Re: Java - banned. Can I ban Flash yet?
Where I work, the ITOps department in its undoubted wisdom has allowed the use of Flash but required admin permission to get the bloody auto-upgrade to run.
/facepalm
4790 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
> When I can get a FitBit/Fuelband style tracker that is as rugged as my G-shock, has the world time zones, stopwatch and timer, is properly water and shock proof (so I can wear it swimming / surfing etc), and does all the pedometer, fitness style stuff (preferably with wireless charge so it can charge off a pad on my bedside table at night) then I'll definitely buy one, but at the moment there isn't a single "watch" device which does it all.
Actually, there is (or soon will be).
I don't much like the way it looks, sadly, but it is all you have asked for.
> The Revenue try to close down loopholes, but the number of tax inspectors has been dramatically cut in the last few years leaving them helpless in the face of large numbers of rich accountancy firms that themselves exploit things like LLPs.
Bollocks. The Revenue don't give a shit if you're rich. They're too busy trying to extract more money from the poor because there are more poor people to tax and they can't afford lawyers and accountants.
> if I run a charity I'm damn well going to make sure I get my money from as many different sources as possible.
I need to correct a misapprehension here.
If you collect from the public and the government, you collect from the public twice except in the second instance without their knowledge or consent.
Oh come on, Trevor. You can see it all over the place.
Chromebooks rise to a 4% share of laptops sold in a quarter?
>CHROMEBOOKS RULE THE WORLD WINDOWS IS DEAD LOL
[Mobile handset manufacturer of choice] is failing?
>SHOULD HAVE GONE WITH ANDROID LOL
(This one amuses me especially because HTC did in fact go with Android. HTC get blame for not going "pure" Android and sullying its perfection with SenseUI because obviously, Android in its pure form must always be profitable).
About the only two Google products that don't get squirted with commentard jizz every time they're mentioned are Google+ and Glass.
And don't ever suggest that Google are datamining you, that their whole business model is datamining you and always has been. These people think Google are somehow "on their side".
I don't think any of the bastards are on my side and I refute your "lesser evil" argument. Google are the greatest evil right now. Google made all this NSA bullshit possible and still make money from it.
You seriously never considered that?
Wow. I don't know, maybe I'm the weird one. Maybe 99% of the planet never thinks that way and thus the unbridled adoration of Google on these forums.
I guess we both looked at the world from a different angle today.
Me, I fix things and make them exploit-proof for a living. I think this way all the time.
Not really. You're now old enough to want more from a film than you did when you were seven is all.
It's not that the prequels weren't bad - they were terrible. But objectively, they're not any worse than the original trilogy. I made the mistake of watching that recently and discovered that Star Wars is the single most awesome thing in the world if you're seven and a predictable dreary bag of crap if you're not.
First, Disney tell all the Star Wars nerds to go shove their shitty Expanded Universe books somewhere really uncomfortable. This done...
Episode 7 - The End of all Hope
Our young hero does some Joseph Campbell stuff and gets oppressed by the New Empire - bigger, nastier, Stormtroopers that can shoot straight, evil for evil's sake because we can.
He meets our heroine in the process, she takes him away to meet with "friends" who intend to end this new dark age.
The "friends" turn out to be entirely Jedi-free rebels trained and led by Harrison Ford.
Then some Star Wars bullshit happens.
At the end of the movie, all of our heroes (except Ford) are killed by the Dark Empress - Carrie Fisher.
I would watch that movie at the cinema a hundred times just to watch the fanboys cry.
> This bribery to port suggests porting to Nokidroid is not a purely mechanical process
Bribery, Right. A couple of beers is bribery, is it? My god man, you can be bought for cheap. How many beers did you get from Google?
Speaking of Google - the Play APIs now pretty much infest Android and they are closed source and wholly proprietary. They also cost money to implement and if the manufacturer agrees to pay this money then a) Google Maps, GMail et al must become default apps on the handset and b) no handsets which do not implement the Play APIs may be produced on that site.
Nokia, having HERE maps and stuff and not wanting to bin them just to make money for Google, are not implementing the Play APIs. This is (in my opinion) the biggest reason why they never made Android phones before; it takes time to integrate alternatives well.
So this event is presumably teaching devs how to use the Nokia APIs instead of the Play APIs.
I guess any dev who attends is a heretic though, right? A heretic who must be burned for not following the One True Google Way?
And then you'll tell me about lock-in....
They could get into bed with Microsoft, or even Amazon (who are rumoured to be producing some games hardware right now).
It's happened before - the guys who did what eventually became Kinect survived up until this year (when Sony borged them).
Or, a better idea, enter a partnership with Logitec.
Uses entirely unrelated story to post retarded Microsoft joke.
You have qualified as 33% Eadon.
Next all you need to do is claim absolute godlike security architecture genius while having a massively pwned website that looks like somebody puked five rolls of Spangles over Neil Gaiman and get banned.
I'm looking forward to the last bit.
Here's a less sensible analysis. Just so we cover all the angles.
Timeline -
1. Goldieblox run advert pimping their somehow not-sexist "Lego for girls".
2. Beasite Boys send letter requesting (not demanding) that they stop using the song "Girls" on it in accordance with Adam Yauch's last wishes.
3. Goldieblox sue Beastie Boys. I know but that's what happened.
4. Beastie Boys countersue under legal advice.
5. Media go batshit crazy.
6. Goldieblox retracts unwinnable bizarre lawsuit.
7. (This article) - Beastie Boys drop countersuit.
My take-home from all this was "if the next one's a girl, she gets Lego. Fuck gender-specific toys".
> Please. Everybody knows that Microsoft system requirements are the minimum resources needed to BOOT a PC, not USE it.
As with so many things that "everyone knows", this is wrong.
I actually had an ExoPC tablet (eventually the cat knocked it off the table and the screen shattered but there you go) with a 32GB HDD, an Atom chip and 1GB of RAM. Basically a netbook with no keyboard.
It ran Win7 like molasses but Win8 ran really well on it.
Bloody cat.
Happens all the time.
Quite a lot of the parts for the old piece-of-shit Mondeo I'm driving can only be found from scrap merchants. It's not just cars, either. Everyone stops supporting their stuff eventually except for a few very rare and very, very expensive outliers like Aga, Zippo and Aston Martin.
Even operating systems. OSX Snow Leopard is no longer supported. RHEL deprecates old code every three years.
Sounds to me like you just want extra special service from MS because wah wah wah M$.
I think he was just proclaiming his own godlike genius again or calling people shills (which is against the House Rules) or maybe he decided to fling shit at an article for mentioning Microsoft without adding thirty four pages of hate-filled rant.
One of those.
Anyway. Definitely nuked. I think Drew got him.
1. Stop shouting.
2. Stardock haven't "fixed" anything. They've simply made life easier for those (like yourself) who are too stupid to use a launcher.
Actually, can we have that /Ignore function now please? You're the first person to make me think that that since Eadon got nuked.
> Yeah 'cause Windows (h)8 is just so great with its Touch ONLY Interface,
Win8 has no Touch ONLY interface.
You have just disqualified yourself from any claim to knowledge of that OS and thus, any credible opinion of it.
Please feel free to post your ignorance to the Verge where they love that shit.
> People are going to find it hard justifying the best part of a grand on an unproven product that will be out of date or abandoned within a year - that actually has no return of investment, and a potentially low re-sell price!
Yeah, but they say all of that about iPads except for the resale price. There are always more fanbois to sell to.
> Other thing they haven't done [....] allow direct connection to a USB printer from the tablet
It does that. We had a salesdroid with one in the office last week who plugged directly into Ed's little colour InkJet and printed out his sales bumf on the spot.
We should have charged him for the ink.
I do not hold the views explained below.
I imagine that Apple would argue that their refusal to stock such a book leads to increased sales among prudes and morons and nobody ever lost money by overestimating the intelligence of the public. This kind of publicity for their decisions is therefore (to Apple) useful and very cheap marketing.
@Psyx
To quote my favourite character from A Game of Thrones - "there's no cure for being a cunt". But there is a cure for having to watch other people be cunts to some poor old bloke who just wants to be left alone.
And you know what? If he did invent Bitcoins, it'd be a "so what" situation anyway. He's broke. It's not like there's anything to be jealous of unless you think being skint and recovering from a stroke is like totally rad and awesome.
As far as I can see, an ordinary member of the public who hasn't bothered anyone is being insulted for absolutely no reason other than that some people are cunts.
Personally, I'd ban 'em all.
"cunted"
Actually the name of a sort-of-cocktail invented by Jim.
Half a pint of dry cider, a double JD and a bottle of melon Bacardi Breezer.
The problem with it is, you only really order one when you're drunk enough to think it's a good idea. Afterwards you're too, well, cunted to remember what a bad idea it was.
Tastes nice, though.
This is not about whether you like the OS or about whether "the average consumer" would be able to do as I've described.
It's about whether the Met's admins can set up a Win8 profile that looks and behaves exactly like an XP profile.
And the truth is, yes. They can. It doesn't even take long. Rant about Win8 somewhere else if that's all you want to do; your dislikes are not relevant to this discussion.
You are of course absolutely right in that Win8 changes absolutely everything, has no desktop at all and certainly can't be configured to behave in exactly the same way as WinXP at all under any circumstances.
Further, there are no Start Menu replacements available and you certainly can't set Win8.1 to boot to desktop by default.
Except that all of the above was untrue and you might want to think before kneejerking.
> Except that the set of touch hardware supported by both Windows XP and Windows 8 is miniscule and may not in fact exist.
That's actually not the case. I was surprised to find that in-car ANPR and supporting systems are all supplied with a minimum of a Core 2 Duo chip and 1GB of RAM. Since the C2D chip supports DX9 and Win8 supports both resistive and capacitive touchscreens, all of those little boxes will in fact run Win8 just as well as they run XP.
the old bill are one of the few organizations that'll genuinely benefit from Win8.
They have - by necessity - a whole lot of touchscreens in their support load. All of those currently have touch layers over XP (which suck) and all are integrated into LDAP and centrally managed except mobile (ie traffic) units which have a third-party interface that everyone hates and are roughly as manageable as a tiger with a roman candle up its bum.
The met will gain native touch support and the ability to integrate their management platform. Although I understand they've toyed with iPads (see what I did there?) so they'll still be supporting multiple OS's.