Re: In the process of this discussion
BornToWin appears to be channelling him almost to perfection.
I say almost because his capslock works.
3907 posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
BornToWin appears to be channelling him almost to perfection.
I say almost because his capslock works.
The very last thing anyone trying to deal with Asperger’s – which entails a lifetime of learning to cope with it so as to be accepted by “normal” society – needs is some asshole accusing them of faking it…or their doctors of misdiagnosing them due to “fashion.”
You sir, are that asshole.
Actually, I'm not. I haven't diagnosed or accused anyone and I am somewhat at a loss to understand why you continue to accuse me of doing so.
Lack of empathy? Granted. Never had much of that. But false accusations from me?
Quote it or climb down off that high horse before you get a nosebleed.
A commentard further up suggested that Asperger's is seen as a good thing here, not me.
I haven't diagnosed anyone, nor am I likely to.
More to the point, where - exactly - do you get off reading content into my posts that I didn't put there?
Fashionable diagnoses are a real issue. I'm married to a doctor, her mates are round here all the time. I get to hear about it. Presumably you're upset because it's a condition you like or identify with? Have I done the equivalent of slag off a Sony product in front of Barry Shitpeas?
Harsh. "Fashionable" and "trendy" are accurate descriptions for a diagnosis that approaches the mode.
Ten years ago, the fashionable diagnosis was ADD. Twenty years ago it was dyslexia.
While it's a good thing that genuine cases get diagnosed, self-diagnosis led by media-hype and anxious/desperate/"oh it's not his fault, he's got"-style parenting lead to false diagnoses which can actually be damaging towards genuine cases.
"Craniorectal inversion" might be something you think is a funny thing to accuse somebody with but a clear and unemotional (I do not have Asperger's or autism of any form and unlike some commenters, do not want them either) view i something that's unaffected by the increasingly monochrome world that I inhabit.
I suggest you may be suffering from pedal ingestion.
Lack of empathy can also be easily manipulated.
I find that outright misanthropy is the only surefire protective condition.
Have you considered that it may be "Johnny"?
I don't suffer from anything fashionable. Chronic degenerative monochromachia is too much of a gobful to be trendy.
Best article I've read on the Reg for ages.
I agree wholeheartedly. Yes, the Cloud is here to stay. Yes, trying to sell to Enterprise is a mug's game. Yes, security/trust is a HUGE issue.
Me, I think I'll write a SME-class Email/Calendar/CRM application since most SMEs will not go Cloud and Microsoft killed SBS. Thanks for the market opportunity, guys.
Or the edited highlights of a Carry On film collection, apparently.
He may be a tribute to He Man and Masters of the Universe, which as I recall was a children's cartoon featuring Ram Man and Fisto.
What the hell were they thinking?!?
Actually, I should go back to this.
Microsoft licensing does not allow you to run a multitennanted environment such as you describe. Different company? Different domain, different physical server. More licences. Separate CALs. Each company pays for it's own CALs, not you.
None of this disqualifies outsourcing of Exchange and SQL Server while keeping an in-house fileserver.
Microsoft licensing was designed by the dark forces underpinning all evil in the universe.
No arguments here.
Agreed, however in this case the goal is not to provide MS Azure. It's to provide a comparable level of service to their SBS installs.
Now obviously, there's some effort involved in it and you have to offer some incentive - service level is usually the obvious one. But just from the point of view of practicality, if you're supporting those SBS installs anyway, why not keep the boxes somewhere where your client can't fuck with them?
I realize this may not be feasible, but you could always just follow the bear.
Assume that you run support and management for say, ten companies running SBS.
Those companies are going to hav issues when the product end of lifes.
Fuullblown Server2012+Exchange+SQlServer is too expensive for them justify - each.
What if YOU set it up? What if your company basically made a "cloud" and sold the service to those SMEs, complete with known access to data, detailed backup and D/R strategy? And they paid you a sub to use YOUR servers instea of Microsoft's?
As i say, there are many possible reasons why it might make no sense. But then again, it might.
Transact-SQL has an awful lot of quirks.
Some of them are incredibly useful quirks, such as the Hierarchical column data type. Man, that thing makes recursive queries fly by!
Regardless, I don't think SQL Server is by default a part of SBS 2011 (except under the hood) so this isn't all that relevant.
You could replace the non-visible bits with PostgreSQL which does most thing that SQL Server can, albeit in a far less friendly way.
They're not using EOS. It was a codename for preproduction.
Seriously? You take more than 32GB of photos without uploading?
Nobody else in the world does
No. Adapt or deserve to die.
Look at Ubisoft, look at EA, look how amazingly their DRM turned out.
Alternatively, look at Steam.
The Range Rover sport isn't that great on headroom, especially in the rear seats. The actual seat are set very high. I bump my head more in my neighbour's Sport than I do in the missus's Honda Civic.
What you need is a Toyota HiLux. Best headroom of any 4x4 out there, in my experience.
Tried WIndows Phone, hated it (based on the fact you couldn't tether the device).
Settings -> Internet Connection Sharing. Done.
My usage includes weekends at race circuits in remote areas, travel at odd hours and "on demand" for a disabled family member, trips to the amenities site with garden rubbish, collecting a neighbours kids and their huge numbers of friends from club nights (when dad has had a few drinks and they missed the one evening bus), oh and I work odd hours too.
So you're an edge case and the scenario does not apply to you.
Okay. So what?
They could always open up BBM, I suppose.
They'd lose in terms of exclusive device sales but those seem to be down the shitter anyway. And they might win in terms of service provision.
I agree about the prices. A decent RT tablet should be about 7.5 - 8" and cost £150.
I wish I knew why, but since developing a couple of Win8 Store Apps for work - demonstration stuff made under orders, basically - I find myself more and more tempted by the notion of a WinRT tablet.
It's a challenge, I suppose. Take the hobbled device, make it do everything I need.
I wouldn't buy this thing, though. The combination of Acer's crappy build quality and a last-gen x86 chip rings up a large "NO SALE" sign.
Thanks for posting the 1/16th clued General Public response, AC.
It's always good for us to be aware of what those with just enough knowledge to be massive fucktards will say.
Presumably he has to fix his own Alfa all the time anyway.
Not at $99, there hasn't. Not in the UK at any rate.
If there had been, we'd have snapped up a couple as test machines.
Have you not noticed that AC always posts that exact text on any security story, regardless of the systems involved?
Either it's irony or some sort of negative astroturfing.
That'll be the same NSA to which Apple is a signed-up data feeder?
My 15-week old son might have opinions on that.
Please explain how your question is relevant?
I have to be honest IP, old feller.
It's not about Windows 8 which I don't love and which doesn't magically make everything better. It makes a very few minor things better, true, but not enough to get worked up about.
What's got me riled up is the massed howling crusade against it when the reasoning is so fucking trivial.
If it made major workflow alterations, sure. Wail, scream and go on and on about how bad it is. But a launcher that you rarely if ever see? That's it? That's your "horror"? That's "the abomination that is TIFKAM"?
Once we get that petty about a tool for basic usage which is not a huge improvement but is actually an improvement in some regards, well.. somebody needs to step up and point out that acting like a screaming drag-queen over a missing sequin does not do this industry any favours at all.
Since nobody else has the balls to tell the emperor that he's Danny la Rue, I have to do it.
Seriously, why are you acting as if there is no desktop? Because there is. All this "I hate TIFKAM" bullshit is just a distraction, regardless of what twisted reasoning you give it, because the desktop is still there and it has been improved.
I see the tiles once per day on boot. Then, because my desktop tile is first in the stack I press the RETURN key and all I get is Desktop.
Tell me, what do you do in your 30 years of IT? Project Management? Cleaning the monitors? Because this is not rocket science. Such visceral hatred for one extra tap on a key is just fucked up.
I take you're an amateur, then?
Because, you know, Event Viewer. It exists for a reason....
You've worked in IT for over 30 years and you can't figure out how to click the Desktop tile or press the Windows key?
What's depressing is that ALL of this Windows8 hate comes from the industry.
End users look at you as if you're mad when you talk about a learning curve between 7 and 8. As far as they universally seem to be concerned, 8 is easier. Press the big buttons. It's computing for the McDonalds employee level and they like it that way.
You do when it turns out that the 'hammer' you thought you were buying turns out to be an orange on a stick.
You don't. Builders don't tend to talk like that.
In any case, nobody with an iota of professionalism could describe Windows 8 that way. It literally does every single thing that Windows 7 does, plus a whole lot more, plus it runs faster, uses less resources and offers improved tools and a lot more information about those tools.
Seriously. If you pick Windows 7 over Windows 8 and you're an admin, you suck at your job and you should be fired. Only an idiot would refuse a better tool simply because it comes with a different colour scheme.
Aw, do the delicate wickle flowers not like the truth? Do they want to believe they are oh-so-special?
You're not. Grow up.
I don't love it but it's just a launcher. The start menu was also just a launcher. If either bothered me, I'd change them. It's pretty bloody easy to do so and very well-documented.
If the aesthetic properties of a tool you work with are enough to shit on your opinion of its utility, you're a bad workman.
You rarely if ever hear the phrase "ew, the new orange on this hammer is so yucky, what a horror. I'm going back to bashing nails in with my head", do you?
Too many fucking divas in this industry. Newsflash, people. We are not artists. We are not visionaries. We are not genius savants. We are mechanics. I have been offered a new hammer. It may be ugly but it hammers straighter and it damps recoil better than the old hammer. It also hits just as hard while being considerably lighter to carry around. Does its ugliness concern me?
No. I have no business being concerned and no right to be concerned. I am not Gok Wan, I am a fucking mechanic.
Do you read back what you've written?
Your problem appears to be that a configurable launcher is different from an old configurable launcher.
The horror... the horror...
"Get over yourself" icon required.
I got new (brand new in pack) Intellimouse Explorer off Ebay last month.
I'm a lefty who mouses right-handed so weird right-hand shapes don't concern me. The reason for ImE is simply that it's the only mouse I've ever used that's (almost) big enough.
In other news, apparently Mary Jo Foley is touting a rumour that J Allard is taking back his "Head of XBox" job.
Or Hyper-V server 2012 - which has an even smaller attack surface..
True but as it's quite hard to use Hyper-V server as a desktop OS, it's out of score (per original question).
Looks like ChromeOS is not getting widespread support and has therefore failed and is useless and should be junked.
No? But those are the arguments which are used for Windows Phone, aren't they?
I wonder if the downvotes all came from ChromeOS users. If so, either Larry or Sergey has more than one Reg account, it seems.
I see Tim Cook is in.
The thing about a civil war is, whoever wins it's the same side.
So the British won (and lost) the American War of Independence because they were fighting on both sides. They also won the war of 1812 but that was because the Americans lost.
I'll give you #2 but #1 has been conclusively disproved. It's pure broscience. If it were true you'd see morbidly obese famine victims.
The body actually metabolizes sugars first, protein second, complex carbs third and fat last.
So for some folk [with certain hormone issues - eg thyroxine] they can eat dramatically less than you or I AND PUT ON WEIGHT...
Are you saying that a problematic thyroid gland can cause you to metabolize fat from air?
Because, y'know, the dear old (calories in - calories out) equation is at least consistent with things like thermodynamics and conservation of energy. Whereas, since fat is an energy store, you appear to be saying that we can magically make more energy than we intake simply by having a glandular disorder.
That seems unlikely to me.