19 posts • joined Friday 13th November 2009 19:31 GMT
Re: On the other hand
Not even a double edged sword. It is simply a terrible law that does nothing to correct the real issue, which is crappy patents in the first place.
This is a terrible day for the little guy
This completely defeats the point of patents!!!
Patents are supposed to allow the little guy to protect his idea from being stolen. All that has happened here is that big corporations can now steal a good idea from someone who does not have the money to productize it.
Patent trolls are not the issue. Bad patents are the issue.
How is a company that purchases a stake (or outright buys) in an idea from a small guy/person that does not have the funds to fully realize the idea any different from a venture capital company??? Exactly the same business model.
This law now gives big corporations free access to completely ignore patents from anyone who simply does not have enough money to take their idea to the next level.
Very, very bad decision.
There has certainly been some back hand payments from big corps in getting this passed.
Just some lawyers trying to make a name for themselves and wasting everyone's time and money in the process..
Just more proof that we need less lawyers!!!
As the old joke goes... What do you call 50,000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean ?... A good start :-)
Re: Truth or consequences
So... If bullying occurs outside school it is nothing to do with the school???
I see double standards here.
How does the BBC loose money if not at top of EPG???
OK, what am I missing here??? How can the BBC, which get's no funding at all from advertising, loose money if not at the top of the EPG?
Even if not a single sole watched the BBC they would still get their funding from license fees.
I would think it would in fact be better if lesser known channels were on the first page.
Sounds like egos are the real issue here.
Alternative to Jailbreaking?
I wonder... If arbitrary code can be loaded then could it be used in place of jailbreaking I wonder?
Just a thought.
Paper IS covered by ITAR
Printing the plans out does NOT exclude you from ITAR requirements. In fact, even talking to a foreign national can put you in trouble.
Hate to say this... but...
When you work for a company ALL ideas are theirs unless specifically excluded in your contract.
Saying "I thought of this when out for lunch" simply does not cut it.
I always thought that a threat worked best when there was a down side for the person being threatened !!??
Yep, they can. technically and legally.
The fact that we may not like it is completely irrelevant.
Just like region coding.
Re: NPE haven't lost anything, so why damages?
Why on earth should you have to actually build something to stake claim for your idea???
Many others have commented on the fact that a small inventor can come up with a great idea and not have the resources or means to productize it.
It should be perfectly fine for a company to invest in ideas which it believes are worth something (whether we agree is not the issue here). Large corporations do this all the time with patents they don't use themselves but want to keep 'just in case'. Companies also invest a lot in ideas for projects that are then shelved. Are you saying these efforts and patents should then be given away free to everyone else?
This issue here is not really trolls (though we would love to blame them), but the fact that the patent issuing system itself is fundamentally broken.
This proposal is like trying to stop road accidents by saying cars must drive on the sidewalks (i.e. completely stupid in every respect)
Distribution medium with increasing revenue stream feared of reducing revenue !???
WTF!!! Digital revenues are increasing and will surpass physical sales yet they STILL think that digital access will cause them to loose sales???!!!
The movie/music industry really does live in a completely different universe don't they !!??
anti-abortion tagged on ???!!!!
This is an example of just how messed up the US system is when senators can tag on any old crap, hiding it.
Seriously, John Boehner needs to put his foot down on this type of thing !!!
I know, it means our elected officials will have to actually READ what they are signing in to law, but come on!!!
Re: Seems they made a mistake....
Doesn't work in Firefox either, so they have done a smack up job on quality control again!!!
This is not true from Apple's perspective.
Apple are based in the US hence the worldwide operations must adhere to US export control laws.
This is true for all US based companies and all companies which have any presence in the US.
It is illegal for a UK based Apple employee to 'export' to a foreign national from a 'banned' country.
Note, this does not have to be a physical item, as knowledge is considered just as important as a physical item, so in theory even showing an iPad to a foreign national from Iran could be considered an 'export'
Does it make sense? Not much. Is it practical? No. Is it the law? Yes.
Re: Blame the law...
Not true. Unfortunately the export control laws are extremely broad and strict.
Letting a foreign national even SEE prohibited technology is considered an export.
It is not necessary to actually ship a physical piece of technology to a 'banned' country. Showing the technology to a foreign national of said banned country is enough. Even accidentally letting them glimpse it is illegal.
This is a strict interpretation of the law. Should Apple follow it this religiously? Legally, yes and so should everyone. Is it practical? Probably not.
I read an article about a company being fined for exporting paint to a company who subsequently sold a painted product for inclusion in a nuclear plant. Paint, for god sake !!!???
Wait a minute... what about TCP ???
OK, only one person so far has even touched on the most critical part of this story in my mind...
What about TCP ??? THEY are the real culprits here by taking money to license something they don't have the rights to.
Following all the other comments basically implies I could 'sell' the rights to all U2's tracks to the Times without any worry, and let them pay for infringement?
If I went in to a Virgin Mega Store and bought a CD to give to my son and was then sued by the MPAA I would be pretty annoyed !!!
What am I missing here?
Re : His bad...sorry.
Noooo, Ticket Master want to control tickets period... so THEY can charge 10% handling fee, 15% convenience fee, 15% just the f*** because fee, 8% postage fee, 9% will call fee, 7% print 'em yourself fee, etc...
Often there is more than 30% additional fees for tickets from TM. Outrageous.
Authorized sellers get special pricing. If I want to buy something at one price and I can sell it for more, that is called a free market. Supply and demand
Drives me crazy when companies bitch and moan because they can't rip you off themselves by imposing region coding and authorized distributors etc... Then they simply pay our politicians off and get it passed into law.
- It's true, the START MENU is coming BACK to Windows 8, hiss sources
- iSPY: Apple Stores switch on iBeacon phone sniff spy system
- Chinese gamer plays on while BMW burns to the ground
- Pic NASA Mars tank Curiosity rolls on old WET PATCH, sighs, sniffs for life signs
- How UK air traffic control system was caught asleep on the job