7 posts • joined 3 Oct 2009
Re: Kids who can think ...
Sure. But if any of the poohbahs knew their asses from holes in the ground, you could "teach them to code" simple games and interactive web thingys for the olds to feel proud of with http://scratch.mit.edu/ - the technology is free and very limited but in a way that should allow teachers to focus on what they do best - helping the kids learn some subject matter creatively. In making things, kids that get it learn that writing code is sometimes like putting lego bricks together which is probably a fairly good primary school lesson - plus they (apparently) can have fun. Checkout the simple game video and http://scratch.mit.edu/educators/
No, I'm not affiliated in any way.
Yeah that way you'll know the approximate cash value to anyone who can part you from both your shiny fruity device and your right forefinger. Handy.
Images of paper charts? Really? Delivered by pneumatic tubes I hope.
The problem being addressed (records available in multiple physical locations) is being addressed by distributing images of the records. None of the many benefits (such as researchable coded data on a defined population) from real electronic medical records arise. Also none of the risks and disruptions to old skool doctoring - this is a brutal approach - we need reliable research data from complete patient records for (eg) post marketing surveillance and comparative effectiveness of drugs.
Good one, NIH. After all the pathetic incompetence and resources wasted on real EMR, we have the low risk but dumb as a doorknob approach.
Laws don't change behavior. Enforcement might.
In the states with laws, how many prosecutions and convictions did they lead to?
France has had laws banning women from wearing trousers since 1799 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7677686/Paris-trouser-ban-for-women-could-be-lifted.html
So why do women in France still sometimes wear trousers? Because the law has never been enforced.
secure email is an oxymoron, dumbasses
gmail not private? Shock! Horror! OMFG! LOL etc..
Outlook correspondence not private? Impossible!
Come on folks. Unencrypted text in an email is by definition not even remotely secure.
If it's plain text on a disk, your friendly sysadmin can read it, and any bored miscreant with a well situated router can read whatever flies by if it's in plain text. That is if they could be bothered.
We (a 500 or so academic subspecies at Harvard) moved to gmail 2 years ago and it's been fantastic - much more reliable and far less expense for us. Privacy? We've heard of that but for email (gmail or otherwise), you must be kidding..
corporate secrets =/= using IE
Sure, opera/firefox/etc are unlikely to be entirely free of current or future exploitable weaknesses, but even adjusting for market share, they seem far lower risk as far as exploits go.
Seriously folks - any modern company with secrets to manage with a CIO who allows anyone on one of their laptops or on their internal networks to use internet explorer 6, or for that matter, any other version needs a new CIO? This is just getting silly.
At least I do understand that sometimes these things break and the consequences can affect a lot of people - like those of us with projects housed at the otherwise wonderful http://bitbucket.org/ as at Friday/Saturday oct 3 - it's down with a bad case of missingness.