Re: g e Re: So. As an Aussie senator
"Would he get automatic diplomatic immunity?...." No, he wouldn't.
9690 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2007
A$$nut is inelligible as he hasn't been resident in Australia for the required period. This has been chewed over so many times already, why are El Reg wasting bandwidth on it unless it's forum bait?
Here's the likely outcomes:
1. A$$nut is announced as a candidate, is promptly rejected due to non-residency, Aussie Dickileaks, Anonyputzers and the dribbling Faithful sulk and refuse to vote, and the status quo is unchanged.
2. A$$nut selects one of his dribbling Faithful as a puppet, they get enough votes to get in, but then A$$nut finds working the strings all the way from the Ecuadorean Embassy in London too much hard work and goes to force himself on the Embassy's cleaner instead. Dribbler wastes his term doing nothing more than making pointless whines and is easily outmanouvered by the experienced parties, and the status quo is unchanged.
3. The voters actually think before voting, A$$nut's protest party get near zero votes and lose their deposit, and the status quo is unchanged.
Enjoy!
"..... And the Opposition doesnt get to change the law. That's the whole point." Actually, she could present a bill to Parliament even in opposition, and if she was actually more interested in the good of the public rather than making self-serving soundbites, she could form a cross-party alliance on the matter. Many UK laws have been passed with support from more than just the governing party. This carefully manufactured idea that Labour in Opposition can "do nothing" is a fraud - they could do plenty by working with the other parties, but it would mean overcoming their Labourite tendency to scoring political points over actually serving the people that elected them.
"Lenovo semi-recently announced that they are expanding their server HW presence in NC, including bringing some manufacturing over from China. Coincidence?" I suspect it will be enough local assembly for them to slap a "made in America" sticker on the product (and qualify for local grants and tax relief).
Poor Local Dupe, he has completely forgotten that it WAS just the word of the women versus that of A$$nut, right up to the point where A$$nut admitted to the Swedish authorities in preliminary questioning that he had indeed had nonconsensual sex because he did not understand local laws. Then, A$$nut made it even worse for himself - when his lawyer was told the authorities were going to charge him, he did a runner! So now it's the word of the women, A$$nut's own admission, plus his doing a runner from Sweden. He then arrives in the UK, spends months bleating on about justice whilst fighting extradition back to Sweden, and then - when he has exhausted all legal options - he shows what he really thinks of justice by doing another runner! So, now it's the word of the women, plus his admissions, plus his bunk from Sweden, plus his bail-jumping in the UK. But still the blinkered Faithful like Local Dupe want to pretend it's all about smearing the women as liars and man-haters.
Seriously, there can only be so long that Local Dupe can carry on trying to pretend reality has not happened.
".....You don't assume that Sweden is silly enough to allow hearsay evidence in its courts?...." Little chance of it going to court and being exposed for little more than whimsical tattletales unless your quivering hero grows a pair and goes to Sweden to face charges.
If only all that was being presented in court under oath as evidence, eh? Oh, but it's not, and you know that the Dickileaks groupies have been sprouting male bovine manure (along with threats and childish squeals of outrage) since before the two women in question were even identified. All A$$nut has to do is man up and go back to face the courts, then all these unsubstantiated claims made by his supporters can be put to rest. Do I think it likely that A$$nut thinks they'll hold up in court? Does a bear take dumps in the woods. Looks like liars take dumps in the Ecuadorean embassy.
Seriously, comparing telephone conversations with Grandma to unpredicted information on Afghans that helped the Alliance root out Taleban and AQ nutters? I don't ever remember chats with Grandma wandering into the illegal disclosure of government secrets or endangering lives. What a pathetic little toerag A$$ange is.
Oh, and someone explain to Jellybrain Fiveash the only reason A$$nut has not been charged is because A$$nut bunked before he could.
"Matt, ever been trolled before?......" And, as expected, unable to present an argument you fall back on the "it was only a joke, just for lulz, etc" fail. But I expected that from the first post you made as AC - when "trolling for the lulz" it is customary to tag up. Straight back at you, that sound is me ROFLMAO.
".....when in a hole...." LOL! It is very obviously you and your similarly upset skiddie friends, all crying over Recursion's inevitable trip to prison, that are very obviously in a hole seeing as you cannot post anything relevant. No arguments, no justifications, just whiney posts against those that mock your "hero" for the very obvious fool he is. What, did it all get a bit too serious for you when the lulz started getting jail time?
".....the more frothy mouthed you get...." Park your ego, chum, that's me laughing at you, no frothing involved.
".... As for my mum, she's a 75 year old widow...." And she's still paying for you to get through school at that age! Hadn't you better buck up and pass first grade, you can't go on living in her basement for ever.
"....something touch a raw nerve?...." Sorry to burst your little homophobic bubble, but no, you provide nothing more than amusement, in keeping with the rest of the Anonyputzs, Dickileaks and other self-deluding Faithful. For you to touch a nerve you would first have to have an original thought, and that would seem as likely as QPR winning this year's Premier League.
".....Methinks the lady, sorry queen, doth protest too much." Ask your mum, when the milkman or the postie's through with her. Don't interrupt her, she needs the money for your school uniform.
"It almost certainly breaches all kinds of laws in the UK....." Only if your Ts & Cs don't include phrases like "and I give Company X's representative permission to monitor my use of social media sites".....
Besides, you are a representative of your company, so what you post on social media can reflect badly on the company or your career prospects. For instance, if you are applying for a job with an investment bank, they would be very interested if your blog reads like the Rosa Luxembourg Appreciation Society as it points out that you are unlikely to be the type of employee they are looking for if not an outright security threat. If you are employed by a company and are stupid enough to have a blog or social media content acknowledging your company role but then also making controversial remarks then you will probably be censured or fired regardless of this new law.
The skiddies blacked out the sites the skiddies visit, sites which the ordinary public (and all those Senators) probably never even knew existed, and expect that to demonstrate what, that they are so far out of touch with Joe Public they make the Senators look street smart?
"....That was not a very convincing argument...." Oh but it is! There is no way Larry would go to Fudgeitso unless he really had to. Ponytail learnt the hard way when he left it late before going to Fudgeitso for help, Larry is just better at lying about CMT's capabilities whilst covering his a$$.
"....Why is that a "cache starved cpu" can be 10x faster than POWER6 and CELL running at 3-5GHz?...." The only time CMT wins is in wildly-contrived Snoreacle benchmark sessions or when webserving. Not in a real enterprise production environments using real production data and stack. If it was otherwise then we'd all be buying CMT servers, and the fact that the VAST MAJORITY of companies do not is all the proof I need to expose your sillyness.
/SP&L
"....cost-savings in the form of more work being accomplished (achieved through performance boosts, etc), etc.". Helloooooh, anyone home? What do you think happens with CMT, already too tightly tied to parallelised workloads to run the single-threaded apps customers have now, when you take away even more general performance stuffing "accelerators" onto the die? FFS, go get an adult to explain it to you.
"I don't think Oracle's trying to sell their hardware of "Other" software...." They have to. Sorry to burst your bubble but the only Oracle software that really sells well is the database software, the rest is usually not even in the top three of the relevant software segment. Remember Oracle Collaboration Suite? So, how many Exchange instances did that replace? And the majority of Oracle databases are actually storing data for other companies' software (such as SAP). Larry may think he can sell everyone an Oracle DB appliance but he can't replace the rest of the stack, and if he tries making Slowaris and SPARC too closely ties to Oracle software then he will kill his chances of selling servers for anything other than his own appliances.
"....The OS detects conditions that match and offload the work to the processors' built in crypto accelerator." Sure, sounds fine on paper, but you need to understand that in circuit design you don't get anything for nothing. The space taken up on the die by additional, specialised circuits usually has to come at the cost of more generalised circuits that can help in more generic uses. In the case of M5, by finally adding the cache the CMT designs need (though not the rest of the cache-handling technology required), half the cores had to be chopped out to make room. So you have a choice - make the CPU bigger so you can add the additional specialised circuits without affecting the general circuits, or add the specialised circuits at the cost of non-specialised performance. Making the chip die bigger means increasing the wattage required and also reducing the yield per wafer, both of which drive up costs. Staying in the same envelope but reducing general performance makes your chip less attractive to those users not running the specialised tasks you have designed for. And - whilst it maybe hard for the Snoreacle fanbois to admit - not every server out there is running Larry's database software as its core role.
it would make more sense to design such offload engines onto plug-in PCI-e cards, then they can be added as required without crippling the general performance of the system.
"..... It performed awfully in real life workloads......" LOL! Didn't you get the memo? The reason Snoreacle's has to swallow its pride and badge Fudgeitso servers is BECAUSE the whole CMT range are pants with real workloads outside of the web serving niche. And the main reason is because it chokes on heavy single-thread apps and doesn't have enough cache. Your pointless denial of reality is very amusing but I think it's about time you started facing facts.
".......Sun couldn't come up with anything intelligent around roadmaps...... It looks like the roadmaps from Sun are pretty much being completed by Oracle......" So which is it? If Sun didn't have any intelligent road maps and Oracle are completing on them then surely that means Oracle are just completing a not intelligent roadmap. Thanks for clearing that up.
"......you don't have a rational argument for your statements....." Try the Oracle server sales figures (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/20/oracle/ ). Nothing shows the fact that Larry is failing to convince the customers more than the complete lack of penetration of Niagara into even existing Sun accounts, who prefer the SPARC64, whether badged or direct from Fudgeitso. Your staged benchmark figures are completely pointless compared to the all important sales figures.
/ SP&L
"There are initiatives underway (and have been for a while now) to use FPGAs to provide hardware acceleration. Why is it a bad idea to do something similar on the processor die itself?...." The question becomes how tightly do you integrate the app to the hardware. Too tightly and the chip becomes too specialized to do any other tasks well. And then you reduce the customer base, which means you lose any economies of scale and have to sell your specialised chips at very high prices. Remember the IBM/Sony/Toshiba Cell? Brilliantly clever, capable of amazingly tight integration, and yet a PITA to develop for due to the tightness of integration. Lack of stomach for the pain of coding it limited the application base, limiting the uses and keeping the costs high, leading to it overlooked in favour of cheaper, simpler, "less clever" but infinitely more popular and flexible designs like x86. If Larry ties his chips too tightly to Java, or worse still too tightly to just Oracle database software, then the other app vendors will push their software on anything but Larry's chips, and you can't build a business on Larry's software alone.
"Itanic.
'nuf said"
More like you CAN'T find anything to say to dispute the obvious - T5 can't do the heavy, single-threaded enterprise workloads Larry claims it can, and sticking a lump of cache on the side without any integration into the chip on M5 is a waste of time. Once again, SPARC64 (and Itanium, and Power) will massively outsell Niagara because it's the only chip Snoreacle's can offer that is actually capable of doing the job required. Whilst it's good for Snoreacle's that Larry has learned from Ponytail's mistakes, it's still amusing to see how the Sunshiners are still trying to deny the obvious.
/SP&L
I'm betting the "skillz" used by HTP amounted to watching the security sites for news of a new security hole, then scanning the Web for any servers slow to patch the hole, using the proof code from the security warning to "exploit" the Linode server, then claiming 1337 skillz. Skiddies. Real black hats wouldn't be blowing their own horns as loudly as possible.
".....Personally I think the question of consent should be rendered irrelevant by the fact that events led to a girl taking her own life." Whilst the suicide is tragic, it does not prove anything other than that the girl in question decided to commit suicide. For all you know, it could be she was ashamed of having sex with four lads, made up the rape story, then couldn't cope with the guilt, or that she was raped and couldn't live with the self-loathing probably combined with a bit of guilt ("I must be to blame for putting myself in the position to get raped"). Truth is we will never know now, and we'll probably never know unless one of the lads involved confesses which, if she wasn't actually raped, is unlikely. The law needs to be based on fact and evidence, not emotion. So to claim the matter is settled just because the girl took her life is not legal grounds for conviction of the accused.
".....So, "insufficient evidence" means that they didn't post the required number of pictures of themselves committing the crime?....." No, it probably means the pics are either of not good enough quality to identify anyone or that they do not show conclusive proof of coercion. The police would need to build up enough evidence to convince a prosecutor to take the case to court, and if the girl did not report the case until four days after the event she probably cleaned up all the physical evidence and left the cops with nothing but her word. Tragic, I'm sure the coppers involved would love to take the "rapists" in question into a windowless room for five minutes of truncheon practice, but that's not how the law works.
What the Anons are doing is saying "investigate but you had better reach the conclusion we have decided on or else" - that's just vigilantism by computer.
"a story about HP doing something that Oracle-Sun doesn't......" Your trollbait would be a lot more convincing if you had taken the time to do a little reserach. Snoreacle has plenty of "cloud" products (http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/cloud/overview/index.html). In fact all the vendors, inlcuding Snoreacle, will claim they can sell you "cloud", it's just they all have different definitions of what cloud is. This does not stop them claiming it works with this or that open standard, neatly avoiding admitting that the bit it attachs to said standard by is usually a bit of proprietary software.
Back to troll school for you!
You cannot sell to Marketing, they don't have IT budget control. At best, they can influence, just like at best the Sales Director (who probably does have a lot more say than Marketing) can only influence the decision, because neither makes either the IT purchases or IT strategy. The Financial Director or CFO would be a better bet as they can apply more pressure to the CIO. Trying to byepass IT is a really bad idea - the CIO will think you are trying to byepass him and it will be the last time you get invited to tender for anything of worth. I have worked at companies where the CIO has removed companies from the approved purchasing list simply becuase they forgot to send him a Christmas card! And trying to foist any tech onto the IT team that they haven't already approved or at least looked at? Are you crazy? Their backs would be up in an instant, they'd be so resistive to your ideas you'd think you were selling a coal alternative in Newcastle. Trying to sell something as core as cloud in via Marketing would be sounding the deathknell on your presence in the company. Please, go back to advising on desktop rollouts, this article is probably the daftest piece I've seen on here!
".....This is just 'SAP is a PITA'...." Hmmmmm, so that SAP software, it got to be so popular because it was a "PITA"? No, it got to be popular because - if you employ or contract people that know what they're doing - it works really well. The key with SAP, as with any complex software, is to employ competent project management and techies that know their stuff. Going on the evidence, IBM obviously did not, or simply cared more about squeezing every last cent out of the customer rather than building a working solution.
In this case, the probably more interesting question is who gets sued for buying IBM? I can't see Logica or Accenture kicking up too much of a fuss as they have to work with IBM, but I can see the taxpayers of Queensland looking to recoup some costs from Big Blue.
/More popcorn, please!
Sorry, but the Arabs are late to this publicity/posing party again (http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/the-world’s-coolest-ever-police-cars?page=72). IIRC, we also had some Jag E-types for chase duties on the M1. And turbo Scoobies. In the UK, not only did we have Imprezza WRC chase cars, we had WPCs driving them! If I'm going to be stopped I'd rather be stopped by said ladies than some hairy Arab.
"..... unlawful financial blockade....." oh please quit your whining, lying propaganda. If it was illegal then it would have been very easy for Dickileaks to over-turn the "blockade" in court, and there would be plenty of luvvies and socialist legal types falling over themselves to help out. The fact is VISA et al are quite within their rights under their terms and conditions to choose not to risk the prosecution of their management by potentially assisting a group likely to be charged with espionage by the US government, and for Dickileaks to call it illegal - and for you to repeat the assertion - is potentially libelous.
".....Only the civilized world......" LOL, more denial! As shown in the thread about the attempt to vote Manning a Nobel Peace Prize, the Anonyputz and associated numpties are not "the civilized World", they're not even half of one percent of the "civilized" World, they're just a tiny minority of shrieking, whining, wannabe, socialist and skiddies.
But I don't see what you're whining so hard about - even when the sentences were lower, all it took was the chance of going to jail for "dedicated Internet warriors" like Sabu to start crying and grass up all his buddies. Seems it's quite common when the skiddies get a taste of the steel bracelets for them to ditch their "ideals" and save themselves a little jail shower action (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/07/hacker_snitches/).
".....Then why were they treated with such unsparing behavior and threatened with such outrageous sentences by the prosecutors?....." Who says they are outrageous? You see it's actually just like dealing with kiddies - the first time they do something stupid you might send them to their room for the afternoon, they do it again then you up the punishment in the hope they get the message, so you ground them for a week. The problem is you and your skiddie chums are really thick and the message didn't get through with community sentences and harsh words, and the e-crims are using your skiddie activities as cover, so the grown ups are having to use stronger sentences and it seems (from the volume of the whining) that you and your Anonyputz buddies are finally starting to get the message.
".....threat....." Threat!??! ROFLMAO! Please do explain what threat the Anonyputzs are to anyone other then themselves? What they have actually done other than mindless and minor Internet vandalism? What massive "threat" did Aaron Swartz provide other than the a bit of petty copyright theft? Sorry to burst that big bubble of grandiose self-absorption, but you guys are not Internet James Bonds or real-life Lisbeth Salanders, you're just skiddies wasting bandwidth.
".....this list is from 2006....." Oh, thanks for reminding me that first Sun and then Oracle have been trying to fix the problems with ZFS for twelve years, and seven years since they tried to push the problem to the OSS crowd, and still can't get it production ready! Face it, ZFS is just another too-little-too-slow-too-late Sun product, it's the "Rock" of software.
"....virtualization penalty is high on Atom...." Your using the wrong implementation model. With multicore Xeon and Opteron, we've got used to the idea of carving up boxes with virtualization software because we had so many powerful cores in even a 2-socket server. Instead, I would suspect that the model with these systems will be that of cobbling individual Atom server blocks in grid-like cluster instances. Granularity is stuck at the Atom CPU level, but management is easier, and you increase or decreas the power of an instance by adding or removing nodes from the cluster. The result is also more resilient seeing as the load is split over several disparate nodes, especially if you can build your instance across two or more chassis. If you imagine using a 2-socket server with hex-core Xeons for a VM that needs 8 cores, if you lose a CPU you could lose most of your processing capability. With this type of mini-server board, if you lose a board you lose two cores, you simply carry on at 75% processing power whilst you switch in another card to bring the cluster back up to 8 cores (you might even have an automated solution that adds in a spare card to the cluster the minute one fails).