".........below £1,200 before it could be forcefully competitive................"
2340 posts • joined 6 Nov 2009
.......my point really was that they are all at and in the process they are hollowing out the tax-base to a degree that is causing the same society that they are dependent upon for their profits enormous harm by their behavior. Fundamentally I am saying that BigCorp in this context are a bunch of bastards - Apple is simply the poster-boy/example.
.....Apple is no worse than any other example of "BigCorp" in the US, the UK or anywhere else for that matter. Whether or not that is anything to boast about is of course another matter.
To quote Oliver Cromwell in another context "i beseech you, in the bowels of christ, think it possible you may be mistaken". It is possible you know to disagree with you without being on the payroll of Lord Sauron-Ballmer.
"..........the invariable public-sector lock-in to Cisco's proprietary Skinny protocol. In comparison, money spent on MS is chump change."
However, I am afraid that the the members of the Anti-MS Choral Howling Society are so obsessed with the size of the teeth of The Demon Lords of Redmond that they have a tendency to miss the fact that there are other sharks out there with even bigger sets of oral cutlery.
............that I would not care to be the senior manager at Redmond charged with that particular judgement call. However, that is the point really is it not? Where is the balance of advantage contra disadvantage? To be quite honest I do not have any certain opinion here and am just glad that I do not have responsibility for that kind of decision. -:)
Microsoft think that having a free-version of Office on Windows RT (ARM version) will be a killer app as far as selling that version of Win8 is concerned. Whether they are right or wrong about that it is not difficult to see that porting it to the big tablet rival would not be the smartest move they could make.
The e-mail I received a few hours ago purported to come from PayPal and asked me to "click here" and thereafter (when one had arrived at the "home page" if one were so transcendentally stupid as to click on the link) re-enter your account details. A standard phishing attempt of course, immediately recognizable to any techie with more than two neurones firing at the same time. Seeing a legitimate company sending a genuine e-mail that is the very twin of the one I have just described leaves me utterly convinced that I would never under any circumstances trust any confidential details to bunch of tools like that.
Indeed, it is very nasty stuff. Not only that it is comparatively rare (about 0.1 ppm of the earth's crust). I would be more impressed with some of these breakthroughs if they did not involve using elements that are likely to end up as another resource problem (as in lack of). I am no kind of bunny-hugging Luddite, I am in fact as keen on innovative tech as the next person but sometimes one has to wonder!
Indeed, which is why I find the end of this piece rather puzzling:
".....avoid suggesting execution is an effective deterrent.........."
...........I have a question to pose. Are you suggesting that News Corp should have been allowed to take over BSkyB completely? Is there not another explanation for Ofcom's apparent change of style? For most of the Blair/Brown years the then government was terrified of Murdoch (not entirely difficult to understand given what NI's newspapers did to Labour throughout the eighties and early nineties until it dawned on Murdoch that the Tories had reached the point of unelectability) and would have done everything they could to stymie any moves by Ofcom to move against NI for any reason. The then opposition Tories would most certainly have not supported any moves against Murdoch's company because they very badly wanted Murdoch back onside. Once Ofcom knew that they could tackle Murdoch without political interference (because by this time NI was about as popular with the voters as syphilis and the new Tory government did not dare hinder Ofcom) they did - and about time too.
......piece of engineering. Oh and +1 for the Crocodile Dundee reference in the subheading.
.....thought out positions (both for and against) rather than howling? I am impressed. OK, enough with the satire. I am myself somewhat undecided (I have been running the beta on a Acer W500) and I am not yet sure how I feel about this at all. My impression, for what it is worth, is that Win8 is somewhat more nimble in desktop than Win7 and that it is a very much better experience as a touch-os when one explores "Metro". I will wait and see what the RTM looks like and how it performs on kit that is optimised for it when such devices are released in the autumn before I make up my mind. Oh and no, I do not give a shit about the fucking start-button.
I entirely agree, however I think that the last group of people on the planet who have the right to urge others to be honest about their mistakes are politicians given that their default position is never to admit to any unless they are so deep in the shit that they have no choice. The fact that "BigCorp" behave in exactly the same way is not news to anyone in orbit around planet reality - perhaps both groups should clean up their act.
The geopolitical reality is that if it becomes necessary all governments of modern industrial nations and those in the process of becoming such will "sponsor" because they will regard it as an unavoidable strategic necessity. Furthermore they will with one voice tell the WTO to vanish making short sharp jerking motions if they consider that to be necessary as well. However big they are the Chinese are still only one nation within that organisation and rule book or no rule book geopolitical self-interest still drives most decisions.
It might possibly be to the benefit of all of us if all companies making smartphones in fact were, in principle, in breach. The arguments that Apple (and the rest of them) would have to deploy in court in order to invalidate his claims would be very difficult to row back from when their claims against each other were being dealt with in other judicial instances. Some of Apple's claims against Samsung for example? I cannot see (on the basis of what we read here) that he has any weaker case than the various examples of large scale patent trolling we see all over the industry from some very famous household names. It is possible that the "law of unintended consequences" may serve us all very well.
We will IMO know by Q4 of this year. If MS do not screw up with what they are developing with Apollo (WP8) and if Nokia do have a genuine flag-ship phone in the run-up to the holiday season (as they call it on the other side of the pond), then the process of getting out of the woods will be seen to have been clearly established if far from complete.
"Clerical error was blamed for exit mail, which had been intended for one person."
They sent by accident an e-mail that was intended for one person as a "general dump"? I would respectfully suggest that if you are going to sack somebody a manager with the cojones to do the job should be assigned to do it face to face. However, they do not want to hear that do they? It is so much more pleasant to press the kill-button on your remote drone "somewhere over enemy territory" than have to do it face to face. Tossers!
Don't you just love jargon? I had to google that to understand what the hell he was talking about. My own ignorance of course but what the devil is wrong with plain English where it can be used? As in "the long term growth drivers for our business"?
"A market as defined by its overarching, long-term trends. Generally, a secular market refers to trends over a period of five or more years. A secular market may be bullish or bearish, and, in market analysis, takes precedence over opposite, short-term trends that happen within the secular market."
Bends the truth? That's putting very politely. -:) Their reaction to finding themselves hoist upon their own marketing petard reminds of the Yiddish word for unmitigated gall - "chutzpah". It is defined in an old Jewish joke as "the guy who murders his parents and then throws himself on the mercy of the court on the basis that he is an orphan".
Absolutely. My back-up mob has no expansion and had begun to "do nonsense". Sent it in and they re-flashed the os as part of the repairs and of course it came back with the os and nothing else. Fortunately I do not keep much on that one so it was not a big deal. However, one does not have to have humungous storage needs for an expansion slot to be very convenient.
There I was thinking that the only references to opera I would see here at 'Reg would be to a certain Norwegian browser!
What would one plead? Self-defence, provocation or both?
At the end of your post (which I agree with largely BTW) you said "without it getting flooded by MS haters and fanboys alike." I've read carefully through this thread and whilst I see an awful lot of howling by the former, the latter are conspicuous by their absence.
I would not disagree with that. However, in what way as far as that is concerned are they any different from any other producer of anything you care to name?
I happen to agree largely with that summary of MS' and Nokia's dilemma. I run a LG 900 as my back-up mob (my primary is a Desire Z) and I think that 7.5 is ok but WinPhone has got to be more than ok if they are going to make a serious impact in the mobile phone market. In practice what it means is that MS either get it right with WP8 (thereby giving Nokia the necessary elbowroom with the hardware) or the project will end up as a bust. I hope they do - competition is after all to the benefit of all of us regardless of which phone we choose to purchase. However, Redmond have absolutely got to sharpen up their act here otherwise it will go down the khazi.
..........we saw exactly the same planted stories in the run-up to the release of the Lumia 800 in Europe as we are now seeing in the run-up to the release of the 900. This is just negotiation by planted leaks by the carriers who do not feel that they are getting as sweet a deal from the Finns as they think they are entitled to. This is a non-story.
.....that you and your good lady are happy with this kit. However, what about the ordinary punter's out of the box experience?
You do not advertise it as 4G-capable in countries where it isn't - simple as that. How hard is that to understand and what part of that did you have reading difficulties with?
Especially this bit:
"We can't have a dynamic, competitive, self-regulating Trust Economy if 20th Century fraud regulation is holding us back."
You only have to delete one word...........
"We can't have a dynamic, competitive, self-regulating economy if 20th Century fraud regulation is holding us back."
..........and you get a summary of the kind of line the "Directorati" punt out on a regular basis when comes to any form of regulation that requires anything of them at all.
I have little time for Cupertino and their products but those transcendentally tasteless remarks I could have done without.
What can I say other than to quote the KJ-Bible in this context? "There is more joy in heaven at one sinner that repenteth than in nine and ninety just men." Though of course how long their repentance will last if El Reg continues to take the piss is anybody's guess! -:P
Really? Apple have started communicating? When did this happen and why didn't I get the memo?
Ouch! The Cupertino Cognoscenti are definitely not going to like that.
"Or, have they, just maybe, simply settled because it got them favours in return from MS? You know, like a business deal..."
Part of the problem here is of course that most companies involved in these kinds of deals insist on NDAs leaving us with little but rumour to go on. However, I must admit that this series of deals that MS has apparently been cutting with world + dog (including such companies as Samsung who can well afford to tell Redmond to go screw if they choose) do smell of some kind of cross-licensing set-up. It is perfectly possible that the real net cost to all involved may be somewhat different from the various rumours concerning cost-per-device that we have seen.
No, that's true but it is likely that they will very happily give you the finger free, gratis and for nothing!
.........................and Dr. Webs is one of them. Its not the only server being gone after."
No, what they appear to have done is, after having taken their sweet time to remove thumb from rectum, thrash around in a panic when it finally dawned them that they had a serious problem. This resulted in them trying to take down a server belonging to the very company that had at an early stage contacted Cupertino to warn them that the issue was a major one. You can dress it up anyway you like but their current behaviour is idiotic.
Ah, now I understand what Apple mean by security. Have the messenger taken out back and shot.
This from Engadget appears to be fairly typical:
"which confirmed that a small number of early handsets shipped with faulty software that caused memory management issues and eventually data connectivity woes. It insists this problem is now fixed, and that come April 16th, all affected consumers may swap their device at any AT&T store or merely download the update."
However, Nokia are indeed showing an unusual turn of speed on this one, their response being that anyone who has already bought it or buys before the 16th gets it, to all intents and purposes, free on contract. If it is the case that the number of customers actually effected is low then this may in fact do Nokia no harm. Indeed it may even do them some good. We have after all seen enough examples in recent times of companies at first denying that there is any problem and then when forced to admit to its existence, being very grudging about rectifying the situation. Nokia's fleetness of foot on this occasion may in fact turn the situation into positive publicity for them.
I entirely agree, given that the market is in it's infancy still and are any number of factors in play which may effect the way that it develop in ways impossible to predict such "analyses" are pure guesswork. One example: Gartner themselves distinguish between "media tabs" and "pc tabs".
The former being, for example, the iPad, the Fire etc. etc. The latter group consists, basically, of Win7 tablets which are currently (in the context) a tiny niche market. When Win8 is released it will be the first time that a full pc-tab os that is touch friendly has been released into the modern tablet market. It may do very well, it may fail completely or something in between but we have no idea because we simply do not *know* whether there is a market of serious scale for that type of tab until we see the punters' reaction en masse. How on earth does one make predictions about a market when there is a completely new and unknown factor incoming? A factor whose effects we simply cannot predict. The whole thing is nuts.
............. it'd be a bugger to operate without arms and legs"
Won't help you if you are a multiple amputee from Glasgow.
Or in this case Chinese/Japanese/Korean whispers. Slow Easter Monday Rick?
How many kidneys are the equivalent of an "arm and a leg"?
"American Imperialist Data Harvesters"
And the ironic bit was?*
*This is also irony.
What he did is roughly equivalent to resigning as a curator at the Louvre, getting a job at the V&A and thinking that your new employer will be real impressed if you turn up with the Mona Lisa tucked under your arm. It (apparently) did not occur to him that AMD would regard him as about as welcome as a dose of the clap when they realised what he'd done?
I think that with a 10 product round-up it is fairly clear that unless the author were to write a humungous review (after spending a couple of months trialling all of them) it was always going to be 3 - 4 paragraphs or so per product. Surely the use of such "portmanteau" reviews is to enable the reader to pick out one or two products for consideration followed by a bit of googling to see if there are any more extensive reviews of the individual product available out there?