Feeds

* Posts by SingerScientist

4 posts • joined 27 Oct 2009

Greatest Living Briton loses £30m

SingerScientist

Goldfish memory?

Whitecollar boondoggles....and ahem, rescuing certain banks (and the whole economy) from super-capitalist madness. Also, I do believe that health and education do have non-building costs, and that even PFI is not cost-free, but better check on that eh?

0
0

IPCC Rainforest eco-tastrophe claim confirmed as bunk

SingerScientist
Grenade

You've half answered your own question

Because only the Sunday Torygraph (a mainstream publication if ever there was one) and, apparently, The Register, have a readership gullible enough to belive this oil-lobby-funded nonsense.

12
40
SingerScientist
Stop

This article is bullshit, please shut this guy up.

See the following link to see a complete rebuttal of this made-up story and other IPCC "scandals", and learn about how the IPCC actually operates.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/15/ipcc-errors-facts-spin

12
10

Globo-renewables all electric future touted again

SingerScientist
Alert

Which is the safest strategy...

...for energy security, long-term cost, and err, safety?

The answer is in Dr Mark Barret's (UCL) study of 2006

http://www.cbes.ucl.ac.uk/projects/EnergyReview.htm

Clue, it aint nuclear.

PS: Its pretty obvious the price of electricity is going to go up. As a result consumption, both domestic and commercial, is likely to drop significantly, and the incentive to "grow your own" will similarly increase. The economics can take us there, but good planning can get us there sooner. Bad planning will cost us a lot, in money, time, and competiiveness.

0
0