Re: I had a physical "DNS" related failure
Also ensure the space is well ventilated. Though the main likely ill effects seem to be, um, hangover... if you don't drink it. ...Don't drink it.
4557 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Sep 2009
Either make it robust, or make it stop working after a month, so it HAS to be done properly! Be ruthless, store dates as a number between 1 and 30...
Relatedly, I try to write "permanent" programs with some change-in-specification headroom. Not too much, I don't write a new (simple) programming language to implement the project in... usually...
Wasn't there something on The Register about President Putin at some recent time ordering that the internet in Russia is to be prepared for disconnection from the rest of the world, to operate independently? And... Russia is quite good at this computer stuff. So I think it would not bother them.
Suppose that Russia demanded that Britain stops lighting up its public buildings blue and yellow, or London is nuked.
I think the freedom and the message of having famous landmarks thousands of miles away from Ukraine look temporarily as though they're not, while being a freedom that I love, is not the hill to die on. Literally.
We'd still do Edinburgh Castle of course. I'm in Scotland and we're thrawn.
You're thinking Segways perhaps.
I wonder if people will or should go back willingly to mass-occupancy public transport and breathing shared air as, with as much good luck as we can hope for, SARS-CoV-2 persists in its omicron form that infects everyone every month whatever you do but leaves alive most of the people that the other variants didn't kill first. Not to mention influenza, winter lung-vomiting lurgy, and just thinking about all the people who don't wash their hands before using a bus or after doing anything.
I do use a bus again... but I don't pick up the freesheet newspaper that my seatmate laid down. Not these days.
So, I'm sort of expecting to see new buses with each seat in its own cubicle with outside door. Or shower curtains all around each seat. Then some kid gets on with a Bluetooth speaker playing "that" music from "Psycho".
Seated on a normal properly adjusted bicycle, your feet barely reach the ground on tiptoe. In fact, my ride does have trademarked "Flat Foot Technology", but stopping and starting is still uncomfortable, and an impediment to making progress. I will fall over at 1 mph, but what I want to do is to as-good-as-stop, look around, and get going again from being not-quite-stopped. It's much easier.
Does the lane function react to your indicators? I think someone here just mentioned that theirs did not. Also, I advise indicating well before you start the manoeuvre. This should show other drivers that you are not making a straightforward lane change since, indeed, you are not doing it yet.
A self driving car ought to be made able to recognise a cyclist with a jacket bearing a large camera logo, as it is on road signs, because cyclists report that this improves the behaviour of human drivers considerably.
It is not true that cyclists hate pedestrians, and, of course, they do not try to kill pedestrians. They are not really allowed to.
Recently on weekends in the middle of Glasgow, I've seen the near exception of food delivery couriers on bicycles, who presumably are paid according to their speed, and not by whether they're riding on pedestrian pavement or riding safely in traffic and at junctions. I assume there are a lot of accidents, and I take a view that Something Must Be Done. But maybe this situation is everyone else's normal.
I disagree with your description of the incident. As a cyclist, like her, I wouldn't get too stoned to ride and then walk with my bike and a load of groceries briskly straight across the road and into the path of a close approaching car on a dark night, like her. And the Uber driver seems to have been watching a video on Hulu. As Wikipedia tells it, the self-driving software braked the car but it was set to leave the driver to execute hard emergency braking, and I think The Register reported that the car adapted by Uber was built with its own emergency braking function that Uber took out. How dark the night was is contradictory; I've seen versions of the video where I would and wouldn't have cycled over her. If the image can be enhanced to make her visible, then she should be visible to the car - but not if processing and enhancing the image takes ten minutes per frame...
I expect there are more, therefore more interesting, incidents with self-driving cars where another road user was injured but survived. Though maybe a lot of those victims are paid to keep quiet.
Quora dot com has a lot of stories of U.S. drivers being stopped by police and even given tickets because they're driving just under the speed limit but the rest of traffic is running faster so apparently they are meant to as well.
But it also has a lot of stories of U.S. drivers being stopped by police apparently just to have a conversation, such as, I was thinking of getting a car like yours, what do you recommend.
And police in other countries, sometimes.
As a cyclist, I recognise the value of stop signs, but if I stop, I fall over. So I prefer to brake down to probably 1 mph, which is falling over speed anyway (I can balance comfortably at 4 mph) but I can look around then either actually stop, or accelerate again and use the junction. I think the difference in this from stopping is not a difference that affects anyone's safety... unless children or the police are watching. For children, I don't want to set a wrong example, for police, I don't want to be caught doing it!
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-pedestrians-1-to-35
does have rules: part of the "sidewalk" may be for cyclists only, and in any case, "Where possible, avoid being next to the kerb with your back to the traffic" - which means that "your" side is facing towards traffic on the traffic-facing edge of the sidewalk, or facing in the direction of traffic and on the away-from-traffic side.
In practice, I leave the away-from-traffic side to less able-bodied walkers, and children, while trying to not bump into traffic, but which side of the road I'm on is more likely to depend on where I can or can't cross the road safely.
An interesting rule is that parades are supposed to keep to the sidewalk ("pavement"). I have seen parades which did not. I suppose this is by special arrangement.
Anyway, if X is a cyclist, and the sidewalk is divided between pedestrians and cyclists, then the cycle track part of it is not for pedestrians.
Pedestrianized paths and arcades with COVID-19 around have set up separated opposite direction walking lanes, and I think that extraordinarily busy areas like London's Oxford Street had previously tried out marked westbound and eastbound lanes on the sidewalk, but most of this doesn't have the force of law, and if it's there now, it doesn't show from above on Google Maps.
I don't know how many distinct fields for "identity of radio station" DAB provides, but each radio that I own seems to use different ones, and in a different order. Is it "BBC 6 Music" or is it just "6 Music"? Does it depend on the day of the week? Hypothetical since except for performer documentaries, Six seems almost never to be accidentally playing something I want to hear. It's uncanny, however do they do it. John Peel's son being there helps probably. :-)
I suppose you could disconnect the radio antenna, thus removing the offending signal. Or maybe find a metal shipping container and park in it while you sort things out. But then the issue of carbon monoxide fumes comes up.
Anyway, it isn't clear that any of these measures would actually relieve the problem.
Thank you. But, does that come rechargeable? Not when I last looked. I was sort of imagining a wireless charged tag for your key ring, etc.
Also in things I don't know about those batteries... My weighing scale stopped working, said "Low". I inserted "new" battery pair at room temperature despite finding packet was out of date. Result, nothing at all. I think I didn't put the old ones back in... but I tried later, it's working now. Do they need oxygen for... instance?
UK Highway Code on hazard lights (all left and right turn indicators blinking):
"These may be used when your vehicle is stationary, to warn that it is temporarily obstructing traffic.
Never use them as an excuse for dangerous or illegal parking.
You MUST NOT use hazard warning lights while driving or being towed unless you are on a motorway or unrestricted dual carriageway and you need to warn drivers behind you of a hazard or obstruction ahead. Only use them for long enough to ensure that your warning has been observed."
I'm having trouble decoding that... is the scenario, someone comes up behind you in lane, you blink at them to say stay behind? And when they do, they have to blink at the next car behind them?
Otherwise: you are the hazard.
They are really expensive to use anyway - I know because most of the Scottish drivers I see stopped at junctions don't turn on their turn light until they start moving. (I am in Scotland.) An automatic power saver setting maybe? As a cyclist, it's similar, I have to stick my arm out and it gets sore, so I do drop it. But I re-signal before moving.
Ah, I think I need something explained. I have some UNIX shell experience and almost no Linux, but I use one Linux system, by ssh, that drops me when I'm not looking. I'm usually not doing anything I can't pick up, but I've been typing
while true; do echo Robert Carnegie; date; sleep 60; done
- to keep my session going, but being confident that there's a more elegant alternative approach...?
I think there's a misunderstanding. In the story, there's no indication that the suicide (prevention) contact service uses AI or Eliza or scripted responses to chat. They do have records, which were to be used as educational input to a customer service chatbot. The role of the customer service function in suicide (preventing or causing) is, very strictly speaking, incidental. With this data, perhaps more likely than not.
Checking, I see it wasn't the telegraph.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17510101
"The chief engineer of the Post Office, Sir William Preece, in 1878: 'The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys.' "
Some other web pages date this to 1876, and so I don't claim to know that it's authentic.
But https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Henry_Preece contains a description of him as "in some remarkable ways, an utter blockhead".
So... your lift car is shaped like an aeroplane wing. As it plummets, the, um, aero force steers it to slam into the side of the shaft, and stop, hard.
If I recall right, modern racing cars use similar design to press the car against the ground while it is driven. Air pressure.
Racing cars are not slowed down notably by this feature.
Edit: by "weight", do you mean mass? Are you considering the difference?
There wouldn't be patents on perpetual motion machines if people didn't deceive themselves in physics.
If the force that holds the elevator up is removed, what force causes it and the people in it to do anything but proceed straight downwards? Not the weight of your feet, for one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_elevator_accidents mostly refers to mining and construction projects. Possibly they are not equipped with the Otis safety device, which has certain specific requirements. The list also is in order of decreasing interest / death toll, so the top cases tend to be big people carriers like in "Metropolis".
I can't speak to the quality of the patch, but "there is no workaround" means that you can't disable the vulnerability in your copy of the software, but you can update the software to the new, safer version.
Since the bug is described as a missing existing safety check of a filename when it is in URI format, I presume that the patched software merely runs the check in that case, instead of not running it.
Having said that, white and black hat hackers probably will be interested now in whether there's another way to break this thing. So users should patch now, and should be prepared either to patch it again soon or to do without it, and should improve security around this product, such as only allowing approved client IP addresses to connect to it, that sort of thing - if it doesn't have that already.
In other words, there actually is a "good" chance of further exploitation of this software. But that is always the case after a bug is patched, regardless of what the software publisher says about it.
While I expect that isn't the actual user name, one like it could be suspected immediately of being an automatically named account created to send spam.
Another condition may be to use a real e-mail account to set it up and to confirm it, and one with another decent user name and not on a disreputable web site. I've for instance met services that don't talk to a Yahoo! e-mail address. And they maybe don't tell you that. It just lets you set it up and it doesn't work.