106 posts • joined 23 Jan 2010
Re: Jump on the privacy bandwagon
I'm afraid Lewis Page has deliberately misled and really played to the commentard orchestra in this place. Look at his part:
"So there you have it. In the view of the ISC - and evidently, the view of the British spooks - US internet companies are under an obligation of some kind to monitor their users for evidence that they are about to commit acts of terrorism. At the moment, indeed, in the view of the British spook community, such firms are a "safe haven for terrorists".
The interpretation that the ISC and spy agencies are under an obligation to monitor their users is entirely Lewis Page's. The report report simply notes that they don't feel themselves under any obligation, and what the consequences could be (it even carefully notes that they're unintended)
Lewis then goes on to say:
"The British intelligence community also believes that the Prime Minister should "prioritise this issue"
Thus suggesting that "this issue" refers to the monitoring of users. In fact, in the report, it refers to warrants not being complied with by US companies.
Well done Lewis. The swivel-eyed commentards here will love you.
Not an MI6 report. Can you read?
I'll just call it the 'zed' launcher, if you don't mind.
Is getting rid of apps all that clever?
I don't think so. Windows 8 has potential as a tablet OS. I like active tiles and when you learn the gestures it's quick and easy to navigate in touch mode. The irritation is that it has to jump to the non-touch friendly desktop for some applications and even OS functions. Sometimes, It's Microsoft's fault - changing the default browser, for example, disables the internet explorer app (Why???!!!!). It feels a bit half-baked (well when did Microsoft ever actually, you know, finish the job?).
I use Windows 8 on the desktop as well, and fixing that with Classic Shell makes a nice OS that can just stay in desktop mode all the time. It's too little Metro that's my problem, not too much desktop. It's not beyond the wit of man to have both!
If Microsoft were actually an intelligent company (I know...) then they would make a Windows 8 which could operate entirely in the desktop or entirely in 'Metro', with the ability to flip for hybrid devices. There really is logic in having two UIs on hybrids. But giving customers options and letting them choose is not something that ever seems to occur to Microsoft.
Re: n+1, no?
The tweet says '3 landings'.
Re: 77 upvotes
"If you actually check the record, The vast majority of plots foiled have been stings where the deluded "terrorists" were recruited and groomed by law enforcement, then arrested by same at the scene of the act of "terrorism". "
I'm very interested in this. Do you have any links to support this claim?
Some believe that the Microsoft association was damaging the Nokia brand even before they dropped the name:
Microsoft seem to be oblivious to the fact that their brand is, well, hated.
To be fair, we all moan about our jobs.
No pun intended.
Re: Anson ? Beatty surely
Well done. I love a good historical joke. Have an upvote.
I agree, but sadly I don't think it's his citizens' secrets that Putin's worried about. In fact, I think he'd rather like to know them himself.
Re: Dear Sony.
I love that you can't spell 'qwerty'!
If your implication is that Russia can get past this, I hope you're right. Nothing in their past history, sadly, suggests that they will.
I lived in Russia. They have an exceptional fondness for the 'strong' leader. They love it when their country feels 'strong'. They associate periods without a 'strong' leader with periods of chaos and weakness. My own take on this is that the actions of the 'strong' leader are the cause of the chaos by stunting the development of anything more stable. You can't have the rule of law, for example, when the leader can't afford to have impartial judges around.
The behaviour of the Russian political system has basically been the behaviour of an addict - they get by, but they never find the strength to go through cold turkey to a better life.
Russia is increasingly descending into that combination of scary and ridiculously comical that all authoritarian states eventually become.
Re: Who cares?
Actually, it would take him 72 seconds.
That's right. All economists are part of the conspiracy. Physicists do the same thing with gravity.
Re: Maybe he read it, but hard to believe he understood it
That's a misunderstanding. The fourth drug store will only enter the market if it's the most profitable thing that the entrepreneur can do with her time and capital. Otherwise, she'll just take those somewhere else. The point is not that everyone gets ground down to the edge of starvation, as you put it, but that capital and skills move to where they're most useful - without infinite resources, that doesn't imply low returns.
It's an interesting take from someone who finds the current system ideologically unpalatable, by the way. The usual criticism is that the owners of capital get too much. Your criticism seems to be that they get too little.
Re: Welcome to the 1950's
I understand the sentiment behind this and many other posts here, but the fact is that it *is* news. I agree that it's got nothing to do with his abilities to run a business, and whatever he does behind closed doors is his business. But many people don't agree, and it's still seen as abnormal behaviour. Imagine a scenario where Tim Cook walks into a theatre with his arm around his wife. Then imagine he walks into a theatre with his arm around his boyfriend. Which one gets flashed around the world?
He has to come out publicly so that he can go into that theatre with his partner. It's newsworthy because it's still so rare in more 'macho' walks of life like sport and CEOs. It's also not an easy thing to do, but it serves as an inspiration to others.
If hearing this story isn't interesting for you, fine. But it will continue to be interesting to the press until there are so many Tim Cooks that it's irrelevant. This Tim Cook has added one more to the list. He should be applauded for it.
Re: Good for him!
You don't have to read, much less comment on, the story.
I have a Samsung phone, but I can't find any particular reason why I'd chose a Samsung over anything else next time round. That's Samsung's problem in a nutshell.
Re: The More moments
Much fun as the righteous anger here is, it's all based on a misunderstanding. The value of a business is determined by its profits - not its past profits, but its *future* profits. Therefore, the value of a company is always based on the market's estimate of what future profits will be. When news comes along that changes those expectations (which are largely informed by the company's own estimates of its future profits) the value of the company changes. Where's the evil?
Re: It contains a "data sphere"?
A meaningless number. If I borrow a £1 million and then put £1 million then put it in the bank, gross debt has gone from £0 to £1 million. Net debt, however, is still zero.
Re: Watch this space
Actually, mercantalism ended because everyone realised that it doesn't work. It was founded on the belief that trade was a zero-sum game: in order for me to win, someone else has to lose because there's a fixed amount of trade to go round. A little thought experiment will tell you that this is nonsense. If one country grabbing more of world trade makes it richer then one city grabbing all that (fixed amount of) trade should make that city very rich. Then one street in the city grabs all that trade and because fabulously rich. Then one house in that street etc.
It's not a zero-sum game. 2 people trading makes both of them better off - that's why we do it. Mercantalism is not a stage in a country's development. It's always a bad idea.
I've got a brilliant idea
I've got an idea for a new kind of payment method. You only need to carry around a small plastic card - hopefully wallet makers will make wallets with special pockets to carry them. The cards are cheap to produce and can be given to customers for free They're small and flat, and a little bit flexible so they're easy to carry and pocket. They're waterproof and don't require charging or batteries. They've got great security features - they're worth nothing in themselves, and quickly be cancelled if they're lost. You can put a chip in them so they'll do NFC just like a phone. As they'll have your name on them, you could even use them for non-photo ID. You don't need to faff around with an app any more - you can quickly whip one of these out and pay for anything.
I think I'm going to be a billionaire.
Re: The BBC told me it was fixed?
I think you made that up.
Re: Expecting perfection? You're going to be disappointed.
Were they 'destructive to society'? How easily you can forget the years of economic growth before the crash. Crashes are part of the economic cycle. They've always happened, and they always will. Anyone telling you otherwise is trying to sell you a book. Economics can reasonably be judged a success if the progress between crashes is greater than the crash - and that's been the case for a very long time.
But yes, I agree that our economic goals - or should I say our demands on economists - are both unattainable and mutually exclusive - which is exactly my point that choices have to be made, instead of naively believing that you can have everything.
Expecting perfection? You're going to be disappointed.
Everyone wants a system which delivers wealth, equality etc. There are some people in the world, let's call them pragmatists, who understand that there are trade offs and you can't have everything. The perfect economic system doesn't exist, as perfect things tend not to (apart from Sherlock, obviously). That's not to say that we shouldn't aim to improve things, just that it's sensible to start any discussion by deciding what your priorities are, going for those, and realising that you're going to have to lose other things in order to achieve those priorities.
Blaming 'the system', 'corporations' big this, big that etc. is all terrific fun, but can you seriously believe its that simple? What miracles do you actually expect from economists? They can't deliver what you're expecting: and neither can you or anyone else.
Andrew, Andrew, Andrew...
...you really need to go back and learn some GCSE economics. A market doesn't simply die when there's no profit to be made. What happens is that loss-making producers leave the market, reducing supply so that prices increase to the point where the remaining suppliers start to make sufficient profits to stay in the business ('normal' profits in economics speak).
It is possible that the high end Android market will come down to just one surviving business which still won't be able to charge enough to make a profit - but I sincerely doubt that will happen - there's simply no precedent for that.
Something doesn't add up here
The membrane coating that wears away bit doesn't seem to add up. Since the vessel is using it to steer, what happens when it wears away? This sounds like a one-shot device like, say, a torpedo, not a submarine.
Re: Bang bang!
America has 97 guns per person?! It's worse than I thought.
Re: This is news?
You sound like you've met someone who's been shot and says 'yes but my arm's bruised, and that could turn out to be just as bad'. The UK's not perfect, but where is? The comment you just made could now have you arrested in Russia. I'll bet you any amount of money that you don't get arrested in the UK, and never will do. Will you take the bet?
Comments like this trivialise important issues, and sound a lot like self pity.
The Isle of Dogs has service. Although there are a lot of valid arguments in these comments, the Isle of Dogs has awful ADSL, so this must be a genuine improvement to some people around here.
It always amazes me that no one's taken up the obvious business opportunity of a wealthy part of London with high density housing and awful broadband, by providing some sort of wireless service. Hyperoptic are slowly fibring up the big blocks but that's a slow process given interminable negotiations with building freeholders. More to the point, it amazes me how many swish new blocks are built with just copper wires.
Re: I'm just stoked...
You mean wrong?
Re: Takes a special kind of bastard
Are you suggesting that having children should make you immune from going to prison? It's a serious question - I don't understand the logic of what you're saying. In what context would it be admissible for someone who has broken the law to be locked up if they have children?
As far as I know, every American President (and every leader of every other country in history) has sent to prison people who have children.
Re: Where did the word "Corruption" and "Treason" went?
It's been "silently censored". By whom, I'm curious to know? (Although they seem to be oddly incompetent, seeing as it's available on Amazon, YouTube etc).
"...the only countries to continue showing it are actualy [sic] Russians and Eastern Europe."
Any evidence for this comment? But your belief is a curious one. Russia, my dear friend, is not famous for its open society and welcoming attitude to free speech.
Re: And that's why an open market requires an open society
"It has forced everyone else to remove national interest protection from their merger and acquisition law."
Any evidence for this statement?
National interest protection law has never been particularly successful anyway. Although France's yoghurt industry has continued to thrive.
Re: job losses
The 600,000 jobs claim was made in 2012:
(19 minutes in)
It was a dodgy claim at the time, but since then there's been a considerable net increase in employment. Obviously time passes quickly at your workplace!
Come to think of it, that's right - because of the plague pits. But I think the use of the cross lateral is suspect even in the National variant.
Surely only if the run of play is with the codpiece holder?
Clever move. I go for Tooting Broadway.
'So it...' ('it' meaning what precisely?) '...would suggest that the real reasoning behind a fatal solution rather than one that allows a device to still be used but then tracked is a financial rather than a practical one.'
-Brilliant logic, except for the fact that the industry has consistently opposed this measure. Obviously they don't know when they're well off.
I think whatever solution was proposed to reduce phone theft, the comments page here would be full of silly conspiracy theories. I really should just accept it and get back to work.
You know, having had a bottle broken over my head and two fingers broken to get hold of my mobile, and having discovered that IMEI numbers can be reflashed in a matter of seconds, I'm all in favour of mandatory kill switches.
This comments page reads like the Daily Express with a Diana story. It's just a good idea from a law-enforcement point of view. Occam would have you leave it at that.
Sometimes the real world takes time to catch up with (superb) satire:
I think I can summarise what you've said as 'they're all just as bad as each other - to hell with them'. Forgive me if I've misunderstood.
Well, don't end on the negative. How would you make the world better? What ideals would you stand up for? How would you stand up for them? Do you condemn the people who break those ideals on both sides, or do you follow the (two wrongs make a right) 'we're just as bad' attitude?
It's easy to be against things. It avoids all the contradictions and difficulties of real world dilemmas. It makes you feel nice and pure. Real world choices are often not between one obviously 'right' and one obviously 'wrong' option. But is standing on the sidelines booing really going to make the world a better place?
Re: I always thought he was a bit crazy
@ Voland's Right Hand
Transdnestr is only around 30% Russian
Transdnestr is part of Moldova not 'in Western Ukraine'.
Transdnestr has a large Russian garrison and is widely considered to be under de facto Russian control
The evidence of direct Russian interference in Western Ukraine is clear - coordinated , clearly trained and heavily armed troops carrying Russian weapons and Russian uniforms (without badges) - oh, and Putin has now admitted the Crimean 'insurgents' were his soldiers. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2014/04/putin-says-no-russian-troops-east-ukraine-2014417132436806530.html
Do you have the slightest bit of evidence about your Transdnestr theory?
I'll add that to my extremely short list of 'reasons why I should continue supporting Spurs'.
Bitcoin - the new Second Life
Just like Second Life, there's a lot of noise about it, businesses will get terribly excited, it'll make money for some people...and then it'll more or less go away because in all the excitement everyone seems to have forgotten the Normal Human Being.
Here's one paragraph from the Wiki:
"Bitcoin uses public-key cryptography, peer-to-peer networking, and proof-of-work to process and verify payments. Bitcoins are sent (or signed over) from one address to another with each user potentially having many, many addresses. Each payment transaction is broadcast to the network and included in the blockchain so that the included bitcoins cannot be spent twice. After an hour or two, each transaction is locked in time by the massive amount of processing power that continues to extend the blockchain."
Now explain that to your granny. And then explain why she needs it. We've already got money, which we call 'money'.
Tech that we want (but they never seem to give us)
I was just reading the story about the phone manufacturers' squeezing ever more pixels into their screens, and I was thinking about what things you want but the industry never seems to give you. Here's my list:
Phones that compromise their thinness to give you more battery life (OK, Motorola have tried this)
Higher resolution laptop screens at affordable prices
A new Psion 5 - pocketable, instant on, great keyboard, long battery life, well-designed software.
- Product round-up Ten excellent FREE PC apps to brighten your Windows
- Review Tough Banana Pi: a Raspberry Pi for colour-blind diehards
- Product round-up Ten Mac freeware apps for your new Apple baby
- Analysis Pity the poor Windows developer: The tools for desktop development are in disarray
- Chromecast video on UK, Euro TVs hertz so badly it makes us judder – but Google 'won't fix'