13 posts • joined 30 Dec 2009
Re: Don't piss on your customers
If only Nintendo had their own Youtube channel... Oh, wait. http://www.youtube.com/nintendo
Re: Fool me 8 times...
So Nintendo's IPs are "rehashes" while Uncharted isn't? (Uncharted 4 will be the 6th Uncharted game in 7 years.)
Wow. This entire article is based on the faulty assumption that Nintendo's Quality Of Life platform will replace traditional consoles. Iwata clearly said that it would be in addition to them.
That's as insane as suggesting Sony's microwave ovens will mean the death of their Playstation brand.
As for "Whatever happened to Nintendo's amazing games?", the 3DS is a thing. Zelda: A Link Between Worlds, Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon, Fire Emblem: Awakening - all amazing games released in the last year.
Nintendo - doomed since 1889.
Ironically enough, almost a year ago to this day, the Nintendo 3DS was launched.
You know, if you believed the media, it was a poorly-designed single stick device which made everyone sick and caused headaches, and would undoubtedly fail once the superior twin-stick Vita with HD graphics and mature games arrived.
A year on , the 3DS has sold 15 million while the Vita has turned out to be a complete flop - barely selling 10,000 a week in Japan.
The cycle seems to go like this.
1. Nintendo announce new console which forsakes graphical prowess for an innovative idea.
2. Nintendo's doom is predicted. The media write the new console off and predict that the rival consoles with HARDCORE GAMEZ!!!!1111 will be far more popular.
3. Despite this, Nintendo's console prints money, completely killing the competition.
4. The media claim that "Nintendo's victory was a fluke that can't possibly happen again" as E3 approaches.
The cycle has happened with the DS, Wii and 3DS now, and there's a good chance this will repeat with the Wii U too.
Just type an extra S
Use https:// instead of http://
As soon as a way round the block is found, news of it will spread faster than Ryan Giggs' identity, rendering all future blocking attempts futile. Sadly, this knowledge will also let perverts access disgusting sites. But it's either that or go down the road to censorship.
Thin end of the wedge
This is web blocking by the backdoor.
If Google implement this, the music industry will not be satisfied. I can hear the arguments now.
"Google clearly know these sites are bad, so why don't they remove the links entirely?"
Other people with an axe to grind will ask why Google doesn't mark other sites in a similar way - cue a Daily Fail campaign to get sites deemed to be pro-abortion, anti-Christian, anti-monarchy, anti-British, pro-Europe marked....
This makes sense.
I really don't understand the fuss about this...
Sony owns the Blu-Ray format. Sony also owns a large movie making empire that releases movies on Blu-Ray. Therefore, including a Blu-Ray with their console was a no-brainer.
However, Nintendo don't own the Blu-Ray format and don't make films, so why on Earth would they include this function? Plus, add the fact that Ninty would have to pay Sony - their rival - a hefty license fee every time a console or game was purchased and you can see the logic behind this decision.
I'm not completely sold on the Wii U yet, but if I end up buying it, it will be because of the games. If I wanted to watch Blu-Ray movies, I'd buy a Blu-Ray player. Simples.
Hang on, that Bird video was definitely from the Wii U.
First the Digital Economy Act, then the resurrection of the Intercept Modernisation Programme, now this. *sigh*
The Government say that these harsher measures will only be introduced if the bill fails to reduce filesharing to the degree they want. However, given that they expect a truly absurd 70% reduction in one year, the failure of the bill is a complete certainty.
If the music industry seriously think this will make people buy their increasingly unappetising product, they're mad. Now when people buy an album from the Big 4, they'll know their money will be funding the enforcement of oppressive laws like this, and that will ultimately only put more people off.
So let me get this straight. This scheme will cost £500 million a year and will increase music and film sales by £1.7 billion over 10 years.
Now maybe I'm bad at maths, but spending £5 billion to increase profits by £1.7 billion doesn't actually make any kind of financial sense whatsoever.
This is especially troubling because:
a) Our Government have always drastically underestimated costs, especially when comes to insanely ambitious IT projects nobody wants. The real cost will almost certainly turn out to be 3 or 4 times higher.
b) This won't encourage anyone to stop downloading illegally and start buying full-price albums / movies again, so I doubt there will be anything like a £1.7 billion increase in music and movie sales. In fact, I can only see it putting even more people off.
c) When the new law inevitably fails to produce the results the music and movie industry wants, the £25 a year fee will undoubtedly increase.
And they plan to implement this a couple of months before the General Election? Yes, good luck with that(!)
- Updated Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
- Elon Musk's LEAKY THRUSTER gas stalls Space Station supply run
- Windows 8.1, which you probably haven't upgraded to yet, ALREADY OBSOLETE
- FOUR DAYS: That's how long it took to crack Galaxy S5 fingerscanner
- VMware reveals 27-patch Heartbleed fix plan