to American English). Two, and more importantly, there is NO WAY on this earth I'm standing in the middle of Kings Cross and saying "Go Glass..."
Re: Surface Pro 2
You probably want to stop buying tablets from dodgy Nigerians. Surface Pro 2 has two 720p HD cameras, front and rear-facing. Surface RT has a 3.5 megapixel front-facing camera, and a 5.0 megapixel rear-facing camera.
The [informed] user has a choice - choice of OS.
Re: Not Funny!
Everything I read on both TechNet and MSDN made it clear by calling it a start button. Maybe you're just a victim of tech journos' seeming inability to sweat the details (like writing Windows Mobile, instead of Windows Phone).
Re: Still not enough
I do get that beating up on Microsnot and Windoze is a popular (and official) pastime these days. However:
I've been using Windows 8 since October last year. Even though I run it on a Series 7 Slate (i.e. with touch screen), the only Metro app I've used relatively frequently is Video. Everything else I do on the desktop (which really is a vast improvement on 7). My single most compelling reason for Windows 8 is taking notes and drawing diagrams with a stylus in OneNote (insanely good).
But this is about RT. So, even though I've not found a single WinRT app in the store that is compelling enough to use daily, I'm actually slowly warming to the idea of creating WinRT apps. Now that the store submission requirements have been relaxed, I think we might actually see touch-based apps on Windows that are usable.
I've a Surface Pro 2 on pre-order, so for now I can only offer my expectation - that the Pro2 will allow me to use a tablet as I would an iPad, and when I need to, to run Visual Studio, SQL Server and Office as though I was on a desktop (small screen notwithstanding).
Even more strangerer...
...is that the company that was singled out is the same one that a). created SPOT (Smart Personal Object Technology ), and launched watches with it 2003/4(?), and b). the Reg itself has stuff on Microsoft's (rumoured) Surface watch, posted as far back as July this year .
Sooo.... duh, wut?
 Microsoft Research came up with SPOT - it used FM radio signals to broadcast news, weather and stuff to wristwatches.
Note that A makes you part of a VERY tiny fraction of the installed base, and that B is logical as, in it's commercial form it can't be.
"Apple everywhere" and "security" simply don't... either. Nor, for that matter,
"Google everywhere" and "security" simply don't...
SD cards. It's one of those eternally-bitched-about things.
What is it about them that makes them so critical? Do SD-card advocates change their phone so frequently that data portability becomes important to the point that cloud storage just isn't fast enough?
Or do they need so many movies and music on their phones that 16Gb doesn't cut it anymore?
My phone doesn't have an SD card slot, and even though previous phones did, I've never had a need for it. And yet I've always got 3 or 4 movies on my phone, and more music than I have time to listen to in a weeks' commute.
Re: An obvious choice
Kevin Turner is not a good choice. I say that as an ex-Microsoft employee. He signs all his emails off with "Thank you for all that you do." *Almost* as patronising as Dick Brown's email sign-off "And remember.... Action, urgency, excellence!"
Anyway, Kevin Turner is not liked internally at Microsoft. He's a poor fit, not least because he's not a techie, and understands Microsoft's market even less than Ballmer does.
Microsoft needs someone that understands that *all* OS's (WinRT, Windows, Windows Server and Windows Phone) need to be on the same release cycle. The next thing Microsoft needs is ONE coherent strategy for dev. That means merging VBA, .NET, Silverlight for Windows Phone and Windows Runtime. It also means coalescing Windows Forms, WPF and Silverlight into a common UI framework.
That said, I've no idea how they're going to do that last one. GDI/DGI+ uses direct rendering, and Silverlight/WPF uses delayed rendering via DirectX (hardware acceleration). In a perfect world, whatever Microsoft come up with will mix hardware acceleration with WinForms' event-driven model.
Re: @ ilmari: there is no security
Email cannot be secured.
Mostly because the ciphertext must be stored on Silent Circle's (or any email provider) servers. When someone sends a plaintext email to someone's Silent Circle address, they (Silent Circle) encrypt the email on their servers. Mail amongst Silent Circle users is encrypted from the get-go. Either way, Silent Cirlce's servers retain ciphertext. And that's the weakness.
They can be forced by law (regardless of whether that law is "good" or "bad") to change their systems to retain copies of the private keys that decrypt the symmetric keys that decrypt the email.
VOIP and SMS *can* be secured, because it's peer-to-peer, and the chiphertext never goes through Silent Circle's servers, so isn't retained. It it's not stored, it cannot be decrypted.
Indeed. Two things really worry me -
Obama is willing to deny Americans their bread and butter in favour of surveillance.
Other than here and the Guardian, this story doesn't seem to appear in the UK press.
There's an up side though. It's offering a huge opportunity to services hosted in countries not subject to such surveillance or, at the very least, offer a little more transparency.
This is turning into an arms race. Client-side encryption (where private keys are generated and retained on the client device), together with distributed server-side storage (data replication across state boundaries) is where this is going next. If the Internet itself is put at risk (probably the next step for oppressive governments), then smaller, decentralised networks will spring up in its place.
If ever there's tech that deserves patent protection, then this is it.
That's because WunRT isn't useful.
Much as I like Windows 8, the apps on WinRT are abysmal. The Microsoft-authored apps are no better than the crap in the Windows Store.
There's simply no point, if I can't run desktop stuff.
Re: Several Questions:
The 920 is just as good as the faked TV ad. I shake mine like a monkey waxing his carrot and the video doesn't skip a beat. It really is that stable.
Read the 808 reviews in photography forums. Most seem to think it's as good as a DSLR. Of course I can't say anything about the 1020 until I get my hands on one.
I do too, and also love it.
What use is speed...
...when the device's OS is an NSA-branded front-loader?
A snowball has better odds of surviving Jenna Jameson's silicone cleavage that the US doing away with their spying. With enough noise from the media PRISM and it's like will just be broken up, renamed and continue. There's just too much money to be had by the president, congress and the IT suppliers.
Re: It's not about techniology, it's about risk.
This is without a doubt where you start. I'd add a contingency plan though. Mitigation reduces probability. You'd want to think about reducing the impact, too.
Whilst there are only 5 threats (spoofing, tampering, information disclosure, denial of service and elevation of privilege), the biggest impact will come from disclosure. What do you do after data loss has happened?
Re: And when the CEO demands BYOD ?
Then your problem is cultural and political. Which needs to be addressed before you start thinking about technology.
First, WiFi is Internet only. CorpNet is wired, and devices that connect to it are suitably locked down (AD).
Second, Internet-based remote access from corporate (non-BYOD lapstops) is provisioned via DirectAccess.
Third, devices that use WiFi or come in via the Internet use policy enforced using Exchange.
Fourth, corporate apps that employees need on their devices are built either as web apps, or you build native clients.
Fifth, you create a separate AD forest, and use WS-* or SAML to create a forest-level trust, so that CorpNet credentials are never used outside the CorpNet boundary.
Sixth, corporate apps that can be accessed from the outside are protected by an application firewall (BigIP F5, UAG, or similar) - defense in depth.
Seventh, you create or use a native app for devices that copies passwords from for that separate AD to the clipboard, so that they can be pasted into to the corporate app, thus foiling the likes of CarrierIQ and the NSA.
Lastly, if the benefit outweighs the expense, BYOD devices use Chip and PIN challenge/response.
The above is trivialised, but that's my strategy. If it's too sensitive to be accessed from the outside, it's simply not available from the outside.
That, at least, is what Betteridge's law of headlines tells us. The reality is yes. Because no publisher will create new games for an old console. Duh.
Re: Conspiracy theoriest right all along
@ Eadon, re. open source.
As we know, closed-source (proprietary) software forces its users to trust the vendor when claims of security and freedom from back doors are made.
Your statement is based on the fact that open source software, by publishing the source code, makes it possible for anyone to inspect that source code, and thereby uncover security or other issues in the software, right?
This may sound like a pretty sweet deal, but it isn’t.
Publishing source code only provides the POSSIBILITY that it will be inspected or audited. It’s virtually impossible to find reliable audit information for an arbitrary piece of open source software.
That leaves the user to trust that the software was reviewed, that the reviewer possessed the skills required to conduct the audit, and that the reviewer’s audit was rigorous and complete.
In other words, whether open or closed source, you're basing your decision on trust. You're better off using Wireshark than being a poster child of the Khomeini Effect - the True Believer who shouts "Open source or die!", without considering practical realities.
WM stopped at 6.5. WP started at 7, and does indeed let you scroll (if that's your bag), or... you could just use jump lists. If you're scrolling in email (much like you would in either iOS or Android), then (unlike iOS or Android) the panorama items will filter your mail.
- Opportunity selfie: Martian winds have given the spunky ol' rover a spring cleaning
- Spanish village called 'Kill the Jews' mulls rebranding exercise
- Reddit users discover iOS malware threat
- Pics R.I.P. LADEE: Probe smashes into lunar surface at 3,600mph
- Ex–Apple CEO John Sculley: Ousting Steve Jobs 'was a mistake'