2421 posts • joined Monday 16th November 2009 12:21 GMT
> We've all gotten by just fine without "visual debugging" (whatever the hell that is)
That's what I said until I looked at it.
I was wrong. You are wrong, too. Take a good look and then use it, then tell me you don't need it. Because you do.
"I know nothing of what I speak! Here is a fireball icon to show my rage!"
Re: Ah, Notes.
And now there's nobody that will touch it.
Seriously, 2013 offers tools like visual debugging and code peek and you're obsessing over colours?
What are you, a webmonkey?
> You can't install a different one so you are out of luck. No Firefox to make IE look bad and force an upgrade.
Yes, but that doesn't make IE bad. It just means you can't replace it.
Same way you can't replace Safari on iOS.
Re: Don't Panic!
Yes, and all other OS too. Nothing is secure unless it's secured. As usual, to those who say that linux is secure I present exhibit A, Eadon's blog.
The problem with XP is that after it EOLs, it cannot be secured.
> Don't you have to upgrade from 32bit XP to Vista-32 first, then 7-32, then is there a 32-bit 8?
You can go straight from XP to 8 (and yes, there is an 8 32bit).
Re: Don't Panic!
The problem lies in the shared codebase between XP, Vista, W7 and W8.x (and incidentally 2K but that's already officially dead).
Assume MS release a patch for a serious exploit which allows a remote user to take over the computer entirely without security prompting (bear with me, extreme examples are more fun).
The first thing your average malware writer is going to do is notice that this patch isn';t issued for XP because it's "dead" and then try the zploit against the nearest XP box. If it works, it's unpatchable (because dead) and all those machines in banks are open for the rape and pillage.
You can be as smug as you like about your XP install. If it's not kept in a cellar with no ethernet access, no mouse, keyboard or available ports and nobody allowed near the damn thing, it is absolutely not secure.
You can upgrade if it's 32bit to 32bit or 64bit to 64bit but you can't cross the streams.
This is all your work, then. You personally made this change in a company that you hate and criticize at every opportunity.
Downvoters - reasons for downvote or you're a wanker.
Re: I didn't read the entire article
> " The original Surface Pro only supported MS VPN connections, no 3rd party support at all (from what I read anyway)"
What were you reading, CultOfMac or a Gavin "I don't know how to long-press" Clarke article?
The original Surface Pro ran anything that would run on x86 or AMD64 Windows. You were lied to.
Again with the PS4 ad?
Is it editorial policy that every story concerning the XBone must contain a (free?) ad in the copy for the PS4?
it has the why fyes and the three gees, apparently.
Is that the hissy fit where the Reg took the piss out of the way Dead Steve said "Jaguar" (ie jag-WAH) and Apple refused to ever speak to the Reg again?
You mean that hissy fit, right?
Review issue -
AC1 was published in 2007, Arkham Asylum 2009. In AC1, combat was often criticized for being a matter of waiting and countering.
I'll grant you the slomo on the final kill but AC's combat predates AAs by two years. Your plagiarism allegation is misplaced.
Re: Avoid the long, cold swim ...
Bears and penguins never coexist.
They're touch-firsting Office, if that's a word.
I don't know if you've seen OneNote MX but it's a rather clever way to produce most of the functionality of Office on a touchscreen.
The issue, as ever, is probably macros. And I think they've got a possible solution for that, currently prototyped in the form of that web-based WP8 app writer. Making it backward compatible against VBA will be quite a trick but doable.
Other than that, there's the integration of RT, WP and XBox (which should arguably have been done when they first headed for metro) and churning out RT productivity apps.
As a reenactment archer - heavy war bow, 210lb - I can assure you that I can teach anyone to be reasonably competent with a crossbow in under ten minutes.
The longbow? Not so much. You do need strength but much more technique. And actually putting an arrow where you want it to be is not trivial. One of the questions I'm most frequently asked is "how do you aim?"
The answer is that I don't. I don't even think about it. I nock, draw, loose, the arrow goes where I wanted it to go. That stuff is learned over years.
Re: An oldie, but a goodie
On the subject of crossbows - and I realize I'm off topic here but I feel a rant coming on -
This guy is a massive dickwad. He sees crossbows as empowering the peasantry? In fact, they achieved the exact opposite. The crossbow disarmed peasants, put skilled archers out of work and fixed powere even more firmly in the hands of feudal lords.
As the author states, any bellend can be reasonably certain of hitting their target with a crossbow. This means you can round a bunch of brainless thugs and use them rather than pay money for soldiers who've spent years learning how to shoot properly with a longbow. Nice, right? Suddenly the people are free?
Not exactly. Think it through.
Compared to a longbow - which is, when all is said and done, a stick - the crossbow is a fiendishly complicated bit of machinery. You need to make steel arms for it. You need a rolling or winding trrigger. You need a cocking mechanism that can actually bend those steel arms without shattering them or ruining them. You need some seriously hardcore cable to be able to cope with the release strain.
What a crossbow actually is, is "seriously fucking expensive".
And any cretin can use one. But only the nobles can afford one.
So you get rid of your skilled retainers, hire a bunch of thugs, issue them with crossbows for the duration of any time spent in missile combat and then collect them all up again afterwards. Nobody else has one. Nobody else can afford one. You can easily make them illegal in your demesne and have your thugs with your crossbows kill anyone who bought their own.
Or anyone who has a longbow because hey, outnumbered!
The crossbow was not an instrument of anyone's freedom but an iron boot on the neck of the peasantry.
I am unwilling to read this pdf any further because Chuck Hammill is clearly an idiot.
Re: "We have seen chat among terrorist groups...
And clearly, they're not fixing the right things or MI6 wouldn't have seen it.
Short of Lord Reith rising from his grave and striking Paul Dacre dead during an edition of Strictly Come Dancing (Judgement Day edition),
PLEASE let this happen.
Re: What a rush
> Microsoft should be offering free accounts to get developers.
Because malware developers are developers too!
And so are the people who write fart apps, right?
It's funny how nobody complains about Apple charging for dev licenses. Or the fact that you need to buy a Mac to write iOS apps.
Re: MS should open development to more tools
Er.. all the VS Express editions are free.
Where's the problem?
Re: Oh dear
> The Apple II was a home computer.
Yeah, if your home was worth a million quid, maybe.
Re: "90% of what's needed"
Hmm. You can turn all that off (I do).
But then again, if the data's going anywhere, why is it better to give it to Eric Schmidt?
Also, the 620 has a microSD slot.
Re: "90% of what's needed"
I wonder what it does that, for example, a £120 Lumia 620 won't do, beyond tell Google everything you do, everywhere you go, everything you read, everything you watch etc.
I'm sorry, I couldn't read some of your post.
Did you mean "cunts"?
During the height of the "knifecrime" government distraction - I mean, hysteria - I was asked for ID in Tesco for buying some serving spoons, because knifecrime!
a) I'm 43 (and I look it)
b) They're fucking spoons.
At that point, I decided expecting anything other than a particularly petty police state was folly.
Seriously, did I just read that? In a sub-headline?
What the hell is wrong with your spellcheck?
Because they have to. Nokia retain the rights to the name.
That one flaw aside however Google and LG should be rather pleased with iFixit's eight-out-of-ten score.
Unless I've read it wrong, that flaw means "if you break the screen, you have to buy a new phone".
Pretty certain that cracked screens are the single most common issue with smartphones.
Re: This will either save PC gaming or kill it.
@lurker - then it better be preinstalled, or again, the average console user will never know it's even possible.
By who's definition of "wrong"?
> Google are an ad company, they're not likely to mistakenly identify you as a terrorist, kick down your door and ship you to a black pit somewhere. The US government may.
"Items which may interest you -
Ski Masks sale reductions!
Enriched uranium blowout!
From Google Maps -
Inside the Pentagon!"
Could be fun.
Re: Chen, don't let me down.
It's not a war, AC. Or a race. We all benefit from competition in the marketplace and I for one hope BB do turn it around.
Also, that kind of triumphalist idiocy makes you sound like a fandroid.
Re: This will either save PC gaming or kill it.
If the media facilities involve a reboot to $different_os and XBMC or something similar, those media facilities will never be used by the majority of console owners.
Re: Inevitable question
Yes, nobody should build anything.
Re: a lot of companies have had a lot of success rolling out iPads
Are you suggesting that Nokia's patents are of the fatuous "rounded corners" style, AC?
Do you suggest that Nokia did in fact not do the R&D necessary for much of modern cellular telephony?
Or is it simply that they are collecting a license fee from Samsung and have a connection to Microsoft that's got your ringpiece itchy?
Re: It would be good for the industry
The phones are good. Just because some stupid people get so attached to a phone OS that they can't stand the idea of competition does not mean that the rest of the world is quite so dim.
I upvoted your post; its use of sarcasm was outstanding.
However, you're wasting your time. The is The Register where legions of pricks who think helpdesk is hard work will instantly pour vitriol on anything to do with Gates, Ballmer or Microsoft.
I agree with Jubtastic. Bill robbed the first world blind and is using that money to save the third world.
He's Robin Hood.
Not that nice. Sony lose money on Android.
Only Samsung are making money from it.
Re: If it's based in the US....
It's not live yet. We don't know where the company or servers will be based.
You seem to be largely correct. The service (from what I can gather) will only guarantee security of communications between Dark Mail users, making it effectively a private message server.
Although the applications of this are obviously limited, it should work.
Re: OpenPGP ?
The metadata is still vulnerable.
Re: I've got a little list.
Re: I've got a little list.
> why doesn't he release a list of the MPs who made/voted-in the laws which allow these accounting 'tricks' to exist in the first place?
Because he and his Chancellor would be top of it. Lest year they made a big fuss about rewriting the tax laws to "clamp down on tax avoidance" and actually hired the big 4 accountancy firms to rewrite the law so that all their avoidance "instruments" are no longer pursued by HMRC.
The law is now that unless you can afford to hire PwC, Deloitte, Goldman-Sachs or the other one (i forget), you pay all the tax. If you can afford them, you pay no tax at all.
Re: I just made this suggestion yesterday
Hyperlinks are your friend, I guess.
Company A own 53% of Company B. Follow the link.
Company X owns 22% of Company A. Follow the link.
- Facebook offshores HUGE WAD OF CASH to Caymans - via Ireland
- Review Best budget Android smartphone there is? Must be the Moto G
- NSFW Confessions of a porn site boss: How the net porn industry flopped
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- OHM MY GOD! Move over graphene, here comes '100% PERFECT' stanene