* Posts by Matthew

4 publicly visible posts • joined 17 May 2007

MEP plans EU build ban on cars faster than 100mph

Matthew

Lotus - nuff said

The 2007 lotus elise is a 1.8L 4 banger that manages 24/29 mpg and weighs only 1975lb..OMG shut them down now! Don't they know any better!

Google embarasses MapQuest

Matthew

As if it is really that hard

Adding waypoints to a direction finder? Wow...that sounds soo difficult...Hmmm

Start Address A to Middle Site B

Middle Site B to Middle Site C

Middle Site C to Middle Site D

Middle Site D to End Address E

Ok, it is a few more graph searches, but woopie...

Waypoints.

'Gay or straight?' ruling looks bad for all US social networking sites

Matthew

Interesting, if not still obtuse

I would be surprised if the website did not have options for no preference or no comment. However, even if they do not have such options, I still find the decision heinous Dick...

The intent of the website, by definition is people finding other people for a roommate. Misuse of the site and information, IMO, does not warrant placing blame on the middle man who is not compelling anyone to use the service, nor is misrepresenting what the service is for, nor is giving any indication that they "care" about the information provided. If someone lies when filling it out, is the site to be blamed too?

Additionally, you say renters misuse the site. Imagine renters going to a nearby gay club and taking pictures of people there, filing them away and cross-referencing them when applicants come in (is this not the same as trying to look people up on roommates.com to find their sexual preference?), would the club/bar then be responsible for advertising that it is a club catering to gay people? It is a public place, the same as the web-site. You don't want to use it, then simply don't.

My simple point is that I'm tired of hearing people crying foul when there was no intent. IMO, the ruling is absurd, perhaps the law was broken, yet IMNSHO the spirit of the law has been broken more.

Matthew

Unbelievable ignorance

Am I the only one completely up in arms about the absurdity. That act as I understand is largely so renters can't discriminate. This site is meant to help people who MUST LIVE TOGETHER find a match. People who sign up surely know that it is to find a compatible roommate! Where is any possible discrimination taking place!? This has me livid. This ruling basically says I have no say in the gender, race, or sexual preference of the people who I must share a roof with! What idiotic nonsense is that? Is the state now going to dictate whom I can sleep with too?!