I don't care WHAT the pretext is...
.. but if they're gonna put Bono in prison, I'm all for it.
1508 posts • joined 23 Jan 2010
.. but if they're gonna put Bono in prison, I'm all for it.
"Seems like somebody should be offering them jobs instead of suing them."
They will indeed be offered jobs. In the prison laundry, for example.
"It may be good, it may be crap. I JUST DON'T FRACKING WANT TO - OKAY!"
If you don't like being told what to do, you might find that you've come to the wrong planet.
This Goldschmidt fellow needs to have a serious talk with Faza over at thecynicalmusician.com. Faza gonna learn him some economics.
"You get an upvote just for mentioning Sexy Beast';
And an upvote to you too!
How could one and the same person play both Gandhi, and Don Logan? Still baffles me...
"I'd feel more charitable if the Tidal crowd on that stage made music that I'd want to hear."
While I loathe the celebrities on display as much as anyone, I don't think that it's fair to let their music be a factor in this particular matter. I am not sure that what they are trying to do (whatever the fuck that might be) by means of this "Tidal" endeavor is dependent on the quality of their music, such as it is. After all, Beethoven could have been up on that stage and it would not make the enterprise any less moronic.
It's also interesting to note that Alicia Keys' husband, "Swizz Beats", was the CEO of MegaUpload. So maybe that's a hint of what the Tidal investors are hoping to accomplish. I wouldn't put anything past them...
It's very very simple: these guys need to be in prison for the rest of their lives. Corruption, especially in law enforcement agencies, needs to be punished so severely that there would be no inducements or advantages that would justify risking the possible penalty.
"Adolf Hitler did win power in a democratic election,[...] he won by a landslide"
This is false. Just completely. Check the election results and the vote totals.
July 1932: 13,745,000 votes 37.3% After Hitler was candidate for presidency
November 1932: 11,737,000 votes 33.1%
March 1933: 17,277,180 votes 43.9% During Hitler's term as Chancellor of Germany
I, personally, see no "landslide".
As for "winning power in a democratic election" that's a debatable statement: he became Chancellor as the result of a coalition of parties none of which had enough seats in the Reichstag to form a government by itself.
(After the 1933 Reichstag fire President Paul von Hindenburg issued the Reichstag Fire Decree which suspended civil liberties and then the Enabling Act was passed and there were no more elections. These two acts were the legislative key, so to speak: Hitler as Chancellor but not with complete power based on these two acts is almost certainly not the same as Hitler in power with the complete power which he did achieve.)
"Now the majority of computers are purchased by end users for personal and creative purposes. That is why Apple is on the rise and IBM and Microsoft are in decline."
Unless you have some citations I am just going to assume that this is bullshit. *I* am pretty certain that the vast majority of computers are purchased by business enterprises and governments. And considering that Windows-based computers outsell Macs by about a 9-to-1 margin, I think that you're overstating Microsoft's "decline" by maybe just a wee bit. And of course, one can debate how much of Apple's current success is built on computers proper, as opposed to the sale of iPhones and mp3 players. (And yes, I know that a smart phone is a computer but they are being purchased as glorified phones, not as computers.)
"According to Schilling, the harassment began after he congratulated his daughter Gabby on being accepted to university. Having 112,000 followers, his public tweet spread, and both Schilling and his daughter received replies ranging from sexually suggestive quips to overtly obscene threats."
I am going to assume that Schilling loves his daughter. Because that's a reasonable assumption. Now, bearing that in mind, and knowing that there are legions of people who, when using their computers, comport themselves in a way in which they would never dare behave in real life, but knowing that, then why, exactly, would Schilling want to make his daughter a target for such people?
I am not excusing these people at all; what I don't understand is what it is that Schilling expects by talking about his daughter to vast numbers of people via a medium through which any of those people can reply in any way they want.
"Wasn't this a plotline from space 1999?......let me guess....are they now going to ask for funding to send a probe to Titan, thus keeping their pension pots topped up?"
You are one cynical son of a bitch. Not, however, as cynical as I am....
"How many relationships did these two tits ruin I wonder? "
I see what you did there!
"Nicola Sturgeon said: 'It is entirely right that Scotland should have its own distinctive and recognisable Internet domain, in particular one that will resonate internationally, helping to promote Scottish business and culture throughout the world.'"
As an American and an objective observer, does he actually believe that, or does he have some sort of financial interest in appearing to be an idiot?
Once they go down the drain, I don't really care.
"Brin and Page are worried about their future liquidity"
I'll be glad to help! Because I would *love* to see these two turned into liquid.
Being an inveterate gamer, I like to compare critic reviews with user reviews on both Metacritic and Steam. While not the most severe that I have ever seen, the difference between the critics' opinions and the buyers' opinions for Evolve tends to the extreme.
"Or he has some pervy fantasies"
Or maybe he has access to information that you don't...
"US plots to KILL hackers – with bureaucracy!"
That's very humane. Now if it were up to *me*...
"HSBC has no record of [Falciani] ever escalating any concerns to his line management, or using the whistleblowing hotline that was in place at the time of the [data] theft,"
There was no need to report his concerns to management. He needed to go right to the appropriate legal authorities.
One of the few things the ex-Communist Bloc countries did right, and that we need to do too, was to execute people for large-scale financial crime.
"Blyk – a service which gave you free calls when your mates listened to advertisements..."
Oh the depths of human depravity!
"...failed in 2009."
Yet the majesty of the human spirit ultimately triumphs!
"we’ve got an aeroplane this weekend"
How I would love to be able to say this myself...
"The number of food producers going bust has increased dramatically as supermarkets squeeze producers in the quest for greater profit, according to accountancy firm Moore Stephens*. 'The supermarkets are going through the bloodiest price war in nearly two decades and are using food producers as the cannon fodder,' said Duncan Swift, a partner at the firm. It’s easy to see the battle as one of price, something described as a race to the bottom as supermarkets cut, undercut and cut once more."
I have something of a philosophico-semantical objection to the italicized passage because, according to the situation as described here, the supermarkets don't seem to be striving for "greater profits", they seem to be cutting prices *and* profits as much as the goal of "staying in business" will permit. That's what makes it a "race to the bottom" isn't it? It's not as though they are *shifting* the burden of lower sales prices to the producers as it is sharing the pain of lower revenue to the greatest degree with those producers.
*Note please that the statement from Moore Stephens is not a direct quote; it seems to be the story-writer's characterization.
Good post. Most people seem to equate "not guilty" with 'innocent".
"'The internet is not what it seems,' Forbes reports Dratel as saying. 'The internet permits, and thrives on, to some extent, deception and misdirection.'"
So much so, in fact, that you'd think that it'd been designed by defense lawyers.
"Durak" means "fool" (noun, as in "a fool and his money") in Russian. So that's appropriate and conforms to all truth-in-advertising laws.
If "written proof" will do, they'll give you all the "written proof" you could ever want, all day long. Yes they will!
Noscript already has many of the larger parasites whitelisted. You might want to look at Noscript's Options->Whitelist tab and see who's already there courtesy of the devs (and, no doubt, large payments to those devs from the entities on the default list.)
"Amazon, Google, etc. have really quite modest adverts and provide a means of income for the content generators in the world."
False. Those ads provide a means of income for content aggregators and for pirates; the income provided will pay for a box of crayons and some looseleaf paper - not a lot of content, in other words, and what can be financed by such income is usually rather basic if not actually primitive.
The future seems to be like YouTube: an Endless Ocean Of Dilettantes And Amateurs.
I don't understand why, having demanded money to take down the pictures, he's not been charged with extortion.
"Don't forget, some people thought it was amazing that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, married to a Chinese woman, had learned Mandarin and held a Q&A with Chinese students."
Don't forget that some commenters on this forum opined that Zuckerberg's mandarin was scarcely intelligible.
What we do here is no excuse for you. And that's even making the obviously incorrect assumption that you have any idea about anything in the US, because you don't. But you just keep getting your understanding of the US from people who have political reasons to distort the facts, so that when things like this happen, you can be easily distracted.
I disagree with your post for a reason but it's for a semi-technical reason: I do not subscribe to the same definition of "rationality" as you think you do - but actually don't.
To me, "rationality" is a consonance of means and ends. Means that can achieve the desired ends are rational; means that can't are irrational. In fact you recognize this in your post as you are fully aware that your health bureaucrats are able to formulate ends and devise means to achieve them (in this case, the end is saving money and the means are financial inducements to kill elderly patients).
That you or I do not approve of the ends being achieved does not mean that they are acting irrationally - as long as the means that they have chosen to achieve their ends can be reasonably be expected to achieve those ends then their behavior is "rational".
And that does seem to be the case.
My idea is that people are almost always rational and if someone's behavior seems "irrational" (in the technical sense in which I have explained) then the most likely explanation is that you don't understand or approve of the ends that they are trying to achieve. (Obviously human stupidity needs to be accounted for but again, "stupidity" is "stupidity" and different from "irrationality". People do make mistakes, after all. Sometimes it seems that "making mistakes" is mostly what they. But that's not news, now is it?)
You people are funny. First you pay hospitals to kill elderly patients by giving them bounties for putting those patients on the Liverpool Care Pathway. Now you have decided that patients who desire any degree of privacy deserve to get cancer.
"NoScript" is exactly what came to mind as I was reading the article. If it doesn't support it then I can't even consider it.
Interesting photograph. I see that they took a random derelict right off of skid row and had him give the presentation. Why they couldn't be bothered to shave and dress him in nice clothes is a bit of a mystery, though. I guess they would have had to give him *two* bottles of Thunderbird in order to have him consent to that kind of treatment, instead of the one bottle that their corporate budget allowed.
I accidentally downvoted you; I meant to give you an upvote. (It's *very* early in the morning here.) Sorry.
"But Love in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction is a gruesome, grotesque noir story of a dismal future, where half of the world is considered disposable by the other half."
So pretty much the same as today. That *is* pretty dismal.
"I've never heard of this sort of nonsense before"
I have. If memory serves, an early version of 12 Tone Systems' Cakewalk music/audio production software would, after finishing an installation, delete C:\Temp and all files in it - which was not a problem except if there was no C:\Temp folder, in which case it would delete C:\. And that *was* a problem...
"Greenpeace and other lobbyists complained the job "concentrates too much influence in one person when that person does not adhere to our anti-science agenda.'”
"Theory of Finance scribe and Nobel laureate Eugene Fama's answer – that economic theory insists it is impossible to predict such things – tends not to convince all that many."
Makes you wonder how he got that Nobel. Kinda like Obama got it, I guess...
"Yet no one judges all Catholics, or Christians based on these nasty people.'
I'm sorry but you're full of shit. There are any number of atheists (including on this site) that will take any behavior by or belief of any Christian or group of Christians and use it to smear all Christians.
It takes effort not to see that.
There are people who might care about Anonymous' opinions; I am not one of them.
"He detailed the dirt-cheap Red Star Linux system which contained a modified version of the Firefox browser dubbed Naenara and an Apple-like Mail client renamed Carrier Pigeon."
"Carrier Pigeon"? Shouldn't that be "Stool Pigeon"?
"the allegation Ulbricht solicited murders is based not only on extensive records of communications between him and others (recovered from his laptop), but also transaction records between DPR and Silk Road user 'redandwhite'."
There are many circumstances in which a person would be wise to plea-bargain; but with the charges this guy is facing, even a plea-bargain is likely to get him decades in prison. (Although there have been people who have accepted 25 year, non-parole-eligible sentences for the sake of avoiding even worse outcomes at trial.)
"There are very many complaints and issues I have encountered when dealing with the creative types that are my user-base, but never have they complained that one storage system sounds better than another storage system."
I have been told - I never encountered it myself, possibly because I never worked with world-famous producers and engineers - but I have been told that one of the more important pieces of esoteric knowledge in the possession of such people was that, after booting the computer you needed to wait ten minutes because it sounded better after the RAM had a chance to warm up.
And I vaguely recall something about green magic markers on cds...
"Even if the attacks did originate from North Korea, no one is discussing whether it was the work of a bunch of script kiddies or a state-sponsored group."
You think that the whole fucking world is just like your home town, don't you? Let me give you the clue that you so badly lack: North Korea is not like anywhere that you or anyone else on this site lives.
How could you not know this?
"Monopolies live in their own world where they expect customers to pay whatever they want to charge. Seems that they have forgot about how a customer sees it."
I have seen the opinion that that's not really classical monopoly behavior, which would consist of keeping prices low in order to discourage competitors from entering the market, so making it a source of low but steady and reliable profits for the incumbent. Duopoly has different dynamics. As would captive markets in which the availability or dearth of substitutes is key. And then there is the inherent threat of government regulation, along with barriers to entry and imperfect competition. But these are all different things.
The situation might be somewhat more complex than you realize.
Any actions meriting a fine this large needs to have prison sentences to go along with it. Both for the responsible executives (for obvious reasons) and the board of directors (for, at the very least, negligence - a directorship is not or rather should not be free money to the the cronies of the managing execs and major stockholders.)
One could not think of a better way to ridicule Google Glass than that photo.
That's all good as far as it goes but how much would it have cost to encrypt the passwords, for example, as opposed to storing them (and all the other information) in plaintext?