During my decade in the military,
Demonstrating the values of peace and democracy to Afghans by having an hereditary monarch shoot them from a helicopter.
21373 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
This uses exactly as much fuel to deorbit the payload as it would take for the payload to carry to deorbit itself (which is a significant part of the fuel needed to orbit it in the first place)
Plus you need the fuel to orbit the capture gadget, and have it manouver and have it move itself to the deorbit level. Newton is a bitch!
There are more energy-realistic options like attaching sails which increase drag and cause things to deorbit themselves - which the Japanese have also demonstrated.
However if you have a space agency that needs some funding between major missions this is a good thing (tm) it is quick and cheap to build and nobody can object - not military, not-environmental, not wasteful 'science' etc
Just do the same thing as oil and mining companies do to pay for cleanup costs.
Everybody pays into a fund during operation from their profits and then when the rig/mine closes the company sells the operation to a subsidiary which declares bankruptcy and the government pays for the cleanup.
Meanwhile the contents of the fund having been distributed as stimulus to the companies everytime the market price drops.
If the technology worked and was cheap and easy you could have digital sales of movies and music.
The reason we have monthly subscription services is that you can't sell a download of an album/movie/image in a way that people can't just copy it.
If it really worked you wouldn't need stockmarkets or banks. If I can transfer a stock to you, or you send a payment tome - with the technology preventing me sellign the same one again - we wouldn't need to pay a commission to any middlemen.
The sad bit is that for many voters Brexit wasn't even about the Eu.
If you lived in a safe Northern Labour seat it was a once in a lifetime opportunity to vote against a smug southern Tory PM and have your vote make a difference.
If you had made the Question "Fuck the Government Y/N?" it would have had exactly the same vote.
There were people in my home town voting for Brexit because Maggie closed the pits.
In theory you can't add any claim that isn't described in the original application - but courts and lawyers aren't maths.
You normally don't have to actually cheat - if you can wait long enough. I file a patent on doing "common office task - with a quantum computer" and then just wait until somebody invents a practical quantum computer.
There was a famous guy who filed 100s of patents on "doing X with a laser" when lasers were a lab curiosity and made a fortune when somebody engineered laser capable of doing X.
It can happen legitimately - but in this case I suspect it was 'strategic', it's called a submarine patent.
The idea is to keep a patent submitted but not granted, and so not public, by filing all sorts of corrections and amendments and continuations. Wait until a company with $$$ infringes, then you get it granted and sue them - hoping that they have invested so much in manufacturing they will pay out.
The USPTO have changed the rules now to make this much harder.
>It is the same with Ralph Nader, the discussion he initiated saved countless millions of lives over the decades.
The opposition to Nuclear Power in America resulting in the amount of coal fired power probably killed a few million
Or more importantly "know your customers" OVH are specialists in running spam farms, if their customers really cared they would use a more expensive supplier with lots backups. They want the cheapest possible host and that's what OVH supply
>Please contact the MMB
>the Ministry of Murder and Bombs?
Milk Marketing Board = the shadowy organization behind all conspiracy
I mean how much marketing does milk need? It tastes of milk, you drink it !
Or if you are sensible you leave it alone until it's been turned into cheese in the proper manner.
The advantage is that the census is broadly fair and honest.
Would you trust the home office to provide data about the number of undocumented immigrants, needing social services / schools / hospitals in a given area - to the same government that would have to fund it ?
> give known names rather than their christened names.... give different information in different places
My first company was sorting this out for N. Ireland - back in the time of the euphemisms.
When people (or at least 50% of the people) used a dozen different spellings of a Gaelic name on any official form.
Of course if the government were at all competent they would be trying to destroy trust in the census.
The conservative chaps over here replaced the census with a "government statistical survey" which determined that there were no poor people living in any city or any rural areas and so social funding could be cut.
>I also agree that it's fascinating to see the different approaches to system development. I just hope there are strong firewalls between the processes on SpaceX development side and the human rated flight side.
One is test things quickly / discover problems / change things.
The other is take so long building and testing everything that it is no longer possible to change anything fundamental (o'rings, foam insulation) because that would make you even later - so launch and hope.
How good would your software be if your only requirement was that no unit test could ever fail? How reliable would it be in production when faced with unknown new problems?
That's the really sad thing about the SLS.
Assuming it is ever launched, and works and gets to the moon - then what?
It was designed as a quick/cheap/politically-expedient way to use some old technology for a showboating trip.
It's like Britain demonstrating a post-Brexit challenge to Airbus by taking a Concorde out of a museum and refurbishing it for a single flight.
>Not that I have opinions about the drinks they serve in Texas - no Sir - not me.
Have you considered that this is just Texas' attempt to make oil a renewable resource?
With dinosaurs now sadly extinct we need a new specious of extremely large land animals (with brains the size of walnuts) to die and their bodies by converted into fossil fuel.
So one is commercial outfit moving fast and breaking things to make launches cheap.
The other is a dead end project to re-use a small stock of 30year old engines, and then build some expensive copies. In a dead end project to go to the moon quickly to:
demonstrate our technical superiority over N Korea
distract attention from the presidential scandal of the day
funnel funding to a bunch of aerospace companies that are losing money *(delete as applicable)
Shaw do it in Canada.
You can connect to any Shaw home wifi router with your account details so get 'free' wifi in any city.
The traffic is firewalled from the home user and they ultimately know your account details if there is any illegal activity. Don't know if you can opt-out
"Hod-carrier's Tea-masher's mate" when I wor a lad
I just got new business cards listing me as a "Principal Research Engineer" immediately followed by a memo that I can't use them externally because i'm not officially an Engineer in this state.
Since I mostly behind a screen "Searching Stackoverflow" as a profession I don't see why I need business cards, especially since this is the C21 and people have email. So logically ones that I have to keep secret are no less useful.
>Nope, just compost them. Which precludes the use of quicklime, and carpets only if those are fully biodegradable.
For long term carbon capture don't you want them not to biodegrade?
I bury all my victims in disused salt caverns (hypothetically of course)