* Posts by Dr. Mouse

1620 posts • joined 22 May 2007

Patch ASAP: Tons of Linux apps can be hijacked by evil DNS servers, man-in-the-middle miscreants

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Thanks for the update el'Reg. I'll get on with protecting my servers.

I just have to ask though:

bug in glibc's DNS resolver – which is used to translate human-readable domain names, such as theregister.co.uk, into a network IP address.

Was this really necessary? I would posit that anyone reading this site, or at least 99.99% of them, will already know what DNS is. Even most semi-technical users know what DNS is for. This line may be needed on a general news site, but on The Register, read mostly by techies?

2
2

Official: Seagate notebook drive has shingles

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

(by which time SSDs will probably be closer or even lower in price, anyway)

And will need some independent, long term reliability tests done, to satisfy your previous requirement. By which time faster, cheaper, higher capacity drives will be out.

...And will need some independent, long term reliability tests done, to satisfy your previous requirement. By which time faster, cheaper, higher capacity drives will be out.

...And will need some independent, long term reliability tests done, to satisfy your previous requirement. By which time faster, cheaper, higher capacity drives will be out.

14
2

Ofcom must tackle 'monopolistic' provider BT, says shadow digital minister Chi Onwurah

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Is the issue Openreach @Ledswinger

Openreach can undercut new entrants due to economies of scale, a massive existing infrastructure, and favourable terms with government (e.g. business rates on fibre).

If a new entrant wanted to provide internet access to a small area, they have large setup costs. Their product will probably be more expensive than BTs, especially as BT can use profitable areas to subsidise unprofitable ones.

However, BT won't roll out to all unprofitable areas. There are not-spots. These are the best areas for a new entrant to wire up. However, as soon as the new entrant is up and running, BT suddenly decide they do want to roll out there, so undercut the new entrant and wipe them out. This is abuse of their effective monopoly to keep new players out of the sector.

* I've used BT, when many times it was probably Openreach, but it makes no difference for the point I am making so I can't be bothered correcting it now...

0
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Is the issue Openreach

Part of the problem is that BT/Openreach are using their monopoly to kill competition.

There have been various innovative projects to bring good broadband to areas neglected by Openreach. What tends to happen is that, as soon as it is up and running, Openreach change their minds, deploy FTTC in the area, undercut them, and drive them out of business.

I had ideas of building out a broadband provider in a small area. Openreach had said they didn't plan to roll out there for several years. I'm glad I didn't: A few months later they started their roll out and my own business would have been dead in the water.

So competition in this market is nearly impossible. Openreach have an effective monopoly in most areas, and can easily undercut any startup. I don't know what the cure would be, but something should be done to "rebalance the market".

0
0

UK to stop children looking at online porn. How?

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

I have to agree. It is the parents' responsibility to ensure their children are safe, but we now have a whole generation who think they can leave their children sat in front of a TV/Computer, ignore what they are doing, and assume they will be safe.

It is simple to implement appropriate filters to a child's internet access, and that should be the parents' job, not the government's. It is also a parent's job to take an interest in what their kid is doing and protect them from the evils out in the world (to an appropriate level).

This is all a symptom of the entitlement culture and laziness epidemic in this country (and beyond), as well as the government's wish to regulate and intrude on every aspect of our personal lives.

23
2

'Hobbit' heads aren't human says bone boffin

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Homo Trumpus?

Politicians are the sad rements of a primordial species that bacteria and other unwanted things evolved from.

Hey! I think that's really insulting... to the myriad of bacteria who you are lumping in with such unevolved scum as politicians!

4
0

Open APIs for UK banking: It's happening, people

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Disappointed...

This was not the news I was hoping for, reading the article.

What I want is a standard API which will allow me to hook an accounting programme into my accounts, from multiple different banks, and get all the data out. Apparently, this is available in Germany, and also on some business bank accounts (for a fee, I think), but at the moment I have to export the data manually and import it into the software. Being able to initiate payments, with an additional auth check (2FA/password/etc.), would be a bonus.

2
0

Danish Sith Lord fined in Galactic Republic rumpus

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Any Republic where Jar-Jar Binks can become a Senator...

Unless he was really a Sith...

1
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Er...

Or Northern Ireland?

3
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: unspecified techniques

Here was I thinking "The Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded."

2
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Damn you!

I've lost!

0
0

Safe Harbor crunch time: Today's the day to hammer out privacy deal

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: It should never have exsted!

Compare and contrast that to how EU citizens are dealt with by the US

Actually, AFAIK, anyone in the US legally gets close to the same rights and freedoms and a US citizen.

It's non-US citizens who are outside the US who have no rights. This probably harks back to the old days before the internet: Why would they need rights in the US if they are not in the US?

1
0

How El Reg predicted Google's sweetheart tax deal ... in 2013

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Corporation tax

Is this actually so? I hear it repeated often, but it seems unfeasible.

Ah, actually I'm not sure. I have heard it repeated many times, and accepted it, but from http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2011/10/24/companies-do-not-have-a-duty-to-maximise-their-profits-or-to-avoid-tax/:

172: Duty to promote the success of the company

(1)A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to—

(a)the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,

(b)the interests of the company’s employees,

(c)the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others,

(d)the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment,

(e)the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and

(f)the need to act fairly as between members of the company.

(2)Where or to the extent that the purposes of the company consist of or include purposes other than the benefit of its members, subsection (1) has effect as if the reference to promoting the success of the company for the benefit of its members were to achieving those purposes.

(3)The duty imposed by this section has effect subject to any enactment or rule of law requiring directors, in certain circumstances, to consider or act in the interests of creditors of the company.

It seems the duty is to promote the success of the company. However, for many the success of the company is defined in terms of profit, balance sheet and PR. Legal minimisation of the tax bill, where it doesn't impact on PR, would be almost foolish to let slip, and could be considered a dereliction of this duty.

As for "The Dude":

But if we want to do this right, then we need to start thinking seriously about abolishing taxation - period - full stop.

Really?! If that were the case, how would they pay for essential services? Police, fire service, courts of law... Would you suggest that everyone has to take out an individual contract with a security service to protect them if a crime is committed? What if they can't afford it, do they not get justice? Does the criminal walk free?

What about roads and other essential public infrastructure? Do we say "No, you can't leave your house because you haven't paid the fee to this company to walk on their pavement"?

It is barmy to believe that, in a civilised society, we could actually manage without a central authority contributed to by all (AKA Government and Taxes).

2
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Corporation tax

It would work if and only if companies were forced to distribute profits to someone who in turn would pay the taxes. But they are not forced, so money can stay in company safes.

I do not believe this would happen. A company exists to make profits, and money sat in a bank account is not making a profit. It is more likely it would be invested, barring a reserve (like an emergency fund, or a future investment fund). Even then, it would eventually be either invested or moved to an individual.

As for structures which make it fall over (ownership of/by other companies), you could state that these rules apply only to UK companies, and treat a non-UK company as an individual, taxing on transfer of the capital. Also, any owners/shareholders of a UK company must be registered for UK tax and pay tax on their dividends.

The idea is not without it's flaws, but it is simpler and more likely to actually raise tax.

2
1
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Corporation tax

Corporation tax is, in my opinion, one of the most complicated areas of tax, and should be abolished.

My reasoning:

Companies are legal entities with, often, an incredibly large amount of resources. Their mandate is to generate as much profit for shareholders as possible. So, if they can spend £1m (say) on accountants, and those accountants find a way to work the profits so that they save £2m in tax, they are legally required to do so*.

On the other hand, individuals (normally) have much more limited resources. Until you reach the upper echelons, the cost of hiring a accountants to find the most efficient way to legally avoid tax outweighs the potential savings.

My solution would be to remove corporation tax entirely (which companies will pour money into finding ways out of) and tax individuals when those profits leave the business. This would end up leaving more money to get into the hands of people, and would reward companies who chose to invest in their business. It would cut down on the cost of accountants for businesses, too.

This argument is not based on morality, but pragmatism. The moral view would be that companies are making lots of money, so we should tax them. My pragmatic view is that they will always try to find ways to avoid paying that tax, so don't even bother trying.

* As long as it will actually net them bigger profits. Google, in this instance, is playing a PR game.

8
5

IRS 'inadvertently' wiped hard drive Microsoft demanded in audit row

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Exactly what I thought. If you told the tax man "Sorry, I accidentally deleted all my records, whoopsy!"... I don't think "Well, you did it and got away with it, so why shouldn't I?" would cut it!

5
0

UK govt: No, really, we're not banning cryptography

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: political lies...

Actually, from what I've heard, they can lock you up forever.

They ask for the password, you refuse, they lock you up for 5(?) years. When you are released, they ask for the password again...

7
0

Updated Android malware steals voice two factor authentication

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge
Joke

Re: Isn't it sweet...

Some Android handsets can be upgraded to Windows 10. That's about as secure as it gets at the moment in mobile. Zero malware so far across over 100 million devices.

Because there are only 5 users, all of whom work for Microsoft, and no apps available yet?

3
0

Murderous necrophiliac kangaroo briefly wins nation's heart

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge
Coat

Have you heard about the guy...

...who gave up Bestiality, Necrophilia and Flagellation?

He realised he was flogging a dead horse!

6
0

Nvidia GPUs give smut viewed incognito a second coming

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

There is blame on all sides here, I think.

Chrome holds the majority of the blame: They are specifically stating that incognito mode keeps your session private. It should wipe anything which could be used to discover information about the session as soon as it is no longer needed. This would include the frame buffer.

Diablo holds some blame, as it should not be displaying the frame buffer until it has initialised it. It is not their fault that the data was leaked, but it is their fault that it was visible through their application.

NVidia should (although they may, I don't know) offer easy-to-use privacy hooks and APIs to ensure data is not leaked, triggering a zeroing of the frame buffer on release.

The OS (and applications) should use those hooks and APIs to ensure data is not leaked (e.g. on logoff or user switching).

8
0

Nvidia's patent war on Samsung is a wreck – what you need to know

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Business as usual for Samsung

excluding those unable to spend on lawyers

This is a failing of the legal system itself, not of the patent system. It applies throughout all arms of the legal system in both the US and here in the UK (and most of the world): If you can afford an expensive lawyer, you have a better chance of winning. This makes a mockery of justice.

As a brief example, a friend of mine has been charged with a fairly serious crime (it is definitely a false accusation). Luckily, he is able to raise the huge amount of money needed for a good legal team to defend him (albeit by making huge sacrifices). This will give him good legal advice on the matter, and skilled barrister in court, and a team looking over the facts of the case to produce the defence with the best chance of a favourable outcome.

In turn, had I been the one charged, I would likely have had to rely on a court-appointed defence. I would have to make do with whatever quality of lawyer I had been assigned/were willing to accept legal aid fees. My chances of winning would be substantially lower, whether I had done what they say or not.

My chances in a civil suit would be even lower, as I would probably not be able to get help defending the case, although at least I would be able to claim costs if I managed to win (something you cannot do against the CPS in the UK).

4
0

Reverser laments crypto game protection, says wares dead after 2018

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: re: Expect government back doors in games in future....

A (video game) cracker is someone who removes the copy protection of a video game, so lamers like you can copy it and play it for free the legitimate owner is able to use it without the ridiculous restrictions put in place by the writers

FTFY.

I have, on many occasions in the past, had to crack games that I legitimately own in order to use them in the way I want. For example, I cracked Quake 2 so I could run it without having the CD in the drive. Had I not, I would have ended up with unplayable game I paid good money for, simply because the CD had become scratched. I would also have had to find the CD every time I wanted to play it.

Things have moved on, of course, but there are still legitimate reasons to crack a game you own. Many games, for instance, now require an internet connection, so you have to crack it to play it on a laptop away from home.

Also, even if your original statement is true, most crackers don't do it so that people can play for free. They do it because they can, because it is a fun and interesting exercise for them.

21
1

US Marines kill noisy BigDog robo-mule for blowing their cover

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Yes, methanol fuel cells are readily available

Yes, methanol fuel cells are readily available

And cost about as much for a 100W fuel cell as a 3kW Diesel genset. They are not very good at power to cost ratio

I can't see cost being the massive issue for such military uses as it would in most other areas. I suspect there are other downsides which took precedence over cost.

2
0

Cat fight: Watch out YouTube, here comes Facebook

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Facebook stats, pah!

I think there is a big difference.

I use Facebook to connect with friends, as an addition to tools like phone calls, texts, whatsapp, and the good old-fashioned face-to-face meeting (usually for several pints in a drinking establishment). If I do something and would like to share information about that with my friends, I will use Facebook as one of the methods. Pics, Videos and descriptions of events in my life others may find interesting. This is social networking, and where such content belongs.

Youtube, however, is generally a public medium. Many people seem to flood it with stuff which is only (or should only be) of interest to their friends and family. This is similar to Twitter, an entirely public forum mostly filled with personal content...

So my view would be that the world would be a better place if personal stuff was confined to Facebook, and Youtube and Twitter were used only for content you want the whole world to see. The quality of content on Youtube would go up, giving them a chance to make a profit.

4
0

Boffins unwrap bargain-basement processor that talks light and current

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Sweet!

An early prediction for you

1) They wil patent the hell out of everything in sight

As they should. This is a novel, innovative manufacturing process.

2) They will charge and arm and a leg to license it

More likely, they will charge what people are willing to pay, or keep it back for use in their own products. What's the point spinning businesses out of a Uni unless they are going to make money from it? The most obvious way to make money would be to license the technique, and to make money from that they need to charge what people will pay.

These are not patent trolls, they are universities.

3) It will die a death as other companies take the ideas and make them work in ways the circumvent the patents

Fair enough. If they can achieve the result they want without using the specific technique described in the patent, there's no problem. Patents only (or should only) protect the particular innovation you came up with, not everything vaguely similar (*cough* Apply *cough*).

6
0

New gear needed to capture net connection records, say ISPs

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Ask the people

should be put to a public referendum. Give everyone the facts

Haven't you realised that's not how referendums work in this country? See the AV referendum... FUD and mudslinging outweighed any facts by at least an order of magnitude!

3
1

Contracting advice

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Contracting advice

Hi all

I am currently a software developer in a staff role, but am looking to move on, and am considering contracting again. There are many reasons for this, and probably the least of them is the money. My plan would be to do fairly short, get-the-job-done projects.

However, it has been about 13 years since I last contracted and I know that many rules and regulations have changed over this time. Back then, I used an umbrella company who set up a Ltd co and funnelled all income through it, paying min wage as salary and the rest, after expenses (and their fee, of course), as dividends.

My plans are also slightly different this time. I have a few projects of my own which I intend to get going and attempt to make money from, and I will not necessarily be confining myself to one contract at a time.

So, given this, does anyone have any advice for me? I am looking both at financials, regs, and also general advice regarding contracting. It has been so long, and I only did it back then as a stop-gap. I have not decided for definite that I will go contracting, but it looks an attractive option. I am newly without ties or commitments, and the variety appeals.

Thank you all in advance.

0
0

US government pushing again on encryption bypass

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: for goodness sake

Encryption is hard to get right, even mega companies who can afford best in field experts like Google and Apple don't get things exactly right every time.

There are various open source libraries which provide encryption. You must make correct use of them, and you rely on them being implemented correctly, they generally make it simple to get "right" (for some value of "right").

If the library is compromised, you are screwed, although this doesn't happen often as is generally fixed quickly (many eyes and all that). Also, if you use it incorrectly (https://xkcd.com/1286/) you have problems. So you obviously need some clue as to what you are doing, but the job is made at least an order of magnitude easier...

1
0

MPs slam gov heads over 'childishness' on failed farmer IT project

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Of course the politicians themselves have absolutely nothing to be blamed for and are never childish.

I agree. I mean, when we watch PMQs or Parliamentary debates, we never hear the sort of jeering and booing that a primary school class would be severely chastised for, do we? Oh, wait...

It's one of the main things which turns me off politics. It's the one profession I know of where you get rewarded for acting like a spoiled 5-year-old, and encouraged to behave as such.

9
0

EU governments reach agreement on passenger name data

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Good start

I haven't read it either, but the article specifically says terrorist offences and serious crime. I tend to trust Out-Law articles, and assume they have read the relevant proposed legislation and reported accurately.

0
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Good start

While I can see the down votes coming in for this comment, I'm impressed.

From what I can see, they have actually specified a limited scope. Unlike, for example, RIPA, they are putting specific wording into the law to stop this data being used (legally) for purposes other than specified. Our (UK) government could learn from this.

It remains to be seen whether this restriction is:

a) kept in the law,

b) followed, and

c) enforced by severe penalties for those who break it.

It is, at least, a step in the right direction.

2
0

Goodbye, Hello Barbie: Wireless toy dogged by POODLE SSL hole

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

So Barbie has been subjected to penetration testing, and the probe has discovered several holes!

Fnar Fnar!

18
0

Infosec bods rate app languages; find Java 'king', put PHP in bin

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

I have to wonder...

C/C++ is difficult to learn (relatively speaking) and develop with. Those who use it have generally spent a lot of time learning to use it correctly.

PHP & Javascript are easy to learn and develop with. People can "develop" with it just by copy-and-pasting from W3Scools and Stack, then modifying until it does what they want, without really understanding what they are doing.

So, is it a problem with the language or the the people using it?

2
0

Microsoft encrypts explanation of borked Windows 10 encryption

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Decrypted plaintext...

"Windows 10 is the best! You should use it!! We fix broken things on Tuesdays! There are ghosts here..."

Obligatory xkcds:

https://xkcd.com/1293/

https://xkcd.com/1032/

7
1

GCHQ can hack your systems at will – thanks to 'soft touch' oversight

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Anon Cluetard Yawn.

Security services are often at a disadvantage. They could stop thousands of attacks, all of them in secret, but would still be considered to have failed because one succeeded.

That said, we do need effective judicial oversight of their operations. This means that open-ended warrants (or warrants issued by a minister) should not be allowed. A judge should sign off on every warrant, and it's purpose should be limited in scope and proportional to the risk.

International "hacks" should fall under this if there is a chance of them interfering with British people's data, but should also be subject to international relations policy and international law. What is GCHQ doing attacking Belgium, who are an ally? They could, in theory, take this as an act of war (or at least a hostile act), Britain launching an unprovoked attack on their infrastructure. We should work with the law enforcement and intelligence services of our allies, each sharing intelligence but collecting it under local laws. What I see is the opposite: Each country specifically attacking each other to get around local laws, then providing that intelligence back to the local agencies.

11
0

Italians to spend €150m ... snooping on PS4 jabber

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Is it just me who thinks this is an excuse for spooks to play video games all day?

7
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Don't forget...

How do you know of the need for Special Adaptations? :-P

3
0

Sysadmin's former boss claims five years FREE support or off to court

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: This does not happen just to sysadmin

As the previous commentard said, outrageous billing is the easiest way to get rid of these (or at least get paid hilariously for your trouble).

When I was at school, one of my friend's dads was a professor in a very specialist area. He was paid vast sums of money to do consultancy work.

One particular job he was offered involved an extended stay outside the country, and he did not want to do it. It clashed with family events and other commitments. Rather than telling them no, he quoted the job at an extortionate rate, 10x+ his normal (already very high) rates. To his astonishment, they accepted. The insane amount of money he was paid was adequate compensation for the inconvenience.

27
0

Who owns space? Looking at the US asteroid-mining act

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: I am surprised

Exactly! And here I thought "Team America: World Police" was just a comedy. They are not extending that to "Universe Police".

7
1

BOFH: How long does it take to complete Friday's lager-related tasks?

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: BOFH getting soft in his later years ?

In fact, I believe they were about to perform a 'live' test at the end of the story

Actually, I think it was the second live test/demonstration. They had just finished testing on the boss, and were moving on to the director.

22
0

Brits learning from the Continent? Authority, digi gov wheezes and the Autumn Statement

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Britain’s polite disdain for authority may be a core element of national character, but sometimes it has a price-tag.

Personally, I'm not sure it is just "disdain for authority". I think one of the main reasons people don't trust our government is that they have shown themselves to be untrustworthy. Whether it's slipping legislation in through the back door, fiddling expenses, or just generally not speaking the truth, politicians seem to find ways of proving that we cannot trust them on a regular basis.

9
0

Samsung Gear VR is good. So good 2016 could be year virtual reality finally makes it

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Film makers?

So much of how we currently make films is predicated on being able to control the framing - which essentially is a refinement of plays which operate on a stage.

People may have said the same about TV/Film when it first came about. If this takes off, I expect the first step will be as a slight enhancement to current films. Instead of getting a single, framed shot, you become immersed in the shot, able to look around (a little) and feeling that you are actually there instead of watching from a distance, filling your entire vision. This is how films started, I believe, as an extension/evolution of theatre.

So, I predict the first VR films will still mostly control the framing, the main direction you are looking etc, but expand the frame so you feel immersed.

3
0

IOCCO: Police 'reckless' for using terrorism powers on journo sources

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

What a crock of shit, I mean seriously, how can you break the law in such a disgraceful way

The unfortunate thing is that, as others have stated above, they didn't actually break the law, they "failed to follow guidelines".

1
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: Duhfish So when the police break the law, it's called 'being reckless'.

The only way - the only way - to ensure that these laws are not misused is to write the laws to specifically restrict what is and is not allowed and under what circumstances and with what authorisation and to clearly lay down that actions that fall outside of those specific criteria are breaches of the law.

Exactly! Have an upvote!

Many of us have been arguing this for a long time. If a law is written to help combat terrorism or find paedophiles the powers that be should specifically restrict the powers to that use in the law. If they don't, we get abuses like this and many more. Of course, the police can still abuse them, but they would be breaking the law if they could not justify their use under the strict restrictions within the law.

Writing these laws with no (or so few) restrictions on their use is practically encouraging their use outside their stated purpose. It leads to public suspicion or the police, the politicians who approved the law, and the legal system in general.

6
0

Uber wants UK gov intervention over TfL’s '5-minute wait' rule

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

First, Uber insist that they aren't taxis, right?

I guess it depends on your definition. In Leeds, all Ubers are registered Private Hire vehicles, which most people would count as taxis. I believe it's the same in London.

Also, Uber generally insist that they are not a taxi company, they are a technology company offering a (booking & payment) service for independent taxi drivers and/or companies.

Second, if there are no car owners in London then who do they expect will sign up to become Uber drivers?

There would be no taxis at all if there were no car owners. I presume he meant no private car owners, as in people who own their own car for personal use. There would obviously still have to be businesses (including self-employed people) who own a car for the purpose of their business.

1
0
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

You put a <wait 300> in the booking routine so that the driver isn't despatched for the pickup for five minutes.

Erm, I don't see how that would work.

As far as I am aware, the process is:

- You request an Uber in the app

- The request is sent to taxis which are not in use, which see where you are and where you are wanting to go

- The driver either confirms they will take the job or not

- You are notified that the driver is on it's way

To insert a 5 minute delay would probably mean they have to just delay the time when they are allowed to "start the meter" until 5 mins after they accepted the job. So, the taxi would turn up, you would get in, then have to wait another 3 minutes before they are allowed to set off. I'm sure that would help London's congestion problems, wouldn't it?!

1
1
Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

The question then becomes: if one rules that the Uber app counts as 'hailing' a taxi because it is effectively the same thing from a customer perspective, then surely one should also rule that the Uber app counts as a 'taximeter' because, again, it accomplishes the exact same purpose so far as the customer and indeed the operator are concerned.

I would argue that using the Uber app counts as ringing to book a taxi for immediate use, as many people do. "I want a taxi now from A to B".

As for the taxi meter argument, I would say it does (or should) count as that. It calculates the fare based on distance & time. If Uber want to be treated as private hire, under the common-sense interpretation of the rules as I have seen them, they would need to adjust their business model to state an up front charge.

Although, to be honest, I don't know of many private hire vehicles round here (Leeds) which do that unless you insist on it (forcefully) beforehand. When you ask for a price, they say "it'll be about £X" then the driver charges you what he wants at the end of the journey. At least with Uber, I know the driver won't gouge me because I've had too many beers, and any "surge multiplier" is given to you up front. I used to keep £40 hidden away for a taxi home from the centre on nights out for what should have been a £10 fare, just because the taxis would charge a shed load extra because he could get away with it (and I was too drunk to care by then).

2
1

Randall Munroe spoke to The Reg again. We're habit-forming that way

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

My copy arrived today

I laughed out loud just at the cover!

I can't wait to dig in, although it is not without risks. I read the introduction on lunch, then immediately had to send an email. Just before I hit send, I realised I had written it in thing-explainer style.... Quick rewrite needed, as it was being sent to an offsite developer!

3
0

France's 3-month state of emergency lets govt censor the web

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

"Don't be sad, 'cause two out of three aint bad"

- Meatloaf

5
0

Cat discovers GNOME desktop bug

Dr. Mouse
Silver badge

Re: More proof

... that cats are awesome evil. (as if any were needed)

FTFY. The cat was not trying to get a bug fixed, just to crash it's owner's slave's computer to get fed/attention sooner.

11
3

Forums