Re: I see your problem
I appreciate the 'left' - correctly implies no change in state
765 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2009
The old story, there is
- want
- need
- ask for
- get
the important thing is achieving the correct balance. One of the problems is that both politicians and many civil servants seem to believe that software is infinitely flexible - in the way for example, that stem trains of previous generation were not. And they act in this belief. Unfortunately other large procurement projects - yes MOD we are looking at you - have taken the same approach with predictable results (carriers san aircraft, another boondoggle for large manufacturing companies who are 'innovation constrained')
It is all getting better. Ian Duncan Smith (yes he of the integration of benefits to the benefit of few other than shareholders in large multinationals) has just announced that Universal Credits will come in before time and under budget - universal credit(?) but then I suppose it is the Guardian that is announcing this…..
Well it's a compromise. Too small a sensor and the noise reduces quality. To low a resolution and you don't capture enough information.
Many DSLRs have bigger sensors than their compact (or mobile) equivalent, and for an equivalent 'dpi' with a similar capture technology they will give better results.
But then marketing folkx had taught the great unwashed that resolution is all that ever matters.
Well with my data plan (effectively unlimited), I tether my mobile and also use it as a very effective digital radio in the car for much of my driving and through headphones when on the train. All drains the battery without much in the way of crocheting.
Depends what you mean by largely true. Surely German intelligence was such that they knew exactly what aircraft were being flown off the Arc Royal? What was reported however is that the aircraft attacking the Bismark flew so low that it is likely weapons could not be depressed sufficiently at their effective ranges.
"If the manufacturer of the tool you're thinking of buying is making over £10 billion squids profit in three months, surely one would start to question whether it's really good value, or just very, very over priced, no matter that it does the job."
But then they might conclude that they are both getting a decent deal, cost of ownership low (in many aspects) at a greater initial cost, Integration effort of the originating company (plus very smart marketing) worth the premium? Maybe not, but your winge is not wel thought out.
When they get hold of it it doesn't have a chance of staying 'profitable' over a reasonable timescale. Sell now before you get screwed if you are a small shareholder. As capital is generally no longer raised through these markets, they have descended into a means of making money through speculation not value.
Actually, despite some initial teething problems (overheating - which were dealt with by MS, post notional warranty), the XBox has been a decent platform. Decisions on charging for certain services that were free on the PS3 - maybe not so good. Their meece by the way were based on an HP technology.
you can defend the perimeter - and should. Assuming it will never be breached is the mistake (as a number of ant and bee colonies have discovered to their peril). Strong perimeter and strong internal protection. The point is that a new threat might be temporarily slowed by perimeter controls while the internal network is updated/reconfigured.