"rational debate on religious grounds"
There's nothing rational about one doing the bidding of an imaginary sky fairy.
6654 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Dec 2009
I think it comes down, also, to a question of scale. A person with a memory way better than mine could perhaps copy Harry Potter word for word. But it takes time and effort to do so.
A machine can easily do it a hundred times per second, and throw in little variations to tweak the story, without skipping a beat.
It's like how many of us pay a levy on blank media. In the old days, copying a record was not feasible. Then came tapes and how the companies freaked out about that, despite the fact that it could take over half an hour per single tape on a high speed deck. Now? Dump an MP3 on a website and untold thousands can grab a copy instantly.
That, I think, is the danger of AI ingesting stuff. It can spew out near copies faster than anybody could keep up.
So, what cost creativity?
DEATH RACE 2030
Drivers start on the east coast with ten million dollars. Everybody that gets run over is a hundred thousand deduction. You forfeit all if the car crashes (especially if you die). What's left if/when you reach the west coast is yours to keep. Better hope it's a positive figure.
Televise the whole thing. You'll get idiots lining up to participate. It'll be a great way to testing the technology and thinning the crowd a little while entertaining the rest. As for payments and sponsorship? Well, we have the technology to put big OLED panels on the cars to push endless adverts, not to mention along the route like those god awful boards around the edges of football fields these days. And if it distracts the robodriver, oh well...
I didn't downvote, but why on earth would:
1, people pay a Google subscription when there are alternative (free) search engines, some of which respect privacy
And:
2, is anybody really dumb enough to believe that Google would honour this and not slurp the data anyway simply because it's there and they can? Oh, sure, they'll wrap it up in cutesy phrases like "to improve the services we offer you", but slurp slurp slurp. The only thing paying would do is get you an "I'm a sucker" badge (which I believe looks like a little blue tick).
Print media adverts are:
1, frequently relevant to the content of the magazine (or in the case of newspapers, to the typical readership demographic)
And:
2, rarely invasive, even a full page advert, it's easy to turn the page if you're not interested
Compare with, for example, a typical advert in an app, where the advert will play a video which often cannot be skipped for 5-10 seconds (and double that as it has to download the advert first) and once you click the skip button it's a static page for another 5-10 seconds, and frequently the parts to tap to dismiss are tiny and randomly placed in different positions and any tap outside of this area leads to you being thrown into the Play Store for the irrelevant crap that was being promoted (look, it counts as an interested tap). While this is predominantly an app issue, I've started to see similar behaviour in mobile websites. It's the way things are going. To download unvetted third party content for shit you're just not going to be interested in, with various dark patterns to interrupt your getting anything done simply because somebody somewhere dangled the lure of currency symbols in front of the developers eyeballs. Oh, and don't forget, of its an advertising platform God knows what information is being sent back, but those needs to know a UID and your location? That's for the adverts, not the app.
In short, it's far far more intrusive than old style advertising for far far less interesting things. It's effectively a giant Ponzi scheme that everybody is buying in to at our expense.
In the earlier days of my mobile internet use, say around 2012ish, I didn't have an advert blocker, and the hardware was generally too underpowered to handle something like Firefox.
Then, browsing sites in France (where I live), I started to get text notifications from Orange telling me that my "Internet+" payment had been refused and that if I wanted to use that service (basically you buy stuff and the cost is added to your phone bill) then it needs to be switched on in the customer settings.
So, please don't try to guilt me into allowing advertising. My personal experience is in laying claim to a lot of bandwidth (that, back in the day, I was paying for), slowing down everything, and straight up trying to steal from me. They're all a bunch of wankers and they can all fuck right off. If a site won't work with the blockers, I'll just find one that does. There's very little that is exclusive to any particular site these days.
Can't help but think that "writing some code for this thing that might find its way to places like Iran" is a whole different concept to "selling weapons to Iran". This just smells of a lousy attempt to throw FUD at something for their fifteen minutes of infamy.
I repeat, if doing "whatever" (*) is not illegal in my country, then why should I care what America's lawmakers think?
* - Which is not, let's be clear, directly selling weapons to a perceived enemy, I'm pretty sure there are rules about that sort of thing here, too.
"you get extradited to the USA and go to jail for breaking sanctions"
Therein lies the problem. If I were to contribute something (*) that is used by whoever on RISC-V... well, I'm not American, I don't live in America, and to be honest I don't give a fuck what America thinks. If it's legal in my jurisdiction, then it's legal, end of discussion.
* - don't worry, I'm not that smart...
I didn't downvote, but I do wonder how many of "the Palestinians" are actually in favour of what's going on right now, versus how many thought "oh fuck". Given what remains of Gaza, I can't help but think that many just want to get the hell out, and never wanted to be in this situation in the first place.
In a local supermarket are little price gizmos. Scan a product and it'll tell you how much it costs.
Once in a while it is poorly and the application dies, leaving a rather oversized Start button on the screen. Which is an invitation for people like me to prod it...and get Solitaire running.
"covering child safety, pornography, and protecting women and girls"
Get them to define what they mean by "girl", and explain the obvious sexism in not wanting to protect boys as well...
...that ought to tie 'em in knots and keep 'em busy for a while so the rest of us can get on with living in reality.
I think you'll find many who "like the EU" like the concept of what it is and what it represents. The actual implementation? Not so much.
But, then, it took Windows three tries before it hit the mainstream, and there's the expression "third time lucky", so here's hoping the EUv2 upgrade will be released sometime soon.
My main browser is the Android version of Firefox. It's set as the default, and web links are to open in Firefox.
Yet when an app opens a link (such as Blackplayer's "Search for lyrics"), it's the Xiaomi browser that pops up. It seems that there's no way to change this (short of rooting and hacking).
Likewise, tapping files in the file manager opens them in Xiaomi's own apps, even if you've told it "remember my choice" to open files in other apps (because for some reason the PDF viewer decided to make the page background grey which makes it harder to read, so anything else would be preferable), guess what happens...
You should write a letter and send it to the highest person at Mars you can find the address of. Maybe if people start pointing out that internet advertising is not the same as TV advertising. It's aggressive, invasive, and often repeats the same thing over and over (that some company is paying for), maybe if people higher up the food chain than the advertising wonks start getting the idea that advertising may be actively alienating people, things might start to slowly change?
Why are they laying fibre in rural areas? Around here (rural France, kind of like the remote parts of Wales) they are stringing it up on the phone poles just above the copper wires.
Not sure how resilient it will be with wind and such (though it's a lot tighter so should move less) but on the other hand much more accessible for fixing and much much quicker to install. Plus they only needed permissions for installing a few new phone poles. Much of the fibre was slung up on existing poles.
"Vs a 30+ year lifespan on traditional meters"
The meter that was taken out at home a few of years ago was installed in 1968. They wouldn't let me keep it either. :(
The Linky apparently has a soldered-in lithium cell with a ten year lifespan. Which means things could get interesting with power cuts after around five years from now given that it's the thing that lets the meter remember who you are and so on.
I don't think people are going to accept their electricity refusing to come back on line because too many cows were being milked at once causing a brownout long enough to give the meters amnesia.
I don't see why the thing didn't use a slot in button cell. Then somebody could come out once a decade, open it up, pop in a new battery, job done.
Hmm, this topic has reminded me that the French Linky smart meter has a "TIC" output. I keep meaning to hook it up to an optocoupler and then feed the result into an ESP32 to chart/record my power consumption.
I could let Enedis access my meter every half hour (rather than daily) and use their website but that means involving a third party, the resolution is lower (I think the Linky spews it's serial data every couple of seconds which is better than every half hour), and as a nerd "where's the fun in that"? Much better to spend a weekend coding up something to record the past X hours of consumption and draw a pretty little graph when I enter the IP address of the device.
Do other (UK?) smart meters have a user accessible data port, or is this just a French thing?
(if anybody is interested: https://www.capeb.fr/www/capeb/media/vaucluse/document/FicheSeQuelecN17TIC.pdf)
"Look at the label on the device. It will tell you how many kilowatts the device consumed."
Not really.
I have a new washing machine. Rated something like 2.4kW. It takes forever as it seems to revel in the logic of "gentle cooler wash for (much) longer".
Problem is, that 2.4kW accounts for when the motor is running, and when the heater is heating. Out of the eternity it takes, the heater is only on for maybe 15 minutes. And the motor? The only time that runs continuously is when performing a water fill or when spinning. Otherwise it's typically 6 seconds on and 12 seconds off (but this varies depending on how much stuff I'm washing). Good luck working out manually the energy consumption per load. Especially if you have one of those smart arse things that weighs and adjusts.
Likewise an oven, air fryer, halogen cooker, fridge... they'll get to the desired temperature and then click on and off to keep the temperature stable.
So working out, say, an oven means counting preheat time, then working out a rough duty cycle (like half the time on, half the time off) then adding that together to work out the total "on" time, then multiply that by the rating.
I think the only things that run full whack at their rating are immersion heaters, bar heaters (until the thermostat trips, but that could be a while), microwave ovens, and kettles.
"So where does the money to pay for them come from?"
Perhaps like here in France where the low voltage supply network was vastly upgraded and everybody got a "Linky" (they're obligatory).
A mixture of government subsidies, EU grants, and - oh look - my electricity that used to be about €0,13/kWh is now more like 0,19/kWh (this with the alleged price cap of 4%). Oh and the standing charge has gone up too, but the maths to work that out is a nightmare.
Anyway, offer something for free and then a couple of years down the line make continual increments to the price and as long as you can play the long game, you'll get paid back and then some.
"I said - be *able* to, not have to."
Slippery slope. If they make them able to use the home WiFi, how long until it is obligatory that they use it, along with a long list of dubious requirements (like uPNP because they don't give a crap about security)?
Of course you can't portscan it (tampering with government property etc) or attempt to lock it down (tampering with your meter, etc) and you just know they're going to do something stupid like open ports, hardwired passwords...because, hey, if the government is behind this then no heads will roll no matter how much of a mess they make.
I don't live in the UK, so different rules. Still smart meters using GPRS though..
"At your own expense" means you'll need to make an appointment that will be billed as a domestic call-out.
Basically for telephone and 'leccy, network faults are their problem and get fixed for free, faults on your premises are your problem and you'll get billed for visits; reading an actual meter hanging in the distribution box is definitely on your property...
Before a smart meter was installed here, the meter reader came by twice a year and it was mandatory that he physically laid eyes on the meter at least once a year (or you'd have to reschedule a visit at a time that suits you at your own expense).
What I don't get, and something that shows things are still very corrupt in the industry, is why the companies insist on continuing with fantasy debits (if paying by direct debit) when there's a meter telling them in exact detail how much you're consuming day by day. Why is this not illegal?
There's a coil of fibre on the pole near the property boundary (they're doing a massive program in Brittany to replace all the old copper, but most of it in the country will be strung on poles).
When the fibre was being installed in the springtime, the time to begin switchover was August/September. Then it was October. Now it's "maybe next year". I'm guessing somebody might have slightly underestimated what's involved.
I'm looking forward to it because after four and a half kilometres of copper, my speed was around 3.5Mbit. A poor patch job earlier in the year knocked off a megabit. And since the A in ADSL means asymmetrical, my upload rate is about 65K/sec. As you can imagine, uploading videos takes bloody forever.
Don't 3D printers make stuff by dribbling hot plastic on top of other plastic layer by layer to build something?
Is that creation then actually capable of handling the mechanical stresses of the gunpowder (mini) explosion to fire a bullet out of the end with enough force to do serious harm?
I'm asking because in my younger years I made a potato cannon out of some plastic drainpipe, a large spud, and bits of firework. If I'd been holding the thing I probably wouldn't be here today, the plastic withstood neither the heat nor the pressure (amusingly the potato survived, being lightly cooked on one side). So I'm wondering if a 3D printer can actually make a viable gun, or if this is more a shouty-screamy as most politicians who want their 15 minutes of fame tend to be.