38 posts • joined 13 Nov 2009
Re: Good luck
Shoot (the take down order) first, ask (no) questions later.
Eat the cake
Just another case of wanting to have their cake and eat it.
I am forever annoyed at the levy to accommodate copying but then I am not actually allowed to copy !!!???
If I am going to pay a tax to cover copying from a DVD to my HDD then surely I should actually be able to do that??
Re: Personally I think
No, they didn't 'fix it' with a new version. They learned from it and released a NEW version with it fixed, and charge for the new product. This is completely different.
Re: Personally I think
Well, if the alarm system decides that it will turn off every Thursday afternoon for 20 minutes due to a bug, then yes, they should fix it.
The issue here is that there are flaws in the software. 'Progress in hacking systems" has nothing to do with the fact that the software was 'broken' right from the start. Just because someone managed to find the fault is irrelevant.
Re: What i'd do...
Unfortunately the law does not allow that. Only dealers can say ANYTHING about the car.
Tesla 'showrooms' that do exist in these insane states are called galleries and the people there are not even allowed to point 'patrons' to the Tesla web page. Nothing at all that might influence a buyer can be said, shown or otherwise revealed.
Complete bollocks if you ask me.
I used to have some degree of respect for Christie but after his turn-around in this issue I have absolutely no respect whatsoever. Obviously so much in the corrupt back pockets it make me sick.
What did I miss??
OK, what am I missing here???
They are getting in trouble because they agreed to NOT actively poach staff from each other?
And is sharing staff salaries illegal? Usually companies want to keep that secret too, but I don't think it is illegal to share as long as they don't include names etc... In Texas EVERY state employee's salary is public record...complete with names, which I would have expected to be illegal.
Re: Mixed signals...
You shouldn't be doing ANYTHING that distracts you when supposedly in control of a car etc...
I often get pissed at people f*cking around with their phones in "stop and go" traffic or at traffic lights that fail completely to notice the "go" part !!!
PAY ATTENTION PEOPLE. IT'S SUPPOSEDLY THE LAW I BELIEVE?
OK, I have not read the entire patent but some of this is already done with Smart Reflex in OMAP processors, which track and compensate for PVT variations (PVT = process, voltage & temperature). Inherent in some of the classes is accounting for variations over time due to changes in performance.
Re: Mozillidiots @CaptainHook
Isn't "Firefox" a Mozilla trademark?
Wrong. Coke COULD if they wanted. They could very easily say "If you want to use the Coca Cola trademarked logo to sell Coke, then you must etc..." but they choose not to.
Levi did EXACTLY this to Tesco !!!
Mozilla can put WHATEVER restrictions on the use of their trademark that they want... ANYTHING.
Everyone seems to be missing the facts that a) putting it on a HDD and distributing to customers is... believe it or not... 'distribution' and b) Mozilla can put whatever restrictions on their software/trademark that they want... ANYTHING.
"doesn't explain why the prosecutors have backed away from the controversial charges" Ermm, perhaps because they realized they were asinine charges and they would look like complete f-wits if they left them there???
Re: It's actually quite hilarious
OK, I don't get how the USD isn't a Fiat currency then??? It has no intrinsic value other than the faith that it can be exchanged for tangible goods.
Re: This is truly revolutionary for Apple
It isn't about "worth" patenting, but about "what can we blow through the Patent Office before anyone realizes it is completely F*CKING obvious!!!"
Ahhh, but you forgot the old "delete 'TV', replace with 'phone', file patent... delete 'phone' replace with 'computer', file patent, delete 'computer', replace with 'absolutely every other device, thing or thought we can think of'"
It is OBVIOUSLY completely different...
Existing or not is completely irrelevant. Your ideas don't have to exist, ever.
Patents protect an IDEA, not a product.
Just who is misinformed, other than you?
Re: The Oxygene of publicity...
So... exactly how much of this JMJ tax do you think YOU would see???
In other news...
Tesco must show Currys' prices for TVs on their web page now.
Walmart must show BestBuy's prices on their web page.
Re: Filters are folly.
Having the filters available isn't the issue though. It is the 'forced' nature of them, and the underhand way the government is trying to say "ahh but you have a choice... all you have to say is 'let me access pron' and we will take them away so you can be a parent on your own"
Lets say you have a very small set of stairs (say 2 steps) and you CHOOSE to not put a gate up and let your child learn by falling down the steps a couple of times to learn it is not a good idea to go head first, then that is your choice.
Re: Publicly available PI
That's the point though. If you owned a shop then you COULD throw them out.
If your shop window allows the 'public' to see in them you can't complain when they do so, even if it is just to copy your prices down.
If you don't want them to see through the window then cover it up and block it.
Re: On the other hand
Not even a double edged sword. It is simply a terrible law that does nothing to correct the real issue, which is crappy patents in the first place.
This is a terrible day for the little guy
This completely defeats the point of patents!!!
Patents are supposed to allow the little guy to protect his idea from being stolen. All that has happened here is that big corporations can now steal a good idea from someone who does not have the money to productize it.
Patent trolls are not the issue. Bad patents are the issue.
How is a company that purchases a stake (or outright buys) in an idea from a small guy/person that does not have the funds to fully realize the idea any different from a venture capital company??? Exactly the same business model.
This law now gives big corporations free access to completely ignore patents from anyone who simply does not have enough money to take their idea to the next level.
Very, very bad decision.
There has certainly been some back hand payments from big corps in getting this passed.
Just some lawyers trying to make a name for themselves and wasting everyone's time and money in the process..
Just more proof that we need less lawyers!!!
As the old joke goes... What do you call 50,000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean ?... A good start :-)
Re: Truth or consequences
So... If bullying occurs outside school it is nothing to do with the school???
I see double standards here.
How does the BBC loose money if not at top of EPG???
OK, what am I missing here??? How can the BBC, which get's no funding at all from advertising, loose money if not at the top of the EPG?
Even if not a single sole watched the BBC they would still get their funding from license fees.
I would think it would in fact be better if lesser known channels were on the first page.
Sounds like egos are the real issue here.
Alternative to Jailbreaking?
I wonder... If arbitrary code can be loaded then could it be used in place of jailbreaking I wonder?
Just a thought.
Paper IS covered by ITAR
Printing the plans out does NOT exclude you from ITAR requirements. In fact, even talking to a foreign national can put you in trouble.
Hate to say this... but...
When you work for a company ALL ideas are theirs unless specifically excluded in your contract.
Saying "I thought of this when out for lunch" simply does not cut it.
I always thought that a threat worked best when there was a down side for the person being threatened !!??
Yep, they can. technically and legally.
The fact that we may not like it is completely irrelevant.
Just like region coding.
Re: NPE haven't lost anything, so why damages?
Why on earth should you have to actually build something to stake claim for your idea???
Many others have commented on the fact that a small inventor can come up with a great idea and not have the resources or means to productize it.
It should be perfectly fine for a company to invest in ideas which it believes are worth something (whether we agree is not the issue here). Large corporations do this all the time with patents they don't use themselves but want to keep 'just in case'. Companies also invest a lot in ideas for projects that are then shelved. Are you saying these efforts and patents should then be given away free to everyone else?
This issue here is not really trolls (though we would love to blame them), but the fact that the patent issuing system itself is fundamentally broken.
This proposal is like trying to stop road accidents by saying cars must drive on the sidewalks (i.e. completely stupid in every respect)
Distribution medium with increasing revenue stream feared of reducing revenue !???
WTF!!! Digital revenues are increasing and will surpass physical sales yet they STILL think that digital access will cause them to loose sales???!!!
The movie/music industry really does live in a completely different universe don't they !!??
anti-abortion tagged on ???!!!!
This is an example of just how messed up the US system is when senators can tag on any old crap, hiding it.
Seriously, John Boehner needs to put his foot down on this type of thing !!!
I know, it means our elected officials will have to actually READ what they are signing in to law, but come on!!!
Re: Seems they made a mistake....
Doesn't work in Firefox either, so they have done a smack up job on quality control again!!!
This is not true from Apple's perspective.
Apple are based in the US hence the worldwide operations must adhere to US export control laws.
This is true for all US based companies and all companies which have any presence in the US.
It is illegal for a UK based Apple employee to 'export' to a foreign national from a 'banned' country.
Note, this does not have to be a physical item, as knowledge is considered just as important as a physical item, so in theory even showing an iPad to a foreign national from Iran could be considered an 'export'
Does it make sense? Not much. Is it practical? No. Is it the law? Yes.
Re: Blame the law...
Not true. Unfortunately the export control laws are extremely broad and strict.
Letting a foreign national even SEE prohibited technology is considered an export.
It is not necessary to actually ship a physical piece of technology to a 'banned' country. Showing the technology to a foreign national of said banned country is enough. Even accidentally letting them glimpse it is illegal.
This is a strict interpretation of the law. Should Apple follow it this religiously? Legally, yes and so should everyone. Is it practical? Probably not.
I read an article about a company being fined for exporting paint to a company who subsequently sold a painted product for inclusion in a nuclear plant. Paint, for god sake !!!???
Wait a minute... what about TCP ???
OK, only one person so far has even touched on the most critical part of this story in my mind...
What about TCP ??? THEY are the real culprits here by taking money to license something they don't have the rights to.
Following all the other comments basically implies I could 'sell' the rights to all U2's tracks to the Times without any worry, and let them pay for infringement?
If I went in to a Virgin Mega Store and bought a CD to give to my son and was then sued by the MPAA I would be pretty annoyed !!!
What am I missing here?
Re : His bad...sorry.
Noooo, Ticket Master want to control tickets period... so THEY can charge 10% handling fee, 15% convenience fee, 15% just the f*** because fee, 8% postage fee, 9% will call fee, 7% print 'em yourself fee, etc...
Often there is more than 30% additional fees for tickets from TM. Outrageous.
Authorized sellers get special pricing. If I want to buy something at one price and I can sell it for more, that is called a free market. Supply and demand
Drives me crazy when companies bitch and moan because they can't rip you off themselves by imposing region coding and authorized distributors etc... Then they simply pay our politicians off and get it passed into law.
Required to log OUT but not IN?
OK, maybe I am missing something obvious here, but how the hell does accepting a cookie to log OUT of a web page increase security????
- Review Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
- MEN WANTED to satisfy town full of yearning BRAZILIAN HOTNESS
- +Comment 'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
- Apple tried to get a ban on Galaxy, judge said: NO, NO, NO
- Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws