Re: Only in America
Not for asking too many questions. For working for the studios. He's not supposed to be on special interest's payroll.
179 posts • joined 9 Dec 2009
Not for asking too many questions. For working for the studios. He's not supposed to be on special interest's payroll.
Last I checked, Apple and MS never released music CDs that installed malware in your computer if you so much as put the disk in.
I, as a proud Canadian, have full faith that justice will be rendered on by our wonderfull federal gov ... oh, this is the same gov that tried to make it illegal for fixed line ISPs to offer unlimited data usage to try and kill the small re-seller market? Right ...
"significant advances in public sector contracting <...> that transfer substantially more risk to suppliers. "
In other words, we bid a lot lower then we knew it would cost to win the contract and got screwed over when the gov actually expected us to deliver at the price we said and didn't approve all the cost overruns we had planned.
I'd suspect a fan of gulags. I wouldn't want something I like associated with that man even remotely either.
Quote: Tech companies who provide encrypted – and therefore secret – communications online <...> foster fear and instability around the world.
What I heard after: And we can't have that, because only government is allowed to do this!
Here is a clue. Maybe everyone is starting to get affraid someone's listening in, not just those you call bad guys. Cause, you know ... bypassing due process and law and all.
What kind of haircut did he have? I wouldn't be surprised if it as pointy ...
it helps them figure out what due process is so they can bypass it
I think it's about time laws were put in place so people who react like they did get jail time.
"We sale hammers" is not an excuse for crap IT practices when you handle people's financial information., yet it's unfortunately a very common kind of excuse. I've even seen IT stores fall to this way of thinking.
Because you can't then resale a 1 bedroom flat you rented and make a profit out of it. You buy a house, let the idio ... taxpayers pay for it, then sale it and pocket the difference.
Having spent the last 10 years supporting Windows machine(server, desktop, you name it), I know entirely too much about it for my own taste.
You make it sound like installing gnome is a must. If you want gnome, yea, you are stuck with systemd. That's systemd and gnome's fault, not gentoo. A lot of people who run gentoo are also likely to use something else then gnome (if they have a GUI) and the default installation manual still recommends using openRC.
Is how much it wants to do. Explain to me why an init system needs (yes, it's required) an http server running?
Systemd is basically trying to take over the entire software stack. The attitude of the devs speaks volumes about this too. You find a lot of gems in the kernel mailing lists. The Gentoo Linux forum as been rather alive about this topic, as the maintainers of the distribution refuse to make systemd the default (it's an option, but not default) and a lot of the users agree with the choice.
Systemd is a lot like the windows registry. Lots of binary blobs you can't read or fix if things go wrong. Most linux users would rather the system took 10 more seconds to boot and be sure they can fix it if something goes wrong. It's not like we reboot our machines all the time.
“That might be one of the initial ‘super powers,’ that quite frankly women [who] don’t ask for a raise have,” came the jaw-dropping reply. “It’s good karma. It will come back.”
Works for men too. What karma does when it comes back is land you with more work, more responsability and not a single cent more, because if you aren't asking for a raise, you must be happy with your salary!
It's like he's drinking the "trickle down" economy kool-aid.
I think it's more ''Please don't hand the next election to the republicans by pissing the electorate off, our finances can't afford it right now" is how I'm reading it.
But I'm not from the US, so what do I know?
Another nail in the "security by obscurity" myth's coffin I guess.
Probably did something stupid like use a hard coded key in the app anyone with a compiler can extract.
But even then, anyone stupid enough to use an un-official site to save snapchat pictures is stupid enough to not have understood the point of snapchat, nevermind the fact that giving your password to a third party is dumb in the first place.
The good book as something about this too.
" A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."
"He still has a long way to go before matching his predecessor, however. Former boss and publicist's nightmare Steve Ballmer had a history of behaving rather erratically in front of cameras."
What's fun is when you find yourself with a boss that think that is the proper way to talk with employees ...
“In any democratic society we need to provide law enforcement with a right to obtain information authorised by a judge, based on a clear suspicion, in cases involving serious crime or terrorism. This applies to the offline world and should also apply to the online world."
And that is why encryption is a good thing, as it forces the law enforcement to actually, you know, ask a judge for a warrant. Once you're actually doing that, we can talk. For now, go back into the hole you crawled out of.
you're starting to sound like amanfrommars ....
To continue with stereotypes, crackpots are also always quick to refuse other's opinions.
Your mistakes, and you made 2, are as follow.
1: you expected that a IT tabloid and it's comment forum were good places to discuss dense implementations of physics developed by people who, while brilliant, didn't have all the facts we have now about quantum mecanics. (remember, Einstein didn't believe in QM. We also find something very much like his biggest mistake (his words) accelerating the universe when we look out)
It's the wrong forum because at best you'll start a troll war. At worst, you'll get laughed into Oblivion.
2: That if experts ignore a paper or think it's not worth taking into account, they generally know what they are talking about.
If you know better, write a paper, prove it, and they will listen to you.
"Yes, quite likely directly into the universe's best implementation of blend-it-all Moulinex."
You, sir, are a genius. You also now have to send me a new keyboard.
Actually, while I do not like apple, you are wrong there. You can install any OS on a MAC. From windows to linux to bsd. They even provide drivers for windows and facilities to do it with bootcamp.
As for OS X elsewhere, that's not the same thing either.
Actually, OS X is now free if you own a MAC. It just won't run if you don't. You aren't charged for iOS or Android, it's given away with the device.
That's the difference.
have a look at just how MUCH information they are able to get from a smart reader. It can even go down to what movie you are watching by being able to analyse the fluctuations in usage from your TV.
It's seriously scary stuff.
They save money for the utilities, because they no longer have to pay someone to go read it.
Don't expect it to show on your bill however.
Actually, code re-use is a good argument FOR the measure.
If your cold is old enough you aren't willing to support it, then why are you still using it in the newer product?
In truth, the whole idea is to force software compagnies to do something all other compagnies have to do, take responsability for the products they offer. By forcing them to re-internalise a lot of the costs of the crap they put out, you make it financially worth it for them to fix it.
GPS wouldn't survive. The satelites would get fried. Also, most electronic that isn't shielded would also fail as induction currents from the magnetic storm we'd get from the CME hitting fries all the delicate components. So no more computers even if they aren't plugged.
That's what happens when the only measure of "effort" is how much you spend.
I can spend 100 000$ on a 20 000$ car, I'm sure I could find someone who'd be willing to sale it to me for that price. Does that mean I have 100 000$ worth of car?
Paying someone a million to write a nice report saying "everything is following best practice" isn't getting a proper security audit with penetration testing by people who actually know what they are doing. But that requires hard work and actual costs, yet doesn't look as good on paper to the board.
That one you got backward. The trick here is they sale you a box that's useless on any other service and sale you 100 channels you don't want in a bundle with the 4 you do want, but that are all mysteriously in different "packages".
The cellphone gig is different. How they did it is they add a small lock code that allows them to claim better "security" for your calls. But due to the DMC's stupid language, that makes changing the code in that illegal. This way, it means you have to pay off your phone if you leave, but can't use it elsewhere. if nothing else, think of all the garbage bags full of fully functional phones. It's basically a way to trap you in.
Just remember apple didn't put it there by choice. They went to court to keep that function from happening and lost. Heck, they are STILL fighting it.
Article basically says that yea, that's exactly what they did.
"We take very seriously the board’s concerns regarding privacy and civil liberties, and we will review the board’s recommendations with care."
He forgot to add "and then do absolutely nothing to change how it works unless we get our arm twisted somehow"
I never understood why it wasn't Yahoo! that got AOL when it went on sale. They seamed made for one another ...
They are afraid of what'll happen when all the internal memos about where the next big stunt is going to happen get read by the NSA and they get labeled terrorists?
It was another chance to protest something while polluting the environment themselves?
On the contrary, it is a good example. An internal data center wouldn't have had an easy to use WEB ACCESSIBLE front end you could use to cause all that damage.
All the crook needed was a single username/password to get in.
Plus, cloud pushes you to do everything on it, even when it's a bad idea. (See backups in the above article). This creates a single point of failure.
Sure, the administrators were idiots NOT to have backups elsewhere, but cloud helped push them in that position.
ISPs here in Canada are not any better. The issue is usually that they buy the crapiest router around and load it with a custom firmware that's anything but good. So you end up with a connection that's effectively trottled by the router's lack of capacity.
And you forgot the part where they blame your computer being slow.
The situation you describe is pretty much how things were here in early 2000s.
ADSL was more or less not an option anywhere yet and cable was the only way to get high speed. You had very strict transfer limits with high penalty for going over.
ADSL came along and couldn't compete on speed, but you could get no transfer limit.
ADSL managed to catch up due to cable sitting on it's ass, then ADSL started putting limits on as well. For a long time, for most people, even if you did have a choice, it was basically the same price for the same thing. Not only that, but then both choices started imposing HUGE penalty if you broke your automatically renewed contract outside something like a 2 weeks window in a 2 years period.
What litle competition was left was ADSL reselers that usually managed to differentiate by offering no transfer limits. Most of it unknown by 90% of the population.
Then the big players got so greedy that they somehow convinced the CRTC (Canada's FCC) to make no transfer limit connections illegal.
That finally got the mainstream media's attention.
Inside a few weeks, the federal gov got so deeply embarrassed the CRTC got forced into action.
The end result is that now we're getting fiber to the home deployed by the combined bells. It'll basically make phone/tv/internet a duopoly everywhere. For now, that means we're getting much faster connections in the near future.
Netflix still isn't that big a thing in Canada, but it's slowly comming. How the ISPs will react to it when they realise people will cut off TV is another story.
In one word, yes.
Energy storage right now is crap. You end up loosing almost half the energy as heat in the storage and re-release.
So you'd need to produce about double the energy you'll be using. Hard to make that make economic sence.
He still did better then any politician at pretending to be human.
This happened 4.5 billion years ago. No humans around back. No anything other then maybe some microbes, if they were (un)lucky.
Humans weren't around 1 million years ago, much less 4.5 billions.
True, but that would require the article actually telling up what the metric is. As it does not, the stated improvement of 100% meaningless.
100% performance improvement is not pretty dramatic, it's a lie. Unless they somehow managed to take backup jobs and run them in 0 seconds flat.
Say a job takes 2 hours to run.
Improve that 100%, you reduse by 2 hours. So the job took 0 seconds to run. Same for backup jobs that took 10 seconds or 3 days.
Gota love mathematically illiterate marketing bods.
You make it sound like software should be held to the same standard of quality physical goods have to follow.
Like that'll ever happen.
It's called a crapy `all case the same` plain text comparison.
In other words, they don't encrypt passwords or they don't do it right.
Doesn't yahoo use bing now?
The people this will suck for however are local stores and techs.
Imagine the waves after waves of "I had office with this when I got it and now it says I have to pay for it! I want my money back!"
Yoda's life story. You get 10 films and probably 20 or 30 seasons of a TV show with those 900 years training Jedi ...
Because the people who decide who gets charged with treason are those committing it.
And we all know how that ends.
Lets do some math.
Webmd says the average human bladder's maximum capacity is between 400ml and 600ml.
For argument's sake, let's imagine our perp had a very large bladder and really, REALLY needed to pee. So 600ml
a quick conversion says 600ml = 0.158503 US gallons.
Now 0.158503 of piss in 38 000 000 gallons of water.
This gives us a piss to water ratio of 1 gallon of piss per 239 743 096 gallons of water, or 1 part piss per 239743096 part water.
I suspect that kind of contamination level is surpassed over 100 folds by the amount of piss and shit wild animals like birds drop in that reservoire will naturally drop in it.
So, knee jerk reaction by squeamish idiots who'd rather waste resources then understand what they are doing.