>> are we sure this guy was a leet developer back in the 80's
It was a different time...
297 posts • joined 15 Nov 2009
>> are we sure this guy was a leet developer back in the 80's
It was a different time...
See icon. For both the original and this post, in fact.
Yes, but what if the entire site is lost...?
What's a "losse"? How do you "loose" one? And is such action likely to negatively impact any parties it's done at...?
>> "Wait, what, the FTSE100's up?", etc.
Now, I'm not a financial expert -- though maybe that gives my opinion, such as it is, more weight in your eyes, come to think of it -- but it seems to me that if GBP goes down against the rest of the world's major currencies then the total valuation of UK stock as measured in GBP will go up even if their absolute value as measured in "real money" goes down, assuming the drop in stock value is not as steep as the drop in currency value; which it stands to reason would be the case. At least in the short term.
But I like your attitude! I mean, what do experts know about their field of expertise anyway? Amirite...?
>> [Deniability] for what?
Suppose someone the NSA are not supposed to mess with was messed with using one of these tools/vulnerabilities during the period this compromise of their systems is supposed to have taken place. Further, suppose that this messing is about to be exposed -- or even has already been exposed, in less public circles. Do you still not see the deniability this #Shadowbrokers business creates?
So... we're sure that it's not the NSA deliberately leaking a subset of obsolete tools to create deniability?
Assuming we're sure it has anything to do with the NSA in the first place, that is!!
Anyone want to bet that by the time they're done migrating, the OS they'd have migrated to will be out of support...?
Where's a hamster wheel icon when you need one?
There should never be an unforeseen catastrophe. There should only ever be foreseen catastrophes that you decided not to protect against after crunching the numbers and judging the investment didn't make sense.
Ah, the righteousness of youth! How I miss those heady days!!
But here's the thing: one *can* raise security concerns with a site's admins, if one finds serious vulnerabilities. No real need to hose anyone's system; and nothing gained from that, apart from those death threats mentioned. Even if the damage is minor and would take someone who knows what they're doing only minutes to fix: the vast majority of users will not be able to handle anything close to fixing an MBR, for example.
What if the admins will not take a friendly warning seriously, you ask? Well, then it's probably a hopeless situation and nothing will prevent a catastrophic breach of the site concerned, sooner or later. After all, raising awareness of a specific issue or three, no matter how dramatically done, is unlikely to change the underlying culture.
I think you need a new acronym because right now, this is starting to look pretty usual, to me.
>> Easy to tell who has never used a database in their life in this thread.
It is, isn't it?
Or at least who finds DBs an apparently unfathomable and insurmountable challenge, if one takes into account that you seem to be equating locating files locally stored in a presumably well structured and indexed archive to clandestinely retrieving files that were stored by a non-cooperative remote entity, that have supposedly long since been deleted and, further, that the bleeding FBI already tried to recover -- with presumably much more cooperation than the Russians are likely to get, one might add -- and reportedly couldn't!
>> If they do have them, they don't need to go hacking.
More importantly, if they already have them, they don't have to find them.
Read into that what you will.
Personally, I read the comment regarding the Mansfield bars more as referring to their high visibility than their ability to stop a car going at that speed. I mean, I'm sure they would have helped cut down the distance the car travelled, but I suspect it would still have passed under the semi had it been travelling at the same speed on impact, at which point it would unfortunately have been too late for the passenger. But a combination of the Tesla spotting the bars in time to start rapid deceleration and the bars' stopping power itself could certainly have avoided total disaster.
You keep using that term, and I don't think it means what you think it means!
>> It's never a good idea to let alpha emitters inside.
True. But then again, it's never a good idea to eat top-soil in general in the first place!
People in general, I find, just don't understand radiation and how the regulations surrounding it work.
Which's extremely unfortunate and may eventually end up being a species-wide "[D]arwinian population control" mechanism.
>> Where would we go beyond that limit?
If I knew that, dear old chap, I wouldn't be wasting my time writing comments on an Internet forum!!
Point is, there's usually new tech sooner or later. Even without that, I've been reading about the eminent demise of the so-called Moore's Law since the early '90s.
Demonstrably, matter can support higher computation densities than we've so far achieved. Much higher densities, in fact. To stick with a cliché, take the human brain. And for a bit of a more abstract example, take any lump of matter doing whatever it is it is doing: to accurately simulate all intermolecular interactions and so on, you would need a computer much more massive than the original lump of matter. Now, I'm not saying we'll ever approach such a density, but when we needs to count the orders of magnitude separating us from it in orders of magnitude, there's clearly still a long way to go!
Here's what I read:
"If the future were like the past, it couldn't possibly contain any advancement!"
As an exercise, I would like to see the authors make predictions based on the data available a) before semiconductors were developed b) before vacuum tubes were developed. Etc.
Backups are important. I would be at the head of the queue to tell you this. In fact, I'd probably have come in half an hour before, said my piece and long gone by the time the queue formed.
But not this important! I mean, they're backups, for Bob's sake! Of your actual data you actually need to run. Only to be needed -- and usually found not up-to-date/functional -- when the live copy fails.
>> maybe then the big ISPs would have to make a noise.
Oh, they'll be making quite a lot of noise anyway: all those disks and the HVAC required to keep them operational!
More seriously, while your point regarding the actual behaviour of lawmakers seemingly everywhere is well-made and unfortunately apparently very accurate, in theory they should very well care about not wasting the public's money. It's, in fact, quite high on their job description, I think!
My first guess is that Putin, or a close friend of his, has recently bought a boatload of Seagate and/or WD stock...
That, or someone who has absolutely no idea what they're talking about is writing laws again.
I know which explanation is more likely, but I also know which one I prefer.
Here's to it soon changing to "driving with no hands on the wheel, please! In fact, let's take that wheel away before it confuses the poor, squishy meatbag..."
>> "Smacks of unbelievable stupidity to me".
Also considering that he was apparently selling trade secrets for amounts on the order of magnitude of what he was paying for readily-available soft-porn, it does not seem to me that this guy was very smart.
And he "worked as a security tester on military satellites"...!?
>> "many people lost their only copies".
Repeat after me: two is one, and one is none.
First, why would you trust anyone else to encrypt your off-site backups for you? And if you don't, why would you care if they did?
Second, I believe it should be "which stuff belongs to whom"...
You do realise that this is not, by and large, about your -- or anyone else's -- next laptop, yes?
I mean, sure, that's also impacted. But it's not what the discussion is about.
I would hope everyone keeps multiple properly encrypted backups of all their important files regardless of absolutely anything else.
Embedded security is critical, IMO. I would very much like to see all data outside processors fully and securely encrypted before I allow chips to be implanted into my body, for example. And we're certainly headed there, even if it's probably optimistic on my part to think that I would ever have to make that particular call, given the percentage of my hair that's white.
But trying to get there by buying McAfee? What on Earth were Intel thinking...?
Ah! The hidden costs and impacts start to show up!!
And it's not like the visible ones were great to begin with...
And I am sure I read quite a few narratives of the Chinese invading through the ground!
>> "half the country has a below-average IQ"
And it's not just IQ, either! It's everything!!
It's extremely frustrating, this. No matter what one does to better things -- education, welfare, etc. No matter what efforts are taken, it still always seems that half the population remains below average.
I'm telling you: the system is rigged...
Not as exciting, I know, but I'm thinking this is more "breakdown of cellular control mechanisms" and less "fear the living dead".
But certainly some more fiddling to find out what's going on is needed.
It would be, you must admit, the perfect cover for an international criminal master mind!
Maybe we should review the file one more time, just to make sure nothing was missed...?
'Nobody cares about your heart-rate'
Until they do, that is. By which time it's usually too late to secure the data.
A person I rather respect once said that if you ever find yourself considering what politicians are doing and thinking "now, that's stupid!", then know that you do not know all that is going on.
Of course, it's not exclusively correct, obviously: sometimes it's the politicians who are lacking critical information and/or understanding, and sometimes they are indeed just being plain stupid. But it's a world-view that's useful to keep in mind, I find.
"US companies dominate the international market".
The question, kind sir, is "would you like that state of affairs to continue?"
Because I personally doubt that it would for long. Even without artificial incentives for people to jump ship.
"The second most popular password was '18atcskd2w' used by 91,103 accounts, with '3rjs1la7qe' coming in fourth spot used by 74,806 accounts".
Eh...? How did that happen, then? I know that the answer to this question is what I personally am most interested in.
Edit: Interesting theories in the video linked.
"Two is one. And one is none".
Also: Schrödinger's backup.
So, which was Gerald...?
>> If you're referring to historical events.
No, I tend to stick with the highest authorities; scripture, in this case. Specifically, Chronicles 4:2:
"He made the Sea of cast metal, circular in shape, measuring ten cubits from rim to rim[...]. It took a line of thirty cubits to measure around it".
>> Even as a fan of crackpot theories one needs some consistency.
Ah, but you're failing to consider things from the conspiracy-theorists' PoV:
Of course the world is a 6000-year-old flatland where π equals 3 and the stars are just pinholes in the heavenly orb orbiting Earth in the sea on which God's throne floats (warning: I may have mixed up a few mythologies)! That's patently obvious to anyone with enough intelligence. But one cannot expect normal people to understand all this; their poor brains cannot handle it, after all. So it's essential to point out the inconsistencies in the lies they believe whenever possible without getting bogged down in large arguments that cannot be resolved -- see "poor brains" earlier.
So pretty correct, actually, now that I write it down. Except with a slight role-reversal.
So... Kickstarter to buy JAXA a few copies of Kerbal...?
>> A sphincter.
Aptly-put, I suspect and fear.
Unfortunately, the rest of the world is rather down the gravity well from said entity, so to speak.
>> Fight them now, or you have no one to blame.
And elect whom, exactly? John McAfee...? The choice is clearly either Trump or Hillary.
"None of the above" does not work. Not short-term, at any rate: maybe there's a place for a third party in the US system, medium-to-long term. Though as the disaffected of either party seem to be rather far from center, I don't see how that would work. Unless the US political continuum is more of a ring than a straight line -- or whatever is the appropriate closed vs. open topology, according to the applicable number of dimensions.
Yes, of course! Linux will solve all of humanity's problems!!
It's so obvious, now that you point it out.
When you're exploiting tricky-language, technicalities and non-intuitive UI design, it's really time to re-evaluate the choices that led you here.
And I love Windows 10!
So people are turned off by their potential partner being more interested in their smartphone than them...?
Fascinating! I would have never imagined that, really. Please do tell me more, at great length (and maybe some girth)!!
>> Surely that just moves the problem to somewhere else.
Not if the mirrors -- if they can be made at all, note: they'd need to withstand much more intense, focused rays -- were angled to reflect mis-aimed beams upwards.
Helicopter icon because said reflected beams may still hit an unfortunate one in the wrong place by chance... Would make for a hell of a movie-plot threat, that: terrorists hacking the control systems of a solar power plant to burn passenger jets out of the sky and discredit the renewable energy industry to hasten the End of the World, etc.