No, I won't be able to retire until I'm at least 70. My retirement was spent on bailing out banks, remember?
4051 posts • joined 16 Nov 2009
No, I won't be able to retire until I'm at least 70. My retirement was spent on bailing out banks, remember?
Except we have an ageing population and old people already own all the property and get all
electoral bribesbenefits and they all go out and vote for whoever's promising them more free shit. Young people are outnumbered. The Baby Boomers rule the world.
I'm 45. I've already seen this happen to my generation - the absolute worst bit being people saying "oh, we must be nice to them, they fought in the war!" when actually they just got wankered at Woodstock or the Isle of Wight - and it will happen to every following generation until those selfish old pricks finally die.
yes because spoofing a certificate could easily allow the viking pirates to steal all of MS's money.
In your wet dreams.
"M$", wow, that's hilarious, is it 1994 again?
I followed the W7 links - am at work - got to the Standalone Updater, ran it, discovered the update wasd already installed. Checked update history and... it was installed on Sunday night.
So this is probably just the Reg's usual "hot off the presses but allowed to cool in order to comply with Health & Safety legislation" policy.
frankly, most malware is less intrusive than Chrome.
what's the cut-off point?
If it's not 22 installs (not users, most workplaces have more installs than users because of servers (however limited, a fileserver is still a server as is a backup server), laptops, other mobile stuff..
Is it 10? What about 10 users? Should you be MacGuyvering your own patch solution for ten users? How about five? A lot of households have more than five..
There are a lot of companies out there with a fileserver, a backup server and potentially a print server and < 25 users. 25 being the "Essentials" seat limitation so it seemed appropriate.
I read your title wrong.
Considering that P2P code was first pushed in Win7 as Direct Cache, I suspect they've had plenty of time to refine it.
And even if they haven't, the fact that is not BitTorrent is actually a bonus. Not in a security-thorugh-obscurity sense but rather simply because it is not as familiar as a BT clone would be. For example, suppose it can only host files cleared by by the main MS servers and which conform to SHA checksum? Would that be hard? No. Would it involve lots of throwing data around? Not really.
In such a case, both client AND server are running security checks. Hard to corrupt, a system like that. Not impossible but very, very improbable.
brighter than you, from the looks of it. Let's actually apply some thought to this, shall we?
You have a small business with 20 desktops and two servers. You don't run WSUS because it's a bit beyond your pay grade and you don't really want the hassle of approving which updates go out. At the moment, you download 22 sets of full updates every month.
This new thing comes in and suddenly you download 22 sets of SHA hashes for comparisons (directly from MS and nobody's got a MITM attack going on that, not even the linux jihadis on the Reg's forums) and one set of updates. You just reduced bandwidth and probably patching time (because your SME net connection is always going to be slower than the Gigabit network you've got in the office) and everyone's a winner.
Or you have a network at home with one HTPC (always on for recording) and a bunch of laptops, meaning n+1 downloads just became 1 download. Why is this bad?
BUT ZOMG THEY WANTZ TO PATCH MY BOXEN FROM TEH INTARWEBZ well yes, they do. But the SHA hashes come directly from MS so you're definitely just getting the patches you need and not any extra nasties.
Are there any intelligent adults commenting on the Register?
Or even writing for the Register, Mr Sharwood? Seriously, wtf was that? It read like the Daily Mail on Romanians.
> a fair indication that Microsoft want everyone to be on some sort of 'Software Assurance' plan with an annual, or monthly, fee. What else would 'WAAS' be?
An attempt to reduce their support base by having run _one_ version of Windows.
And your Secure Boot FUD is littered everywhere and provably false. You keep posting it though.
> 'Free update' does _NOT_ apply to businesses
Yes it does. It just doesn't apply to Enterprise editions. There are millions of SMEs out there running Win7Pro/premium who can upgrade for free.
Also, I don't believe you about "weasel words". I might if it were anyone but you but your antipathy toward Microsoft and insistence on making up lies to make them look bad - pointless, considering how much better they are at making themselves look bad than you are - is rather well documented. I can easily go find examples from these very forums if necessary.
I expect they're consoling themselves that Windows PC sales could fall by 99% and still exceed linux demand on the desktop.
Or Mac sales.
Sorry to pour cold water on your boner.
I agree that business won't buy hardware but it might go for the OS for two reasons.
1. Free upgrade if you do it within one year of release, even from Win7
2. It's even lighter and considerably better optimized than Win7 so crusty hardware is likely to last even longer.
That means at almost no expense (install time, compatibility check) they can get money off the hardware bill for longer.
But the rear door isn't a hatch.
Same chassis maybe, but I find the RAV4 to be extremely capable off road provided you can actually drive a 4x4.
DISCLAIMER - grew up with Land Rovers and tractors.
I agree. And the larger dataset will improve results.
They might as well since they don't have any actual power.
That actually made me cry fr the friend I've lost. Thank you or damn you.
> - Affordable Graham :-/
Hi. Bryan here. I remember you, and your dodgy website.
Early on when we started doing that stuff, before any Conventions happened at all, he used to just show up in pubs where some of us were meeting up. Sometimes there'd only be 7 or 8 people there and then suddenly there was a Hat that wasn't Alan Bellingham. Never bought a round.
Despite somebody once saying "who's round is it? Well, which one of us is a millionaire?"
It's a good thing you're buying. As many, many afpers* will tell you, he never once bought a round.
*if you have to ask, you aren't one. You weren't there, man, you weren't...
because of the Alzheimer's.
As it turned out, he never lost his marbles entirely and he didn't end up in a depressing hotel in Switzerland, far from a home that denies people their final release from pain and misery. He died in his own bed, with his family on a pleasant-ish* spring day in Wiltshire.
That's called "winning".
* ie - perfect for Terry.
Three costs. They also now have to compensate all those broadcasters who already bought the full series of Top Gear from BBC Worldwide.
This doesn't cost the same as a small car.
the useless OS and the pathetic storage?
I think you mean they're not used in ChromeOS.
At this point it is traditional for a billion fanboys of various stripes to leap in declaring that if you cannot change the OS - even due to keyboard choices - then it is a piece of shit and probably evil and almost certainly tied to the NSA, typical Microsoft.
I didn't see a UKIP angle.
But then, I wasn't looking for one.
I expect this will be clamped down on fairly quickly. Those laws will start being enforced.
Because of statistics. Among the population in general, around 2% are housing landlords. Among MPs, over 30% are housing landlords. Mainly in London. They buy the house, let it, expense the mortgage, nice little earner for our upstanding representatives.
More lets will reduce the rents and they won't want that.
> If you're a professional developer, it's a piece of piss learning a new language - just open notepad++ in one screen, and google on the other.
But that won't get me a potentially useless certificate.
> The jury's largely out on employer and headhunter attitudes to this kind of achievement.
Tell you what. Let's find out. As a deve/architect these days, I haven't done any Powershell and the gap in my knowledge is bugging me. I'll do the Powershell course and put it on my CV and see if it gets noticed. $90 should be an affordable tax write-off, especially when converted to proper Sterling monies.
I didn't know Peter Mandelson posted here.
I guarantee 100% of those MEPs have received something from Google - search results.
What do you think they've received from Microsoft?
> you get lumbered with all the tedious EU trade harmonisation regulations, but with zero say in them.
So? we don't actually get any say in them anyway. At least that way we'd stop actively paying for bureaucrats to invent ever more tedious trade regulations.
Poor research, I suppose. Yes, the kind of arrangement Iceland and Norway have. An open, single market. No legal authorities. No MEPs. No commissioners. No representation on the Council of Ministers. No nett contribution. No CAP. No CFP.
And, you know, so what if the EU does stupid things to itself from then on? Not our problem.
The single most anti-EU politician I remember (including Nigel Farage!) was the late Tony Benn. And he was very definitely a lefty. He was also appalled by the EU's corruption and lack of democratic accountability.
> MEPs backed him despite having no say whatsoever in resolving EU antitrust cases
MEPs have no say in pretty much everything of importance. The whole system is horribly broken from the point of view of democracy and accountability.
And that, as an aside, is why I favour leaving the EU and striving for the kind of arrangement some of the Nordic countries have going. Open trade area, absolutely nothing else. Because the EU is a democracy in the same way that Google does no evil.
The bit that confuses me is where you say the upgrader will need some help.
No they won't. All those .mdf files are backed up (they are, right?) so you rip out the old server, take a hammer ot the spinning rust, fire up the new server and restore the .mdf files.
You now have a later version of SQL Server. Go you.
Yes, it may take a little fiddling to recreate a cluster or a fast-cache environment but the database? That's easy.
Not really. The USA has been (on aggregate) the single largest sponsor of terrorism in the world since the 1950s. Cubans, IRA, Contras, Mujahideen, thousands of others.
I'll wait for the Raymond Briggs cartoon.
internet pronunciation of "fracas"?
I love Turkey and the Turks are a very welcoming, friendly, generous people. With great food, secular attitudes and a determination to see the bright side of everything.
I don't know where you went. Must have been a UKIP fact-finding trip.
@Jim 69 - some things should make you angry. The fact that the country I lived in and loved does this kind of horrible thing is a good reason to be angry and foam-flecked.
Go to Holyhead some time where the ferry lands in the UK. You see girls arriving in tears and girls leaving in tears. Sent away from their homes and their families in order to prevent them losing their lives, dreams and ambitions via a heart-breaking (but beneficial) operation, denied even the opportunity for their mam to hold their hand. It's wrong. Not the abortions, those are absolutely right if those girls are to stand any chance at living the life they choose.
But the policy on contraception and abortion in the RoI, which is criminal. It's an attitude ISIS would be bang alongside. Couple that with the abuses of the Catholic church, the corruption in Irish politics, the disastrous entry into the Euro....
As stated, my ma's Irish. I lived there for years. I even remember a few words of Irish from school (which is a few more than most Irish people do) . I just can't help but think, on reflection, that if the British government hadn't delayed the Home Rule Act due to WWI, the country would be in a lot better shape.
Oh sure, Ireland would be whining about independence just like Scotland does and pretending to be oppressed but we'd have avoided the terrorism and deaths, the tacit collaboration with the Nazis, the Euro, much of the poverty and a whole lot of paedophile priests.
And the policy on women's rights and reproductive health would not be made by allegedly celibate men who wear dresses.
@splodge - there's nothing racist about recognising that for example, this is a savagely cruel abomination.
My mother is Irish so I am unlikely to be "racist" against Irish people even if that were actually possible. However, the Irish government is run like a pre-Francis branch of the Catholic Church and Irish laws about reproduction and families are just horribly, despicably wrong.
You didn't know about this? Oh, then you just downvoted out of some misplaced nationalism, which makes you an idiot. Or you agree with this? In which case, that makes you a disgusting individual and I hope you get a particularly painful fatal cancer.
Is that the place where if you get raped and then find out you're pregnant, they lock you up to stop you getting an abortion by going to the UK where we're not fucking 14 century lunatics?
O2 offers TuGo, which is app-based VoIP
I think you mean "O2 offers TuGo, which is great if you want it to take half an hour just to type a text that will then refuse to send anyway". As for call quality... there is no call quality.
TuGo is, basically, non-functional.
> Hence Dogged, did you seek permission before broadcasting the C* word?
Yes I did. I said "Am I allowed to call this guy a cunt?"
Did you miss that bit?
Am I allowed to call this guy a cunt?
What a cunt.
> Windows Mobile 7.5
No such thing, sorry.
On topic, will it serve PLEX?
I'm waiting for the Stephen Fry review.