Re: Oracle shared services
Very loosely bound, certainly.
3724 posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
Very loosely bound, certainly.
I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
This is what happens when you pay tax avoidance specialists like PwC to write your tax laws.
Tory outsourcing at its finest.
And "looses" too! Clearly a scholar.
If it were just Microsoft I'd agree but this hits every US-based cloud supplier. Google, Apple and Amazon are next if the precedent isn't struck down.
Then again, this may be exactly the kind of leverage somebody needs to make all that nasty encryption stuff go away.
Do that a couple of times and all lobbying money from all tech firms suddenly starts getting very, very focussed on Capitol HIll.
Actualy, this whole thing may just be some senators looking for a fat pension.
> Just so far every single comment has one down vote.
That's probably just Matt Bryant, his insane fascist rebuttal comments hidden behind a shield of moderatorboredom.
>It's not like terrorism is a new thing, and we handled it perfectly well in the '70s and '80s when the IRA were blowing things up, without any of these new laws.
When did people become such cowards?
@AC - 7/10 troll. Good effort.
> A country where the police can execute pretty much anybody they want and hardly ever get punished?
Provided the executed person earns less than they do. It's the new system in the USA - pure meritocracy where your merit is determined by how many dollars you have.
aw look, somebody who can write a whole page of HTML5
Actually, I am (among other things).
We've had new stuff come and go but the Framework itself has seen no changes of mind in 13 years, until now.
Even this is evolution rather than revolution.
Once in 13 years ain't bad.
4) They probably said it but both were practically illiterate in English so it could have meant something completely different and none of the keywords were triggered.
well, that's what Ops think.
Could I get a 7 foot longbow in it? How about 6'8" tent poles? Could I do this by only dropping one rear seat, leaving one for the child-seat?
If so, potentially interested.
If not, anyone got any recommendations?
None of you care because you can change YOUR default search provider and obviously, it's all about YOU YOU YOU and only YOU, right?
I use Firefox and I'm concerned. Seems to me that the second Chrome shows a higher market share than FF, Google stop supporting what is probably the single most widely known F/OSS project in existence.
I'd like to see MS and Apple pick up that particular tab as an obligation-free donation. Firefox and Mozilla gave us the open web and prevented web standards from being a bad joke. Chrome and its horrible -webkit extensions are bringing us rapidly back to the days of IE6.
Everyone benefits from Mozilla. I hope Google lose an extremely significant percentage of search traffic for dumping them.
> Wow, so much negativity on a pro-Microsoft article.
No, it looks like all the usual fandroids are right here.
This is almost certainly the case.
However, we still have hippies^Wpeople who think 56 is 56 too many and we must shown all nuclear power. Because of reasons.
Honestly, more people have died from bloody windfarms..
> Smokers get dementia, which can be a long-lasting and very expensive malady, earlier and more often.
Actually, that one's bollocks. Smokers get less dementia, probably because we thoughtfully and considerately don't live long enough to get it really badly.
The cost of emphysema and lung cancer is minimal because so few smokers undergo treatment. Most just die.
>We shall see the evidence of this when China's smokers reach a certain age and start to die in massive numbers, slowly and expensively, or cheaply and horribly depending on the state of their state at the time.
That one'll haunt you if it doesn't actually end up happening.
I have a clue about Oracle and that clue is that it hates you (where "you"=="developers").
Selecting Oracle means a) add a year to any development time for hassles in dealing with fucking Oracle and b) somebody got paid off.
Probably not. Tax law is far better defined than "control of electronic assets" law.
> The wholly Irish company is wholly owned by the American company. i.e. ALL the shares, and therefore ultimately in control.
Legally, and in terms of ownership of assets, there is absolutely no difference between owning one share and wholly owning - in both cases, the "owner" owns dick unless/until that asset is liquidated.
I currently work for lawyers.
The actions of the US Government in this case are clearly illegal.
This action effectively says that a wholly Irish company (Microsoft Ireland Operations Ltd) must hand over data to the US Government simply because it has a shareholder (Microsoft Corp) based in the USA.
So doubtless my bank (Barclays Plc) has US-based shareholders and therefore Uncle Sam has an absolute right to look at my bank statements?
I think not.
> All of this makes hydrogen cost 10 times as much as petrol!
So since "green" taxation wouldn't apply, at the pump it would probably cost about the same.
Under the terms of the Play license, all Google services must be front and centre, all "own brand" stuff relegated to the App Drawer.
Which is pretty much the same as "deprecated".
Yes really. Nokia could have gone with Google but in doing so they would have scrapped billions of dollars worth of services and time spent on those services.
Instead, they went with Microsoft and got $2billion cash per year and somebody to buy off their sinking handset division.
Pre-Elop, you could accuse the Nokia board of many types of foolishness. Post and during, all they've done is score win after win in terms of shareholder value. I understand that you're personally betrayed because "M$" and tiles and not doing things you like so therefore everyone involved is simultaneously an evil genius and an absolute cretin but Nokia walked away with very full pockets and overperforming business areas.
As far as the board are concerned (and I want you to brace yourself because this may be a bit of a shock) it is not and never was about what you want.
It's the Nokia Xn writ a bit larger, hence no Google Play because of Here again.
It may not be "polluted with windows" but it hasn't taken a great big internal creampie from your beloved Google either.
So no, you won't buy it.
> Didn't Nokia want to (abide by and) sign the contract with Google giving them access to the Play Store in return for sticking to certain specifications, etc.?
That's the main reason why they never went Android in the first place.
Nokia have an enormous investment in services. What used to be Ovi is now Here (or just Nokia) and supplies a whole lot of really good maps and other shit which Google would relegate to "thing in App Drawer that you never use because of all the Google services". That would have been basically pissing away everything they spent on making those services (which are still Nokia, not Microsoft) excellent.
Google Play was always the problem. Not Elop, not burning platforms, just Google.
Not that anyone here wants to admit it.
It does not run Google Play because Nokia still aren't keen on throwing away their own services as Google would require.
They weren't keen before Elop, they weren't keen during Elop and they're not keen post-Elop.
This is why Nokia never got into bed with Google. Google wouldn't (and still won't) let them bring their own pillows.
36 (72 per cent) of the top 50
Thanks, I don't feel patronised.
Turns out it was just another Foxconn android tablet.
I was actually thinking "femtocell".
I shall try this if I get time at the weekend.
Upvoted for providing a testplan.
Apart from his frankly retarded idea that prohibition is effective, I'd prefer David Davis to Cameron and regardless of opinions, Prescott is always going to be an improvement on Milliband.
Being able to code means that you understand what people can do with a computer
but not really. Because "being able to code" doesn't specify what you're able to code. Six months reading github might teach you what other people are able to do with a computer but if all you can do is write a "Hello world" HTML page, that's not really comparable.
You're full of shit - he had to use one to take the damn test.
You guys are awesome. No, you guys are truly amazing. If only everyone was secure enough in their own skills to publicly sneer at little children on the internet.
The point is - many adults fail these tests. He didn't. He's clearly a very clever kid.
Shitting on his achievement this way must mean that each and every one of you is Carl Sagan.
Go you, you high-flying big-bucks earning super geniuses.
I am, of course, operating under the assumption that every comment here was made without bias, on personal experience and that none of the above commentards are semi-employable halfwits who read a fucking support script for a living.
were you five?
"The history of Windows dates back to September 1981, when Chase Bishop, a computer scientist, designed the first model of an electronic device and project "Interface Manager" was started." - Wikipedia
I never said "released". Troll harder. I'm at least not claiming that anyone supports a v1 OS anymore.
Says the man who thinks .NET frameworks previous to 4 aren't cumulative.
Nobody can take anything you say about anything MS seriously.
They pay enough for my little boy to go to nursery.
Very well put, Anon.
> The root problem has NOTHING to do with Europe, and is not fixable in Europe.
Well yes, hence an amicus brief.
(I currently work for lawyers - don't hate me, I do enough of that for all of us)
The problem is that even if it flies and the EU run with it, the Tories and UKIP will then spin it as a bad thing and immediately hand over everything.
> Did you have to?
Yes, I really did.
I could have mentioned that he looks like David Cameron too if I'd been feeling really vindictive.
Pronounced "Git Milton Keynes".
"We want to identify people for who they are, not what they remember"