Re: Wouldn't it be better if solar panels were ...
But you would like them to absorb the abundant sunlight in the very bands that the orbiter's imager uses.
5648 posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
But you would like them to absorb the abundant sunlight in the very bands that the orbiter's imager uses.
That's just what they wanted you to think.
In fact China introduced a backdoor into your router so it inserts these fake stories and fake images directly into the http connection
I think they bought the cheap chinese ones from dealextreme
I assumed that the NSA were behind this.
Since we all know that software piracy funds terrorism, drug smuggling and kitten abuse - then surely it's the job of the squared jawed patriots as the NSA to target users of illegal software sites
Although if you removed the window by throwing someone through it then that would count.
She did a lot for the air quality in South Yorkshire
< hovis advert music > I remember when all these fields were factories .....
So currently half the US army in Afghanistan operations are guarding fuel convoys to power the AC needed to keep the fancy electronics running (the famous $1Bn/month for air conditioning).
Now every platoon is going to need it's own diesel generator
>Only infantry can take and hold ground.
Your smart drone knife missiles take the ground then you send in a bunch of 3rd world cannon fodder managed by "security consultants "- no need to waste any white boys.
It used to be you needed an empire (or a religious banner) to recruit a source of expendables - now you can just buy them from whichever country currently has more teenager boys than dollars
>So are you saying Turing is a myth, that he was gay is a myth, or that he is an icon is a myth?
He was an icon and he was gay that doesn't make him a "gay icon" anymore than Tutte was a straight icon.
I heard he was killed by a robot sent from the future to stop HP-UX ever being created
Apple cars will direct you to where Apple Maps thinks the destination is.
Audi Android maps simplify the routing by assuming you have an Audi Quattro and just draws a straight line to the destination
>The other thing it's not going to do is get people to buy a new TV every 3 years
It is if the channel change software needs an update every year and you stop shipping updates after 3 years
Growing up to become politicians
Imagine if camera phones had been around 20years ago, you now wouldn't be able to open your email without the risk of seeing some image of Cameron or Boris putting their wedding tackle somewhere 'hilarious' .
T' internet will collapse from the horror
So who is the person responsible?
The secretary who posted a CD to another dept?
The case manager who didn't check that the secretary followed ISO 2001:1138 section 56 part 54 when preparing data?
The BOFH who allowed secretaries access to CD writers?
The CTO who allowed the dept to install such a crap system?
The previous minister who ordered a system which couldn't talk securely to the other dept?
Safest thing is to never send anything, so the school never mentions to social services that they haven't seen the little girl for a couple of weeks - that way nobody will get into trouble for improper transfer of information - and the papers will blame the parents when they find the body
> Secondly, how do you think "martyrdom" of so many senior commanders of Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan was facilitated?
By real inteligence work, not stopping little old Canadian ladies flying to Florida to go on a cruise - because you had hacked her Canadian medical records and found she had once been treated for depression
That's the great news though.
With all this security our kids will grow up in a world with no crime or terrorism
Chromebooks probably aren't the first choice for software engineers at Google.
But to say this is a fault is like saying a 747 is crap because Boeing employees don't commute in them
That's why it is a pardon. A pardon says "yes you did it but";
we have forgiven you/ we don't mind/we understand you had a reason/we now like you.
Sorry, should be "role" - I can't type and this gadget thinks it's cleverer than me.
They will still be blocked for his flagrant copyright violation.
Especially his notorious roll in developing "tools intended for circumvention of copy-prevention systems"
They did pardon the WWI victims in 2006
HP is a vanity project by a departing executive that costs 2.5x as much to build as it sells for.
EMC is a simple reliable product designed by one the greatest auto engineers, was built in vast numbers for half a century and is so loved by its owners even decades after it finished that a new rendition became a best seller?
offtopic; An American management consultant gave us a pitch in which they asked if we wanted to be a "Cadillac or VW sort of company". Much to their confusion we all agreed we wanted to be VW.
ie. A globally successful engineering led outfit, not an overweight wallowing piece of old fashioned junk driven by little old ladies.
Sure because you can trust expensive ones like EMC (owners of RSA) or IBM (whoops we are banned in China for spying on our customers) ?
Never fight a land war in Asia
Never trust an online service provider with your privacy
Although the schools have been trying hard to reduce this ability - mostly through ICT lessons
>Car makers can't enforce "only at authorised garages" for their servicing
No but they don't have to give away copies of their software. So if they decided that the engine management software needed to reside in the oil filter then anybody would be free to make and fit an oil filter - it's just that only theirs would allow the car to start. It would only be illegal if they did it deliberately to restrict servicing to them.
>"servicing" of a server must include firmware updates when the service engineer installs new hardware??
If HP claim that the updates are upgrades - ie a continuing process of improvement and support for new features then it's perfectly reasonable that they only give them to paying customers.
Its like Microsoft giving you service packs but charging for new versions - there is no law saying what is a service pack vs. what is a new product
Limiting free fixes to products in-warranty or in a service contract is probably OK.
You could argue that the firmware update is fixing a flaw in manufacturing and so is equivalent to a product recall - but you would have a job claiming that the server wasn't fit for purpose if you had used it for its entire warranty period.
It is definitely illegal to prevent other people servicing your equipment or offering replacement parts. But the plug-compatible laws are a bit out of date when it comes to your firmware.
I imagine Europe's car makers are watching the case with interest. If HP are allowed to block replacement parts which aren't recognised by HP firmware - yet you aren't allowed to modify HP's firmware - then I'm sure BMW/MB/VW are going to find a reason why their oil filters need to talk to their engine management system.
It might be a good idea if Nato registered .nato as a gTLD
At the moment they use nato.int which more than a few badly configured email systems refuse to recognise.
Hopefully NATO will decide that airstrikes are cheaper than lawyers, more fun and less messy
The very corporate funded ICANN wants to invent lots of new domain names so you can be www.sony
Organisations like Nato point out that if people try and register .nato as a new business Nato will have to go around and drop a big pile of "peacekeeping" on them.
So wouldn't it be better if ICANN announce that you can't register .nato, .un, .red-cross etc
Because parents don't have the technical ability to know that website X has to be blocked because its parent company competes with one of BT's strategic partners in a different business area.
Over here one of the countries big 3 telcos (we can only have a cartel of domestic carriers for security and cultural reasons) decided to block the website of the union it was in dispute with - for all it's customers.
Bizarrely they didn't seem to think anyone would be annoyed, or that it would be news!
If there was a $10M invoice to NSA for "services rendered" - then yes
If there was a $10M higher bid that was accepted somewhere in EMC's $15Bn of sales to the government - probably not
No RSA can't be held liable for being ordered by a secret court to do as it was told - just like Huawei can't be held liable in China for doing the same thing.
But all RSA's foreign customers can now decide that it is about as trustworthy as Huawei and be about as likely to use if to for important stuff. Its US customers will ask themselves if secured by RSA now means - "copied to the IRS" and every other government agency.
But following on from more than a decade of fighting strong encryption products like PGP, weakening existing standards and secretly reducing the key length in commercial products exported.
You would have to be very niave and very out of touch not to be suspicious.
Although it is possible that all the world class security experts at RSA never use the internet, or read the newspapers or watch TV or follow the news in anyway.
Given that one of the main aims of the constitution was to prevent the formation of an all powerful central government in the hands of a few imperial families and largley influenced by religous extremists - I would give it 5/10
emc (RSA's) parent company has an income of $15Bn - or at least it did last year.
How many foreign customers it will have at the end of this year remains to be seen.
How much is a fuckton of money if it means nobody trusts your security company anymore?
> RSA might have honestly thought the NSA was recommending the algorithm to help protect national interests,
And people might honestly have thought that the Tories were privatising Royal Mail to ensure a better service for little old ladies and better pay and conditions for the posties
And with VMS not only could you replace the battery yourself - it wouldn't drop the call while you were doing it.
VMS or at least NT4
Or they will have to commute further
I would have loved to live in WC1 and save the trip on the Northern Line - but I don't think it's the government's job to force somebody to (somehow) build cheap housing for millions of people in the square mile.
Ironic that they are protesting an environmentally and neightbourhood friendly form of transport. Hopefully when Google stops the busses because of the bad press all the highly paid Googles will buy Humvees and F150s and drive instead
> appoint an agent in Rome, give him a 0.5% margin
Or appoint an agent in Rome, charge him 101% of all revenues as a licensing fee and then apply for Italian government aid to help this struggling local business
But unfashionable areas can start very quickly
We should describe ourselves as "Ursa Minor Borders"
Or stop people accessing the boxing day movie on iPlayer and going out and blowing up German dams
Any idea why it is banned?
Religous hate speech?
They think scrums are gay porn?
Or just because Union should be banned anyway
It doesn't sit exactly at L2 it orbits around it - there is still an overall resonance that keeps it around that point.
In fact you don't want it exactly at L2 because the Earth would eclipse the sun and its solar panels wouldn't get any power.
The reason for L2 (rather than something closer) is that the Earth only covers a small patch of the sky. So the Earth doesn't get in the way of the targets and there is no thermal change as the satellite passes through Earth's shadow.
The previous satellite to do this, Hipparcos, had a problem after launch and the booster stage didn't separate.
However having a couple of tons of booster attached to it meant that its orbit was a lot more stable and there was a suggestion that all future astrometric satellites be launch with a couple of tons of scrap iron bolted to them
I would have thought "unwarranted" = without a warrant?
Although somehow I suspect not
Being in public doesn't mean you have no rights
If you were constantly followed around by a squad of police recording everywhere you went, everything you said, everyone you talked to and everything you looked at - you might think that was pretty oppressive