Re: May as well offer us 1TB free
Donvoted because Bob Vistakin, I suppose.
3907 posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
Donvoted because Bob Vistakin, I suppose.
I use it. So many corporate email providers bounce zips and executables that sending code to, for example a company that posts example code on github that doesn't fucking work* is far easier if I send a link to Skydrive instead.
Since that code has no business case for security, Skydrive is as good as anything and it was free.
*Most recent usage.
Nice try but wrong.
RT is an API set for Windows, addressable via the .NET framework. As such, it runs on every post Win7 windows installation.
You edited your post in a BIG way.
Yeah, it was incoherent. I hadn't been awake long.
I'm not angry. Just disappointed, I guess. The sheer amount of no-life wasters on here with no skills and no ability and a huge hard-on for a company that exists to sell them as product getting all tribal about allegiances makes me sad.
He doesn't need to convince you, Jake.
I'd go so far as to venture that he doesn't need the reassurance of anyone who has enough time to waste it on dismissive comments about the multi-billion dollar company he was a partner in building and running. Has Steve Ballmer done better for himself and his family than any one of us?
Yes. Indisputably so. But you just bitch away, Jake. You with your secret special knowledge what's good that either nobody else has or nobody else gives a shit about. Bitch away, old son. Make yourself feel better. As for the idiot with the Harvard maths degree (those don't come free with your cornflakes either), I expect he feels pretty good anyway,
And has never heard of any of us and wouldn't care if he did.
The idiot who tripled revenue, doubled profits and turned cloud, CRM, Sharepoint and gaming into billion dollar businesses? I mention those because they're not dependant on windows+office and did not exist in Gates' era.
Yeah, what an idiot. You're so much smarter than him, Jake. We know because you keep telling us.
The irony being that Google are flat-out lying through their collective arse about it?
They'll all slate it anyway for not being an iPhone.
throe. Not throw.
Yet another reason not to take you seriously.
So that you could plug in a monitor and a keyboard and only need one computer?
(I doubt this will ever happen, especially with Atom chippery, but it's a potential reason).
Then he'd read his Shakespeare.
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Because nobody uses Google+ ?
There are other desktop operating systems out there and yet Microsoft has a monopoly.
Not all market-shares are created equal.
Unless we're saying that Google is a monopoly in the online video world?
You could certainly make a case for that.
I've got a Lumia 920.
The old app didn't show ads. The new app showed ads until Google got it pulled.
The article is wrong and interestingly it's wrong in a way that makes Google look good and Microsoft look bad.
Mistake, or El Reg pandering to the (obvious) prejudices of their readership?
You be the judge.
If I could upvote you twice, I would.
Are Microsoft an annoying, expensive pain in the arse? Absolutely.
Are Google being nasty little bitches about this? Hell yes.
Well, all those kids who got a Nokia 520 for less than a hundred quid off contract, that's who. Is that what you want to happen, Googlepologists?
We weren't promised flying cars. Unless you're over 60, you weren't either.
We were promised a bleak, dirty, Orwellian cyberpunk dystopia.
And it's very nearly here..
It would be if it worked.
I've never had a FON hotspot work without demanding money from me. Never.
These days I just ignore them completely.
Left hand: We're supporting Windows XP Embedded with security patches until 2016/17
Reading comprehension, anon. You fail at it.
In what reality is 37.2% a monopoly?
"Proposed amendments tabled by EU Ministers would, if introduced, restrict the cases in which personal data breaches would have to be reported."
Do they think it's not important? Do they think their corporate masters can save money by hoping nobody finds out?
Unless there's been another kernel-swap, no.
It' hardly a unique situation anyway. How many Sony and Motorola Android owners are still waiting for an upgrade from Froyo (the single most widespread edition of Android)?
I think the market is somewhat larger these days.
You know, to the tune of several orders of magnitude larger.
You can do all of these already.
I do, anyway.
Hardly a reasonable comparison, given that the 620 costs £150 off contract.
Compared to an Android phone that costs £150, it's a miracle.
Or maybe he works for a company with some level of "MS partner" programme membership and they get all their stuff for free anyway. With support.
A lot of companies do.
[MS has a big hole] in their Accounts that shoud have been filled with Windows 8 license revenue.
Really? Unless I read the report entirely backwards, revenues are up again this year and operating costs are down. The 900m on Surface was defrayed against corporation tax so that didn't hurt their bottom line either.
Unless you hate Windows 8 to the extent that you can no longer read a balance sheet, I suspect you may be talking out of your arse.
Sheesh, the Google posse around here are going to downvote you to death for actually doing the maths.
That was careless of you.
Now this too will suffer undeserved stigmas for trying its best to run on Acer's shitty kit.
Where did you get that idea?
This IS the XBox Live charge. What we see here is just more people whining about it. Anyone who actually cared about $63/year bought their subscription half-price on Ebay or got a PS3 instead and those people - who clearly weren't in the market for an Xbox One anyway - are the ones shitting themselves over this "extra" (but actually completely unchanged) charge.
"Xbox Live Gold now includes Skype and some other shit as well as what it already supplied" isn't such a click-baity headline, though.
Can I recommend the Chuckle Brothers?
Almost certainly cheaper than Sean Bean.
He did. Malaria.
It was definitely there on WM6.x devices such as, for example, my old HTC Touch.
Perhaps you weren't looking for it?
It's weird that this is new. Even that most hated and "half-baked" of phone operating systems has had this from day 1.
I think the problem here may be in your choice of incubator.
I have all this to learn, as the father of a four-month old boy.
I was rather hoping that the fish/ponds/relative size thing could be solved by judo and boxing from age 4 or 5, in much the same way that working my arse off on a farm sorted it for me.
Tetchy, aren't we?
Point out where I condoned anything, little miss sunshine.
"Live by the twit" is accurate, if only because the feminist in question campaigned to get Jane Austen on a banknote via Twitter. She apparently said there weren't any women on banknotes, somehow having never seen the front face of a Bank of England note since 1953.
The abuse is bad, really bad but the medium is her medium. She used it. Now she is being abused by it. There's a slightly poetic irony in that which is ugly but still of more worth than anything ever written by Jane "Mr D'arcy will make it all better" Austen.
The problem with removing a service that allows numpties to post unregulated nonsense online is that they would find new places to post their drivel.
Yes, but nobody reads the BBC's "Have Your Say" pages.
"Send an SMS message" would be setting yourself up to get pantsed via premium rate numbers.
*That one might catch a colour-blind person, of course.
Tell me about it.
My eyesight is better than 20/20 but I suffer from degenerative monochromachia. One problem this causes is that coloured text often becomes illegible.
When it's been deliberately munged AND coloured on top, it's literally impossible to read.
I don't have a solution but I really wish that captchas didn't come in so many multicoloured varieties.
I've been thinking about this and the usual slew of car analogies are wrong.
It's not like the phone market. It actually reminds me of nothing so much as the Home Computer market in the late 80's. The myriad of 8-bit Home Computers has pretty much died, people are buying Segas and Nintendos for their kids and Ataris or Amstrad Word Processing boxes for themselves, usually running CP/M.
And then there's this new thing called Windows RT which is kind of like buying a 286 running DOS. You'd have to be an idiot to buy one of those. Right? DOS sucks, after all. DOOM hasn't been written yet. You can't play Mortal Kombat on that thing and it costs a fortune.
Much the way that the 286 PC should have died on the vine, logically speaking, RT should also die on the vine. The 286 went on to become the box we're all using - yes, even you, Mac user - mainly because IBM.
The real question here - and please leave the gibbering fanboi arguments at home for this one - is, are Microsoft powerful enough to be IBM in this century? It's an interesting one. Almost every damn business in the world runs their stuff so they're arguably even stronger. And it's not as if IBM were ever well liked by their clients - far from it, in fact - so can we not stoop to the "but people hate..." stuff, please?
If they are, the tablet market may eventually follow the home computing market. If they're not, it won't.
That's my theory. What's your take on it?
Why should I? If you're going to spread FUD about languages being interpreted or otherwise, what use are you?
WP9 is already slated to not be compatible with WP8. Its going to be an improved and incompatible device to old WP8 devices.
If you believe every rumour that Eldar Murtazin shits out, possibly. I don't.