Re: So they need power?
absorbs sunlight directly on some panels and converts it to ....
Thing is, you see, let's think about it. (yes, I did see the icon...)
What is the footprint of a typical datacentre rack? Let's be very generous and imagine it's about the same as a typical roof-mounted solar panel (that's about 1m x 1.75m by the way, considerably larger than most racks I know).
Let's be even more generous and imagine that there is only one floor in this datacentre and that this floor has an area of 20x the area of a rack for each rack installed - that's to accommodate the plant, the staff facilities, store rooms, corridors etc. We'll assume that the whole of the roof is available for solar panel installation.
Now let's assume the panels can be ideally angled to the hot Arizona sun and that 1m of panel requires 1m of roof to avoid shading and indeed, how about motorising them so that their angle can be varied through the year so that they are always square-on to the sun?
A typical panel of the size I've mentioned might have a peak output of 350W so again, let's be generous and imagine 400W and ignore inefficiencies caused by heat and all the other stuff which means that kWp is rarely reached in practice.
According to Wikipedia, Phoenix receives about 3,800h of "bright sunshine" a year, which is only a little less than if we assume 12h of sunshine a day, so let's go with 12 hours of generation per day and that all of this is at peak output.
In a typical day then, the 20 panels available for each rack could potentially produce a maximum of a generously-calculated 20 × 0.4kW × 12h = 96kWh of electricity, which is quite a lot.
How much electricity does a rack actually consume? I don't build racks (not this sort anyway), but I've had a look around and it seems as if a low-density rack (I'm being generous again) might be rated for 10kW and require about half that again for cooling, so the power consumption of a rack over a day is 15kW × 24h = 360kWh.
Not even close.
Ok, so I'm being a bit devil's advocate, and I have to point out that if someone did cover the roof of each datacentre with panels and generate ¼ of the electricity consumed onsite (it'll actually be less, but the point is the same), that's quite a lot of electricity that doesn't have to be sourced from coal, oil and gas so it's definitely beneficial if you can afford the initial costs...
M.